2. a lot of coins are burnt, i've burnt at least 2 tbtc so far by sending it to bad scripts when i was testing stuff.
Of course. This one makes a lot of sense. These coins are designed to be thrown around and abused. It does make me wonder how many ideas have been inhibited by the inability to get hold of them, but of course there'll be a lot of clueless people happy to burn through tons of them in pursuit of dead end ideas. Bit of a tricky one to balance really.
|
|
|
Funny how everyone seems to trash sgbett, even when he called almost the exact bottom of the last bullrun already on 7th of December 2017. In a different thread we would call a person with his price prediction skills "Master". It was a great call. However since he got infected first with BCH and then, gulp, BSV any credibility took a permanent vacation and the thinking is stained with it. 2. I don't think BTC has the fundamentals to warrant a recovery this time. BCH is now Bitcoin for me, that is the one that will recover.
A proper trader is completely unemotional and totally pragmatic about these things. You don't make calls because you want it to happen. We won't have that long to wait anyway.
|
|
|
All depends on how many coins you have. If I had 10,000 I would've been perfectly happy to get rid at any point in the last 3-4 years. $10 mil is more than serviceable. 200 mil works for me too. I'd much rather get rid when things were relatively peaceful. I can't imagine exchange services will handle future mania any better than they have in the past, maybe considerably worse. As for Omniviolence, whatever. Move to an island, live in a shielded shed and have an EMP going off every ten minutes if that's your thing.
|
|
|
Can anyone enlighten me as to why test coins are so hard to come by? There should be millions of them flying gaily around. Is everyone secretly hoping they'll be worth something some day?
|
|
|
Ted Haggard Syndrome
Same goes for the 'woke'. They'd probably start screaming for the police if a non cracker started talking to them if they weren't holding a placard. Real people of either persuasion just tend to get on with whoever whenever without bashing you over the head with their ideological brick.
|
|
|
It's interesting that most of the political figures mentioned in the above Twitter thread are republicans.
It reminded me of a documentary I once watched, where it was mentioned that a cable TV survey revealed that the majority of hardcore adult channel subscribers came from neighborhoods occupied by predominantly republican, church-going families.
An interesting correlation...
I have always assumed that the more bible bashing, family brandishing and righteous you are the higher the likelihood is that you snort meth off the anuses of your multiple boyfriends, and maybe microwave the occasional baby wearing goat horns. Vocality usually means to me you're trying to deflect the actuality.
|
|
|
I can categorically state that if I'd traded back and forth I'd have a shit ton less than I do now.
Gawd knows why most newcomers arrive believing 'trading' is the best course of action. Almost all of them will fail if they keep doing it.
If you believe you have enough knowledge and mastery of your own emotions then go for it. You won't find out that you do not until a very expensive moment has already been and gone.
|
|
|
Wow, now that's one conspiracy theory that even I had trouble stomaching because it's just so incredulous.
So on some level Pizzagate is real then?? And on both sides of the aisle, no less.
Some of those convictions are 25 years old or more. The thread creator just collated them in a certain context to stoke some Twitterites. The world is filled with kiddie fiddlers. It stands to reason that plenty of them will wind up in politics.
|
|
|
If I'd put in $100 to get that $100 million then absolutely. I wouldn't really care if it dropped 10x from here. If I'd put in $180 million to get that $100 million I would be a bit more annoyed, and weird.
|
|
|
It's all whacky from a point of view of a bitcoiner, but some investors are not here for the ideology, they just want to make money, and that's okay.
Aye. I guess it's about risk. To many of us lot the risk comes gravitating towards such a set up. For the probable majority it's the direct opposite. As above it would be interesting to see how a legit hack would be handled by a legit company, not a wing it special like Bitfinex. I presume if such a service were to have verifiable coins they'd go with a proven custodian. And if THEY got hacked the entire scene would certainly pivot.
|
|
|
However I have never been a supporter of donations for poor. I have always followed the ideal of "Teach the man how to fish and he will feed himself". Giving money to someone might make you feel good but it does not solve the problem.
It's not always 'the poor'. It could be a straightforward emergency such as a natural disaster. It could be building infrastructure that does exactly what your quote advocates. In both of those cases there are - some - longstanding organisations who'll do a rather more professional job than some rando on here.
|
|
|
When you deposit to a bank you are giving up your money and accepting an IOU. This is exactly the same but also worse as you've no idea if there's any real Bitcoin backing it, at least a straightforward bank failure has an element of government protection. If the company becomes toast then you're just another creditor and one at the bottom of the list.
With a proper exchange or any service that allows the real deal in and out you have the option of complete control over your destiny even if many won't take it up.
|
|
|
I like no kyc exchanges, please do not advice me to use any kyc exchange. I prefer exchanges that do not demand for kyc or the ones that makes kyc not mandatory?
Then you're going to get screwed at some point. I would never use an exchange with optional KYC unless I'd done that KYC because if you use it a lot the chances of your funds being frozen are much, much higher than somewhere you've already cleared yourself with. There are properly decentralised options where freezing can't happen but there aren't many options. That's what you need to investigate.
|
|
|
Now, the game continues, that bounty is really f**ing good for hunters to pursue this hackers, bring out your popcorn guys, we will see how this is going to end.
Check the wording. They're offering 5% to anyone makes an intro to the hacker or 25 to the hacker themselves. There's no mention of 'hunters' or ultimately dealing with anyone other than the thief at all. They haven't put up a wanted poster. They're pragmatic enough to realise no outside party is going to get anywhere for now at least.
|
|
|
I occasionally notice things in the local press about computer repairers taking massive advantage of the data they have access to.
It's entirely down to who you choose. It might be a company made up of techno monks who've been doing it since birth or it might be some freak who got out jail yesterday and will store his child porn on your disk for a bit.
If I were in the market for this I'd be looking for a place with miles of track record, multiple branches and government and big business contracts, but they're the ones who are going to cost the big bucks others have mentioned.
Some random computer repairer? I wouldn't do it if there was any risk.
|
|
|
Lol! What else you can expect from a hardcode communist country?? Do they have a good reason to allow freedom to their own people?
It's a gangster country these days. Like anything Russian regarding crypto I'll wait for it to officially pass before believing anything. I expect between now and then Putin will champion Rapecoin one day and then threaten to murder anyone who looks at r/bitcoin the following day.
|
|
|
Yeah, but your untrusted negative feedback collection needs some work! Rookie numbers: only one?!
I have absolutely no idea what that means and it's staying that way. I've only sent two feedbacks I think both of which were for actual transactions of a sort on here. Beyond that my eyes glaze over and my tiddler goes limp.
|
|
|
|