OMG big_daddy! I can not believe that Shakhtar equalized even after 3 - 1 behind and both goals were after 90 minutes. Even the saddest part was to score the last goal in the final minute!!!
Man you were almost winning the 0.01BTC

Haunebu, City has a nightmare at the final 15 minutes.

I was following these two bets to see who wins and in one stage I though you both were to win. It proved again that bookies always are the lucky one. :-D


Edit: Lucky you that you just saved 0.01 BTC lol

Yeah, native segwit and it's a multiSig wallet with extended seed.

Welcome to the elite group :-P

And if it starts with bc1q then I can confirm that it will be Multisig segwit wallet.

I understand you point of view @OP but I really doubt that theymos will care about such things. There are zero possibilities.

I would like her there :-P



Anyway, when is the next IPL?

Easy win to pick up for WI. 57 needed from 16 overs. There was a good chance to bet for WI when Afghanistan had this 100 runs partnership in the innings.

OP updated.

Thanks bud.

Well all of those were sarcasm honestly speaking but yes finding a solution for this kind of situations will be nice. But call me an old school, I would really not like another man in the field to check other things like No balls, caught behinds etc.

This will kill the cricketing spirit and this technology already took a lot of excitements from cricket. Even with this technology they still give wrong decision. Then what is the point?

I am not saying that I am against technology but if thing goes too much with only technology then we really do not need field umpires. We already have 12 cameras (if I am not wrong) and the umpire in the official room then can manage it from there!

If an umpire is too unfit to decide a "no ball" for over stepping then why do cricket need them to pay this big amount of money they take from the matches and also from ICC.

@Haunebu can you please post your payment address to get the winnings if you win? I will need to update the OP so that JSRAW finds it easy to get the winners addresses.

I was almost tempted to bet for Afghanistan LOL
Thank god that I did not :-D

By the way, I have sent you a PM. Please check.

You need to have a minimum of 1 merit to be a Jr. Member here.

Read:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2766177.0

Why do you care?
I think you have no business here. So just get lost from here.

I am not watching the match but just checked the score and it seem WI was able to slow down the Afghanistan cruse LOL. 6 wickets gone and only Afghan seems to be a set batsmen. By the way, Naib can be a good thread of he has not taken early.

I think Afghanistan will not be able to finish their 50 overs allocation. You targeted prediction seems realistic.

Yes it is only for IPL and I was thinking the same LOL. Here are the scopes:

A dedicated umpire for LBW
A dedicated umpire for Checking no balls in over stepping
A dedicated umpire to check now balls in full toss balls
A dedicated umpire to check wide in short pitch bouncers
A dedicated umpire to check caught behind
A dedicated umpire to check boundary

There could be many more scopes LOL
Honestly speaking these days the umpires are financially motivated.

In addition I found this from google: https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/5385/how-can-i-delete-an-address-private-key-in-the-list-of-received-bitcoins

If you already have used any of the addresses then it's suggested to have the backup of the private keys.

Now WI has things to worry. This partnership almost nearly going to have 100 runs. When I was making my last post the run rate was 3ish and now it's 4.66. Most importantly as long as these two will continue the run rate will start getting sky high.

I am really confuse now who to pick if I were to bet in this match.

Sounds really weird but this statement could trouble you. I am assuming this is just an ignorant mistake. In this community users do not want to see anyone is doing anything to build up trust. Trust is something which will you have depending on your personality in this community.

I will highly suggest you to remove that statement. It's good thing that you are trying to build up a business but first let's practice some community standard.

By the way, your idea is good and I hope you get some users in here.

Well with Bitcoin anyone can trace you with proper chain analysis tools. This chain analysis industry is getting bigger now a days.

There is this common misconception that bitcoin is anonymous but actually it is not. It is pseudonymous. When you are doing KYC with exchanges and sending coins there and withdrawing from there, the exchanges or any other companies knows your addresses and using those addresses they can figure out which one is yours.

And also when you are broadcasting a tx if you are not using VPN then whoever is controlling the server they can have your IP location.


So, over all you are actually anonymous.