Again, you missed my post. Is it so difficult to read posts people made on your own thread one by one carefully? What you need to do is literally caught up from where you last posted something.

First thing first, your opening said stop the shitty dogo and cute token (which were examples of meme token) but your thread subject itself said this project is a meme?

Second, your total supply is... 105%? And it has a sum of 145b token allocation while total supply is 140b? I also would like to know how does 60% of 140b is 100b. Oh, while we're at it, please tell me the difference between "bounty/community" and "bounty/community". Talking about stopping the retard token.

Yes, I've seen the page (although very briefly). But aren't these member are individual and non-financial-body? They're more to an independent people like member of this forum, while your claim clearly state 3,000 bank.

Can you please clarify what you mean by non-formal community and online banking forum? I asked previously and waited for your answer for a long time. It seems you somehow managed to missed the post.

But... you're here, you can replied my post. Wouldn't it be more effective if you answered my question together with the invitation? And about it, I'm not in hurry, so I can wait for a slower response here. You visited this thread as their representative like, once in a day?

Can you tell more about the "play to earn"? How exactly will people earned by playing? Will it be like after finishing a mission they will rewarded by some cashable currency? Or do they compete with each other and the winner get the money?

Nice catch! This proves that the project uses bumping service, and it raises one alert flag about the legitimacy of this project.

I'll write in red to catch dev's attention: @dev, please explain the reason why you use paid bumping service and my previous question too.

Until dev answered this, I'll advise anyone to be cautious and avoid this project

Oh, I'm not interested on buying, just curious about what @arjunabtc claimed as "normal" and wondered if he said this baselessly or with reasonable thinking behind it. Because to be honest, if we have to buy them as a whole then if the project is prospective, endorsed by powerful public figure, teamed by world professional, and ensured to be successful? Then yes, it can be considered as something within reach. But for a project that's proven to take poor and questionable decisions right from the start (for example, the infamous incident of Yggy-the-hard-to-pronounce-tree above)? Yeah, no.

Actually, it is improving from last few weeks, and given the project itself is not fully launched yet, it shows a very good sign. I'm sure with their platform fully operating, and some of those important milestone achieved, price will easily goes up

Can't find the info about token sale anywhere, but are the minimum participation is 0.75 or it is the rate of one token and someone can buy lower?

I'll suggest you to combine these three posts of yours into one post, I think forum rules forbid multiple consecutive post.

Also, I am kinda believe too that you're not involved with this project. However, maybe it'll be best if you post an explanation on twitter describing your situation and (non)relation with them. Things like this are better be cleared soonest possible before they dragged you down together with them.

What complaints are these? Sorry, I tried to look it up myself, but I can't bear scrolling ups and ups, reading something rather mundane or questionable (like a user that made a blog post about hitbtc, and certainly has some experience in trading since he wrote a blog about an exchange, but somehow didn't know how orderbook works) to find the right topic.

About signing up with them, I guessed some people actually did, but that's just for the sake of their airdropped token.

Oh, just quoting your words.

Anyway, if there were no volume and no users, despite it's been in circulation for like 10 days now, wasn't it a bit worrisome? I mean, for the last 10 days, people were just signing up at most, no one is interested to trade on it, not even the team themselves.

Have you tried this "present a product" and see if it really works and functional and not just a simple pages with button? I'm really asking here, because their exchanges seems unusable, with zero volumes and zero data

Was there any info on how many they accumulate during their ICO? It seems @JanEmil is only acting as their CM, although with this thread posted and managed under different username, we can't be sure if he's a supporter (hence mentioning them on his twitter profile), their CM, or the dev himself.

Explanation video shared by @Theones tell us that the reason is because the community find it difficult (and they didn't know how) to pronounce Yggdrasil. So, instead of doing the very simple fix of informing people how to pronounce it (ig-dra-sil) or give a catchy short name ("igg" certainly very easy to pronounce by most tongue) they decided to rebrand into something more pronunciation friendly, which derail everything (they said the reason why the extended ICO was because the took time to rebrand, by the way)

What we got here? As an "avid supporter", you seems quite hesitant yo use your own account to show your support that you specifically created a new account to post on their behalf. And why the self moderated? If it is community led (and oriented), shouldn't the community has the freedom to post?

Let me clarify this: you suggest (or rather, tell) people to just buy instead.of waiting for explanation? Thus, you suggest people to skip DD and blindly trust you? Why? Because you can't explain all of the questions?

Your whole post describe the exact way how project like this ruins crypto's image. If we let projects to sell token (where they took investor's money) and then abandoned it just because they lost their interest, or worse, where they simply create the token and never have any intention to further develop it, all of those just for the sake of "have fun", how exactly newcomers to cryptoworld will perceive this?

Well, everyone, they're not even active for the past week. If they gave excuse of the absence on this forum due to them being actively building their website, then we should have seen it working by now, but neither of the web nor their activity here shows any sign of promising project.