|
The issue is, most stop see at the surface.
BSV is real Bitcoin
|
|
|
|
Calvin Ayre says fake Satoshi is real Satoshi.  Think, why only trolls and anos say the opposite?   |
|
|
|
The software implementation had bugs. Perhaps you are confusing software implementation with protocol? I may well be confused. Did satoshi change the blocksize limit and nix some of the opcodes and were these protocol changes? Yes, and debatable. If Satoshi thought these could have been reversed before such time as they became economically interesting (certainly we have evidence that he did as far as the blocksize cap is concerned), then they are arguably not protocol changes. But that's not really what you had in mind with your 'that had bugs, needed feedback', is it? Maxblocksize is no protocol relevant thing, all trx should go smoothly through, unaffected of any block size |
|
|
|
U cannot prove that - que up with all the trolls pls
Hey, I'm Satoshi. If you try to disprove me I will sue you.  Go public and I might check out Shut up otherwise |
|
|
|
-snip-  This part is also ridiculous and also dishonest. They'd have to store up millions of the most efficient - at the time of this 'attack' - mining rigs but not mine on them yet. The budget to do that is left as exercise to the reader. # Craig Wright is a fraud. U cannot prove that - que up with all the trolls pls |
|
|
|
|
If bsv does not go well, we all go back and work on it to get it fixed, like we saved the true protocol for the rest of the world.
If bsv goes good, and that we see now, all are invited to share the happiness.
Even trolls are welcome since there was always the role for the harlequin
|
|
|
|
Legally he must inform in advance if he indents to sell large amounts. According to what laws? BTC isn't a security and Craig Wright is not a company insider. He doesn't need to disclose anything under any law I've ever heard of. There's no such thing as "insider trading" with BTC so he doesn't need to use a 10b5-1 plan or anything like that. And if he were trying to comply with Rule 10b5-1, his little social media FUD doesn't meet the requirements. Right, he doesn't really need to atm - there is no regulation in place. But to be save u might deduct things from standard regs, like for (finite) stocks - where u can calc e.g. thresholds and more, and must report such stuff in most juristictions. That's kind a proactive due dilligence. |
|
|
|
dumb troll ranting detected ^ bot  |
|
|
|
|
There are big scaling mining corporations running datacenters for Bitcoin, just enough to stay 'decentral' enough and responsible for do the honest mining. (Read more)
|
|
|
|
Do ya own research BSV follows the white paper closest. Wanna dispute that with same weak crap? Bye
Do ya own research
BSV follows the white paper closest.
Nobody cares what you or anybody thinks follows the white paper closest. Its a 10 (almost 11) year old document, an outline for an idea. Bitcoin changed quite a bit even when satoshi was still in charge. Times have changed, technology marches on. You're stuck in the past, caught up on a tired talking point. U can (soft) fork and airdrop as u wish and spend time for, that doesn't give u any rights to keep name, brand and claimed security of onchain Bitcoin tech. Its u trolls misinforming others Again, Bitcoin is more than just ur ponzi ticker. U cannot dispute this, so u need to troll harder |
|
|
|
Its a bit concerning for bitcoin cash that the miners have the power to 51% attack the network so trivially. Even if they seem to have reasons, they shouldn't be able to
I don't really understand what exactly you expected from a shitcoin like BCH.  I'm not a fan of bitcoin cash. In the beginning it was interesting as a candidate for the version of bitcoin following the original ethos. But that is well and truely dead in the water now. Especially after the damaging Bitcoin SV split. I don't like SV either Dash has the most interesting approach to mitigate against 51% attacks Mitigating 51% attacks with LLMQ-based ChainLocks https://blog.dash.org/mitigating-51-attacks-with-llmq-based-chainlocks-7266aa648ec9Implications and effects on the network
ChainLocks have a few very important effects on the whole (Dash) network and its economics. The most important effect for normal users and merchants is that transactions can be considered fully confirmed after the first on-chain confirmation inside a block protected by ChainLocks. Transactions can no longer vanish from the chain since reorganization of signed/locked blocks is not possible. This means that there is no need anymore to wait for 6 or more confirmations until a received transaction can be considered secure.
It also has effects on the economics of mining. It removes all incentives for miners to cause chain reorganizations. Many attacks based on secret or selfish mining become impossible as they all depend on miners withholding longer and secret chains. Under the current consensus rules, such chains would override the publicly known chain and cause a chain reorganization when published. With ChainLocks however, miners are incentivized to publish every block immediately, even if they in theory have enough hash power to overrule every other miner. Failure to publish creates substantial risks for a malicious miner since any secret chain (even if thousands of blocks longer) would be immediately invalidated if another honest miner publishes a valid block that receives a CLSIG before the secret chain is revealed. The split was inevitable since too many idiots try to fiddle around with the legit and copyrighted version. Anybody welcome to go on protest now and show up in real live. https://twitter.com/justicemate/status/1132050812530675712?s=21Clear all that fud, thats no longer needed in PosM world |
|
|
|
Cannot be that hard to grasp, Bitcoin is only Bitcoin as Satoshi created and copyrighted it.
Pffff Why else posting here, when time of trolling is such a waste?
Already told you, because you fuck ups troll the Stuck Version coin on WO, confusing newbies. Hm, fear of wrong bags?
Not, I don't own any of this SV shit & never will. Bitcoin did not start as a ticker, u might stay confused for ever. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
