|
I am sorry to tell but sometimes, this is how it ends. You should continue posting in your current account or with new one. It maybe recovered later. An account LOBSTER was recovered when his/her new account was Sr. Member. So be patient and don't loose hope.
|
|
|
|
I'd like that; throw all those signature ad campaigns in there as well, services is overflowing with them.
I'd rather make two different boards for those, but that's a good idea indeed  There aren't enough signature campaigns to make a new sub-board. |
|
|
|
|
Thank you, btchris for taking the time to post to resolve this!
P.S. I am also curious to know the answer.
|
|
|
|
Try restarting your modem and then PC. Then check if the problem persists. If it do, try flusing your DNS.
To flush DNS, open command prompt(cmd), type ipconfig /flushdns amd click enter. Reboot your system and check if it persists. Hope either will solve the issue.
Thanks for your help. I tried restarting my modem and PC, and I even used a VPN service just to continue browsing, still the problem persists, but not too often with the normal connection that my ISP is providing. I'll try flushing my DNS and see what would come out of it. Btw, what will happen if I flush my DNS? I never heard of such a thing before, as I'm completely ignorant of these things.  Edit: Did you try to log out and login with the "signed in forever" option?
I've never seen that problem before, Probably your session time is set something really low (that can be your logged in session time).
If logged in session timeouts, he will be logged out but AFAIK in this case, OP is having session timeout for posts. |
|
|
|
This may take some time like it took to get a ponzi sub-board. So please be patient. |
|
|
|
|
Try restarting your modem and then PC. Then check if the problem persists. If it do, try flusing your DNS.
To flush DNS, open command prompt(cmd), type ipconfig /flushdns amd click enter. Reboot your system and check if it persists. Hope either will solve the issue.
|
|
|
|
Looks good. +10. I only care about ideas shared in this forum. "Imam bruce lee" represents a set of ideas. It is you now, but we had plenty before you and plenty after you.
I ain't Imam. I understand the feeling though. When someone makes a joke about sending a car bomb to my neighborhood when I wasn't even involved in a back and forth discussion, it was a little bit disconcerting to say the least...
Uh! I had no intention to hurt you. You posted a meme about a car to tease me amd BADecker spread some lie or something(I don't remember correctly), so I took that car into what I said. I apologize if I had offended you. However, posting a meme there made you involve*!in the discussion. * Cause to experience or participate in an activity or discussion. |
|
|
|
Sounds like something is wrong with the way your browser handles cookies. Try a different browser.
Tried clearing my browser's cache and cookies (Google Chrome). Also tried a different browser like Mozilla and IE but still I get the same problem. Can you tell which browser are you using and which browser you tried other than the usual one? Your OS also maybe helpful.
I'm currently using Google Chrome with all the caches and cookies emptied, but still the problem persists. Tried 2 different browsers but to no avail, still having the same issues. If OS helps, I'm on Windows 7 Professional 32-bit. Can you tell us which browser have you tried? I think the OS is not the problem here... but maybe I'm wrong. He mentioned names of two browser he tried in reply to first quote. |
|
|
|
Is "islamaphobia" and "islamaphobic" violent?  I haven't told anything except that about you in the quotes you made. P.S. I won't assassinate you or anyone. Besides, you should understand what assassinate means. I haven't teared your character except that I told you are islamaphobic and what such people do. If you think I did, sorry! |
|
|
|
|
Ok. It will be good if there is two user mods(basic+advanced or similar), so users can choose according to their likes.
Thank you for your time.
|
|
|
|
hi Marco,
I'd like to join your avatar campaign.
Am i eligible?
I think you are NOT allowed to put the Avatar other than BIT-x, while you are the member of Bit-x Thanks There is no such rule. The current rule is "you are NOT allowed to put other signatures other tham BIT-X when joining avatar campaign unless you are an active poster". |
|
|
|
|
Can you tell which browser are you using and which browser you tried other than the usual one? Your OS also maybe helpful.
|
|
|
|
You need to trust the same people he does. If you don't use default trust at level 2 you'll see different scores depending on who you have added.
Thanks though i do trust only DefaultTrust but i figured why i see Different from QS (becuase i checked his trust and he has left feedback thrice for him so it adds up +6) , so comes to 25 but i don't understand why 44 , why such large difference ? Understanding Trust system is little hard but maybe it's because QS's list must be a little modified and hence making it more Green for him . Only QS can confirm it ! EDIT : @Muhammed Zakir , so his Trust List is modified , i thought to check it up (which i'm) but it's big to compare it in devthedev's  Thank for clarifying I use a custom trust list. Any feedback that I left for dev will show up for you by default because I am in badbears list. The reason that his score is higher from my point of view is because more people have left positive trust to dev that are in my trust network then are in default trust network. I don't see why a custom list is of any use to those outside the level 2. As far as possible I would like to see the rating as I know the majority would see it. If I want to decide whether the person is trustworthy, I will check through all the feedback. I don't need a number or color then to show me whether to trust. If you don't trust me and if somehow I am default trust list, you can remove me. Even though you check each feedback, by removing people you don't trust and adding people you trust will help you to get an idea whether user is trustworthy at a glance. |
|
|
|
I don't understand why ppl still still trust bc.i. They've had more than their fair share of bugs[1][2][3], some of them serious and/or inept which have lead to actual btc loss.
1) They covered users' looses if anything happens. 2) They are well-known and trusted. 3) Importantly, it is an online wallet. Most people usually don't check how "secure" is a wallet. They check how "easy" is to spend from a wallet or to access it. Adslot in this forum about electrum: There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. Hybrid server-assisted clients like Electrum get a lot of their network information from centralized servers, but they also check the server's results using blockchain header data. This is perhaps somewhat more secure than either server-assisted clients or header-only clients.
|
|
|
|
We are the gods of life and death now,
I am not telling you to pray God or something but just asking a question: If you think humans are gods of life and death, can you predict an exact time of a death or birth? |
|
|
|
I can't understand anything in this formula LOL
It's got too much of mathematics and am not at all good at it!
Anyways let's now hijack devthedev's thread , i got my answers Thank you
Not so hard if you check forst few comments in the formula.
Quickseller's +6 rating will change third number and maybe fourth too. The first number will take some time to increase.
I never understood how the trust works , I see you have this trust : 0: -0 / +3(3) , why does the First number of yours is still zero ?? As you posted above a quote by Theymos , he says first number won't be other than 0 for a month , you first trusted feedback is 2 months old but your first number of trust is still 0 WHY theymos said that nobody will get first number above zero until system is atleast 1 month old. Not the way you said. Relevant part of the code for your question: limited_total = min(subtotal, 10*months) / 10
AFAIK if you get 1 feedback only, it will take 10 months for the first number to become 1. So when you get more feedback, 10 month will reduce. I will have to wait dome more weeks for first number to become 1 unless a user who left one of the older feedback is in trust list of the user who sees it. P.S. If you want to get better answer and/or want to know more, please start a new thread. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
