I had no idea ~BfX~.  I thought Craig designed it.  Props.  Gotta Stalk you a lil’ mo’.

Alwys Did like YOU.  And your socks.  Lol

You’re not an OG Without socks.  Lol

- sock master blaster

I was talking about bitcoin’s monetary policy. The size of the blocks is only a small part of why bitcoin is being used substantially as a speculative investment than a real currency.

Wei Dai has written about this on 2013.

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/P9jggxRZTMJcjnaPw/bitcoins-are-not-digital-greenbacks

Also, BSV is a scam and you are being annoying. Stop mentioning this in discussions.

I am supportive of the people who want bitcoin as a form of digital cash, however, it cannot be because of its monetary policy. Everyone should accept that it is a great success as a form of speculative investment and asset for value growth during bull markets.

With SmartBCH we might be able to bring the EVMs to BCH

Hast du ein Link zu diesem Magazin? Wäre interessant mehr darüber zu lesen. Bisher hört man davon nur sehr wenig aber wenn das implementiert werden würde, wäre das ein Grund für Preis +50% mindestens?

Just a heads up for the insignificantos.  Remember in 2017, all exchanges were overwhelmed and it took in many cases for muppets weeks to open accounts.  

Herein lies the problem. This boom will be the biggest mother of alt booms.  The above coins have low volume, most have been forgotten by the insignificant idiot masses.  As a result they were delisted from most exchanges. Greed over quality work.  Freicoin in a way became a niche exchange freely listing old but legit coins with active good devs.  

If I’m right it will take you weeks to open an account if those old coins moon and they will moon fast cause their age and low supply many were lost and they’re a nitroglycerin type coins and I may just be the one who lights the fuse.  

Open an account on freiexchange dot com NOW (simple clean exchange takes 5 minutes) and transfer whatever btc you’re comfortable with in case btc chain gets bogged down or freezes up.  You don’t have to buy anything just have your 12 gauge locked and loaded.  Then if I’m right you’ll be amongst the first to pull the trigger.  

Freiexchange is on telegram.  Old coin, legit devs from Norway.  No KYC right now for you criminals.  Lol

Telegram freiexchange.  Very active high skilled devs.  https://t.me/freiexchange

You’re welcome, ungrateful rats.  Titanic rats not welcome, your destiny is to watch as you lose all your btc you corrupt, greedy bastards.  You simply can’t launder your drug and porn money with $30 volume.  Trust me, I’ve tried.  😬


- Mr Knowitall

Thsts common sense but first the mother of all bubbles.  Most alts haven’t mooned.  We need to see 2-3 months of stupid buying and people saying they’re geniuses and your pet hamster wanting to invest.  That’s peak.  And yeah, then total collapse after that.  Let’s see where btc goes this third Friday.  That’s a big tell. 

Was haltet ihr von der Befürchtung, dass die Großinvestoren verstärkt auf Ethereum setzen und Bitcoin gegenüber Ethereum an Relevanz verliert?
Ist das mit technischen Grundlagen zu rechtfertigen? Ethereum wirkt noch immer sehr bastelig, dass die Entwickler nicht so richtig wissen, ob das funktioniert, was sie da vorhaben.
Meinungen?

Thanks for the Demerits, I shall Cherish them.  


Bitcoin is easy to use , for even the moderate PC person.
LN is the stuff , where you have to be a super nerd to even mess with.
This is not the majority of people.



https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/91211/how-can-someone-lose-funds-in-lightning-network
You lose your partner's revocation keys:
You lose the commitment transactions:
Losing funds from going offline

Random Bugs, not sure if the one below has been fixed yet.
https://bitcoinerx.com/bitcoin/90-of-bitcoins-on-the-lightning-network-could-be-lost-to-attackers-following-current-lightening-implementation-research-says/

Nothing a Super Nerd would worry over, but more than the rest of us will waste time with,  


So, I only leave the amount on the exchange, that I plan on spending.
No one should ever keep all of their eggs in 1 basket.
However if the exchange was reputable , and they lose my coins, I can sue them for damages.
So I can get something back.

If I lose my Funds in LN for any of the reasons mentioned earlier,
who do I sue, No one, it is just gone as a sacrifice to the crypto deity.



I get most bitcoiners believe that,
but to me it is a line of BS.

Artificially limiting BTC onchain network , so that I can claim 12 year old kids are running full nodes and keeping the network less centralized is just plain wrong.
No matter 1 or 1 billion non-mining full nodes, it has zero effect on decentralization, because all they do is relay, they don't validate ,
so this virtue is pure imagination on the part of bitcoiners, kind of you have to believe it to join the bitcoiner cult.
This one confusion of the english language causes so many bitcoiners to repeat the decentralization myth.
Validation only occurs , when a transaction is added to a new block , only mining nodes can add new blocks , so only they validate.
Non-mining nodes, can't add new blocks all they can do is relay blocks, which is why 1 non-mining node is as good as a billion, since all they do is relay blocks.
If this makes no sense to you, no worries just means you are a loyal bitcoiner that does not question blockstream.  




I get you think LN is the solution.
Personally , I don't.

The only way it becomes a solution , is if you pay a bank to credit you with capital on their LN channels, and when finished they let you cash out in fiat. Notice at no point , do you actually buy or sell bitcoin in the above scenario. That is the only way you avoid the overly high transaction fees to open and close LN channels. But theses are just my opinions. In time, all will be apparent.  


FYI:
https://coingeek.com/lightning-strikes-out/

Der Blocktrainer spricht öfter über ein mögliches Sicherheitsproblem, das bei Ethereum durch POS entstehen kann. Meines Wissens nach ist es nicht möglich zu sehen, wer wie viele Coins besitzt und so würde eine Zentralisierung von mehr als 50% unbemerkt bleiben. Gerade mit Blick auf sehr große Exchanges scheint mir das ein durchaus berechtigter Punkt zu sein. ich bin aber nicht tief in der Materie darum meine Frage: Kannst du diesen Punkt widerlegen?

Besonders im Hinblick auf Werterhalt ist die Sicherheit des Netzwerkes das wichtigste, darum bin ich Bitcoin-Maximalist