Within the first 28 days that the rewards kick in, after the 7 day fair buy in block section, you will see a substantial amount of rewards. We are not promising anyone richness, but we are promising a stable, long term investment.
Okay, a stable long investment. This is why you have a lock-in policy, right? Can I get an introduction (picture and linked-in is more than enough) to the team? |
|
|
|
One of your main purpose is to facilitate someone with social side that had an idea to raise some funds for social things like books for school or local food bank... aren't there companies out there, already established, have physical buildings as strong evidence, with clear and open for public records of their social works, where people can transfer their funds there to help for ongoing project or start a new project if they want? Yes? No? So why, kindly tell me, do people need a blockchain to do charity?
That is not our main purpose, our main purpose is to enable people to raise funds for their projects. And as you pointed out a lot of the large charities and companies have huge overheads for the buildings and staff they are having to employ and rent so most of the money you give to these will go on expenses. Our aim with the charity section is to raise awareness and funds for local courses and charitable projects that people feel strongly about and do not have a large organisation. and this is not run on the blockchain, the token can be used as a donation, and as a means of funding for the projects people are advertising for. Might be and idea to read and understand the post before writing, if you wanted any help from someone to clearly explain our aims and goals you could always contact us by email, discord, telegram Well, contrary to what you believe, I do read the post. If I didn't read the post, how do you think I can see that you have a "charitable section". while for understanding it, doesn't the purpose of me asking you is to help me understand better of what I failed to understand? You, on the other side, should be questioned if you have really read my post carefully or not. Isn't it quite sad if someone with a great aim to built project like this, failed to carefully read someone's question, and worse, shot back with something that's less than polite? Allow me to assure you that not like several spamming posters with high rank, I always tried to read before posting, and would always inform the dev team in that same post if I didn't have time to adequately read their proposal. And well, I said one-of-your-main-purpose, as in you have several or even plenty main purposes and one of them is what I tried to clarify. Can anyone be blamed to assume that ONE of your main purpose is to establish a charity category? In regards that you made this dedicated "sub-section" on the opening post, placed on a relatively earlier part of the post that is right under the brief introduction, which usually will caught more attention than if placed somewhere in the middle without bold letters to indicate it is something quite important? |
|
|
|
We did the math, and with 100 masternodes online the ROI will be 2700% during the first set of rewards.
Do you suggesting that there will be 2700% ROI, which simplified to 27 times of the initial investment on the first set of rewards? And when does this first set happen? The 7th or the 28th day? Like... you're not joking, right? There is 7 days after the blockchain is live where the rewards are basically nothing, this is to give everyone a fair start in starting up their wallets, and masternodes. After that 7 days period, the next 28 days are the highest ROI period, which as described would be around 2700% ROI if there is 100 masternodes online. The ROI will drop after 28 days, as dictated by the coin specs. So you were saying that in 28 days, suppose that there are 100 MN online, someone can reach a new level of richness? Like... In less than one month? Interesting... let me see your team who backed up this thing and make such thing like this possible |
|
|
|
We did the math, and with 100 masternodes online the ROI will be 2700% during the first set of rewards.
Do you suggesting that there will be 2700% ROI, which simplified to 27 times of the initial investment on the first set of rewards? And when does this first set happen? The 7th or the 28th day? Like... you're not joking, right? |
|
|
|
How low is this... low transaction fee? I don't get why should this low tx fee become a selling point if at the end of the transaction, most of the paid fee will return to out wallet anyway.
Transaction fees will be between 0.1 % ~ 0.05 %. Yup, I do agree that low transaction fees is a minor selling point. Our goal is to ensure that traders like yourself pay the lowest possible fee, though unfortunately at this stage, there are certain variable costs that are finalized at the end of the transaction. Which is why we have to collect the fees first, and rebate any excess afterwards. And will it be the same for either market takers and makers? I'd also like to discuss about your listing mechanism, as convenience as it is for new tokens and coins to be listed merely by votes and by neglecting previous daily volume, it emerges new possible problems to today's crypto situation where ICOs are coming like wild fire. We can assume that PnD (or maybe we should establish a new term called RnA for Raise-and-Abandon) project to ask for their community to vote, or even promising some bounty to vote on your platform so they can get listed, pumped the price, then dump and abandon the entire project soon after. Which leave you with non-functioning coins on your exchange. Solution? |
|
|
|
|
Can we have pictures or some chart for this? I felt like I'm reading wikipedia that I don't even have enough will to finish the first few paragraph before scrolling down to look for something interesting and get lost on these sea of words
|
|
|
|
|
One of your main purpose is to facilitate someone with social side that had an idea to raise some funds for social things like books for school or local food bank... aren't there companies out there, already established, have physical buildings as strong evidence, with clear and open for public records of their social works, where people can transfer their funds there to help for ongoing project or start a new project if they want? Yes? No? So why, kindly tell me, do people need a blockchain to do charity?
|
|
|
|
I don't use telegram and relay solely on social media channels of my projects of my interest @Sheckley. For example you can go for twitter there every single update is published on regular basis. Ethlend platform is just adding more and more token backed by large communities and strong purposes of real life. This is steady advancement towards strong digital future.
You can use the pinned message for recent updates of their project on telegram. Or use quick command. That way, you don't have to scroll past less important conversations. |
|
|
|
|
How low is this... low transaction fee? I don't get why should this low tx fee become a selling point if at the end of the transaction, most of the paid fee will return to out wallet anyway.
|
|
|
|
Is there other thread or channel or media other than this thread? One that is more active than this. It's been too long that I even need to go back few pages to refresh my memory of what this project is about. And certainly addressing a question dated almost one month behind is not impressive
your other media channels you can checked it out in their telegrams and asking other channel links will surely be in love by their team Do you mean they have other channels aside from this very quiet thread and telegram? I'd also like to know how active their telegram is. Anyone joined and can give a valid (pun intended) input? |
|
|
|
|
Is there other thread or channel or media other than this thread? One that is more active than this. It's been too long that I even need to go back few pages to refresh my memory of what this project is about. And certainly addressing a question dated almost one month behind is not impressive
|
|
|
|
Good afternoon!
Tell me when I can get my tokens for generosity, and can I get them at all? Maybe someone owns the information?
Thank you
Is it bounty tokens or airdrop tokens? Both are not yet distributed and scheduled to be on few more weeks. But about bounty tokens, sylon is currently submitting the form to the team to be reviewed |
|
|
|
What happened here? Where's the team? It's been months since ico ended yet there's no development in the project. I think the team should update the community to avoid confusions. I still believe in you guys so please don't disappointed us.
They're reachable through telegram, very responsive there. I know that it'll be better if they can be more active on both channel, but that's up to them. As a supporter of their project, J tried to give my best by help answering what I can here and bring the matter to them on telegram for those that I can't |
|
|
|
Many projects do not do team reveals. It is the right of the people involved in the project to not have their names, faces, and personal details published. Some of our team does not wish to have their information published, and we will respect their right to privacy.
Yes, many projects decide to hide their team's ID, but do anyone take note that from those "many projects" only few really succeeded on delivering products while other disintegrated into thin air alongside with the investor's fund? And those that succeeded are those that has solid team, and that tried to "compensate" their decision of staying hidden by giving their fullest to answer questions and banish every doubt as soon as they can. But I can not agree more on what you said on a post above me, that works speak louder than names. Hopefully your work in the future can help compensating this decision, because up to this point your action is almost (IMO) next to poor and I can not see why an investor is advised to consider your project on their portfolio. |
|
|
|
Confirmed with team that they will still use AIC as their token ticker and there should be no problem in between the two tokens as their details is still different.
of course they have different details, but what if they both, with same token ticker, will send a request to the same exchange?) How to be in that case? I think better to fix it now than have a problems in the future. But they have different details, so even if (let's say) we are going to transfer both to binance (assume that they're somehow ended to be listed on binance), the recipient address themselves are different. Further, I don't think exchange will let same symbols for two different coin. I had this case of "Soma Community Token" and "ScrypToken" on yobit. Soma initially choose the ticker SCT for their symbol, but yobit already has SCT dedicated for scryptoken, so they got S-O-M-A instead of S-C-T for yobit while on other exchange like cryptopia, they still listed as SCT. Means, only on an exchange that already had akaii that aitheon need to have different symbol, and I don't think there will be plenty of big exchange listing akaii. I mean, is it even well known? |
|
|
|
I like idea but i just dont get the idea from where the profit will come. I have read the whitepaper but lets say im not strong in economics so maybe can You explain it simple with Your own words.
not wery active group... True that the group is quite passive, but I think that's because there are very few numbers of people involved on the team. I think this group is a one-manned team? Their aim is great, though. And to answer your question (I vaguely think I've actually encountered such question, but can't find it anywhere within the last three pages of this thread) their aim is to "merge" abandoned and dead coins into their bodies, giving a chance of certain coins (ones that already abandoned by respective team of the said project and we, as token holders, consider as nothing more than a worthless coin on our wallet) to get some value and being sold, then "erased" from etherchain, thus cleaning the directories from "junk coins". CMIIW dev. |
|
|
|
I understand that there have been many scam coins, but that doesn't mean they all are. I fail to see how demonstrating progress on the project is a red flag. On the contrary, failure to do so should be a warning sign.
True, demonstrating progress of a project (on this case, informing a sneak peek of new design) is not a red flag at all, but demonstrating it but failed to answer repetitive question on previous page can be regarded as an evasion, and the evasion itself is alarming. Nevertheless, thank you for attending me, allow me to repeat my question about your team details, can I know who works and back up this project? |
|
|
|
Yes it's different but it will make confusion to traders so before it gets too late I mean while it's not yet listed to any exchange sites then ticker should be change.
I hope someone from the team will get us some update.
I thought they tried to say that they had the ticker first. Before they start their ico, they searched ticker for aic and it's still not being used by anyone, but as projects these days can miraculously popping out from thin air in mere seconds, a project seems use the name and "finished" their ico before aitheon did. Below is the full quote of team's explanation Erica Harvitt AITHEON ICO:
When we named Aitheon Aitheon, and decided on AIC, there was no other AIC registered. However, cryptocurrencies are poping up very quickly and yes, we definitely have a different smart contract.
|
|
|
|
Yeah, that seems to be what it boils down to. I was thinking of arguments in favor of pre-sale nodes that we've seen with other recent project which mostly pointed to various Legendary btc-talk members voicing support for the project. It would be nice to see something like that here but it doesn't seem like that is happening and if that wasn't thought of then this is poor planning from the start. Decentralization is great and all but starting something off like this while also assuring trust is the tricky part and I don't see much indication that such things were considered so far...
The algo seems good and so far the project leads chat nice but all that still doesn't give this legs. yep... slow burner here more than likely
Clever is a good name which is more than I can say for a lot of recent coin releases. could be interesting. I would use a service like this. But I think what's more likely is crypto being used in places like ebay and craigslist. CL already allows users to specify crypto as a payment option. I've expressed that option on CL a few times but no takers so far.
I thought some member with higher ranks are paid to promote those projects by saying they're supporting the project, or had some talk with the team, etc? Because I saw once a legendary said he had a good discussion with a team and deemed the project to be very worthy. The project is scam. And the said legendary member didn't even make clarification about his previous statement. While for this project, I really started to doubt their worth and professionalism. They, once again disregard any of our posts, popping out to inform some new design. Definitely a red flag |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
