Lafu is really cool, exposing malware and stuff... DT1 please consider excluding the users mentioned in the OP, and the users who are seeking to exact revenge via the creation and support of a frivolous flag. Support: mhanbostanci, muslol67, hacker1001101001, bonesjonesreturns Flag is opposed so no worries about it but members who supported such flag shouldn't be in system. I see that account muslol67 is not DT any more (he was DT earlier today or it has something to do with my trust settings  ), troll and Bump are not DT anyway so only mhanbostanci left.
I will probably create another topic because of retaliatory negative I have received, I am breaking my head for few days and I have no idea what author of that feedback tried to say, I might ask in Bitcoin Technical Support about this input thingy  |
|
|
|
His inclusion bumped you up to +1. So what? So what? So I'm just explaining to you what I meant since you misinterpreted it the first time, that's what. None of the rest of what you said has anything to do with this issue. Why do you even try to discuss anything with these users, they have their opinion which no one is able to change, they are not open for any discussion, they see everything as personal attacks, they act like when someone hate the other person so much that they will close their both eyes and just agree/disagree with something which is directed towards that person and it suits their narrative(no matter whether is something true or not), and, of course, they will receive merit for it. Discussion is pointless.
I don't know, sometimes I have that strange feeling that I am reading posts from bunch of alt accounts. |
|
|
|
Čestitam Trofo na ulasku u najbolju kampanju za najbolji privacy service! Nadam se da ne bude propalo sad sve... Kad smo već kod toga, pa kako oni financiraju tu kampanju?
Koliko znam, oni ne uzimaju nikakav fee već žive od donacija. Imaju 55 članova, da svi napišu max broj postova to je malo preko 2 BTC-a. Uzmimo da svi napišu pola pa da je 1 BTC.
Kako na tjednoj bazi ostvariš toliki prihod samo kroz donacije?
Takve stvari se ne pitaju  Vjerojatno ima neka shema sa reklamama, i/ili pranjem novca pa im je i dalje isplativo Ili ljudi jednostavno doniraju, između ostaloga sva mixanja se zaokružuju na 0.001 BTC, 0.002 BTC itd. a sve što bude iznad ide njima, npr. ako miksaš 0.0012, dobiješ 0.001 a 0.0002 ode njima, vjerujem da se nakupi velik broj dusta. |
|
|
|
However he doesn't want his nephew to have access to the funds because he is a minor and he doesn't want him cashing out, buying drugs etc,
That is definitely new excuse card. THEREFORE he shares only a BTC address from his own wallet which his nephew can then use to receive payments on some of the jobs he is taking online.
mhanbostanci wouldn't agree! when I realized that this account is my nephew,
I forbade him to use the forum. (He was 13 years old at the time.)
mhanbostanci wouldn't agree!
mhanbostanci probably lied because we can't handle the truth. Maybe he lied to DragonDance as well? |
|
|
|
There are several possibilities that more than one person can use the same wallet.
Investment fons, laziness/indolence, lack of knowledge etc.
And? What is the case here? Now do the right thing and exclude this abuser and his alts. I've never added Zz on my trust list, but I trust mhanbostanci. Therefore, he will continue to be on my trust list. So you trust liar(your words) and abuser(my words)  Since this message has been deleted by Lauda, I will not reply on this matter. Also, i'm busy atm. I'm out of this topic now.
You replied to my post but you ignored important parts of it because Lauda removed your post  |
|
|
|
merit/giveaway/trust/default trust abuser
I also have 2 eyes bro, how did he abuse the default trust system? Seems you don't, you have loycev's trust viewer so you can check inclusions from both accounts. Here you go: For account mhanbostanci http://loyce.club/trust/2020-05-16_Sat_05.03h/434984.html and for account ZZ http://loyce.club/trust/2020-05-16_Sat_05.03h/318348.htmlmhanbostanci Trusts these users' judgement:
1. theymos
2. TECSHARE
3. peloso
4. EFS
5. goraset
6. teramit
7. MorpheWQ
8. Lydian
9. LoyceV
10. cabsav
11. ekiller
12. onurgozupek
13. bobita
14. Vispilio
15. wolwoo
16. Blacknavy
17. AlyattesLydia
18. PHI1618
19. gospodin
Zz Trusts these users' judgement:
1. EFS
2. goraset
3. teramit
4. MorpheWQ
5. Lydian
6. cabsav
7. ekiller
8. onurgozupek
9. bobita
10. Blacknavy
11. PHI1618
12. gospodinAnd as for exclusions: mhanbostanci Distrusts these users' judgement:
1. ~Foxpup
2. ~Lauda
3. ~Timelord2067
4. ~klaaas
5. ~mindrust
6. ~owlcatz
7. ~Last of the V8s
8. ~termo$
9. ~nullius
10. ~JollyGood
11. ~GazetaBitcoin
12. ~rehberistan
Zz Distrusts these users' judgement:
1. ~Lauda
2. ~bobmarley650
3. ~termo$
4. ~rehberistanI won't even talk about including trust manipulator to his trust network last week and some other accounts, but I am glad that you at least agree on this part: merit/giveaway/trust/default trust abuser Actually, it seems that you agree that accounts are alt accounts: "So how right is it to find a connection between the Bitcoin addresses of users we dislike and forget about all their trustworthy backgrounds?" Now do the right thing and exclude this abuser and his alts. |
|
|
|
Maybe he had to lie because he knew you wouldn't believe him? There is always a possibility here.
Ok, so mhanbostanci sent PM and lied to iasenko because he knew I wouldn't believe him? And he has telepathic abilities and he knew iasenko would post it here and I will read it? Yeah, makes sense. "So how right is it to find a connection between the Bitcoin addresses of users we dislike and forget about all their trustworthy backgrounds?" Excuse me, but what the hell are you talking about? What is mhanbostanci still doing in DT, user is merit/giveaway/trust/default trust abuser and he is trying to convince people that blockchain proof is not solid one, which is malicious claim itself.
|
|
|
|
And yet you find this as rock solid connection https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5219960.msg53689508#msg53689508 Many investments of my relatives are in my hardware wallet
ekhem... those signatures belong to different wallets.
We have here 2 signed messages from 2/4 addresses connected in one wallet while mhanbostanci claim it is not the same wallet and I have no reason to think that iasenko made this story. |
|
|
|
TECSHARE has him included in his custom trust list. TECSHARE has some shitty people in his trust list, he’s always on some weird one man crusade to mould DT how he wants it so he adds scummy posters to his trust list.
That's really funny, TECSHARE you say? No way! I started topic a year ago about TECSHARE's trust network and mentioned account JusticeForYou in few posts and some other accounts as well. He was off DT few times but somehow he always get back in. Exclude the members including the account.
Agreed. Users who are not able to use system properly and/or are using system to troll shouldn't be in system in first place. |
|
|
|
^ obviously, timelord is always right. I have recently sent counter to timelord and lauda and timelord created crazy theory. I have tried to explain him why I have sent that feedback, and, instead of reading, timelord went full retard so I gave up and I just told him that he is idiot and I linked my post. His last reaction was this(of course, once again timelord tried to hide something, in this case, link from my post): Nice deflection. Now cry me a river.
You are idiot. The correct English usage is: " You Sir, are an idiot!" Or, you can get away with: " You are an idiot!" or the contracted: " You're an idiot!" (Note also the punctuation in the form of an exclamation mark). In every case please note how you have omitted the word ANMost important when you are trying to insult someone to get it right.
Your hostile reaction over the last few posts is proof positive that you haven't changed, you are still as hostile as ever and your glowing positive trust was only a method to attack mhanbostanci using myself as collateral damage. I've moved on. I didn't say I'd forgiven, or forgotten. Just that I've moved on. Marlboroza is going to have to work out whatever daemons are burning him up on his own. Now cry me a river. |
|
|
|
That's a tough one. I'd say ban everyone who hasn't put cryptohunter on ignore yet.
Point taken. |
|
|
|
I did not ask for mouth closing, ban or payment for speaking.
Just moving to section where you will not get paid for crap insults, revenge, etc.
Send PM to campaign managers and ask them to not pay users posting in reputation, may I assure you it won't change anything, there will always be some bitching around because user A doesn't like user B or something else. I asked for cleaning up reputation section
It is for meta then. And you can't move topics when they get derailed into insults, otherwise anyone could troll a topic out of the Reputation board. Derailments should be reported to mods as off topic posts.
Yes, but moderators probably won't remove post if it contains some on topic parts, for example, troll bonesjuniorreturns post few on topic words and half of his post is off topic defamatory insult and nonsense. |
|
|
|
~
Now look at what you started @dkbit98. I mean personal attacks and same old sick opening witch hunting and revenge topics.
Free speech buddy, everyone is allowed to post whatever they want if it fits in reputation category, and to be honest most topics here ARE for reputation, that includes defamation and black PR topics. Most of members have their signatures (and that is ok) but it is NOT ok be be paid for NON-STOP arguing!
Hm, why? This is hard board and requires lots reading across forum. One simple doesn't jump in reputation and spam for sig. Why is this in reputation btw? |
|
|
|
Baš čitam da VISA pokušava pokrenuti nekakav crypo projekt https://news.bitcoin.com/visa-cryptocurrency-system/. Ako sam ja to dobro shvatio, oni bi zamjenili "pravi" novac za "digitalni" i pritom uništili pravi novac Čisto sumnjam da će ovakvi patenti proći a i ako prođu bude to još jedno centralizirano smeće. |
|
|
|
~
No problem, counter removed(btw, that feedback has nothing to do with topic, it is separate issue and counter for false feedback). Now go and create another theory in your head and spread it world wide.
Marlboroza [...] is still deleting [...] posts [...]
So you quoted my post but you didn't read it? |
|
|
|
blockchain proof
You...you...racist! However it's even less likely that theymos would blacklist the dipshit so there's that too.
I wonder, what's that blacklist button supposed to do, and when? Theymos said this: However, I reserve the right to remove you and blacklist you from future selection if you engage in egregious and obvious abuse, or if multiple known alt accounts could be selected.
So what is keeping him from using that button, I mean, how many proofs theymos really need to open his eyes? |
|
|
|
He has a point. [...]
The accused members are free to post fully and whenever they want to. Self-mod is not for me to take away the power of the accused to defend themselves, but to protect myself from the usual trolls.
|
|
|
|
Either you are right and I am wrong or you are wrong and I am right.
@suchmoon, you were right about this one. What about this one now https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5247998.0 ? Is this going to be self-resolved withing DT1? 2 days has passed... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
