Nice! I have something similar from a couple months ago, and indeed they are great for educating others.
|
|
|
Received .07 btc!
I think you should rename them from "discount payments" to "dividend payments"... discount sounds like I'm losing something, whereas a dividend is easy to understand.
|
|
|
I simply LOATHE paypal. It's another CIA/NSA front to track each and every one of us, part of the surveillance state and the monopoly money masters.
Yeah that... or it's just a large successful company trying to earn revenue and mitigate losses. An even more frightening prospect IMO. Do you not do not exhibit the exact same behavior in your own affairs? Will you pay $5 for a sandwich if you can get the equivalent for $4?
|
|
|
I simply LOATHE paypal. It's another CIA/NSA front to track each and every one of us, part of the surveillance state and the monopoly money masters.
Yeah that... or it's just a large successful company trying to earn revenue and mitigate losses.
|
|
|
The lesson I learned from the Mybitcoin scam was to never use another online wallet again. It doesn't matter how secure the wallet is, there is nothing preventing the owner from walking away with all your money. Remember, Bitcoin has absolutely no property rights. This is a huge downfall that will have to be addressed before widespread adoption can take place. Until then, secure your coins yourself. The client isn't that hard to use and now has encrypted wallets. And this forum is full of ways to securely back up wallets.
That's the wrong lesson to learn. The correct lesson is, "be careful." And another good lesson is, "don't store lots of money with someone you don't fully trust." ewallets are fantastic for small amounts of bitcoins, but large piles of savings should be properly stored on your own backed up wallet.dat in multiple secure places. It's important to remember that every place you store bitcoins has risk. Holding a wallet.dat has risk of user error/negligence, which can be worse than the risk of an ewallet provider running off with your money. And there are things preventing ewallet owners from stealing everyone's money, 1) long-term profit motive and 2) genuine good character (which is the majority of business owners).
|
|
|
Yifu - on the transparency page (looks great btw!) please mark my work as pro bono. I won't be requesting compensation. My compensation will be if just one angry socialist discovers Bitcoin and comes to learn what free market really means
|
|
|
I doubt that any business with 100 millions USD of revenue would accept bitcoins right now. Do you realize how much a 1% shift in Bitcoin price (which happens everyday) would affect the company? Million dollar companies don't play the roulette with their revenues. Every dollar is accounted for.
It's important for people to understand that exchange rate risk has been virtually eliminated by at least one company, Bit-pay.com. They are an ideal candidate to provide the merchant solution for any sizable business. They enable the business to receive the Bitcoins automatically converted into USD instantly. Some might say, "well then what's the point of accepting btc at all?" And the answer of course is that this is a gradual process. We need to help companies step by step. Show them that bitcoins aren't scary. After they are used to the Bitcoin world, some will opt to keep a portion of earnings as Bitcoins. But again, this is is a gradual process. Also, the most likely way someone can claim this bounty, is if someone has a personal/professional connection to a decision maker at a medium sized business. Who do you know? Who do they know? Set up a meeting and discuss. Describe the advantages of Bitcoins from a merchant perspective (no chargebacks, lower fees, acceptable from anyone anywhere - even Ivory Coast and Ukraine). OP - thanks for setting up this ambitious bounty!
|
|
|
It's indeed a very good article. The reporter is very talented and dedicated. He has good writing skills, and the "detective work" was well done.
Agreed, great article. Wonderful writing and narrative.
|
|
|
Yeah, Canada doesn't have a single national healthcare plan. They have 13 different systems based on broad national requirements administered by each individual territory/province. Their system isn't perfect, but I would say it works somewhat better than the current US system, at least in the area of controlling the kind of out-of-control price inflation we're seeing in the US.
Also, emergency room wait times suck in America as well, and people dying during the wait isn't completely unheard of.
The rapid price increases in America are very easy to explain, and in fact this was made clear to me on a recent doctor visit. The problem is that the patient (customer) is not the one who pays for the service. There is a disconnect between customer and merchant. This disconnect enables the incentive of a company (hospital/doctor) to raise its prices to go unchecked. The doctor can prescribe anything, run any tests, and generally "over-service" the patient, because the patient wants "all the health he can get" and isn't paying the cost directly. For the most part, it's paid by the insurance provider or an employer via the insurance provider. This singular dynamic is the primary reason healthcare costs in America seem "unrestrained." The incentive to reduce costs is gone, or almost gone. I had understood this conceptually for a while, but on a recent doctor visit it was made terribly clear. I went to get a prescription. Before the doctor would prescribe the drug, he said I needed to take some blood tests and other types of analysis. It sounded a bit excessive, so I asked him, "How much will all that cost?" You see, I cared about the cost, because I don't have insurance. I have to pay for the services I receive. The doctor said the tests would cost roughly $900-$1,200. I gasped! He looked surprised at my question, and asked, "don't you have insurance?" I said no. He looked more surprised, paused, and then said, well, I guess we don't need to run all these tests. He crossed some things out on the clipboard, and said, "okay, just these three tests are required. The cost will be about $350. So I paid for those tests, and got the prescription. If I had been a "normal client" with insurance to cover every expense, the cost of acquiring the services would be over a grand. But when the discipline of a price-conscious customer is added to the equation, the cost dropped to $350. Remember that when insurance companies pay your bills, their costs are distributed amongst all their policy holders. That is why insurance premiums keep rising - because doctors and hospitals have no incentive to control what they provide for a given demand. This isn't the full story of why prices are rising, but it is a large portion of it. Insurance should not be paying for normal medical expenses. It should cover only catastrophic events, and people should get used to paying for the services and goods they demand. The overall price of health in the country would fall, or at least stabilize. It is not a coincidence that those industries with the most government distortion are the industries in which prices are out of control (college, healthcare, war, etc.)
|
|
|
Do you do free or really cheap logos for non-profit movements?
Logos of his caliber for 8 BTC IS "really cheap." That's an amazing deal and I hope everyone here takes advantage of that. Zaise - are you still offering this?
|
|
|
Don't think so: o Davis, the author of the New Yorker story, emails Clear.
"I like to keep a low profile," Clear replies. "I'm curious to know how you found me."
Davis eventually cuts to the chase:
Finally, I asked, "Are you Satoshi?"
He laughed, but didn't respond. There was an awkward silence. ^ awkward silence doesn't really work over email. LOL If you read the article, he was actually speaking with him face to face. He had emailed him to set up a meeting. So, an awkward silence at that meeting was quite possible =)
|
|
|
That's a fun idea. It's too bad one can't just give coins to random people by email address. Winners in Starcraft 2 tournaments for instance. They'd be forced to learn about it if they wanted to cash out on these mysterious gifts and then perhaps they'd get into the mood of getting more. You can give coins to random people by email address. Use BTCinch.com They're in beta, but PM me your email and I'll show you (goes for anyone who's curious).
|
|
|
All property can be traced back to the commons. No man is an island. It is not theft when you are expected to contribute to upkeep of the commons.
Try tracing any property "back to the commons" and you will find it is quite impossible to do. The chain of property ownership is flawed and fallible. Yet for the vast majority of property, there is no contention as to its owner. Nobody out there claims ownership of my computer, nor my car, nor any of the things I have. In those cases of a property dispute, that is a good role for courts. And I have no interest in contributing to the upkeep of your commons. If it is of value to me, I'll pay for it voluntarily. What you advocate is the forced surrendering of the product of one's efforts, and I think that's immoral. For the same reason that slavery is wrong, partial slavery is wrong. People can't choose how much property their families control when they are born. In biblical times, property rights only lasted 49 years. When Copyright was invented, works lapsed into the public domain after 14 years. Rampant privitization of the commons is theft in my opinion. Property rights have merit: even animals understand the concept of territory; but there has to be a happy medium.
In biblical times, they did lots of screwed up shit It's fine if you want to say privatization of the commons is theft... indeed I don't know of one universal way by which "common" things rightly become private. We can dispute that. But once something is known and agreed to be private, without legitimate contention from another claimant, then it ought to be respected as such. And no, animals have a terrible understanding of private property. Animal behavior is more akin to socialism, where force is used to achieve various ends... and perhaps that makes sense in the animal world, where most resources are not produced, but instead taken from the earth. Humans produce their resources and as such have right to claim them privately. In my opinion, the "happy medium" is reached when collective rights and individual rights are perfectly balanced. It is difficult to achieve, but it is the only way anarchy can work. I find "Anarcho-Capitalist" and "Anarcho-Communists" contradictions in terms.
I respect your opinion, and I won't use force on you to convince you otherwise. Sadly, you won't extend the same courtesy to me... if you disagree with me, you'll vote to plunder, whereas no matter how much I disagree with you, I will not plunder or encourage others to do so on my behalf.
|
|
|
Not really. It's more like, "I choose not to steal from or hurt you, and I hope you will afford me the same courtesy."
Or to put it in your terminology, "I won't fuck with you, please don't fuck with me."
Hoping someone won't steal from you and asking them to please not fuck with you doesn't seem to be working out for the bitcoin community very well, so far. I've had much more stolen from me by the government... and of course the government theft will continue. At least with bitcoin, people can educate themselves and be prudent with whom they trust. A diligent person can be relatively safe with bitcoin. A diligent person has no such benefit when it comes to matters of the state, social engineering, and economic planning.
|
|
|
I must have had the same idea as evoorhees, because I just finished prototyping some Java code to do pretty much what he specified in the original thread. 1) Create a few thousand instawallet.org pages/accounts. Record the URL's 2) Feed each account with, say, .01 bitcoin 3) Print cheap business cards or flyers with the instawallet URL address (one on each card) 4) Hand these out at the OccupyWallStreet protest.
It lets you... Create up to N empty Instawallet addresses. Fill them each with N bitcoins (from "master" Instawallet account, but could be from bitcoind). Print out an 8.5" x 11" sheet with 12 business cards on it, each containing a little blurb, an Instawallet address, and the associated QR code. Tomorrow, I'm getting 48 of them printed at Kinkos, which I funded with 0.5 BTC each. Is there still interest in this? YES YES YES!!! Hey jump in IRC #operationbitcoin That's where we've been organizing. Someone else is making a similar system to yours, and that's the ultimate goal. Please join the discussion I'd love to see what you made!
|
|
|
Just got this from Yifu via Skype seems like the goods have arrived. And FYI - the QR code points here: operationbitcoin.org
|
|
|
Roughly $2,500 in coins themselves. Am buying more every month.
Don't invest any money you can't afford to lose. Bitcoins are wildly speculative. You should assume they will go to zero.
|
|
|
Thanks for the proposition, I might throw a coin in if a group put a fund together.
What kind of amount are you look for for the sponsorships? If we were given a set price that might be more easily digested.
|
|
|
your arguments for freedom just boil down to a an argument for "fuck everyone who wasn't as lucky as me".
Not really. It's more like, "I choose not to steal from or hurt you, and I hope you will afford me the same courtesy." Or to put it in your terminology, "I won't fuck with you, please don't fuck with me." Amazing that it's such a radical position
|
|
|
Satoshi would not be first concerned about user encryption wallet, just like Gavin told at the NY conference.
He would be concerned about how to dump the rest of the coins on the market without anybody noticing Just like the 20k dump a week ago Whoever he is, he is LOADED !!! We can tell which coins Satoshi mined in the beginning. We can tell if they move. Whatever, he is still going to be LOADED when he cashes out. Even if he only does 1000 BTC at a time etc. and transfers it to different addresses to obfuscate the laundering etc. For some people, "cashing out" happened when they got rid of their fiat currency for something better. For some people, there is little desire to exchange this valuable currency for the play-money of governments.
|
|
|
|