Saw this article a couple times in different locations -- same show different venue.
It would be great if 21 supported PICISI, write that story.
Since you wrote this here, I'm going to remove the link on my article page itself. I don't agree with the PICISI concept at all: a bunch of cryptocurrencies that can pay to promote themselves while others utilize your site to crowdfund their ideas (which are probably less than stellar, or slathered in fraudulence. The best ideas would want to to go for the most liquidity, seeking the highest opportunity of success ... ponder on that one.) for a slew of different alts.
As it stands I don't use any crowdfunding platforms - because I feel like the best ideas can be bootstrapped and/or find proper private investment capital. Your idea, while nobile, will not garner support because the cryptocurrency community by in large has been BURNED by alt-coins. Furthermore, there is barely any liquidity in BTC, most holders of BTC choose to hold onto it as a speculative investment and would rather give away fiat to invest in ideas. Have you not seen coinmarketcap.com? The liquidity in all the other coins combined is a drop compared to BTC so offering a multi-coin crowdfunding site seems 'awesome' to an uninformed young entrepreneur, but reality will set in real quick when the site is live for 7 months and there's 10Million + in funding requests with less than $200 in actual funds 'pledged' to campaigns. Your idea has no ground imho.
If you don't believe me, try this experiment: Go to Alexa.com: Check the website rankings and estimated traffic for the following sites/projects:
Bitcoinstarter.com
swarm.fund
vinumeris.com
cryptostocks.com
Those are your direct competitors and who you would 'need' to outshine in order to seem more attractive. (so that others choose to use your site to pledge funds to awesome ideas) Keep in mind that that's a wishy washy statistic because it doesn't actually measure potential participants nor potential funds pledged within the platforms, (I don't know maybe that is a potential competitive advantage = full disclosure of all funds invested and where)
NOW, compare those findings to indiegogo.com and also to kickstarter.com. Those are your indirect competitors and who you actually need to acquisition customers from in order to flourish. I'm presuming the underlying goal is to be in the captains seat earning 2% right? Well, you'll need to take some of their traction in order to make a reasonable return with that percentage. Also, 3 articles, paid for, to promote your idea, which has no actual working prototype website, nor competitive advantage over existing competition, will. get. you. nowhere.