Everyone knows that Lauda is a cat, which is pretty much the opposite of a rat.

---

Seriously though, THOUSANDS of users have a vote now, even some bright red scammers. So all these DT complaints... meh.

There is no logic in getting Lauda in the DT list. It looks too stupid to see a scammer having many numbers of green trusts.

I can only put 4 on the list if i'm doing it right....
but i have trust in a few more members

difficult case

need some expansion

Just dipped under 3600 - that escalated quickly.

Need some new hopium please 

Unless major problems come up, I'm going to reconstruct DT1 again using the published criteria on Monday, so set up your trust lists before then. After that I'll probably switch to doing it near the beginning of each month.

It can be added to the bitcoin.conf file as addresstype=legacy. No need to change the startup command, especially for users who don't know how to do that.

I don't see any point of report to DT button really. You can leave -ve feedback yourself and open thread on Reputation or Scam Accusation board. You should ask to tag with proper evidence. If use report button then people's will misuse. As marlboroza already said PM him once you find any suspicious scam a activity. Don't PM for that you don't like someone and you want to tag you. You should tag first with proper references. Usually I open thread on Reputation or Scam Accusation board once I found any suspicious activity and obviously I tagged them first, you can check my trust page. Sometimes PM also to few DT, but I PM post link because need proper explanation why I think that user should be tag. Sometimes need attached picture, so how you will add you multiple picture on report button. DT have no enough time to check your link one by one. Surprised ! You are asking for Report to DT button but you haven't tagged any scammer yet.

So please forget about this button. Open your brain button and use it.

I never thought for once that smart contracts were made to replace lawyer. It's just a way to enforce rules that two or several parties agreed, and cooler stuff like making your own asset on the blockchain (token). There is no way smart contract can replace lawyer, it doesn't help you defend your case, it won't help you find evidence if you're alleged for a crime nor it gives you suggestions on how to act in court.

Actually a little worried about Virgin Roach. He hasn't eaten any cookies mummy has brought him all day. This bull market is gonna be really hard on him.

We can debate both the Bible or science, I'm just saying matter cant be created or destroyed that's all that;s a law of physics. What do you mean I didn't know the subject?

I don't doubt you at all.  The problem is that I can almost guarantee that most answers would be over my head, technically.  I might be able to tell whether a post is a shitpost or not, but I don't trust my technical knowledge enough to know a good answer from a bad one.  Still, I'll keep that in mind.  

This has been mentioned before, but remind me:  Is the Bitcoin Development & Technical Board a section that tends to be under-merited?  That's a section I have on ignore, but not because of the quality of posts.  It's because of my own ignorance.  All of my education has been in fields having little to do with computer science, and when I see people incorporating a lot of tech jargon in their posts, my eyes glaze over pretty quickly.  

I'll keep an open mind on this one and un-ignore that section for the time being.

I'd love to be able to give out 5-8 merits to some exceptional posts (but I would reserve such a large grant to ranks lower than Hero), but previously there was no way I could do this and still have enough sMerits left over to merit all the other good posts I see.

Thank you for checking my meriting history for the last 120 days.  I haven't even been a merit source for that long--I think it was at the end or middle of september when Theymos added that batch of 36 new sources.  I've been trying to spread out merits to deserving posts (and NOT just the really good posters on Meta who don't need them to rank up) but always ran out of sMerits even when I became a merit source.  That's why I had to ask Theymos for this favor, which I'm grateful for, as well as for his reply here.  I may disagree with some of his administrating tactics, but he's no dummy and I've seen worse administrators. 

I'm on the hunt now mainly in Economics/Speculation, Meta, and Reputation, though occasionally I stray far from my usual sections.  Yes, I definitely do have a lot of sections blocked, but that's because there are only so many hours in the day to read and write on bitcointalk, and I just find some sections too spam-infested to even bother with.  I would be tickled pink to be able to merit a good post by a Newbie in Bitcoin Discussion, but trying to find one of those is incredibly difficult just by searching and reading through posts--that's why there needs to be some sort of reporting mechanism.  The individual threads don't seem to be effective.

I will say this again:  ***If you're a lower-ranked member and think you or someone else has made or found a post that's gone unmerited, drop me a PM and I'll take a look.***  I've made the offer in other threads, but got zero takers.  In the PM, just write something like "Merit?" and then a link to the post.  I'll either merit it or I won't, but you can be guaranteed I'll look at the PM, the post, and most likely the member's post history as well.

Mmmm bones didn’t you had a double upgrade of stashes    

Tried to make a haiku of it ....
But still need to try better cause still not getting it
Next one must be spot on before posting

That would be like Trump allowing Mexicans to vote on whether a wall should be built or not.

 Lightning is still beta software.  Users should experiment with only small amounts of BTC, or other compatible cryptocurrency, until LN is more mature.