Ok, class, anyone feeling a little unwell can excuse themselves and go see your therapist about learning to accept loss. While you're there, ask him to teach you some critical thinking skills.

For the rest of you, this is gonna be FUN!!!!

850GH/s of Scrypt
-12GH/s - 'Unknown' on LTC
-28GH/s - The entire network hashrate of the top 8 Scrypt coins
---------
810GH/s

We now look further down the list of Scrypt coins, to those that aren't necessarily more profitable to mine than LTC but, because so many of you little darlings want to pretend that your beloved, 'Admin' has some super-clever way to mine less profitable coins on the sly and then sell them during tiny market-value increases that *might* lift them above LTC, we'll indulge you:


So we're going to allow for PLENTY of wiggle-room here and go pretty far down this list. Digibyte shows a global Scrypt hash of 260Mh/s according to their own stats.

When we add up ALL the above network hashrates (omitting LTC obv.) we get: 14.52GH/s

Ouchie.

But, hang on, maybe something magical happens when you do the sums? Let's see:

850GH/s of Scrypt
-12GH/s - 'Unknown' on LTC
-28GH/s - The entire network hashrate of the top 8 Scrypt coins
-15GH/s - The entire network hashrate of the remaining top 20 Scrypt coins
---------
795GH/s

OH NOES!!!!

What does that mean? ARGH!!! The sky is actually fucking falling!

So, kiddlies, even if we pretend *real* fuckin' hard that scrypt.cc is mining ALL of the ENTIRE top 20 Scrypt coin networks, we're still left with 795GH/s of mining that . . .well. . .huh?

B. . .Bu. . .But. . .Marcelo!





Class is excused.

Anyhoo, while we wonder aloud where Neil might have got to, let's carry on with the compleximacation mathemitcallasthnetics, hmm?

So, as I was saying:

850GH/s of Scrypt
-12GH/s
---------
838GH/s of Scrypt that is apparently being pointed at other Scrypt coin networks.

First, let's take a look at the top 8 Scrypt coins you can mine which will payout more of their own coins in value than that wot u wud get frm LTC


Now, again, each of these coins have their own pools which generally account for the hashrate you see here but, just for funzies, let us play a game of pretend, ok children?

Let us all close our eyes real tight and make a wish as *hard* as we can and wish that ALL the mining of these coins is being done solely from the 838GH/s of Scrypt mining power scrypt.cc are left with after you finally accept they ain't fucking mining LTC with it.

According to the only pool I can find for Tagcoin http://tagmining.com/ it has 40MH/s hashrate. So we'll work with that figure.

When we add up all of the above network hashrates we get: 27.73 GH/s

That's ALL of them listed above and, let's not forget our fun game of pretending that nobody else is mining these coins apart from scrypt.cc, ok?M'kay.

Back to the math:

850GH/s of Scrypt
-12GH/s - 'Unknown' on LTC
-28GH/s - The entire network hashrate of the top 8 Scrypt coins
---------
810GH/s

Ooooh, it's not looking good for the next lot of Scrypt coins to list. Feeling a little nauseous now, are ya?

. . . .to be continued.

Ok, cryptodevil, breathe. Don't let the stupid overwhelm your ability to type reasoned rebuttals.

*cough*

Ok Neil, how about you do us all a quick favour and pop on over to https://bitcoinwisdom.com/litecoin/difficulty and tell the class what the total hashrate is for the entire LTC network, hmmm?

How does that compare to the figure shown in the pool graph breakdown?

[While we're waiting for Neil to hear the loud clanging of that penny dropping, I'll explain it to you - The total hashrate displayed in that first graph *is* the total hashrate for the entire fucking LTC network. The 'email us to have your pool included' is to, you guessed it, notify them of your pool being part of the 'unknown' figure. The 12GH/s figure]

HEY, NEIL! WHERE YOU GOING? COME BACK AND TELL THE CLASS WHAT YOU FOUND!

So, hopefully the dizzying math hasn't confuzzled your brainiums too much so far.

But, now, I'm going to have to ask you to pay even closer attention, because things get *real* complimacated now:

850GH/s of Scrypt
-12GH/s
---------
838GH/s of Scrypt that is apparently being pointed at other Scrypt coin networks.

I'll shout it so you all hear at the back, MERGE-MINED COINS USE THE SAME HASH AS DISPLAYED FOR LTC SO DISREGARD DOGECOIN AND VIACOIN etc.

Don't believe me? Fine, let's show you an example of a pool mining LTC with DOGE and VIA merge-mined.


Are you able to agree, now, that merge-mined coins clearly are not to be counted as additional hashrates for that 838GH/s ?

. . . .to be continued so as to not overload with complex mathematicalistics. But I'm betting you're starting to get a sinking feeling in your little tummies about now.

The reason I keep saying it is because I keep fucking proving it. Are you lot so goddam lazy that you really can't be arsed to check some basic math before throwing your BTC at an easily-provable scam?

Fine, yes, I do have some time at this moment. I'm supposed to be finishing off some other work but this well of human stupidity keeps drawing me back in like some old-worlde freak-show. Let's run through it, shall we?

Now, children, are you paying attention, you don't want to get overwhelmed by the incredible complexity of what I am about to explain to you.

Scrypt.cc claim to be mining 850GH/s of Scrypt coin.

So, first let's take a look at the mack-daddy of Scrypt coins, LTC. With 850GH/s potentially available to them, there's absolutely no point in  mining at a pool because then they'd be paying pool fees and, besides, with a potential 71.9% of the entire hashpower for LTC in their pocket, they'd easily out-mine any fucking pool out there.

Checking the actual stats we see what, children?


That's correct, kiddos, "Unknown" accounts for just 12GH/s of mining. Now it is extremely unlikely that "Unknown" would only be one entity, but just to be generous let's pretend for shits'n'giggles that "Unknown" is all scrypt.cc mining. K? M'Kay.

850GH/s of Scrypt
-12GH/s
---------
838GH/s of Scrypt that is apparently being pointed at other Scrypt coin networks.


. . . .to be continued but I want to just let this sink in first. I think you know what's coming next.

Next stage, support tickets for everybody!

Except the sock-puppets who must report in about how they absolutely have everything working just fine so, you know, patience everybody nothing to worry about!

This is a different legal issue altogether. That the owners of a business are Catholic bigots doesn't entitle their for-profit commercial enterprise to operate as though their Catholic bigotry over-rides their business obligation not to discriminate against their customers.

The fact that Hobby Lobby managed to twist the law into crow-barring the notion of the "deeply-held beliefs" of its owners into over-riding its obligations to its employees when it came to health insurance claims, should worry you far more than two people of the same gender wanting the state to stop discriminating against them.

Remember the bakery which wanted to pick and choose which customers it was willing to serve? People were quick to post misinformed clap-trap such as, "It's their business who they choose to serve", when the fact is, it isn't. If you run a for-profit business you are required to operate equally and fairly to all potential customers. The right of, say, managers of a Bar serving alcohol to refuse service is something entirely different and they are allowed to refuse service on the grounds that somebody is not fit to be consuming more alcohol.

Trouble is the fungelical loonies like to wrap the whole mess up into one and scream about being persecuted because their religious 'rights' are being 'trampled on'. But its no different to the Puritan settlers who first left England for America, not because they were fleeing persecution but because they were not being allowed to persecute those who did not want to accept their puritan demands. So they went to start a new country where they were free to persecute anybody who wasn't like them.

Which is how we get to the 'Deep South' religious insanity of today.

Actually I've just found an awesome J&M which references a reddit post describing perfectly what religious belief is driven by:

How about this harm I already pointed out?

You see, coming up with vague notions of elements of polygamy which might not be harmful is not exactly useful in the presence of a reasoned fact of how polygamy is harmful.

How long did it take you to come up with that awesome rebuttal to the proven evidence that scrypt.cc doesn't have their claimed 850GH/s of Scrypt mining power?


Don't worry. they're not mining. So that's one less thing for you to have to worry about them robbing from you.

850GH/s of Scrypt. Do the math.

I don't believe the marriage-equality issue is about forcing religious organisations to conduct marriages which are counter to their inherent bigotry.

AFAIK marriage-equality deals solely with the issue of ensuring that all US States have to conduct and recognise marriages between two people, irrespective of their gender. It is a legal issue of ensuring gay couples can have the same rights in marriage as heterosexual couples.

The law does not concern forcing religious organisations to conduct gay marriages. Unless you know otherwise.

rather, loss of traditional theist privilege to demand their right to discriminate against those they are conditioned to see as a threat to their traditional theist privilege of expected deference and respect for their 'god-given' bigotry.

There, that should do it.

Since their inception it has always been: 1HWqsgnSd12Gv8SpoUMi1Cj8hp79BTSpW7

. . .and lose.

The, 'slippery slope' argument is utterly absurd and, just like the idea that opposition to gay marriage is actually a defense of 'traditional' marriage, it is based, not on reasonable argument but, rather, loss of traditional Christian Privilege to demand their right to discriminate against those they are conditioned to see as a threat to their traditional Christian Privilege of expected deference and respect for their 'god-given' bigotry.

Nah, it was just the mod cleaning up the absurd off-topic idiocy which was Barneyboy claiming that his anonymous internet username had legal protection under defamation law which only applies to identifiable legal 'persons'.

While you're all waiting for scrypt.cc to come up with their next phase of manipulation, why don't you spend a little time browsing the blockchain of their wallet transactions? You might get to see where scrypt.cc has been sending your money over the last several months.

I'll give you a clue, it rhymes with, "High Volume Bitcoin Mixer".