nope. not at all. What blockheights do you guys see?

$ battlecoind getblockcount
378352
$ battlecoind getblockhash 378352
4218563402b28f12fb4e0be2fb0e048ac23bed0bbbf16cb4d75260aab2a1d60b

Due to unstable behaviour of new version 0.4.0 (time to time lack synchronization happening), we strictly recommend return EmerCoin wallet to version 0.3.2, which is stable. Please, backup wallet.dat before update, and delete whole blockchain 0.4.0.

emercoind getinfo
{
    "version" : "v0.2.4emc-9-ga88cb63-beta",
    "protocolversion" : 60003,
...

Well, my guess is that cryptsy is in US, I2P should allow anonymity, but, if they (cryptsy) don't want to be put down (legal with current development on regulations), they cannot allow that, or they may, but then, they will risk problems in future.

Ok, assuming the worst is that Cryptsy has to wait for a new release, how long will the wait be? Are there any major impediments on the way, that may hinder a new release altogether?

One thing, though. I'm not into how things are working and I do not use the dedicated anoncoin wallet client either, but all my ANC are stored in Cryptsy. This question has probably been asked a few times, but I'm still wondering what do you think of the situation at Cryptsy? When could one expect them to remove the "Wallet under maintenance" symbol and what would yet be needed from the ANC community? There has not been much pushes to github lately either, so I just wonder what's the current situation. I have seen a few goals at the Anoncoin wiki, but frankly, I have no clue what they mean.

Hey guys. Have you heard about Synereo?

We're building a fully decentralized social networking platform. We have a distributed tech stack that's been in development for over four years.

Come check it out. Crowdsale starts tomorrow for our token, which has an inherent value in the network.

www.synereo.com

Just to clarify.

When a person uses a coin, the transaction process is encrypted and the ledger is public.

When doubts exist as to the integrity of the development process and quality of cryptography used in a transaction, a coin is worthless. Those doubts do exist with anc. In other words anc has reached a point where it either must use a trusted algorithm or it has no real value.

In practical terms it means the algorithm should be something like bitcoin, litecoin, etc, and not something like zerocoin, cryptonote etc.

Offering people the option of which algorithm to use is a solution that settles all sides. For example if a person can choose between zerocoin, litecoin, cryptonote etc then the coin can survive. How this would be done I don't know. But as it stands now if you are going to offer a mixture of algorithms, under the guise of protecting against attacks, but the user has no control over the mix, then you are offering nothing.

Everything about anc now resembles a corporate mindset. It is nothing like it was in the beginning. Now iis sort of like a cross between Ripple and Mexican Pesos. I think it is finished unless big changes happen.

Not in any practical sense.

If something was broken that did do that on his system, both execution traces would be the same.

In this case the posts just clearly appeared to be an excuse to encourage people to run backdoored private key generating code (which I've removed from the thread).

It's a mostly-random process, so that can happen.  In addition there's collisions on address space, though in this case it looks like it ended up with the same private key as well.

Could you share the command line you had used for those two runs?

I don't know off hand what the statistical odds are of that happening with vanitygen, but they should be very, very slim to the point that I'd wonder if somehow the RNG's entropy pool was weak (essentially what K1773R said while I wrote this)...but then it should be happening more often.   ( You can provide another source of entropy for the seed based on a file )

So, either something weird's going on, or you hit a one-in-a-largenumberhere fluke

Some suggestions for anc. The coin is basically going to be dead in the water when Cryptos start rising unless a few simple steps are taken.

1) Acknowledge the drama in anc's history and use it to anc's advantage. Governments are heavily meddling in cryptocurrencies for aml and other reasons. Nobody doesn't know that. Put a statement to that effect somewhere obvious, acknowledge anc may have been victimized by govt wanksters, and move on tofull transparency.
Example of what the statement could say.
"It is widely known that cryptos challenge govt control of personal money and that numerous govts have invested heavily in cryptomeddling. Governments do not meddle in finance for good reasons. Very little data collected by the nsa and similar groups is used for legitimate domestic purposes. The only authorities that have unfettered access to this type of data are police agencies in client states like Bahrain, Egypt and Nigeria. If you cooperate with the agenda of controlling currency you are helping crush democracies in numerous places.

Anc may have been fiddlefucked to some degree by the nsa and similar groups, as have many coins. Henceforth all developmental work on anc will be done in plain sight with no bullshit."

2) To further the goal of trustable transparency, anc should offer a choice of algorithms, not a mix of algorithyms. There should be several algorythms available as modules in the wallet, and a person chooses which one they would like to use. As I understand the new version a person mixes algos, and that makes little sense. A modular wallet with severasl algorithm modules would let a person encrypt the trasaction with their choice of algo. Obviously this provides another level of complexity, another opportunity for the syphillus breath antiliberty bureaucrats to meddle, so people have to examine the code etc carefully.

3) Another option is simply switching back to a basic trusted code like bitcoin or litecoin.

4) As has been said before, anc really has nothing except its brand. There has been some question in the past about which "brand" anc represents. Is it anonymous transactions? The anonymous collective? Something else? Anonymous coins are aa dime a dozen at this point. If anc wants to stay aslive it has to actually represent something that people will support. So my suggestion is go full bore in support of the anonymous collective. Combined with the acknowledgement that anc has been raped and brutalized by govt shills, this could lead to a strong long term net gain in the image of the coin.

If nothing is done, anc is finished. If the half hearted lame steps that have been suggested in recent posts are done, also the coin slowly fizzles and dies. Coins require legitimate steps to stay ahead, not half assed shit steps.

vanitygen problem it generate same address again
... removed crap ...

Hello

Right now we blocked user registrations from TOR. The reason was the abuse of our referral program.
TOR schould be fully supported in few days, but with some restrictions:
- no CP points for user account registration
- no CP points for referrer

I2P - Very interesting subject!
We promise that, something will move in the topic of I2P within a month.

Those are all different things, what you're saying doesn't make any sense. IPv4/6 is fundamental for the Internet, network tunneling protocols like l2tp are based on it. Anonymizing your IP via VPN is your concern and how is SSL not secure?

No, I don't believe he has.

This is an attempt to create an incentive for someone to come up with a solution to the scalability issues.

Perhaps if the pot got big enough Forrest would focus back on P2Pool, and I for one would be ecstatic if he figured it out and claimed the bounty.

I don't fault him at all for not being active, he is young and has other interests, P2Pool has represented an enormous contribution and I am grateful for all his work.

Since virtually no one I'm aware of pays the donation this could be an opportunity to create an incentive that gets work moving again.

We still need to define the criteria for success very clearly before we can start thinking about setting up a pot though...

Hello

Just opened, new market: Quarkcoin (QRK/XMG)
https://cryptoine.com/trade/qrk_xmg
With 0% Trading Fee.

Don't forget about https://cryptoine.com/trade/qrk_btc

I was going to beta test it on Xubuntu 14.04x64 but get the following error after

Will I have to change to Berkeley DB 4.8 to use the new wallet.  As I'm not sure if some of my other wallets would like that?  Or will the new Linux binaries be ok like the current ANC wallet I have works.  Although I think I currently use the i2p repo.  Will that be updated with the new wallet timely.

indeed , alot of text i had to read it 2-3 times untill i understood it correctly , dev you should probably make a easy to understand video.