Thanks to this guy Mike Hearn the price went down $60 today. Alot of people have lost a lot of money and it's all because of this guy.
In order to get back our money we need to find this guy and make him take back all the bullshit and lies he wrote in his blog. He will be making a full public media apology for his actions and a confession that he is a troll and FUD master.
So if you know Mike Hearn, his address or any information about him please post it. We need to contact him personally and let him know he is responsible for people losing their hard earned money. And we need to ask him what he is going to do about it.
Ha ha - I can see that the church of bitcoin is strong as ever.
|
|
|
China was responsible for the current pump but was unable to rally enough people to join them and move beyond 500 in USD terms.
The question is, will they return and pump it up again in the next 30 days?
I agree that we are in Chinese hands. I think that the MMM pyramid was the greatest factor in the pump - I would like to hear from some Chinese users if MMM China is already saturated or not.
|
|
|
"Price had it's peak at November which was at $504, after which it corrected to around $460 in the beginning of December. That held until very recently, the 7-day high being at $456."
Oh - you only forgot that it corrected to 300.38 between 504 and 460 - but yeah beside that you are 100% correct.
|
|
|
"Potential catalysts for bitcoin price volatility this week include the release of US retail sales, PPI, and consumer sentiment data on Friday. "
Oh come one! Do they just copy crap from one analysis to another?
|
|
|
... Potential catalysts for bitcoin price volatility this week include the release of US retail sales, PPI, and consumer sentiment data on Friday.
|
|
|
This is meaningless without the context.
|
|
|
That big upside is 17 dollars.
|
|
|
...
I don't think that this MMM stuff is a good explanation for BTC rising from 300 to 500. If that was true, it would continuously grow until it crashes. BTC went from 300 to 500 then crashed back to 400 and now is 430. This erratic behavior is not compatible with MMM being the cause of it.
There are multiple feedback loops - both positive and negative - this is why a constant demand pressure can result in an oscillating price behaviour. Look at the run up to 500 - it was very smooth with no pullbacks - exactly what I would imagine to happen when there was a constant up pressure that would eat the pullbacks. But it was super-exponential (it looks crazy even on logarithmic scale) if it was to be continued it would quickly grow past $1 million (or any other big number) - it had to stop at some point. And because there were no natural support levels when it stopped and eventually a pullback was initiated it went very deep. Then it started again. All of this is not very verifiable - it is just a story - but for lack of data this is how I interpret it for now.
|
|
|
Bullish or bearish?
I think it is inevitable that we talk our own position. After all if we believe it will go down - then we sell, and if we believe it will go up then we buy - so if we are honest we'll always talk our books. But it gets somehow unbalanced here.
|
|
|
Triple top is kind of forced interpretation. I would rather expect this to be a triangle - and break in the direction of previous trend - that is up.
|
|
|
I don't think there will be a double top - sure there will be a lot of resistance - but people are expecting that. Last time 500 was a really crazy target so when it started dropping it could not find bottom - now traders are more accustomed to thinking that it might in fact get back to 1000 and above. - just speculating
|
|
|
Brick and Mortgage? Is that a new English idiom?
|
|
|
Total click-bait nonsense.
There is zero requirement for Bitcoin in order for driverless vehicles or any of the associated technologies to function. The article does not even attempt to qualify the statement, and is therefore not a story about Bitcoin.
Yeah - it looks rather desperate - I guess it is was a slow time for the journalist.
|
|
|
I think the OP confused btc-e with bitfinex.
|
|
|
According to my calculations for 2.5 leveraged (default at bitfinex) positions bought between 400 and 500 the margin call price is 280-350. So if it falls below 350 we can see some of these.
|
|
|
|