Bitcoin Forum
November 11, 2024, 04:17:29 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 ... 87 »
221  Other / Meta / Re: [POLL]Double standard moderation? on: April 28, 2020, 02:36:57 AM
RegulusHR's ban appeal https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5097792.0
Hacker1001101001 anti ban appeal https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5240612.0

There is no response from anyone "on top" about these issues, please read both topics before ticking 1) or 2)

Please vote!

You are full of shit and showing lapse in your judgement with clear double standards.

Even I support RegulusHR's unban, but unban him or ban me..awesome justice !

You should better compare your own abuse and supporting of user's and cases biasedly with me. I am way less evil' and harmful to the community than your biased judgements. And have lesser greed of power than you, on the other hand complain about double standards from you are laughable.

It would be better if we compare yours and mine deeds other than me and RegulusHR's.

faucet hunter !
222  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Bitget exchange on: April 27, 2020, 01:52:46 PM
This guy is spamming the exchange link in his posts and seems to be connected with them.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2734425

You could do nothing more than starting a flag on him and warn future victims somehow. Sorry to see the loss.
223  Other / Meta / Re: Appeal of Ban Appeal: “hacker1001101001” spammer-sockpuppet menagerie on: April 25, 2020, 01:53:23 PM
Fighting scam but spreading spam? I am not convince that hacker1001101001 deserves to even have a chance to even be here in the forum. It's pretty ironic that he is cleaning the forum from scams yet he is something doing against the rules by being involve in a bumping service.

I have stated multiple times I was involved in it before I was aware about the core working of the forum, I was/am pretty much against spamming on the forum and even discourage working of such misleading services.

He might not even stop it in his own will since the bumping system in the ANN section of Altcoins have been change that's why he is claiming that he is no longer part of it. However if hacker1001101001 still wants to receive a temp ban I think it would be enough for him to spill out all the names part of this bumping service (with proof) in order to come out clean.

Are you trying to imply ban as some 3rd degree torture treatment so that I would spill out... ? I don't have any internal knowledge about those services and the user's behind it. I am sure there are many people's around the forum anonymously offering such services which is out of anyone's reach, not even mine.
224  Economy / Services / Re: Need someone from America to get something done for me on: April 24, 2020, 01:00:55 PM
Hi,
I have a few things to do on a website in the US, so I need a guy there to do it for me. All work is legal and will be compensated accordingly, I will pay with BTC or some kind of money like skrill, neteller, paypal, ...
I will pay from 10 dollars or more depending on what you can do. I'm in a signature campaign for $ 60 per week, you don't need to worry about payments (Escrow is also okay if you want). Reputation is the most important thing in this forum. Send me a personal message here or via telegram to discuss details.

Please make sure you are American, don't send me a message if you're not, it is just a waste of our time  Wink
Reading your previous thread I thought you yourself were from the US. If you're not from the US than how can you order products to US at discounted price?
Maybe it is possible, or maybe not!

It is just an bought or hacked account with no proper knowledge about how most of the things and rules around here work.. I am sure he is getting those products from e-commerce websites at cheap price through something fake or scammy similar to what he is trying to do in the OP here by asking others to create accounts for him and tricking limited edition products on Amazon my using multiple accounts.

I don't think anyone should trust OP over this, as it could land you upto a bad deal.
225  Economy / Reputation / Re: Fixed match offer with 200% return. on: April 24, 2020, 02:07:50 AM
Fixed matches are SCAM in themselves. Never trust.
226  Economy / Reputation / Re: I have done nothing wrong but I am negative trusted now on: April 24, 2020, 02:01:52 AM
JollyGood is just an waste of the DT1 space here.

You should better ignore his feedback, I am sure you would be more effective in Ignoring someone than that piece of shit and a lier. And the best course of action would be ~JollyGood in your trust list.

Red trust for politely saying someone that you are doing a good work by refunding the victims, what an dickheaded judgement explicitly from the people who trust him. ( Lack of Objective Standards )
227  Other / Meta / Re: Appeal of Ban Appeal: “hacker1001101001” spammer-sockpuppet menagerie on: April 23, 2020, 05:26:53 AM
Hacker1001101001's probable bump spamming should have been apparent to the admins when he was unbanned, and given the amount of time that has elapsed since I believe he did this, I don't think it would be appropriate to prosecute him for this.
FTFY. It was not apparent, therefore your argument is nullified.

It was not even hidden from my post history, and was public to anyone checking it, I am sure there were many more aspects taken into consideration behind my unban, hence even your argument is nullified too. Your lapse in judgment shows you should be nowhere at an postion to judge same goes with your baised and invalid flags.
228  Other / Meta / Re: Appeal of Ban Appeal: “hacker1001101001” spammer-sockpuppet menagerie on: April 23, 2020, 01:46:38 AM
I would urge administration to limit nullius's walls of text due to his time consuming baseless threads  and rants which he uses to shit everywhere around. I even find his posts less intresting each day, at least less intresting than bonesjonesreturns.

Which rule is he breaking?

Have your eyes popped out ?

Which rule am I breaking ? (I am already experiencing pretty harsh 2 years of signature ban for the rule I broke about Plagiarism)

There is no real logic behind his ban appeal hunt here other than his pussy licking urge and him digging his own hole to prove his evil nature, hence you would not be able to find logic here in my reasoning too..
229  Other / Meta / Re: [March 2020 Update] Kalemder Merit Source Application for the Turkish Board on: April 22, 2020, 07:06:52 AM
Got to hand it to you Lauda, you never rose to the bait and instead showed this merit abuser and fake trust circle participant a mirror which he cannot deny if he had any decency at all.

You should better put a mirror on your own face and see how it relates to you. Merit circling abuse, biased inclusions and exclusions in your own trust lists to from fake trust circles in the urge of power and the biggest crown on your head of abusing the trust system with your filth buddies.

You are nowhere to pass judgements around OP. You can create your own thread to ramble about it, your one comment show's you don't support the application. That's enough rather than spamming with your fake accusations on the application thread.
230  Other / Meta / Re: Appeal of Ban Appeal: “hacker1001101001” spammer-sockpuppet menagerie on: April 22, 2020, 03:18:31 AM
Unpaid, non-ICO BUMP!



Nice, Lier ! I thought you gave me that job. What an waste of your Quarantine time anyway.

I am off the forum for the next day or so, and intermittently for the next few weeks.  Busy.

Meanwhile, please feel free to keep bumping this thread with your self-pwnage.

I would urge administration to limit nullius's walls of text due to his time consuming baseless threads  and rants which he uses to shit everywhere around. I even find his posts less intresting each day, at least less intresting than bonesjonesreturns.

Hope you are safe from viruses and they aren't able to HACK you until.
231  Other / Meta / Re: VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position on: April 22, 2020, 03:03:50 AM
Jesus Christ.

Even if everything you said is true you're still the one acting like a child.

Btw, there was a question to be answered about why do many users here still trust VOD even after knowing all of the above is true. Doesn't it activate your spidey sense.


Go take a walk or something.

Even don't forget to wear a MASK, if you step outside OG !
232  Economy / Reputation / Re: Nullius the scammer supporter and dumb fuck wishes to excuse scamming come here. on: April 21, 2020, 03:00:09 AM
No, no no. You said I asked for video evidence that zorrobek is my alt account. This post proofs that I didn't ask for evidence that zorrobek is my alt account, it shows proof that I asked QS to provide me proof that I deleted post. As I said, I let you play for...."weeks"  Grin

So let me get this straight (can't read the CH garbage but I'm assuming he's insisting that QS is right) - the dipshit in his own self-moderated thread is refusing to accept the possibility that a moderator or a self-mod OP could delete someone else's posts?

Yes, but that's not the case here.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1472668.0

Moderators would just trash up the thread or even if they edit it, the same would be notified as an edited by mod. It would not be wrong to assume he deleted many more of his posts from there.

I think marlboroza looked liked a faucets hunter with his alt.
233  Other / Meta / Re: Appeal of Ban Appeal: “hacker1001101001” spammer-sockpuppet menagerie on: April 20, 2020, 03:05:06 AM
Therefore:
  • I urge the administration to review the case of a longtime spammer who was granted leniency for plagiarism!

I would urge administration to ban the OP for his offtopic trolling ( with uninteresting and time' wasting walls of text), his overall double standard nature which is crystal clear here and for having accusations of being in internal relationships with an "underage e-whore" and even for doubting the ownership moto behind the bitcoin.org website which is serving as an guiding platform for information about Bitcoin to many newbies from years. He is more like some of the Chinese news reports, they would only report things which suits there agenda... Yet don't care about anything as an whole.

Boomer !

"Bun" him please !

How is the quarantine time going ? I feel the waste of it on your side.
234  Other / Meta / Re: The Objective Standards Guild - Testimonium Libertatem Iustitia on: April 18, 2020, 04:19:33 PM
That is your own interpretation of me being fraudulent despite me not intending to scam anyone around

Yes, I was involved in bumping business and I even had many other users working around me.

I'll probably bookmark this.

That doesn't proof anything other than you being biased in your judgements and trying to ignore and even wrongly troll my statements.
235  Other / Meta / Re: The Objective Standards Guild - Testimonium Libertatem Iustitia on: April 18, 2020, 04:10:18 PM
Why are you suggesting users to trust fraudulent account?

SUGGESTED INCLUSIONS:

hacker1001101001

Your are one of the most harmful troll here with lot's deception inside you. That is your own interpretation of me being fraudulent despite me not intending to scam anyone around or not being an individual risky to deal with. I even don't shit on other users trust wall's as you do and enjoy the most.
236  Other / Meta / Re: Domain name update on: April 18, 2020, 01:43:45 PM
Sad to see Cøbra downing the control towards an important aspect of the Bitcoin ecosystem.

More than imaginable number of users still see many of his works towards maintaing some important aspects of Bitcoin to be over the mark and think him being more creditable than he is now.

Sad update though.
237  Other / Meta / Re: [POLL]Dear Forum Administration, Merit Question on: April 17, 2020, 04:18:21 PM
Theymos once commented on it.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4102382.msg38214098#msg38214098

Quote
It doesn't make sense to show Trust to guests, since Trust is relative.

For merit, it was just an implementation shortcut. If people care, I can (at some point) make the user summaries public.



I have a different question: why do you even log out?

Even I am curious as most possible reason near to OP as I see is having multiple accounts. Huh
238  Economy / Reputation / Re: More trust abuse by marlboroza on: April 17, 2020, 03:56:38 PM
That's not what "frame" means. You didn't get framed with plagiarism or with ICO spam, you did it yourself.

He is clearly trying to spread baseless accusations about it and frame childish shit over, there are zero evidence of his comment below.

Did TECSHARE wrote this for ya, Bump?
Yes he probably did get paid and he probably wrote the text for him to post here. Did we really think or expect anything else?
239  Economy / Reputation / Re: More trust abuse by marlboroza on: April 17, 2020, 03:24:34 PM
snip
Why do you keep making new accounts?  I don't get it.

Why do you keep ignoring the facts that someone whose judgements you trust is just try to frame anything he can around here. And there is no logic remained in any of his accusations. Why do you keep trusting such peoples? I don't get it.


Yes he probably did get paid and he probably wrote the text for him to post here. Did we really think or expect anything else?
240  Other / Meta / Re: [POLL] Should I donate the Known Alts Donation funds to Bruno's plea? on: April 17, 2020, 02:50:27 AM

I tried alluding to the fact that his family was aware of the donations that had been made in his name. I also recommend that no more donations be made to his addresses. I knew Bruno personally and have been in contact with a family member. That's about all I can say. If you need specifics for whatever reason then you can PM me.

Do you know whether they do or don't have access to that wallet? It sounds like they might not or haven't figured out how to gain access yet from what you said.

I see your argument about his family members being not able to handle or use those crypto funds properly or take advantage of it as intended. I could imagine many people's around the world thinking it as an alien tech.

Yes, from nutildah's statements about the funds it seem that there is something worng regarding the access of donation funds to his family as he recommends not donating further, but it even indicates that they are aware of it.

I don't see why it is so hard or not ethical for users to just give an clear statement about "if his family can use those crypto funds or not as intended by him". I can't see any potential harm in confirming it publicly.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 ... 87 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!