How does one hard fork a "genesis", or it's just some crazy marketing term they are trying to use. I don't think you can roll back 10 years worth of transactions, as no one has been able to day a reorg even back a single day.
It's the re-genesis rather https://sv.coin.dance/the great 'un-fckening' - gettting rid of shit in the code that never belonged in it |
|
|
|
You mean like this?  Nah, he probably meant like the time I crashed my lambo, and lost the memory to my passphrase in the process:  Sad story really.  Hodl - job done |
|
|
|
i m here for Bitcoin, the one Satoshi designed for us.
 FTFY:  Nice, capacity is attractive. LastV8 is just driving as hell, just too quick for ur shutter. Who's wants to get stuck on their way? Where will the lambos get used as they can? On BSV, CSW will go out of the way soon, once the street is set in stone  |
|
|
|
please do fuck off hv_,
you have a contract with BSV,
the wall has spoken.
#haiku
i m here for Bitcoin, the one Satoshi designed for us. Cheers |
|
|
|
Butthurt and angry lol
Buthurt angry one might never find out |
|
|
|
Derp
There are no 'Bitcoin issuers'. Maybe go back to reading the whitepaper before spewing more verbal diarrhea? Interesting, in the Satoshi White Paper it says that Bitcoin s value comes from having it as a provable chain of signatures, where signatures are most critical in our internet world. Second it calls for honest a lot. You must be a fan of BSV, cause that's really following the white paper. True is, any shitcoin that has no high potential of all sorts of interconnected things you need to have / transact / store onchain, just are worthless. Most are even non compliant and damned illegal.Top scam coin is XrP. Just printed security at will, no use |
|
|
|
which bitcoin cash are we talking about in here?
Depends. There are the anarchos version bch, doing all the shit into protocol as dictators say (same as blockcore did Segshit) And there is BitCoin (BSV) guided only by the original idea and white paper The world will find out, what is Bitcoin, just by proper analysis |
|
|
|
#SegShitCoin |
|
|
|
Nope, fucking scary actually. But it seems not Trezors fault, the STM32 micro misbehaves when it is voltage "glitched". Basically the device is useless as hardware wallet without replacement, except when the seed is protected by a BIP39 passphrase (which is what Kraken recommends as fix/cure). ^ Krakens blog article is really very detailed and well written. You need only a minimal electronic understanding to reproduce the attack. (<- Meaning the crims will be up to speed quickly). On the positive side, it means that people who have forgotten their trezor pin can now get access to their bitcoins. Always look on the bright side of ...  |
|
|
|
|
Nothing is where it should be. Neither journalism nor exchanges have gone regulated and 'free' of crime / crap
Only by having micro-payments we will reduce the FUD in press
Only with transparent and regulated processing we will reduce crime.
All the anonymity and anarcho crap does not good for Press and Bitcoin
|
|
|
|
We have no regulated exchange yet trading Bitcoin - but some are 'moving' - I bet complinace is the only reason that Bitcoin needs - I see that promoted only by BSV - so I support this - no matter who else does as well.
All the rest comes with industrial adoption
Compliance will play a big role, but when BSV benefits from compliance, so will hundreds/thousands of other altcoins. Nothing really special. In all honesty, there isn't much of a difference between BSV and BCH. BCH has smaller blocks in comparison, but will expand when the demand knocks on the door for an upgrade. That's how things theoretically should go. Neither chain will however gain actual adoption as envisioned by the creators, hence the reason they spam their own network to make it appear active. I'm pretty sure that we will have a fork of BSV's "original" vision this year as well. What version of BSV will you then support? There is a massive diff, it's called > purpose BCH > go dark , anarcho, anonymous, fork for dev and (hidden) agenda sake BSV > go back to the roots - refactor and scale on chain, don't be evil, lets go industrial + gov regulated, transparent, stable & compliant as White Paper defines a good working base protocol see? |
|
|
|
In It is better when there is one currency with a large number of different purposes for which it can be used. In addition, I almost never heard of half the forks on this list.  Sure - there was 1 defined in 2008 BitCoin all the rest try to copy & alter , gover > derail ppl If that happens - better reset (refactor - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_refactoring ) & comply -> back to the roots and show these roots worked already fine - no better governance needed - decentral as planned |
|
|
|
Ein großer Vorteil von Bitcoin ist, dass keine Geldscheine/Münzen mit Bakterien und Keimen angefasst werden müssen. Deswegen ist Hände waschen insgesamt seltener nötig.
Konfuzius?? Wir sind alle schon Konfuzz genug Wohin geht die Reise ? |
|
|
|
Nope - not for refactored BSV
It doesn't matter how you refer to BSV. It's still just a chain that's not actually being used. BSV's "use" at this point is a few weather and price fetching applications creating a lot of transactions non-stop. Is this the use you envisioned BSV to have? Also, your master CSW absolutely hates USDT and exchanges, yet it's that exact stablecoin being used to pump the price of BSV on shady exchanges such as OKEx and Huobi. https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin-sv/markets/reported/Compared to a large variety of altcoins BSV is slow, more centralized, not even the cheapest, not suited for complex applications, etc. How is the enterprise world going to use that chain with plenty of more suitable alternatives available. I'm not even talking about how toxic the backers of BSV are, which in itself is already a huge no go for serious businesses. I fully agree that Bitcoin is all about real world use. - That would recommend wide compliance, stability and capacity and low price / efforts for risk assessments and transacting (needed for proper secure setups in industry use). Trading / spec is not that much important - except of providing liquidity We have no regulated exchange yet trading Bitcoin - but some are 'moving' - I bet complinace is the only reason that Bitcoin needs - I see that promoted only by BSV - so I support this - no matter who else does as well. All the rest comes with industrial adoption |
|
|
|
Nope - not for refactored BSV |
|
|
|
fight is still ongoing. but we have a new AYH (Bitstamp) at $9570.0. weekly close (UTC) is important.  (*) Bitstamp data timeframe 2h in lower timeframe fight for 61.8% retracement level of the last up swing is ongoing. we will see.  (*) Bitstamp data timeframe 1h GO BTC GO!Maybe Mike Novo went short ? As well on Tesla ? Lol https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuXItw9wliI |
|
|
|
Senior Adviser To The Operator Of The “Silk Road” Website Pleads Guilty In Manhattan Federal Court Roger Thomas Clark Was a Key Figure in the Development of Silk Road, Advised Ross Ulbricht on All Aspects of the Criminal Enterprise, and Urged and Facilitated an Attempted Murder-for-Hire Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced that ROGER THOMAS CLARK, a/k/a “Plural of Mongoose,” a/k/a “Variety Jones,” a/k/a “VJ,” a/k/a “cimon,” pled guilty today to conspiring to distribute massive quantities of narcotics, a charge arising out of his role as the senior adviser to the owner and operator of the “Silk Road” online illicit black market. During its operation from 2011 until 2013, Silk Road was used by thousands of drug dealers and other unlawful vendors to distribute illegal drugs and other illicit goods and services to more than 100,000 buyers, and to launder hundreds of millions of dollars derived from those unlawful transactions. CLARK pled guilty before United States District Judge William H. Pauley III. ... https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/senior-adviser-operator-silk-road-website-pleads-guilty-manhattan-federal-court |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
