A este ritmo los mayores "holders" de criptomonedas será la policía de diversos países. Sería interesante saber cual es el plan para esas criptomonedas, si planean retenerlas por tiempo indefinido o si planean venderlas en alguna especie de subasta y con esto capitalizarse.

Seguro si entregaron voluntariamente 50,000 BTC se guardaron algo para cuando salgan de la carcel, algo sutil como 100btc.

You add an extra zero, if you see in my quote the amount is 0.005 ETH, and that's $11.6, that's why i say it's a little high from my point of view. But is not a crazy amount at all.

I like the casinos that charge a fair withdrawal fee, and with a fair fee I'm talking about the fee used on the blockchain by default, i know most of the blockchains have a dynamic fee, but i don't like when the casinos make from the withdrawals a personal business.

I'm a little worried about the ToS in your site because they say the withdraw page isn't ready yet.


Maybe I'm wrong and the withdraw page is already done and you forget to update the ToS, but i will not even try it until this gets fixed.

And another point is:


That's a little high from my point of view, and a nice way to avoid this would be with smart contracts in BSC or Tron. That way people would save some cash in the withdrawals.

Le has dado al clavo colega. No se trata de que la inteligencia artificial lo haga todo por uno, sino que usar la inteligencia artificial como apoyo.

Una cosa es conseguir un software de inteligencia artificial para trading, y otra cosa muy diferente es padir le a una inteligencia artificial que nos ayude a desarrollar un programa para trading con la API de casa de cambio famosas utilizando algoritmos de trading conocidos o populares.

Personalmente me agrada la idea de apoyarnos de la inteligencia artificial para el desarrollo de nuestras herramientas, sin embargo la gente piensa que con solo darle dinero a la AI esta te lo multiplicará, y las cosas no son así.

Un gran pedazo del pastel se va para la DEA, como comentas es una cifra bastante considerable, y sería interesante conocer la negociación. Ya que el atacante al entregar estos BTC por voluntad propia seguro negoció más que su extradición, no dudo que la base de datos de todos sus clientes haya sido entregada a la DEA también. Seguro lo que buscaba el delincuente fue simplemente reducir su condena.

I would deposit if their games are provably fair and i can verify each bet, that's the right way for a casino to earn the trust of the customers.


I agree with you, trust can be ruined fast, but i prefer to get scammed from a casino without KYC and License than getting scammed from a casino who have all my personal data and sensitive information. I mean, in both scenarios we lose the money, but the fact that one of them can sell our personal data is cruel.

This is a great work apogio, Bash script was my first coding language, so, i will try it this week and see if a can add some cool stuff to it.

it would be nice to have all the diferent kind off addres for the same Hash160, i know i have that script somewhere, but have to search it.

En México tenemos elecciones este año, y los hackers estan abusando de esto para estafar gente a traves de redes sociales con la ayuda de nteligencia artificial. Ya van varios anuncios que veos con los candidatos electorales en los que te invitan a invertir es negocios con grandes rendimientos, pero son anuncios creeados con inteligencia artificial. Y no deja de dar rabia e impotencia el echo de que las redes permitan estas estafas.

You have a good point here, crypto casinos are about trust. And the gambling industry nowadays thinks the users will trust on them because they have a valid lisence. But a curacao lisence doesn't mean the casino can't be an exit scam or they cant close when they want without anouce it to the users.

Casinos need to build trust more than having a lisense, and for that they need time and be nice with the customers.

Tell us more about your big wins because even if you are targeting the high rolles this site only let you withdraw $2500/week a max of $10k/month


I'm sorry but this is not a good site for highrollers.

Even if events are independent from each other, chaos in gambling has some rules that we can confirm in the long run. A good example is the plinko distribution curve. It comes from a random process but the result is really close on each run of multiple bets.


Trading is different, I agree with you on the point that news affects the markets, but the fact that whales can manipulate the markets by moving big amounts is a human decision and not a random process.

I have discussed this with multiple users, even with casino owners, and they don't think luck comes in waves. But there is a universal rule for gambling, You can't always win and you can't always lose, but since it's a random process you will lose on a bad streak and you can win on a good streak.

Es también lo primero que me viene a la mente, 17,000 usuarios estafados es una cifra considerable y algo que debería de preocupar a las autoridades. Sin embargo no es una cifra que vaya a disminuir, cada vez veremos mas estafas en este mudo de las cryptos. Y es responsabilidad de cada usuario el no caer en ellas.

Tal vez una campaña por parte de gobierno podría ayudar a que la ciudadanía este informada sobre esto y no caiga tan fácil.

Username: seoincorporation
Segwit Bitcoin address: bc1qa80splpy5eylt8v7apw67r6lak9a9624kr5xhs
BC.Game User ID: 28571278

Ready to accept Sr.Member position.

I have been reading all the answers from the community, and your comment is the only one that doesn't have sense at all... If Curacao licenses doesn't have anything to do with governments, then why people don't get a license from their own country?

The point here is simple, there are a bunch of business who find a gap in the legal system. Decide to play it smart and put the rules on the table about how crypto gambling should work on a legal way. And from my point of view is a bad joke that someone who lives in Australia have their servers on India and their Gambling license from Curacao.

I mean, i can open a casino and say it will operate under the "United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea", where there is no jurisdiction.

This is not a spam thread, is a good discussion, and i enjoy reading all your points of view.

It's fun guys, govs hardly avoid accepting Bitcoin is money, but when it comes to gambling then users are risking money, so, casinos need a license.

Let's be honest, If you can deposit, wager, and withdraw. I don't see where the license is in the process...

Just want to say Fuck Curaçao, the island in the middle of nowhere who decide to take the crypto gambling industry in their hands and make billions of dollars with it. Who the fuck they are to wash money this way?

Crypto gambling needs freedom, and i insist in this point. If you can Deposit, Wager and Widrawal, then you don't need anything else.  And a big shout out to those casinos who still working until now without a license, freebitco.in, Just-Dice.com, bustabit.com... They are big examples of how crypto gambling should be.

Those games don't have a fair system, users can modify the user seed, and they don't operate under a house edge, they work with something called RTP, which means the game will give wins and loses depending on how much the house has win/lose with that game.


The fairness of your site isn't fair at all, because the formula that you use means the operators input is dynamic, and to play it fair the user needs to change the customers input before each bet, if we keep the customer input then the house can predict our next bet result and modify the operators input.

Thanks for the nice campaign management, was great to be part of this campaign.

+1 To Little Mouse for his great job.

Acabo de leer sobre BRC20 creo que ya son proyectos muy volados... utilizar un simple ordinal como el siguiente para crear una cadena de bloques es absurdo:

{"p":"brc-20","op":"transfer","amt":"443.23","tick":".com"}

y digo que es absurdo ya que es solo un mensaje en la blockchain, no es realmente un contrato inteligente.

Desde mi punto de vista esto va a ser una de esas grandes cripto-estafas, veamos que pasa con el proyecto a futuro.

The Cybersecurity on blockchain and cryptos is really solid, and that's because it is an opensource project. Since everyone has access to the code some white hat hackers have made big improvements in this area. But that doesn't mean it hasn't been exploited in the past. A good example is the incident in 2010, it was known as the "value Overflow Incident", and one user was able to send 184.467 billion bitcoins. But Satoshi Nakamoto see the transaction, forked the block and patched the code with the help of Gaving Andresen and other Devs.

No soy experto en el tema, pero por lo que tenía entendido el consenso se aplica a los bloques, y no a a las transacciones ya que es el bloque lo que se confirma y con esto se confirman todas las transacciones que están en este.

Y cabe aclarar que no hay nodos especiales, el core de Bitcoin es el mismo para todos.

Por esto es que existe el riesgo del ataque de 51%. Si alguien tiene mas del 50% de los mineros de bitcoin quiere decir que esta persona puede escoger que bloques son válidos, e incluso puede sustituir bloques que fueron minados en el pasado, pero estos con transacciones que envían los bitcoins a otros destinos.