Yes, and it appears the one of the members of the enterprise has decided to give a red flag to bob123, whose investigation helped discover this.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=292
It appears some member believe bob123 went to0 far by lying to the account sellers and getting them to reveal details on accounts they were selling and to verify a few. Apparently, this resulted in harm to the poor account sellers because their merchandise could not be sold for a premium. Never mind that it appears 2 out of the 6 accounts are verified as hacked.   I'm glad that bob123's efforts helped you in the end regain control of your account.

I just want to say, that we now have verification that a second account that the OP and his business partner offered for sale was a hacked account. It appears that the OP and his business partner are selling stolen merchandise. But I guess some people believe that we should flag anyone that dare try to expose their shady business. Fortunately, for Nasty Fans, whoever acquired this account didn't realize what kind they could have done. It appears they only shitposted with it.

      Please have your web development team remove the dead links and I will consider removing support for the flag and remove the negative comment. People should not have to check a box stating they accept terms of service that do not exist, to register with your sight. It is irregular. Unfortunately, with the flag, it also has support from another person, and I doubt that they will consider removing their trust comment or support for the flag. I cannot delete a flag.

     Furthermore, it does appear that your progressive betting algorithm was successful for my limited sessions. However, as with all progressive betting schemes, there is always a risk of ruin. In the end, the house has an advantage that cannot be overcome with any progressive betting scheme. Any particular reason that you changed the recommended settings for dice from 1.2 to 1.5? Was it because it is more likely that your algorithm will appear to work when someone bets 1.2 instead of 1.5, (less risk of ruin with ~80% chance to win rather than 66% chance to win each bet.) and you can get more believers in your system?

I'm not sure how to report the app. You should probably go to the google store. Also, you should not post links to malware. It is against the rules.

I just went to countrade's web page and it looks like a clone of cex.io site. This is another characteristic of scam exchanges. @OP, I am sorry that you had to learn about this kind of scam the hard way.



It appears the scammer probably got his account nuked for spamming. I believe when a user is nuked, they don't list each individual topic/post deletion in the mod log. If that is the case, it would probably be redundant to flag them.

Sorry for your loss. As you can tell, a gambling site should never ask for you to make a deposit in order to be able to withdraw. Definite scam. Your links only go to the now deleted topic. Do you have a link to the actual user profile? If you can get to the person's trust profile and create a red flag, I will probably support it. I cannot create a red tag on your behalf, because only the victim can make the red tag.

I must admit, I don't play on many online casinos. Exactly what are the usual minimum and maximum bets for a dice game? If the minimum bet is 1 satoshi and the maximum is 1 BTC, you would have to lose 23 times in a row to not be able to double your bet anymore. That would be ~ 1 in 5 million streaks. Of course, with an expected profit of only 1 satoshi per series, no one is going to get rich. However, it may keep someone entertained for quite sometime before going bust. (Unless they are extremely unlucky.)

     Coinbase is merely attempting every effort to remain in compliance with US regulations since they are based in the US (San Francisco). Since Coinbase is one of the bigger exchanges listed in the US, I am sure the US government is keeping a close eye on them. From what I understand, Binance is going to stop servicing US customers on their main platform, probably because they do not want to deal with the long arm of the US government. However, I believe Binance is going to have a special platform based in the US for US customers. Since online gambling is technically not allowed in many states in the US, Binance will probably have to take measures to discourage any transactions coming from casinos as well on their US based platform.

Perhaps online casinos should have certain levels of KYC verification like many exchanges do. I really do not see why the casino would need kyc information if the player is a small bettor. The only time that a real world casino gathers KYC and AML information in the US is if the player attempts to purchase more than about 3000 chips or cash them in.

Hope you have a quick and easy recovery. Looks like moments after you posted, we got some green dildos. Hope you had a chance to check it out and it helps put you in a better mood.

   I liked the stripped training jerseys myself. I guess those won't be available for sale. Yellow and black is not really my color. Guess it reminds me of hornets and bees too much.

Yes, I wish a global moderator would comment on why tvplus006 has been overlooked for a temporary ban. I think he was definitely a net positive. Now I see many people that got the temp ban have had their temp ban expire and are posting now. tvplus006 have had several members requesting he get his ban removed. I hope a global moderator or administrator considers out pleas.

A few days ago, game-protect posted a bunch of off-topic posts in service gambling threads and signature campaign threads that accused campaign managers & signature participants of being mentally ill. He ended up having 25 posts deleted for being off topic in a day or two. Such a high volume of off topic deletions has a good chance of getting a member temporarily banned. If game-protect has had previous infraction like this before, it could get him permanently banned for repeated violation.

     These jerseys look really nice. I wonder if they are available for sale to the general public. I'd certainly wear it.  Unfortunately, I'm a poor boy, so cannot afford to travel all the way to Brazil to pick one up at a vendor of one of their local games.

     I wouldn't be surprised if he was at least temp banned. He only had 25 off topic posts deleted in a day or two. Also, he hasn't posted in 3 days. I'm sure the bogus negative trust comments didn't help in any either. When I first noticed the trust comments, I also found the comment about children particularly disturbing. I am particularly offending since I'm a gay man, and this slur is often used against gay men. However, since he gave it to everyone, I'm certain it wasn't meant to be targeting against me as a homophobic smear. He just wanted to be generally offensive. At least he didn't come out and say, "sexually" abusive. although I am certain that was what he was applying.


    I don't think he would give out that bounty even if you recorded his confession.  Besides, knowing him, even if he gave you the 5 BTC, they are probably tainted.

     This solution is not acceptable at all.  The Mona holders would be better off if Livecoin socialized the losses among current Mona holders, get on the new chain, and let the Mona holders withdraw the coin. Retaining the Mona coins and having the individual holders attempt to get them from the developers is ludicrous. Also, it is despicable that they will continue to allow trading on this dead asset.

  Yes, when I registered the account, it had me agree to terms of service. However, no terms of service is available, so who knows what I end up agreeing to. (I'll assume that I am agreeing to nothing, since that is what the link goes to.) Also, I mentioned in your support chat over 24 hours ago that these links appear to be broken to both the terms of service and privacy policy. I was told the dev team will get on it right away. It seems like any easy fix, if the documents truly exist. Also, I find it strange that the only place on your web site that even offers these links is on the registration page. I would think links to such important documents would be available on the bottom of your main page.

   I have been trying out your "advance" AI algorithm. It is clear that it is only a variation on the Martingale strategy.

Well it appears many of his posts have been deleted today. I know that I reported most that I saw. I'm not certain it was enough to do a temp ban. At least I am not the only one he claimed was abusing children. I thought that he was supposed to be some kind of legal advocate for casino victims, among other things. That's a great way to deal with people that are critical of you, to slander them by stating they abuse children and are either brain dead or insane. 

    I am really confused why someone would consider an income of $300,000 per year would be considered part of the "wealthy" class. I would think that would be the expected income of a successful doctor, lawyer or small business owner. I always thought people in these professions were considered Upper Middle class, not Lower Upper or Upper Upper class. I also thought these progressives were going to go after the upper classes with their taxes, not the middle classes. It appears that once again, the middle class are going to be the ones who truly shoulder the burden to assist the working and lower classes, while the people in the upper classes will find all kinds of loopholes to pay as little tax as possible.
  To get back on topic, if some form of "Medicare for all" ever gets implemented, I certainly hope it works out better for me than the current system. People on Medicaid have better coverage than I do. 

Please support my flag against user BTCGamblePro. He is promoting a web application that claims to give a foolproof way of winning. When I decided to take him up on his offer for a free 1 week trial, I discovered the terms of service that I had to agree to is non-existent as well as the privacy policy. The yellow flag may be redundant since he already has red banner displayed due to previous negative trust feedback. However, I found the hyperlinks for "terms of service" and "privacy policy" that lead to nowhere particularly irritating.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=447