Hi admin I didn't receive any airdrops despite completion of all required steps?
Because it is not yet distributed. They're currently working with sylon for bounty allocation, then they'll move to airdrop. There will be news about development tomorrow (every Tuesday) |
|
|
|
Awesome Work!! I love the work your team does!! Looking forward to Pre-Sale!
Thank you. The Private sale is live now, but I understand many are waiting for the wallets be released before making a purchase, which is understandable. Join us in Discord to participate. Thank you. https://discord.gg/F86UGUUHave you heard from your old partner yet about their willingness to vouch for you? It seems it took very long for any of them to jump for your aid although (you said) you've help a lot of them in the past. Wonder if that's really a favor that's worth returning at all. |
|
|
|
FreeLancercoin was a working silently.
After the ICO ends, people think that it's already **** because no activity at all at Telegram for at least a month if Im not mistaken. Then exchange listing with coss.io came. And with just few weeks later, another listing from IDex.
Yes still not a decent exchange but at least some efforts about listing are being established. The team is active and Im seeing another new listing before the year ends.
Almost all of these exchanges are very small and do not bring much benefit to investors. If the project is truly active, they have to pay more attention to the community but they do not. Personally I am very disappointed with the development of this project and I believe it will never grow in the future because this project is dead. The post you quote is from June 10th, by the way. But you're right, they don't seems to have any big exchange that boost liquidity. I tried to check in CMC because I don't really follow their development on exchange and I found out that they're not even on cmc |
|
|
|
News Update from AITHEON Team!!
This is an old news update, if I'm not mistaken, from two or three weeks ago. The installation of the robot is done, there are images on telegram of how the team and HK citizen being served by the robot. |
|
|
|
I would invite people to visit https://masternodes.online/ and review other coins as well. You can see many starting ROI are around the 2700% ROI that we have calculated to be practical at 100 masternodes online. Very well, it is settled that there are many projects has high percentage of returns too, just like yours, I don't think I want to bother poking around them as I am currently busy with seeing how far and serious your project is. I think we need to get back to the main concern here, that you still need to prove your legitimacy. The promised return of investment was merely a trigger that causes questions upon your credibility. The main concern here that I tried to erect as well as solve is how you refuse to inform us your team member, or anyone with clear reputation that can vouch you by stating you're legal, (and by that, also willing to be hold responsible in case of the entire team leave with raised funds). Essentially, this responsibility fell to the team member, which usually can be tracked how real they are in person from their history on LindkedIn and other social medias. But as you refuse to disclose the info, I ultimately offered you to prove your legitimacy to the public by other means, namely asking any of the entities that you've helped in the past to give some testimony. Entities with projects or clear and solid background, not newbies that's credibility is questionable. And so far, you're still not providing it. I, as well as other members of the community here that perhaps also following this issue, am still waiting. Now, as you pointed out the site, I'd like to point out to public here too what the site suggest on the bottom of their own site, ROI changes often and is not the most important factor. Please consider Dev Team - Community - PURPOSE/Platform - Liquidity - Wallet when making masternode purchases. As I highlighted, the site themselves stressed on how important it is to know the team's background. Hey Miiike, This team really is legit, I've been following Crypto-Mick for months watching him learn the crypto world through several other coins being their marketer. My first experience of Mick was in Linda and I've continued to see him across many other communities. I joined this project mainly in that I know that he is the real deal! He has no intentions on scamming anyone and has even gone out and said he will be committing 100% of his time to this project and crypto starting in 2019 if not sooner. What else do you want from a leader? He truly is committed to making this coin successful and he has only made a positive impression on the crypto community for several months in a row. Which over these months he's easily learned the do's and don'ts of what to do in the crypto space. Lets just compare this to a political position. Would you want a guy/woman going into office who hasn't had any experience as a lower role in politics? That's how politicians come to be and become a trusted person. I honestly think that's exactly what Crypto-Mick has done and he has found people he's trusted over this time to be apart of this coin. The concept of the coin is brilliant and we shall see what other avenues he decides to take this coin, but definitely the eye appeal is there for it. There's my thoughts on it and I truly support the project! If you haven't seen my name before, I am a critical part of several teams across the crypto space on discord. Currently have a team role in GMCN, GIVES, Altcoin Global, and also this project. Just a little background on me if you are questioning my statements here. mbush I'm sorry, first of all, I'm not really fluent in names of crypto, there are thousands currently exist and hundreds coming everyday. So what (or is it who?) is Linda? And I assume Crypto-Mick here is...the alias of the dev? I'm not sure what you tried to say on your paragraph about political position, care to explain more? And about background, sure, do you mind giving me any name for me to do the check? Linkedin, perhaps? |
|
|
|
Yeah we have been waiting the final documents from our boynty campaigns to be included in the calculations.
Sorry it's been so long. But while we have the exchange process going on you can't really do anything with the tokens anyway as they are locked.
But still bounty hunters feel relief if they see their tokens in their wallet even it's locked and so we know that we're paid for our work. Everyone here wanted transparency so I think the team should do that in a sense that even the investors will benefit. It's sad that Sylon is really hard to reach so the participants are staring in a blank space. I would agree that having some insight on the bounty progress will be really pleasing. But doesn't sylon still in discussion with core team? He's quite reachable, then. |
|
|
|
I would invite people to visit https://masternodes.online/ and review other coins as well. You can see many starting ROI are around the 2700% ROI that we have calculated to be practical at 100 masternodes online. Very well, it is settled that there are many projects has high percentage of returns too, just like yours, I don't think I want to bother poking around them as I am currently busy with seeing how far and serious your project is. I think we need to get back to the main concern here, that you still need to prove your legitimacy. The promised return of investment was merely a trigger that causes questions upon your credibility. The main concern here that I tried to erect as well as solve is how you refuse to inform us your team member, or anyone with clear reputation that can vouch you by stating you're legal, (and by that, also willing to be hold responsible in case of the entire team leave with raised funds). Essentially, this responsibility fell to the team member, which usually can be tracked how real they are in person from their history on LindkedIn and other social medias. But as you refuse to disclose the info, I ultimately offered you to prove your legitimacy to the public by other means, namely asking any of the entities that you've helped in the past to give some testimony. Entities with projects or clear and solid background, not newbies that's credibility is questionable. And so far, you're still not providing it. I, as well as other members of the community here that perhaps also following this issue, am still waiting. Now, as you pointed out the site, I'd like to point out to public here too what the site suggest on the bottom of their own site, ROI changes often and is not the most important factor. Please consider Dev Team - Community - PURPOSE/Platform - Liquidity - Wallet when making masternode purchases. As I highlighted, the site themselves stressed on how important it is to know the team's background. |
|
|
|
Right, any coin can promise any amount of coins to be created. This is dictated in the coin specs. And then we have reducing rewards over time to help with inflation.
I'm sorry, what is the relation of the initial "promise" of return (in percentage) with total coin spec? I failed to see the relation of your post to my previous comment |
|
|
|
Just to be clear the 401K Core team is absolutely not promising any returns on your investment. 401K Coin will be going onto an open market such as CoinExchange or Cryptobridge first, and we can not promise "huge returns" or any returns at all on ones investment. We can only promise what the coin specs will deliver. The ROI that is described is in reference to 401K Coins...not dollar value.
Umm... Pretty much sure you state that in percentage, like... No matter what the value is, the end result will be at around the certain multiplication of the initial investment. Either in fiat or in crypto. 2700%. I even look at our post behind to make sure. To be fair, it is true that you did not promising the return, the said number will only be reachable if there are 100 MN online. But the probability is still there, as you state that (you said and I quote) "you will see a substantial amount of reward" |
|
|
|
Hi Miiike, I'll ask some members of the community to step in here, and say a few words. Thank you for your continued interest.
Please, please tell me that above posts are not what you mean by some members of the community. Because I didn't see they started any good project that you helped, nor they are a long-time member, which can help accredited your reputation. For all community knows, you can ask them to say something nice about your project in return for something, or even they're your own alt accounts. Please be serious. If you claimed that there were some projects that you've helped, that could prove that you're really legit and trustworthy, then ask them to step up, ones that evidently has projects like you said I was not paid to post my comment nor am I an alt account. I may not have been on BitcoinTalk forums for long, but I'm sorry this forum is not the be all and end all of cryptocurrency. If you joined the Discord to talk to any of these people who posted above you would know they are not alt accounts. Do your research about a project before spreading hate. Yes, this forum is barely the only source of reference for cryptocurrency, but it is one of few that hold so much influence. And discord, I've explained why I'm not willing to move to discord, that it took a whole different media. Plus, the even major reason is the truth that people would likely come here to look for reference. People will seek for info about their future investment and how legit a project their about to invest from discussion on this forum. Bringing the topic to discord will not help those people who come here to see if this project worth investing or not. Hate. Oh... hate... I don't hate developers of new project. What I don't like, are people who scam other people and stole their money. That is what I tried do here, trying to prove either the dev is legit or he is a scammer. Rest assured that if he's legit, I'll be more than willing to support, but if he planned to run with investors money, well, let's say then I'm glad I give my best to unravel the truth. And research, well, I do. That's why I demands certain details, because after my small study of their project, I find it quite scarce of essential info. A team that's so brilliant that they promised a huge return for one's investment, are not backed up by a strong team that can take care of so-called blackmail? Even ones with legal background or legal back up that can take lawsuit on these blackmail? A team that had helped so many project on the past time, yet can not ask any of them to return the favor by vouching and stating that this dev is indeed legit and truthfully had helped them before? And forgive me if I getting even more doubtful and wondered if these posts are paid post, because soon after I demand this new method of proving their legitimacy( because they're failed to provide 2 previous details that (if really true) are actually easy to provide) there are lots of posts made by newbies (no member with high rank and reputation here) that suddenly make a long sentence that the dev is legit, members that's barely even post on regular basis, and whose posts are consist of usual basic useless posts like "oh, nice project, looking forward for this one" or "my address is....." But, very well, let's make it simple for you, Let's say we can count your post as a positive support for them, the first one of what should be many if dev's claim is true, will you by this state that you're affiliated with them, and that if one day they're proven to be scam, you can and will be held responsible?
Keep them coming dev, the owners of projects that you said you had helped and are willing to vouch for you. I'm waiting. We need to settle for this credential issue as soon as possible. |
|
|
|
Hi Miiike, I'll ask some members of the community to step in here, and say a few words. Thank you for your continued interest.
Please, please tell me that above posts are not what you mean by some members of the community. Because I didn't see they started any good project that you helped, nor they are a long-time member, which can help accredited your reputation. For all community knows, you can ask them to say something nice about your project in return for something, or even they're your own alt accounts. Please be serious. If you claimed that there were some projects that you've helped, that could prove that you're really legit and trustworthy, then ask them to step up, ones that evidently has projects like you said |
|
|
|
Congratulations with excellent results. Tell me, on which exchanges do you plan to add a token for trade? In advance thanks for the answer.
What are you talking about? Umm... spamming? It's been on exchanges for months! Ever heard binance? Hitbtc? OKEx? Please, next time before you tried to chase your post count, at least give some read so your attempt won't be that obvious |
|
|
|
Discord community is continuing to grow, we're at nearly 600 members! Please feel free to join us, and have a chat with us. https://discord.gg/F86UGUUAs you've managed to make 2 posts and failed to provide what I suggested (and by suggest, I mean asked), I take into assumption that you refuse to provide the evidence of blackmail? Hi Miiike, Yes, we are not providing evidence of the blackmail. If you want, please feel free to join the discord server, and talk to the 401K Core team there. We've been helping other projects over the last year, and many people have gained trust in who we are. If you don't feel comfortable investing, then please do not. Thank you for your time. Not many people want to join discord because it's another channel to attend to. I know, gaining trust and credibility takes time, so maybe if you can't afford to provide what he's asking, then, time will tell how honest and sincere you are with this project. We will know how far you will achieve on this project and your real motive of setting-up another MN-related project. Pretty much agree with him, that I feel reluctant to join a whole other channel and media. As for trust, isn't that what I tried to attain here? To prove that you're trustworthy or not, for members here. And unfortunately it is not "none of my business" things. If you tried to erect a project and ask people to trust their funds in you, then its community's obligation to ensure the newcomers understand how risky their investment is, and how likely their first investment turns scam. The decision to not disclosing the evidence. Well, it's kinda fishy if I may sound my personal opinion. Didn't want yo disclose team member because they're blackmailed, then decide not to give a hint of evidence that the threat is real. I have other solution though, you inspire me, actually. You said that some people, by time, trust you as you helped so many projects. Which means... they owe you something. You can certainly asked them to vouch you, to give a testimony here that you're legit and indeed had helped their project. |
|
|
|
"brilliant approach" ..
To take money from the people and while time goes by, "change" the whole project into a "Social media network" and act if you never spoke about ico's ..
Yeah, f****ng brilliant.
Guess what, old site and all promises will be online shortly at a new domain. Some members in the community aren't born yesterday and backupped all.
That post you referenced to, are bumping posts, it's rather useless to address them (well, I accidentally do sometimes when I didn't know if the one I addressed are one of those kind) as I think they're bot generated. And there are plenty of projects invaded by them, usually scam ones. |
|
|
|
The innate value of ...
I really hope you're username Bdunn on telegram and one of the admin of this project, because that is the exact copy of his writing, and if you're not him, you can be accused as copy and pasting materials and should be banned. |
|
|
|
Discord community is continuing to grow, we're at nearly 600 members! Please feel free to join us, and have a chat with us. https://discord.gg/F86UGUUAs you've managed to make 2 posts and failed to provide what I suggested (and by suggest, I mean asked), I take into assumption that you refuse to provide the evidence of blackmail? |
|
|
|
So you promise a coinstarter platform, raise 8 million USD, then deliver a 1985 website build in bubbles, after freaking 25 delays and excuses...and this website isn't even a coinstarter platform!!!
I really hope that you didn't invest anything on this project and suffer a great loss. Their bad track is a little bit clear when they evading what should be their community's right. Free or not, they're working for them, they helped spreading words about the project. And then there is the swap, the second wave that severe any other investors' faith. |
|
|
|
Within the first 28 days that the rewards kick in, after the 7 day fair buy in block section, you will see a substantial amount of rewards. We are not promising anyone richness, but we are promising a stable, long term investment.
Okay, a stable long investment. This is why you have a lock-in policy, right? Can I get an introduction (picture and linked-in is more than enough) to the team? The rewards only promise that amount of coins. The value of the coin is up to the open market. As far as identifications of the 401K Coin core team, we had the team members on the site, and within the first couple days we had more than one attempt to blackmail us, and extort us personally for our btc, and 401k Coins. We quickly removed our identities from the site. Please only invest in 401K Coin if you feel comfortable to do so, but for now we don't feel safe putting our personal faces out there. We are quite well known in the Crypto Community, where a lot of people on Discord have seen us helping in other projects over the last year. Please feel free to join the discord server, and meet us all there. https://discord.gg/F86UGUUOk, then kindly disclose the evident of blackmail attempts so people here can see that your statement has some strong bases. You can even censor several identity if the victim prefer and if the censorship didn't obscure the main evident of the blackmail itself. |
|
|
|
And will it be the same for either market takers and makers?
I'd also like to discuss about your listing mechanism, as convenience as it is for new tokens and coins to be listed merely by votes and by neglecting previous daily volume, it emerges new possible problems to today's crypto situation where ICOs are coming like wild fire. We can assume that PnD (or maybe we should establish a new term called RnA for Raise-and-Abandon) project to ask for their community to vote, or even promising some bounty to vote on your platform so they can get listed, pumped the price, then dump and abandon the entire project soon after. Which leave you with non-functioning coins on your exchange. Solution?
Sorry for the delay. --snip-- I would agree that costing some projects millions of dollar just to be listed is quite unfair as there are lots of micro-project that worth attention but didn't manage to survive due to lack of exchanges for their coin. Anyway, doesn't an exchange needs certain liquidity, like as a last-reservoir in case of huge loss or account hack or anything else that would be used to reimburse users' fund? I really don't know about this detail, but if I am correct that an exchange need this, will this fund collected from your coin sale? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
