Dear all ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I just read this thread with increasing interest. While marco made a mistake, repaying late, and not handling the business professionally maybe the reaction is a bit harsh. Let's have a look at the facts: - He repaid late
- He was difficult to contact for the lender
- The lender hasn't left him a negative
- The lender left him a positive rating
If we now compare the situation to a "traditional" market place like ebay or alike, it wouldn't be possible to leave a negative for the business handled by others. The negatives he received are not wrong per so but some are a bit harsh and not as factual as they should in my opinion This member is proving himself to be untrustworthy as far as taking loans go, and I'll review this feedback if and when he pays back the loan from the reference thread.
I would invite The Pharmacist to review his feedback and state that the repayment, while late was paid. Choosing Neutral or Red is of little importance. Failing to repay a loan, again. Why not be more specific and say it was a late repayment. With this feedback you will let people think he actually completely defaulted on the loan which he didn't (unless I missed something). A fair warning is let potential lenders know he is often repaying late, but he actually is repaying (until now). Why overreach? Going any further is doing harm he doesn't deserve in my opinion. Posting a double here for reference, as the discussion seems to go on over here.
|
|
|
Dear all ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I just read this thread with increasing interest. While marco made a mistake, repaying late, and not handling the business professionally maybe the reaction is a bit harsh. Let's have a look at the facts: - He repaid late
- He was difficult to contact for the lender
- The lender hasn't left him a negative
- The lender left him a positive rating
If we now compare the situation to a "traditional" market place like ebay or alike, it wouldn't be possible to leave a negative for the business handled by others. The negatives he received are not wrong per so but some are a bit harsh and not as factual as they should in my opinion This member is proving himself to be untrustworthy as far as taking loans go, and I'll review this feedback if and when he pays back the loan from the reference thread.
I would invite The Pharmacist to review his feedback and state that the repayment, while late was paid. Choosing Neutral or Red is of little importance. Failing to repay a loan, again. Why not be more specific and say it was a late repayment. With this feedback you will let people think he actually completely defaulted on the loan which he didn't (unless I missed something). A fair warning is let potential lenders know he is often repaying late, but he actually is repaying (until now). Why overreach? Going any further is doing harm he doesn't deserve in my opinion.
|
|
|
Mann muss ja nicht auf Beistrichen herumeiern, grundsätzlich geht es darum nicht "Deutschsprachige" zu entlarven die nicht einmal einen Post ohne Translator zusammen bringen ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) . Mir ging es viel mehr darum wie er reagiert hat. Und das habe ich mehrmals erwähnt. Wie auch in Privat mit 1miau & Daniko besprochen glaube ich immer noch nicht das er dass sehr profi-mässig angegangen ist. Allerdings glaube ich auch nicht dass er nochmal etwas mit solchen Fehlern postet. Feedback auf neutral geändert. Fertig. Endnote: @Daniko manche Wörter lässt man einfach in English. Alle meine Fehler die du so schön aufgezeichnet hattest, haben kaum die Verständlichkeit beeinträchtigt. Bei deiner Übersetzung was das aber der Fall. Dir noch viel Glück beim Bounty "jagen" ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
Pour te prendre au mot sur le RIC Tu prends l'exemple de l'augmentation du SMIC, cette question en amène forcement une autre, comment le financer ?.
Très bon exemple. Et l'explication parfaite de pourquoi une démocratie directe ne PEUT pas fonctionner en partant des bases actuelles. La pris de recul nécessaire pour ce genre de décisions ne s'apprend pas du jour au lendemain.
|
|
|
In my opinion, "Cryptocurrency" more about freedom... and what a number of users here are advocating is taking away freedom of choice from managers/campaigns. For instance, what happens if a bounty manager chooses to keep all the records offline in a notebook? Are you now saying that all managers must use and publish a spreadsheet to manage a campaign?
Ones freedom stops where the freedom of other starts. In this case the freedom of the whole community. Don't get me wrong, I'm just playing devil's advocate here... I personally prefer if a manger would use a spreadsheet for most of the reasons that have been listed in this thread... however, I do not advocate for this being forced upon managers if they do not want to do so.
That's what I thought
|
|
|
He bought me BTC. He sent the SEPA transfer to my Revolut account. I sent him the BTC.
Plain and simple. He scammed you.
|
|
|
What about Monero? or any of the other privacy based "blockchains"? Granted Privacy =/= Transparency, but still... they don't "transparently" identify participants... neither does Bitcoin for that matter, being pseudo-anonymous.
So, would you be happy with spreadsheets that redacted all "user identifiable" information?
Not engaging in playing dumb & dumber with you. I believe you understood my point. Also privacy is already guaranteed since your forum alias =/= your personal information.
|
|
|
Bordel comment le RIC c'est pas constructif? C'est juste l'outil démocratique du 21ème siècle, le truc qui n'aurait jamais pu exister il n'y a ne serait-ce que 30 ans!!!
Tu as vu que je suis pour le RIC hein ? Etre pour =/= être constructif. Etre constructif c'est prendre les choses en main et construire au lieu de réclamer que d'autres le fassent. Ensuite tu dis que le RIC c'est l'outil qui mène à tous les autres. Il faut aussi lui mettre des barrières, sinon on va se retrouver avec 5 votes par jour, ça ne va pas faire du bien au pays non plus. Sur le fonds j'ai l'impression d'être d'accord avec toi, sur les mesures concrètes tu as des réactions du niveau de yaplatu. "let's do it" c'est trop facile.
|
|
|
You did not understand me. I'm talking exact about that. If casino is giving their earnings to charity means that if you win jackpot you are decreasing casino earnings and that means that they will give less to charity. The more you will the less charity will get. That steals fun out of your win. That's my point. Maybe i wasn't precise enough with my sentence you quoted.
I think you have no idea where the earnings come from. You should look into the business model of a casino. They earn money as long as you play. winning or loosing makes no difference. If you don't win, someone else will. And most importantly the casino always wins.
|
|
|
Hi asche, My question was not if the funds have already been escrowed. I wanted to know if an escrow has been chosen who will carry out the escrow in the future once the sale is over and the tokens are ready for distribution.
I still don't get it. When the sale is over and the tokens are ready for distribution, they get distributed immediately. Where is an escrow adding any value/security to the process?
|
|
|
I wrote an email to her, she didn't answer yet. I can't call he because I don't speak German.
If you can write in english, I guess you can also call her and talk to her in english, right? I don't quite get it. You sold BTC, and she sent you a wire transfer to your Revolut account? Your BTC-> HER HER -> FIAT in your Revolut account?
|
|
|
I just tried to sign up rocket.run but I am unable to complete. I am getting error of "Registration failed. Please try again later."
I had to do it via private navigation. Had a similar issue with a regular window with chrome. Worked perfectly on private. Could log in without any issue with my regular tab afterwards.
|
|
|
1/ tout ce que les GJ demandent c'est le RIC, c'est quand même pas compliqué.
Déjà tu sais bien que ce que tu dis est réducteur. Personne ne peut prétendre savoir ce que les GJ veulent réellement car il n'y aucune concertation à ce sujet. Alors oui le RIC est ce qui revient le plus souvent, et je conçois que bien utilisé ça serait un atout pour notre démocratie. Par contre de dire que c'est "pas compliqué" c'est carrément faux. Le cadre légal à mettre en place autour du RIC pour éviter une utilisation qui irait à l'encontre du but recherché est importante, et mettra du temps. Forcément j'aurais bien aimé voir une commission chargée directement de travailler dessus, idéalement d'initiative citoyenne, mais le changement prends du temps. Je ne pense pas qu'aujourd'hui aller foutre la merde à Paris fera arriver le RIC plus rapidement. La meilleure solution reste qu'un candidat choisisse d'utiliser cette "manne", l'intègre dans son prochain mandat, se fasse élire, et fasse ce pour quoi il a été élu. C'est comme ça que notre démocratie fonctionne. On peut difficilement reprocher à Macron de prendre les actions pour remplir les missions qu'ils s'étaient fixé dans son programme. On pourra argumenter que c'est parce que le système est cassé, or ce n'est pas le système qui est cassé, c'est un manque de choix alternatif qui a provoqué cette situation. J'attends toujours un super champion des GJ qui lance un mouvement en bonne et due forme pour faire changer les choses. Raler est facile, être dans le constructif ça l'est beaucoup moins. Jack Welsh faisait un truc du genre chez General Electric aux Etats Unis. Il virait les 20% plus mauvais tous les ans. Chaque manager devait désigner un quota d'élements à écrémer. Cette politique est effectivement bien plus simple à réaliser d'un point de vue management qu'élever ses équipes, les former, et les améliorer. Je vous le donne en mille, un temps ça a marché du tonnerre, et puis après le climat de défiance a été carrément contre productif.
|
|
|
Isn't that because people gamble to win? Gamble for charity kills fun from gambling.
You should read the context. This was about the CASINO giving money to charity, not gamblers splitting their gains.
|
|
|
Hey guys,
I'm really curious about the League of Legends betting. Do you have an ETA regarding it's availability?
|
|
|
Schön zu sehen das du die Arbeit nur sauber machen wirst weil es "Wächter" gibt.
Genau diese Denkweise ist der Grund dafür das ich in näherer Zukunft nichts entfernen werde.
Wie du erwähnt hast ist es vielleicht "gut" das wir alles nachlesen, leider ist dies deine Arbeit als Übersetzer, nicht unsere. Der Fakt alleine das ich und andere damit Zeit verbringen mussten sind Grund genug für was passiert ist
Und so als neben information, satt wird eh nichts, die anderen Projekte genauso. Reiner Zeitverlust.
|
|
|
Any more information you can give us regarding the potential escrow agents you will use for your project? Have you selected one already?
I think you need to read again. The amount is determined by the raised money. You can't escrow an amount of 0. 0 being 1% of 0 raised by now. Same thing for the token/coin that doesn't even exist yet. I'm unsure regarding what you are expecting
|
|
|
Find ich echt nicht ok!
Was ich nicht ok finde ist das du für so ne schlampige Arbeit bezahlt werden wolltest. Du bleibst erstmal rot. Nicht übersetzen zu können ist okay. Dann sollte man sich aber nicht dafür bewerben und Geld dafür verlangen/bekommen.
|
|
|
^FindingNemo is stupid.
That was more of a joke. I usually overstate things. No hard feelings. I as everyone else make my fair share of mistakes ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
Hat von mir nen Roten bekommen. Wapinter habe ich auch angechrieben.
|
|
|
|