I thought Dean left this forum: I'm done with this forum now.
Dean screwed investors more than a year ago, it was pointed in this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4751127.0;allI'm buying tokens back with my own profit, the 30 million tokens I keep from the ICO. http://archive.is/9opwz#selection-6385.0-6387.1ICO terms: -30 million will be retained by BetKing for ICO bounties, testing bounties, advisors, hiring, future marketing and development.
-After the crowdsale at least 50% of the funds raised will be used for the house bankroll that players bet against and winnings are paid from.The remaining funds will be used for marketing, promos, seo, design, development, server costs and legal. http://archive.is/tdcWrAnyway, for this thread: Remaining token holders have the benefit that their tokens have much more value the longer they hold them. They can choose to never sell them back to me for many years or if the site was to be sold. http://archive.is/9opwz#selection-6393.0-6393.198My buy back price does not reduce after buying back. So if sa I bought 10% of tokens back for $1 or whatever after first quarter.
The remaining tokens are still worth $1 and then have the profit of next 3 months added on top of that http://archive.is/yxKBo#selection-849.0-851.102 |
|
|
|
All of your answers are in the last few pages of the thread I want to hear it from you. Tell me, why is it I should justify Nutilduuhs own ratings? OK, let me try it this way. You are the one who brought 3 trust ratings into this thread. Explain to our community, as one of the oldest members here, this: What does it mean?
I am not even saying
your ratings shouldn't have been left
maybe they should
but that is irrelevant.
Should they have been left or not? This is very simple question.
We have:
1)malware
2)scam
3)super speed erc 20
Do you think rating should have been left for people who
1)spread malware
2)scam
3)run extremely super speed erc20 Grin
Or not?
Why did you post trust thingies?
How are these 3 examples the same as iCEBREAKER's trust rating? You have presented 3 examples of trust ratings for people who: 1) spread malware 2) scam 3) run very very fast erc 20 tokens chain whatever You must have reason why you have mentioned these trust ratings. So say your reasons why they should or should not be -ve tagged. That is how normal conversation works. You say "I agree or don't agree that you have tagged scammer and person who spread malware because..." After you are done, we will discuss account trading part. It is very important that you answer this before we discuss other part. |
|
|
|
Where did the bitkilo connection come from? Well... Hi lightlord, could you please change my payment address, i have also sent you a PM about this.
Thank you.
And this is marcotheminer's addy http://archive.is/uf3md#selection-6663.0-6663.161 (scroll up and check table) Unless they used marcotheminer's address in signature campaign to repay loan, but that doesn't make sense because marcotheminer posted this: Repayment came from 17eDS4zwUvd3whq6ep46NRN4gVegQ8JuFM which is bitkilo's address https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1161170.msg18700229#msg18700229I am really confused. That loan should have been repaid a month before this transaction. |
|
|
|
Lock Meta so no one can complain why Meta is locked. Replace every link with this. I have heard it will be new bitcoin but it is still in development. |
|
|
|
~
How about stop changing subject and address this one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5118010.msg50244857#msg50244857 thank you very much. The part of my selectively edited quote which you conveniently left out: I am not even saying your ratings shouldn't have been left, maybe they should, but that is irrelevant. Part of post is left out because you didn't say anything at all. What does it mean? I am not even saying
your ratings shouldn't have been left
maybe they should
but that is irrelevant. Should they have been left or not? This is very simple question. We have: 1)malware 2)scam 3)super speed erc 20 Do you think rating should have been left for people who 1)spread malware 2)scam 3)run extremely super speed erc20  Or not? Why did you post trust thingies? How are these 3 examples the same as iCEBREAKER's trust rating? |
|
|
|
~snip~
Lets stick to this one for a moment: "bataklik 2019-02-23 0.00000000 Reference Promoter of scam project that is pretending to be a successful project. Please see here for scam accusation thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5110191.0 . This user's account has likely been hacked and is untrustworthy. " Sockpuppet. Malware. "BrieMiller 2019-02-22 0.00000000 Reference Promotion of HYIP products, part of a bumping service that bumps threads with low-value posts. Not genuinely concerned with the outcome of projects. Do not trust this user or take any of their questions seriously. "
Sockpuppet. Scam. "cryptobenn 2018-12-02 0.00000000 Reference Promoting the ETH token scam "FREE Coin" "
Why use FREE coin?
Extremely Fast
Super speed erc20 Chain LOL! Looks like some super speed pump and dump erce 20 scam crap. What is point of this post? What is wrong with 3 selectively picked trust ratings? You picked them for a reason. So what is wrong with them? Are they financial or not? |
|
|
|
"bataklik 2019-02-23 0.00000000 Reference Promoter of scam project that is pretending to be a successful project. Please see here for scam accusation thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5110191.0 . This user's account has likely been hacked and is untrustworthy. " Sockpuppet. Malware. "BrieMiller 2019-02-22 0.00000000 Reference Promotion of HYIP products, part of a bumping service that bumps threads with low-value posts. Not genuinely concerned with the outcome of projects. Do not trust this user or take any of their questions seriously. "
Sockpuppet. Scam. "cryptobenn 2018-12-02 0.00000000 Reference Promoting the ETH token scam "FREE Coin" "
Why use FREE coin?
Extremely Fast
Super speed erc20 Chain LOL! Looks like some super speed pump and dump erce 20 scam crap. What is point of this post? |
|
|
|
It is not easy to build perfect blackjack. Do you propose anything or you just want to harm this project?
Provably fair is very important aspect of this project. If you know how to improve it then please do.
Why would you think I want to harm project? Because I pointed serious issue with fairness? Because you didn't want to answer how to verify result even thought I (as maybe customer) asked you 5-6 times? I told you what you should change. Make server seed hash visible before someone place bet. This isn't provably fair. Take some time and read this https://cryptogambling.org/ |
|
|
|
After game you can verify that client seed and server seed are not changed.
I don't know that seeds are not changed because I don't see secret server seed before I place bet. Look, I opened site and changed client seed and server seed hash is visible before first bet was placed (you can see chips, I didn't place any bet yet):  And after that round I got this result:  I didn't check results, but visually this should be ok. Now, I changed client seed again:  And I don't see server seed hash. After placing bet (you can see the cards under provably fair tab), server seed hash is revealed:  That is not how provably fair is supposed to work and this leaves some space for manipulation. If player can't see server seed hash before they place bet then it is not provably fair, it is simple as that. Also, client seed always change, so player has to type seed every time. This is not good in my opinion. EDIT; I've not deposited BTC yet so can't see but when I'm on the FUN currency it shows above the cards what the max bet is, it is not the same for BTC?
 Huh? Bet limits are:
BTC 0.00001 - 0.2 btc
DASH 0.0001 - 10 Dash
LTC 0.0001 - 10 LTC
I suppose FaQ doesn't show correct bet limit, or? |
|
|
|
Meanwhile you can check MENU-Provably fair
What can I check exactly in that MENU? Longer explanation coming in FAQ very soon.
Please a bit patience.
Dude, what is max bet limit and how can I verify result? 1) What is max bet limit
2) How to verify result
3) Where can I find hashed server seed before I place bet?This is 5th time you are avoiding question. |
|
|
|
Today is the day.
Is today the day when you will explain how to verify results? It says provably fair. Where can I find hashed server seed before I place bet? How to verify results?What is max bet limit? |
|
|
|
Could you please share your knowledge and tell what kind of changes would you prefer?
A + 10 blackjack without option to hit another card Last screenshot, highlight cards. I didn't test anything else. AFAIK, split can be done when user get pair cards only while marlboroza could do split for Q and K.
It depends on rules, but look, I got K7, QA and K6 and I can't remember did I hit stand on that blackjack. What if that happens when you split 88 for example?
How to manually verify results? What is maximum bet limit? |
|
|
|
Now reread the post again
That is not going to happen. I am not interested to read your rants again. Stay focused on this part: As I said, stop shitposting and putting everything you can in your post to look like you wrote something meaningful.
Not interested in reading. Not interested in debating because too scared. Okay moronbozo.
Actually I am not interested in playing chess with pigeon  |
|
|
|
Q A is blackjack as far as I know.
Fix your software.
As far as I know if you play for example in real life with a dealer then you have a chance to Hit one more, even with blackjack. Should this be different when it is digital? That is very stupid explanation. Is that everything you have read from my post? Explain this: This is such an easy way to double your money. With
provably fair you have very good chances to win also. Explain how is gambling easy way to double money. Explain how with provably fair system player have very good chances to win. Questions: How to manually verify results? What is maximum bet limit? How about this:  I was playing the game, my phone ring and I came back after 5 minutes. Now I can't remember what was my last move. Can someone tell me, is that stand button for blackjack or K 6  I don't want to lose money because they didn't test software before releasing the game. ? |
|
|
|
~
As I said, stop shitposting and putting everything you can in your post to look like you wrote something meaningful. We as managers get messages from potential clients(or message them apparently lol) and the process starts. We do a little research into the casino, exchange, dice site, wallet, etc.
Not professional site: This is such an easy way to double your money. With provably fair you have very good chances to win also.
Lies to customers. Gambling, such an easy way to double money, right  Broken software: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg50192369#msg50192369https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg50197257#msg50197257Took me exactly 2 minutes to see this. @Thule maybe next time go directly to announcement thread with some facts? Lazy people |
|
|
|
How to manually verify results?
Hit the menu button then click Provably Fair as shown in this screenshot http://prntscr.com/myy1nsI want to manually verify it without clicking verify button. There is no terms of service, no FAQ. And I have just read this in topic: This is such an easy way to double your money. With
provably fair you have very good chances to win also.
This is nonsense. This is gambling so it is not easy way to double money and provably fair system won't make anyone's chance better.  How many suits are used here? And: I was playing the game, my phone ring and I came back after 5 minutes. Now I can't remember what was my last move. Can someone tell me, is that stand button for blackjack or K 6 I don't want to lose money because they didn't test software before releasing the game. ------------------------------ No minimum deposit.
What is maximum bet limit? |
|
|
|
What the fuck is this:  Q A is blackjack as far as I know. Fix your software.
How to manually verify results? |
|
|
|
~
Oh that must be the reason why all these exposed ICO's run away, domains suspended, announcement threads deleted and social media accounts removed. Stop shitposting. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
