You mean you regret not going on a spammy promotion of your scam signature links before?

Let's see now, how does you yelling that scrypt.cc is not a scam counter the mathematics that proves scrypt.cc is lying about their mining, which is evidence that they are, indeed, a scam?


ROFL, just checked the specs on the links in your sig, could you be any more of a shill for obvious-scam-is-obvious frauds?

Let's see now, how does you yelling that scrypt.cc is not a scam counter the mathematics that proves scrypt.cc is lying about their mining, which is evidence that they are, indeed, a scam?

Let's see now, how does you yelling that scrypt.cc is not a scam counter the mathematics that proves scrypt.cc is lying about their mining, which is evidence that they are, indeed, a scam?

(╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻

If you're a true fan of scrypt.cc let's see some cheerleading for your esteemed 'Admin' here! ThorSWO is either 'Admin' himself or is a member of the group running this criminal enterprise.

That's my take on the situation, given his posting history, particularly those he tried to delete.

I do find it amusing just how many times these scrypturds rage-quit and then are unable to stop themselves posting again, thereby rendering their rage-quit moments even more laughable.

Pro-tip fanboys and shills: We are not going to stop keeping the issue of this scam's lies and deception front and center in this thread.

Based on what reasoning do you choose to trust an operation which is proven to be lying about their mining?

So are you saying that you have no interest in whether a ponzi scheme is a ponzi scheme, even if they are pretending to not be a ponzi scheme?

Ah, the ol' "Hey those guys over there are up to no good, too, why should I be punished for the bad things I am doing?" vapid excuse.

You are known to be operating three shill accounts, GermanGiant, SpanishSoldier and RussianRaibow which you use to actively promote the scams you are involved in while criticizing those you are not.

You have been repeatedly challenged about your obvious shilling and so, in order to reduce the chances of other users falling for them, it is necessary to make sure there's a nice bit of red text under each of these usernames to make it that little bit harder for you to rope in new victims.

If you have evidence which could prove this fraudulent 'cloud mining' scam to not be a fraudulent 'cloud mining' scam, then feel free to offer it up, otherwise you're just as guilty in knowingly promoting it as it would be if you were actually part of the criminal gang running it.

Do you know what the biggest giveaway is that they are not even a British-run scam operation?


In the UK a comma is used to denote the thousands in a number, not a decimal point.

Translation: Ffs, quickly buy my stinking bag of worthless 'khs' before this scam finally topples over and dies.

What is to stop you trading with yourself through another account in order to fake 'profit'?

Funny how the solution to a poorly-performing ponzi is to tell 'investors' to buy more of the imaginary hashpower it is selling.

I'm calling bullshit on that claim. That's Josh Garza style of exaggeration.

Where do you get that number from?

This is another quoted post where he has since deleted the content. In it he uses the same, 'why do you think they'd steal your paltry balance when there is so much btc going through the site every day' vapid evasive answer that 'Admin' himself uses in one of his rare posts here.

FYI, for anybody who isn't aware, if you have a few bitcoin addresses and you moved 1btc through them back and forth a few hundred times, they would show as having had several hundred btc's worth of transactions.

So, when you marks send in your btc on the assumption that this scam wouldn't bother stealing it remember that the whole premise of the fraud is to mislead you and showing balances and transaction totals that are so large is part of the con.

Here you go, his very first post which has since been deleted by him, but is nicely quoted for us by another user. That is why people full-quote on this forum, because scumbag shills like to edit their history when it begins to look a little suspicious over a longer period of time.



My guess is that this information about the other address belonging to scrypt.cc might lead further down a rabbit hole he'd rather we didn't explore.

ThorSWO has 188 posts, every single one of them shilling for scrypt.cc in this thread.

I think it is pretty clear that he is involved with the scam.

It's such a fine line between stupid and, uh...

An anonymous criminal is unlikely to give a flying fuck about people on the internet calling him and his scam out for what it is. Certainly not in a, "I'll show them!!1!11!!" dreamland scenario where he suddenly decides to take all the filthy lucre he scalped from you marks and actually build something legit with it, not when he can simply move on to his next scam op and scalp you all some more under a different name.

The general principle I have seen discussed by others who feel the same is that you challenge the member to justify their support for a known scam and, when they can't, if they are not willing to remove their promotional links or posts then it is justifiable to rate them as knowingly supporting fraud.