Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 06:08:25 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 ... 80 »
241  Economy / Speculation / Re: Mike Hearn needs to make a full public apology on: January 17, 2016, 04:51:18 PM
Thanks to this guy Mike Hearn the price went down $60 today. Alot of people have lost a lot of money and it's all because of this guy.

In order to get back our money we need to find this guy and make him take back all the bullshit and lies he wrote in his blog. He will be making a full public media apology for his actions and a confession that he is a troll and FUD master.

So if you know Mike Hearn, his address or any information about him please post it. We need to contact him personally and let him know he is responsible for people losing their hard earned money. And we need to ask him what he is going to do about it.

Ha ha - I can see that the church of bitcoin is strong as ever.
242  Economy / Speculation / Re: Will the Chinese pumpers pump BTC up again in the next 30 days? on: January 16, 2016, 07:24:29 PM
China was responsible for the current pump but was unable to rally enough people to join them and move beyond 500 in USD terms.

The question is, will they return and pump it up again in the next 30 days?

I agree that we are in Chinese hands. I think that the MMM pyramid was the greatest factor in the pump - I would like to hear from some Chinese users if MMM China  is already saturated or not.
243  Economy / Speculation / Re: DO NOT SELL - 15.01 dip in price explained for beginners on: January 16, 2016, 08:39:18 AM
"Price had it's peak at November which was at $504, after which it corrected to around $460 in the beginning of December. That held until very recently, the 7-day high being at $456."

Oh - you only forgot that it corrected to 300.38 between 504 and 460 - but yeah beside that you are 100% correct.
244  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2016-01-14]Bitcoin Price Technical Analysis – Bearish Continuation Signal on: January 14, 2016, 04:21:43 PM
"Potential catalysts for bitcoin price volatility this week include the release of US retail sales, PPI, and consumer sentiment data on Friday. "

Oh come one! Do they just copy crap from one analysis to another?
245  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2016-01-14] - Bitcoin Price Technical Analysis for 14/01/2016 on: January 14, 2016, 10:38:54 AM
... Potential catalysts for bitcoin price volatility this week include the release of US retail sales, PPI, and consumer sentiment data on Friday.



246  Economy / Speculation / Re: There is a risk that part or all of the Trust’s bitcoins could be lost, stolen. on: January 06, 2016, 07:40:12 PM
This is meaningless without the context.
247  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2015-01-06]Bitcoin Price: Classical Pattern Targets Big Upside on: January 06, 2016, 05:53:00 PM
That big upside is 17 dollars.
248  Economy / Speculation / Re: What is exactly goin on with that MMM pyramid? on: January 05, 2016, 02:19:16 PM
...

I don't think that this MMM stuff is a good explanation for BTC rising from 300 to 500. If that was true, it would continuously grow until it crashes. BTC went from 300 to 500 then crashed back to 400 and now is 430. This erratic behavior is not compatible with MMM being the cause of it.


There are multiple feedback loops - both positive and negative - this is why a constant demand pressure can result in an oscillating price behaviour.

Look at the run up to 500 - it was very smooth with no pullbacks - exactly what I would imagine to happen when there was a constant up pressure that would eat the pullbacks. But it was super-exponential (it looks crazy even on logarithmic scale) if it was to be continued it would quickly grow past $1 million (or any other big number) - it had to stop at some point. And because there were no natural support levels when it stopped and eventually a pullback was initiated it went very deep. Then it started again. All of this is not very verifiable - it is just a story - but for lack of data this is how I interpret it for now.
249  Economy / Speculation / Re: What is exactly goin on with that MMM pyramid? on: January 04, 2016, 07:17:50 PM
I have read something about MMM being responsible for BTC movements these past weeks, but there were just mentions on posts just like this one, with not real proofs or cues.

I do not think it may have such a high influence.

It is pretty big: http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/http%3A%2F%2Fmmmglobal.org (in comparison: http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/http%3A%2F%2Fbitcointalk.org). It it looks like it started gaining popularity in August (see also: https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=mmmglobal&date=today%2012-m&cmpt=q&tz=Etc%2FGMT-1).

And it works primarily in bitcoins (because of the easy transfers probably). I think it is a very good explanation of why BTC broke 300 in October and then shoot to 500 - this required some new interest in bitcoin and MMM is a very good explanation for that. Also the correction on Christmas is very well correlated with the alleged collapse of the MMM-China scheme (this is from the link in my original post - I would like to see some confirmation of that).

250  Economy / Speculation / Re: What is exactly goin on with that MMM pyramid? on: January 04, 2016, 05:11:08 PM
There are some theories that it was MMM that pushed the BTC price in the recent months - so if MMM gets into trouble - this might mean a BTC correction.

There are some strange announcements: https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=972278662821447&id=100001179666580

Anyone has better sources about this?
Never heard this type of connection between bitcoin and MMM. Don't think it is true.

https://letstalkbitcoin.com/blog/post/mmm-global-republic-of-bitcoin-cryptos-next-scandal

MMM Global uses bitcoins primarily - that generates demand for BTC. The hard part is to estimate how big it is. But the first MMM pyramid was estimated to about $ 1 billion - so this might be significant.

When it crashes there will be three negative effects on bitcoin price - one is the reduced demand, two is the damage in image, three is that in a quick time many people will try to cash out their earned BTC.

https://www.google.pl/search?q=bitcoin+mmm
251  Economy / Speculation / Re: What is exactly goin on with that MMM pyramid? on: January 04, 2016, 12:46:26 PM
Another piece that I found: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3zctni/for_those_wondering_how_much_of_an_effect_that/

No source.

I wish I knew Chinese.
252  Economy / Speculation / 6 out of 7 top not pinned threads from kwukduck on: January 04, 2016, 12:05:17 PM
Bullish or bearish?

I think it is inevitable that we talk our own position. After all if we believe it will go down - then we sell, and if we believe it will go up then we buy - so if we are honest we'll always talk our books. But it gets somehow unbalanced here.
253  Economy / Speculation / What is exactly goin on with that MMM pyramid? on: January 04, 2016, 09:46:36 AM
There are some theories that it was MMM that pushed the BTC price in the recent months - so if MMM gets into trouble - this might mean a BTC correction.

There are some strange announcements: https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=972278662821447&id=100001179666580

Anyone has better sources about this?
254  Economy / Speculation / Re: Triple top, low volume, it's going to fall. on: December 25, 2015, 03:36:49 PM
Triple top is kind of forced interpretation. I would rather expect this to be a triangle - and break in the direction of previous trend - that is up.
255  Economy / Speculation / Re: The local bubble is about to burst on: December 11, 2015, 04:08:40 PM
I don't think there will be a double top - sure there will be a lot of resistance - but people are expecting that. Last time 500 was a really crazy target so when it started dropping it could not find bottom - now traders are more accustomed to thinking that it might in fact get back to 1000 and above.

 Wink - just speculating
256  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2015-12-07] What Brick and Mortgage Companies Must Do to Attract Investments... on: December 07, 2015, 07:42:06 PM
What Brick and Mortgage Companies Must Do to Attract Investments from the Bitcoin Community

Ward Stirrat: Traditional Companies Have to Speak the Language of Bitcoin Community to Attract Investments from the Industry.

http://cointelegraph.com/news/115813/what-brick-and-mortgage-companies-must-do-to-attract-investments-from-the-bitcoin-community

Brick and Mortgage? Is that a new English idiom?
257  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2015-12-07] bitcoin.com: Driverless Cars Will Require Bitcoin & the Blockchain on: December 07, 2015, 07:41:10 PM
Total click-bait nonsense.

There is zero requirement for Bitcoin in order for driverless vehicles or any of the associated technologies to function. The article does not even attempt to qualify the statement, and is therefore not a story about Bitcoin. 

Yeah - it looks rather desperate - I guess it is was a slow time for the journalist.
258  Economy / Speculation / Re: Since you can't deposit/withdraw fiat on Bitfinex -How does it control the price on: November 30, 2015, 10:12:50 AM
I think the OP confused btc-e with bitfinex.
259  Economy / Speculation / Re: What's after 366.66? on: November 06, 2015, 01:40:54 PM
Maybe this:



http://bitcoincharts.com/charts/bitstampUSD#rg60zczsg2013-11-17zeg2013-11-21ztgSzm1g10zm2g25zv ?
260  Economy / Speculation / Re: Not all is lost - let's check the chart and VOTE on: November 06, 2015, 08:50:01 AM
According to my calculations for 2.5 leveraged (default at bitfinex) positions bought between 400 and 500 the margin call price is 280-350. So if it falls below 350 we can see some of these.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 ... 80 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!