I am aware that it supposed to be a slide, as the arrow indicate, but when I clicked the arrow, it gave me nothing. I'm not sure if the error only happen to me. Anyway, thank you, I see that I can find the team on the ann. However, can you edit the image so when we clicked their name or linkedin symbol, it redirect us to their page instead of your site?

You tried to facilitate between investor-wannabes and ICO project by allowing them to buy the ICO token through your site, am I correct? Can you point out the reason why someone can trust you with their funds, while there are a lot of more secure and official ways to participate on ICO?

Let me sum it up, you want a new car, you don't have enough money to buy them so you asked people to send you some waves (which you'll exchange into fiat at some point) so you can buy the car, and in exchange they'll get some waves token that practically has no use? In short, you want them to buy you a new car and get nothing in return.

Kindly correct me if I'm wrong, but your concept here is to award community with some tokens for viewing ads from some companies that hire your service? Isn't there some site that already adapt this concept (paying viewers with crypto) to watch ads?

Regarding your team member, I can only see 4 people, are they the entire team? And their linkedin profile, only 1 link works, the other 2 is not redirecting to linkedin and the other one's link is broken. A complete name is also nice to give better credential, though

And another deliberate act of ignoring inquiries about team details. One can easily assume that the project is fake and scamming if you keep evading questions by cryptocommunity

And how do you plan to sell them at the moment? The token is currently locked, which make ant transfer impossible. And when they're unlocked, an exchange will come soon, I don't see a reason why we need an otc

Did the "just" in your sentence refers to a "very recently" as in that post was your first on this thread?

Because you've been here on May 20th and even older, on May 12th. I'm not sure if you simply didn't realize you've been here before, tried a lame excuse (which is very understandable and acceptable) for the poor post, or got mixed up with your multialts' posts

Uhh... no, the reward is currently fixed at certain tokens each week depending on your rank or followers. What I propose is to change that system which has a possibility to give a better reward for each participants through stake based payment. If they could determine the allocation for each campaigns from that 5mlns pool, (for example, 45% for signature, 30% for twitter and FB, 10% for youtube, 10% for blogging, and 5% for airdrop) then it is very easy to apply the stake base. Stake based payment has an advantage when the number of participants is relatively small, as well as can backfire into disadvantage for each participants if there are a lot of people joining.

Or, if the team is very kind, they can decide if they pay on fixed rate or stake base by the end of the campaign by judging from which method give better payment for participant  .

Just a small suggestion, it's minor though, but if you can change the team's linkedin's picture with a better quality, it'll give a better credibility to your project.

Hi, I am interested to join your signature bounty, one thing that I'd like to highlight before that, as we are on the very early stage of bounty, is it possible for you to turn your payment from the fixed rate of certain RUNS for each rank to a stake base? As you're already allocating 5mlns of tokens for bounty anyway, it would be really nice if we can have a stake base.

Hi, I see that you can post something after my post that's quoted below. Can you please attend to this question as team member in details really helps measuring your credibility

It is a joy to see your interest on this project. Please be patient and wait for token sales as it'll start as soon as scientists find a machine that allows time traveling. You know, for you to go back into the past when token sales has not even started.

Of course there is a simpler way where you learn how to read info instead of blindly spamming

They're currently in process of listing on exchange and the NDA disallow any discussion of it. Any token will be distributed  before the listing happen.

Sr, hero, and legendary are considered equal? It took a lot of effort from sr to hero, especially with merit applied. And further, they only get 30 USD weekly (can be less, depends on how successful the ITO is) plus being forced to pass KYC. Seriously?

umm... no? I'm looking for a middle way than the endless debate. I tried to give him a chance as well as challenging him to prove himself, that instead of trying to answer with detailed and prepared explanation about how their level-depth incentives or how their arbitrage is proven by them to be accurate, let's start from the very beginning: the team themselves. If they're legitimate, at least they have the exact same team member as what they state on their WP and OP, that against all of the evidence provided, the team member is indeed a real person working for their company instead of an photoshopped image.

The method is extremely easy and only take matter of minutes to set, skype allow multiple video call. If the team is real, they could, would, and should be on the video. If, for whatever reason, logical or illogical, even one of the team member can not be present on the video (again, video, not image or screnshot of a video conference), then I don't think it is necessary to try proving their legitimacy as they failed on the very basic.

Coinect admin, I would suggest one simple method to prove the legitimacy of your team member, at least to show that Jason Zhou is truly originated from his mom's womb instead of photoshop skill: do a live video, or a recorded one, with all of your team member, in your office, with your brand visible, and statement that they are indeed are part of the team.

Lol, this is becoming more and more interesting. I have to admit, the 40% profits scare the hell out of me. Yes, I know that I currently wear their signature and supposedly have no right to say anything against them, but in my defense, I signed up for their campaign simply just because I currently has no signature at that time and wanted to see how this thing turned out, that I posted something bare minimum every week and won't get paid eventually... I have a streak of masochist

And furthermore, still in my defense, someone with high rank and green trust said he had a talk with the team couple weeks ago and implicitly stating that he had reviewed the project? So... what happened, exactly?


Should I start worrying about this project and remove my sig? 

I would strongly suggest to avoid investing on this ICO for whatever reason you have faith on this project for. Not only they extremely rarely active (lest it be because they're too focused watching World Cup) and refuse to answer inquiries, but their project is also very ridiculous and seems to be hasted.

Hmm... Sad but true, that so many ICOs these days are merely stepping stone, a project that much less like a PnD game where some gain profit while other suffers loss. I still hope this one works well, though. I've been with them for five months