Available Supply 984,134,461 MYR WHY? I think it's because the explorer they link to was cryptapus' old ABE explorer, which is now offline. I'm gonna send them a link to here: http://insight-myr.cryptap.us/
|
|
|
Have you guys tried syncing with cryponited instead of Qt?
Yes.Can you put in rar all files from app data except your wallet.dat. and upload?Then i will put in my app data with mine .dat? I can't right now but in a few hours I can. However I would suggest you try running cryptonite on a different computer or different operating system. Some Windows machines seem to have problems running cryptonite but it's usually just qt. How do you know that cryptonited was getting stuck too? I was just able to sync on win7 with 64 bit qt, but after several crashes and deleting contents of data dir once, but then after I was synced and closed qt window, it crashed again with something runaway error, but I was able to get synced with qt...
|
|
|
I restarted the wallet and synced fine after i added the new nodes. It takes a long time before the program actually starts find the nodes But i am not sure if hirocoin will come back from the dead, there is no exchange and nobody seems to have a interrest to get action going
It actually still trades on Poloniex...I'm not sure why, but it does
|
|
|
With the current setup of Bitcoin, you would need to wait just above 100 confirmations to do secure ACCT (Atomic Cross Chain Trading). This would be 1 full round of all delegates for DPOS (about 15-20 minutes atm). These intervals don't make sense for trading. For ACCT to become viable for any chain (without waiting too much) you need a PBFT or PBFT-like real-time Consensus and Ordering Protocol (COP) on top of the main blockchain to make ACCT viable. That, or the light client trading server does Paypal-like fraud detection and compensates counterparty risk accordingly with pretty high trading fees (anywhere from 0.5-4% of each transaction). Source: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=14472.msg188878#msg188878I'm not sure where that information is coming from, it is incorrect. There would be no reason for atomic swap transactions to require more confirmations than any other payment transaction, so something like 6 would be a safe upper bound for even very high-value trades (and less confirmations can be used for smaller value transactions). And any contract protocol that relies on third-parties as escrow or delegates is really a hack and not a very clean way to work with cryptocurrency. Protocols like that are also weak as any third-party can be bribed or be a sybil node. BlockStream's design for sidechains relies on atomic cross-chain swaps with a very similar protocol to what is being used in Mercury, and their judgement is probably the most trustworthy in the cryptocurrency space. (See http://www.blockstream.com/sidechains.pdf, page 21). I think he meant to say Bitshares, not Bitcoin, thus all the talk about DPOS and the bitsharestalk.org...
|
|
|
I asked for solution for my problem on VPS, not for buying a grafic card. Anyone with solution? Lots of VPS's will terminate mining tasks or processor intensive tasks, but it could also be the host OS taking the task down with an OOMkiller (out of memory killer). Typically speaking a VPS isn't well suited to processor intensive tasks. It's not about memory, it have 16GB (enough for Monero), and I do not use max core power ( 8 ), I am using 75% ( 6 ). It's Ubuntu and it have all it needs to mine XMR. I use the same config and miner on the other VPS and there is no problem of any kind. So it is kinda strange to me and thats why I am asking for help or solution. I think on VPS you typically share a cpu cache with other users/VPSs, so it could be that someone else is doing something processor intensive, or that the hoster just doesn't like you using so much cpu power so they throttle the cache for you.
|
|
|
That's not the problem, kiklo.
If you send coins with computer 1, computer 2 does not know a possible new generated change (back) address. After some time, you have 2 different wallets with a different coin amount and many different key pairs. It ends up in chaos. A wallet is a container for many private and public keys - like a key chain. Amount of coins is a summation of all addresses.
Just the opposite: NXT has one private and one public key. You can use it where ever you want - simultaneously.
Or just use an electrum style deterministic wallet, and then you don't have to worry about this issue either...
|
|
|
Yet another milestone... DOGED is number 5 in network hashrate (Scrypt) LiteCoin, DogeCoin, ViaCoin, SysCoin and Doged. Very select club!
Especially considering Doge, Sys, and Via are all merge mined. So, really Doged is #2 in terms on non-merged scrypt coins
|
|
|
Hi dNote, you are making a great job with Darknotes, do you think release the source code of gui wallet for possible implementation in others Cryptonote coins?
thanks
Yeah sure, as if he would just give the results of his hard work to other cryptocoins, that makes sense..... I'm glad Satoshi didn't have this attitude. Or the originators of cryptonote/bytecoin, for that matter... NXT didn't release the source code at first. Eventually it got released, but it was closed source to begin with. And NXT is currently valued at a little more than half of its closest competitor according to coinmarketcap.com - Bitshares, which has been open source from the start. Likewise, Monero and Bytecoin, which are completely open source, are valued at about double what Darknote is. Maybe it's a coincidence, maybe it's not...
|
|
|
Hi dNote, you are making a great job with Darknotes, do you think release the source code of gui wallet for possible implementation in others Cryptonote coins?
thanks
Yeah sure, as if he would just give the results of his hard work to other cryptocoins, that makes sense..... I'm glad Satoshi didn't have this attitude. Or the originators of cryptonote/bytecoin, for that matter...
|
|
|
I'm seeding this new one, but in the future it would be a good idea to include the date in the package name. Good point. Will do...assuming DB version release doesn't relegate this to obsolescence in the interim.
|
|
|
summary of the missive? I don't want to listen to some people drone on and on unprofessionally about some mundane esoteric mess
same here, i personally doesn't like audio missive. I'm not good at listening English, i had to come here in seeking for a detailed text. I am a native english speaker, but I just don't like podcasts...thankfully we have some good samaritan monero transcriber people here
|
|
|
yes but the intention of that domain name was not to be a forum so a forum was made under it. New users could remember the easy domain name and navigate to forum with link on main page. I dont think there is a need to move the forum from forum.monero.cc to monero.cc but a link to the forum on the monero.cc page would not hurt. I mean, it's easier for newcommers to remember a full domain, which is what they're used to. Than have to type in a sub domain. It looks better aesthetically, is easier to remember, and much more common. Even forum.bitcoin.org, was changed into this forum, bitcointalk.org What i mean is, its probably easier and common to access a forum through a full domain, rather than a subdomain. Newusers want things as quick, and easy as possible. Try this: http://moneroforum.org
|
|
|
i'm really happy that MYR is getting back to feet again. Soon will be 100 satoshis bottom for MYR. Cheers Yeah. I just wish it would've happened maybe 2 days earlier. After an entire year of holding I got scared and dumped everything because one key person decided to delete his profile for some reason. Now I have nothing. That sucks Kraxer...looks like it's gonna come back down to 30 sat though I bet...I don't want...but looks that way to me.
|
|
|
Over 500k xmr on the ask book. Most I've seen since the xmr market opened there. Lots of coins on polo and someones jammed a 100k ask in at 0.00225. The games begin.
Yea, I know it doesn't mean much having only one relatively small market (and a few other tinier markets like bittrex and hitbtc), but the buy/ask ratio is looking a bit shitty at the moment. 175 BTC / 500k XMR is about 0.0003 BTC/XMR
|
|
|
Today I found an interesting blog entry about the Bitmonero launch and the initial slow hash version of the miner that came from Bytecoin. Quite interesting to know how a few made a killing from private optimizations in the Bitmonero mining for months where more than the 50% of the network. http://da-data.blogspot.com.es/2014/08/minting-money-with-monero-and-cpu.htmlThis only reinforces my opinion that there few to none fair launchs in the cryptocoin world. I don't follow Bitmonero thread and this may be a very old story but thought someone in the Bytecoin community could be interested. Wow... Someone was mining Monero with 100 times faster mining program than the rest of the miners? And controlled 60% of the network hash rate at some point? Yes, the author of that article is a computer science professor at Carnegie Mellon Univ. In the article he accuses the original Bytecoin developers of intentionally crippling the wallet miner: The more I looked at it, the more clear it became: The original developers deliberately crippled the miner. It wasn't just slow, and it wasn't just naive; it was deliberately obfuscated and made slow by the use of completely superfluous copies, function calls, use of 8 bit pointer types, and accompanied by the most ridiculously slow implementation of the AES encryption algorithm one could imagine. Also faking an 80% premine by suggesting it was all done on the "darkweb": But when Bytecoin was released, it was presented as though it emerged from two years on the "dark web" (Tor onion sites and the like), during which time, 80% of the possible coins that could ever be minted, had been minted. The reception in the cryptocurrency community was heavily skeptical.
My strong belief is that the skepticism was warranted: Here's the original slow-hash from bytecoin as it was copied into Bitmonero. It has some doozies. For example, on line 100, you might note that for every iteration through an inner loop repeated tens of thousands of times, the AES key is re-imported into the library. The later loop, starting on line 113, is repeated half a million times, and is so abstracted through lots of memcpys and pointer manipulation it's hard to tell that all it really does is one round of AES encryption, a pointer dereference into a random scratchpad, a 64 bit multiplication, and another pointer dereference. Phew. This original code was roughly 50x slower than my final optimized code, and could have easily been used to fake two years of blockchain data on a single computer or a small cluster. I'm pretty sure that's what happened.
|
|
|
Bytecoin is now available on excoin.gq! Register today and get 0.1 BTC free! From their website: Zero Fees
We have no commission on trades and withdraw. So they have zero fees on anything and they offer 0.1 BTC to sign up... They also misspelled 'repeat' as 'repeart' in the "Repeart password" field of their sign up form. Sounds about as legit as Bytecoin
|
|
|
With several exchanges hacked in the last 24 hours, this is looking more relevant than ever...
|
|
|
I think you mean http://cryptorush.in , which is actually back online under new ownership, and attempting to pay back the losses incurred under previous owners. Yep, that's the place. Thanks! Where are you getting the information from that they are trying to recoup the losses from the previous owners? I personally didn't lose anything with them, but I know there are several people who lost some Zeit who I am sure would be happy to get them back. The guys who run/own it now are always in #cryptorush on freenode: KingDragon, X3n0X, and JCJr222. They have also put some info up on the website about how they intend to pay people back (Cryptorush bonds). I think Zeit wallet was drained, so if they had a ZEIT balance, they will probably just get the Cryptorush bonds if they sign up on new website. Apparently they haven't been bugged about ZEIT enough to try and load up their wallet and check though, if you look at the status here: https://cryptorush.in/status_old It says the database balance for ZEIT was nearly 2B coins tho
|
|
|
|