|
Have we worked out that these are standalone devices? i.e. if you just buy one A10 then you don't need anything else? Just http to the management interface on the miner itself?
Does that mean that if you have the choice of running them individually, each unit plugged into a switch ala most other miners out there, or you can just have one plugged into the network and all the others daisy chained off that one miner via rj45 cables?
|
|
|
|
The pool server may also be reachable my replacing the 'mmpool.org'
with the ip address I gave.
But with the long absence of the pool operator,
it is kind of risky continuing here in long run.
I will keep the s7ln's pointed for a while. It cost more to drive up to shut them down then it does to let them run for a while. I will not longer push a rental at them. I would do so every once in a while. Sad if it dies especially with all the potential coin I have there. jonnybravo ha his pool die I had .30 btc potential there. so this is 1.2 + .3 = 1.5 coin loss ugg You're not saying you actually had over 1BTC stored in a pool wallet are you? |
|
|
|
My avatar is my selfie  |
|
|
|
Exactly, that definition says that "some" of the transaction fees in the block reward are shared with the miners. I would like you to define exactly what % of that is shared with the miners and what % do you keep? |
|
|
|
Thank you for your answers. I made the change. However when i visit http://ckpool.org/users/<my BTC address> I'm getting { "hashrate1m": "0", "hashrate5m": "0", "hashrate1hr": "0", "hashrate1d": "0", "hashrate7d": "0", "lastshare": 0, "workers": 0, "shares": 0, "bestshare": 0.0, "lns": 0.1, "luck": 1.0, "accumulated": 0.0, "postponed": 0, "herp": 0.1, "derp": 0.0, "worker": [] } Is this due to the very low hashrate? No its due to you mining on the solo pool but looking at the stats on the normal pool  Try http://solo.ckpool.org/users/<my BTC address> It can take some time for stats to show up, depending on your hash rate. |
|
|
|
You are absolutely right. We are talking about "PPS Fee" and "Other Fee" in terms of wiki comparison.
So can you clarify? 1. You give out 100% of the block reward to the miners, no fee comes off the 12.5BTC reward when a block is found using your pool? 2. How much of the transaction fees in the block reward (anything over 12.5BTC) do you share out to the miners vs how much you keep? I think you have covered that currently you do not charge to send mining rewards across the network. If the above is what is currently the situation, do you expect it to change? If so how and when? Many thanks. |
|
|
|
Hello,
I just bought a TTBIT 10GH/s usb stick and I put it to mine at depool.ckpool.org as a lottery.
I'm trying to see it, using the tools and searching with the mining BTC address but it is not shown.
Do you have any suggestion?
cgminer says that it mines at an average of 10.5 GH/s
Thank you in advance
Better to put it on the solo pool de.ckpool.org Thats the one that runs as a lottery. The pool you have it on is the normal pool where 10GH will only earn 5c/month if and when a block is found The solo pool is where you could find a block and if you do you get the big prize |
|
|
|
FPPS - Full Pay Per Share. Similar to PPS，but not only divide regular block reward (12.5 BTC for now) but also some of the transaction fees. Calculate a standard transaction fee within a certain period and distribute it to miners according to their hash power contributions in the pool. It will increase the miners' earnings by sharing some of the transaction fees.
- From wiki. |
|
|
|
|
New miners for sale, Canada this time.
Anyone who wants to ship multiple to the US, remember they need to be less than $800 to avoid chinese goods import tax.
|
|
|
|
|
I've got one board that's only running at 283 Freq, the others are at 550 or so. Means that effectively its almost in spec.
|
|
|
|
Quick update: Telegram support recommended trying downgrading to January FW to see if that would fix the low hashrate problem that appeared after the PSU problem. As my M10 is not run at home I had to wait to come in this morning to give the downgrade a try and, unfortunately, it has not helped. No change in hashrate, still only ~28.5 TH/s.
Will get back in contact with support over telegram tonight to see about next steps.
Where is this FW available? |
|
|
|
Delivery schedule. That has been a general issue with Innosilicon for a long long time.
I didn't have any issues with the T2T's just order and ship pretty fast. |
|
|
|
Biggest problem with T3's is actually getting what you ordered. I know people who ordered Batch 1 who still haven't got theirs yet  |
|
|
|
|
14TH ones sold. 13.5TH left
|
|
|
|
|
3 different pre-orders for the M20 at whatsminer.net
M20S – ~72.x Th/s @ 3124W (33124W on the web site, typo?) - $2160
M20V1 – ~48.x Th/s @ 2200W - $1390
M20V2 – ~58.x Th/s @ 3364W - $1485
|
|
|
|
Replied |
|
|
|
Hello, I have a question hoping you can answer: I have 6 Antminer s9 mining on slushpool with an average of 82 Th/s, I have set my "minimum difficulty" to "14848". Is that the "best" setting? what happens if set the difficult low or very high ? THANKS The "best" setting is just to let the pool manage the difficulty, so set it to 128/Auto the pool will then adjust the difficulty depending on the share return rate of the miner in question. You only need to tweak it if your miners are showing lower hash rates than expected. There is an explanation here: https://slushpool.com/help/first-aid/troubleshootingLeave it at auto, wait for a day and see what your average hash rate has been for each miner, if its as expected then don't worry. You won't make enough of a difference to waste time over. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
