A veces damos por hecho cosas por el contexto, y luego resulta que no es así. En el casi de El Salvador, daba por hecho que no había KYC para las TXs comerciales hasta la fecha, pero según el artículo abajo referenciado sí existía, y por un monto tan bajo como 200 $. Ahora, un cambio normativo ha relajado este hecho, pasando a ser el KYC obligatorio a partir de los 25K $ en TXs de bitcoin: Previo a la reforma al Código Tributario, por cada transacción por 200 dólares o más, los operadores debían establecer en la factura los nombres, firmas y número DUI de la persona que entregaba y la que recibía el documento. Ahora, el mismo proceso burocrático se realizada solo para montos superiores a 25,000 dólares.
Ver: https://es.beincrypto.com/salvador-acuerda-no-aplicar-kyc-transacciones-btc-menores-25000/En teoría con esta política buscan incentivar la inversión y el turismo, aun que mas bien yo diría que buscan incentivar el lavado de dinero. Tal vez para paises de primer mundo $25k no es mucha plata, pero para paises de latinoamérica es bastante teniendo en cuenta que con eso puedes comprar una propiedad o un auto usado de gama alta. Cabe aclarar que esos 25k son la sumatoria y no solo 1 transacción grande, pero aun así creo que el límite es muy elevado y no creo que esto sea algo bueno. |
|
|
|
Printing is a favorite habit of central banks in all countries, they don't stop printing money. About the USA, I am not surprised as their debt increase a lot since the pandemic. See US debt clock. The debt number is $34,485,020,xxx,xxx and it is even bigger then total debt of China and Japan, at the second and third positions. https://www.usdebtclock.org/world-debt-clock.htmlThat's the magic about the current money, it's an infinite element, govs can get into infinite debt and nothing will happen, no one will come to them and say "Hey! You have to pay your debt", and this is because the debt is not only in the government hands, the debt is in the civilians hands too... Each time a civilian gets a bank loan to buy a house or to buy a car, then this debt increases, and USA is the country with the biggest access to credit. Almost anyone can go to the bank and get a loan for anything. |
|
|
|
I don't know why they changed the site to hide the private keys, maybe its because some blockchains let you claim coins with the private keys, an example of this is clam coin. But you can use the Wayback machine to access those private keys, i will leave the link here: https://web.archive.org/web/20230608025004/https://privatekeys.pw/puzzles/bitcoin-puzzle-txThe only problem is that the newfound private keys will no longer be public unless the finder decides to post them on the forum. |
|
|
|
This is a casino related issue. I feel like some people are lucky. Or maybe this isn't about luck. If you read on this forum and on the internet you will see that there are people who complain about the same casino that you have been playing for years about, being unable to login, unable to withdraw, and other casino issues, and calling these casinos scams. For some of these people, they didn't default on the terms and conditions looking at their screenshot evidence(I know that it is just a few cases). How does it make you feel knowing you've had a smooth experience while others have encountered such challenges?
Most of them somehow break the casino rules, and that's why they get their account blocked or their withdrawals locked. Casinos don't do this without a reason. But sometimes users make mistakes that cost their funds, for example, let's say a user sees a promotion where new accounts get 10 freespins, and he starts creating multiple accounts, since he was a new user (and he doesn't read the ToS), then all of his accounts will get locked, including the main account which could have a balance on it. |
|
|
|
|
The fact that a game is built with a smart contract is not enough to call a casino decentralized because the guys who generate that smart contract are the ones who create the rules of the game and the ones who will get profit in the long run. I don't see what doesn't have of decentralized. I mean the community can't change the house edge, that would be a good example of how a decentralized project works.
For me, all of them are centralized, but they use different technologies to operate, that's all.
|
|
|
|
|
The only casino that i can recommend for your list is Just-Dice.com, that's the only site that really gives freedom to the users.
Pros:
-No KYC.
-They allow multiple accounts on the same IP (for play, not for chat).
-Even if you are banned from the chat you will be able to keep betting, deposit and withdraw.
-If you win a big amount you will be able to withdraw all.
-You can play in TOR, or any VPS.
-A lot of years operating.
-They allow betting bots.
Cons:
-They only accept clamcoin.
-They only have one game (Dice).
|
|
|
|
Are there any other ways with core to cold spend that are not pretty technical.
Someone tried to explain making a raw manual tx but it was confusing and actually I didnt understand it at all.
I think there is a way. Let's say you use vanitygen to create a bitcoin address, and save the addy and privatekey. Then with bitcoin core you build the transaction but never send it to the blockchain, when you create the transaction you you use the new generated address as the output. bitcoin-cli createrawtransaction '[{"txid": "input_txid", "vout": "vout"}]' '{"address": amount}'bitcoin-cli signrawtransactionwithwallet "your_raw_transaction" At this point you save the signed transaction and have it ready to broadcast. When you want to get the coins then you can send the raw transaction from a wallet or an online service like: https://live.blockcypher.com/btc/pushtx/ or from a core with the command: bitcoin-cli sendrawtransaction "signed_raw_transaction" And to access those coins you only have to import the privatekey from that address (the one that you generate with vanity gen) to any wallet, and then you will be able to spend them. |
|
|
|
What will happen when only large institutions can afford to use Bitcoin's blockchain, due to rising fees? Won't this centralize the network if most can only trade bitcoin on centralized exchanges?
When that happens then people will start using altcoins for daily transactions and bitcoin will become a coin used for big amounts, and it will be this way because the fees for transactions will be huge, Just think about it, buy a $2 coffee and pay $50 as transaction fee just doesn't have sense. But with coins like dogecoin or Litecoin it will be totally possible to buy a $2 coffee and pay the network fee. |
|
|
|
|
Use a platform like this to buy or sell bitcoins, is a High-Risk move, i wouldn't recommend anyone to risk their money this way because if you lose your money the platform will say "It was a P2P exchange and we are not responsible for your loss".
My question is, how does the platform avoid scammers if there is no KYC process on it? Anyone could join with a fake name, offer Paypal, and after the deal then charge back the Paypal payment while they already get the BTC.
the idea isn't bad, but it will be a paradise for scammers with the current rules.
|
|
|
|
<…> a cuanto equivaldria ajustado por inflación el ultimo ATH? 74.000 usd? <…>
Cerca … De manera aproximada, y cogiendo como referencia el ATH de 68.789 $ de Coinmarketcap del 10/11/2021, el valor actual sujeto a la inflación equivaldría a cierre de enero 2024 a 76.330$ (faltando los datos de febrero, pero cogiendo noviembre entero al ser la granularidad a nivel de mes y no de día). Calculado con la inflación de EEUU. Ver: https://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl?cost1=68%2C789.00&year1=202111&year2=202401Interesante perspectiva, aunque tal vez cada quien debería de establecer un ATH en función de la inflación de su país y no de EEUU, Si lo vemos desde esta perspectiva el ATH en Argentina sería de mas del doble  Pero creo que ya estamos a nada de ese famoso ATH, ver Bitcoin hoy a $66,740 ha sido una gran sorpresa. Abrochen sus cinturones que ese cohete va hacia la luna! |
|
|
|
...
The writer was using a sort of a metaphor.
Terrorists kill people and destroy things.
He was implying Eddie supposedly is killing an entire generation by getting them addicted.
Hope it makes sense now.
If the casino is a success it means a lot of people have lost money there, but it doesn't mean that 100% of the users lose. Some of them have good days and walk away from the casino with profit. But this open letter will not change anything, is like writing an open letter to NATO telling them how people are dying daily due to the wars they are supporting. We need to understand the world already works in one way, and if we don't like it we only can change our actions, but it's on each individual to take this decision. |
|
|
|
You can find the right answer on ChatGPT, that's the right way to use artificial intelligence. Here's a simplified description of how seeding might work for an MWC generator:
1.-Initialization: The generator's state, which typically consists of two 16-bit integers, is initialized based on the seed value. The seed value might be a single 32-bit integer or two separate 16-bit
2.-Multiplier Constants: MWC generators use specific constants as multipliers to produce a new random value in each iteration. These constants are chosen to ensure good statistical properties of the generated sequence.
3.-Seed Expansion: The seed is used to initialize the internal state, and the generator goes through a series of iterations to mix and expand the seed values across its internal state.
4.-Random Output: Once the generator is seeded, it can produce pseudorandom numbers by iteratively applying the multiply-with-carry operations to its internal state. Here is a high-level Python-like pseudocode for a simplified MWC1616 seeding process: class MWC1616Generator:
def __init__(self, seed):
self.state = [0, 0]
self.multiplier = [0xDEAD, 0xBEEF] # Example multipliers
# Seed initialization
self.state[0] = seed & 0xFFFF
self.state[1] = (seed >> 16) & 0xFFFF
# Seed expansion
for _ in range(10): # Arbitrary number of iterations
self.next()
def next(self):
# MWC1616 operation
temp = self.state[0] * self.multiplier[0] + self.state[1]
self.state[1] = (temp >> 16) & 0xFFFF
self.state[0] = temp & 0xFFFF
return self.state[0] I hope this information helps you, and i highly recommend dealing with AI for this kind of question, because if you want to get on details or if you have any other questions about the topic, then the AI has a great explanation for you. |
|
|
|
...
Ya van vaíos casos de este estilo en españa, es interesante ver como los chicos malos contemplan el minado de criptomonedas como una forma efectiva de lavar dinero, imagino que en países de latam pasa lo mismo sin embargo aquí no los atrapan con tanta facilidad. También otro tipo de lavado de dinero con cryptos es a través de casinos, esa es una buena forma de justificar un ingreso grande. Aunque a través del KYC es mas complejo, sin embargo usando prestanombres es como operan. |
|
|
|
We searched about it on forums and found out some sites decide to ban players when they win.
Now the support is saying that my account got frozen because of multi accounting.
Was it illegal to open two accounts between me and my husband?
The main problem here is the IP, since you and your husband were on the same IP, that looks like multiaccount. Casinos don't ban accounts when they win, the first look for an excuse to ban it, and 2 accounts on the same IP is a justified reason to block your account. I know it sucks because with KYC you should be able to prove how both accounts was from different users. But the stake support is really hard to deal with nowadays, i stop using the site because they ban me from the chat for 6 months. And even if i talked with them and told them it was a mistake they decided to hold the ban. Usually, support should give a warning to the user before a 6 months ban, but they have their politics about how to deal with users. From my point of view it was a rude move and they lose a customer. |
|
|
|
El video es algo confuso colega, ya que hablas de como crear una dirección en el protocolo de Waves (en su blockchain), y luego instalas una Billetera de un servicio externo a Waves para poder obtener así una dirección. Personalmente no conocía Waves, pero me gusta que sea una cadena de bloques independiente y no un contrato inteligente. Así que me voy a echar un clavado a esa tecnología aver que mas ofrece. |
|
|
|
|
But why define the winner as a Mom and not as a Woman? I mean, when we win a big prize we say a Man with a Jackpot, and not a Dad wins a Jackpot.
What i don't like about this history is the fact that she didn't know what to do with the money, she is looking to invest it, and maybe she could take a piece of that cake for a deserved holiday.
|
|
|
|
No me sorprenden las cifras de Argentina y Venezuela por la necesidad en dichos países de una reserva de valor fácil de usar como es el Bitcoin, pero aunque me esperaba una cifra alta también, no hubiese imaginado que lo fuera tanto en México (5 veces el nivel de España, para menos de 3 veces su población). Quizá por influencia de otros países vecinos?
México cuenta con una población de 131.1 Millones, por lo que podríamos decir que el 6.4% de la población usa bitcoin, lo cual no está mal. ¿Me pregunto por que no hay mas Mexicanos en el foro? Uno de los mayores promotores de bitcoin en este país a sido Salinas Pliego, el cual es uno de los magnates Mexicanos con un valor de 16.6B de dolares, y es una persona que le gusta hacer mucho ruido en las redes y cada vez que tiene la oportunidad menciona Bitcoin. Realmente ese 6.4% del que hable anteriormente se lo debemos en parte a este gran personaje. |
|
|
|
|
It's easy for people to judge others for activities that they have never tried...
What does a non-smoker think about people who smoke?
What does a non-drinker think about people who drink?
And what does a non-gambler think about gamblers?
I hope you get the point now, when we grow up our parents teach us "Don't do that because is a bad vice", so, we grow up with a bad idea about some activities, but from my point of view we have to try/taste to be able to judge something.
|
|
|
|
El movimiento actual de bitcoin me confirma una vez más que tomé la decisión correcta al convertirme en un holder, dado que, si me hubiesen hecho esta pregunta tan solo unos días atrás, diría que no era posible para bitcoin alcanzar un nuevo ATH este año, pero ahora no solo parece posible sino inevitable, y podría ocurrir con una celeridad que de no ser porque tengo la evidencia enfrente de mi me parecería imposible de creer.
Pero al mismo tiempo esto me preocupa, después de todo los movimientos a la baja tienden a ser incluso aún más rápidos y violentos, y pensaría que en algún momento una corrección tendría que aparecer porque este ritmo de crecimiento es imposible de mantener.
Estamos tan cerca de esos $64k que podría pasar en cualquier momento, y no dudo que cuando eso pase muchas personas venderán, por lo menos las personas que compraron en el pasado ATH y tuvieron que esperar 2 años para recuperar. Imagino que un gran porcentaje de ellos se bajarán y se retirarán de las cryptos con un mal sabor de boca, ya que ver como el precio cayó de $64k hasta los $13k ha de haber sido algo terrible para ellos. |
|
|
|
1 IP per user is a rule in most of casinos nowadays, if you live with friends and each of you have an account on the casino, then the casino will block the accounts because is against the rules. You can see that in their ToS. 3. Multi Accounts
3.1. You can sign up (register) and use only one Account on the Website.
3.2. Only one Account for each household, IP address and computer or device is allowed. If two or more users share the same household, IP address and computer or device we must be informed by the respective Accounts’ holders in advance.
3.3. If you sign up or attempt to register more than one Account, for whatever reason, we may block or close any or all of your Accounts at our discretion. We may also void all the bets that have been placed in the duplicate Accounts, block bonuses and gifts and void withdrawal requests. In addition, any returns, winnings, or bonuses have been gained or accrued during the duplicate account lifecycle will be forfeited from you.
So, in theory, you break the rules, but most of the casinos will understand the fact that multiple users like in the same house and allow them to play with the same IP, other casinos will take that excuse to not pay and block the account. It really sucks that you weren't able to take your profit, you should ask them to do KYC for all the accounts with the same IP and prove there are different users on each account, that should be proof enough that you are not cheating. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
