What is that? I am not much up to date about the technology change for Ethereum. Do you have a article or something so that I can have a look to understand the work currently going on with Ethereum or has already done?

Cheers :-)

I am not gambling these days (from last a week) and decided not to gamble anymore. But in my gambling career I never chased. I know if I go for chasing then I will lose more. I have seen a lot of people around me losing their hard earning money.

Taking about tennis, I missed this Wimbledon to see because of this World Cup cricket. Looking forward to the next major tournament.

What do you guys think about Federer, he already have 20 GS. Do you think he will manage to get one more or few?

Everything has its cost. We see all those multi million dollar company are letting us to use their service for free but without any catch? We are their product. Without us there will be no Facebook, no Google, no Yahoo. But the only way for them to hang us with them is to provide us the service. And they are doing the exact thing that they were suppose to.

Problem is - we are so dependent with those service that knowing our privacy is being compromise, we are still using their service.
For example: To make this post I am using Google chrome firefox (Not using google chrome though). I am logged in with my gmail account which means google is tracking all my moves. Constantly they are storing my information in their database so they know me very well. I know all these things but why I still let them to do that? Because of the comfortless of using their system. They are customizing their serving for me which makes my life easier.

I see an ad on the Tele where one guy is saying why don't I see that you see in my phone. The other guy proudly saying because google knows what I want. I am in the same situation but not proud because I know I have no option but use their service knowing that my privacy is in stake however we try our best.

Looking forward to the fourth round and the first payment from CyberDice.

Cheers bud :-)

Awesome! Awesome!!
Feels great to be a part of this rescue operation :-)

Have fund bud. Stick around to this forum :-D

Now we know that it's a legacy address. I am assuming you are not seeing the same address those are in the watch wallet? If not then you have entered wrong see I am afraid.

Check if you are

# missing any word from the seed
# any wrong word in the seed

If none from the above then the seed you are entering is not the seed of that watch wallet.

Oh great! Are you seeing the balance now in the restored wallet?

If you really want to post a selfie with your ID and other sensitive information then I would suggest to post them in the Investigation board.

Okay you can not post them in the investigation board. You will need to be at least a member but I can help you if you want. If you PM me the information then I can post the information in the Investigation board.

But before that I will suggest to create the scam accusation topic in the scam accusations board. In the topic body give the link of the investigation topic as well once it will be created. Posting the sensitive information in the Investigation board protect your privacy from Google and other search engine. They can not crawl those data and expose your personal information.

Feel free to PM me if you need help. I am online for the next one hour or so.

PS: When you take the selfie, make sure you hand write your BticoinTalk username and the username in localbitcoins in a paper to prove that the photo indeed had taken for this purpose.

Yes, I am aware of this. And I think with the OP it's the case. Also in Electrum if one use extended seed and then if they forget about it but use only the regular seed then they will see a wallet but that's not the same wallet they had originally.

To help OPs case we really need to know the above information those were asked already and with that OP needs to make sure that he has not used extended seed as well.

The client software those support seed - were they have to be the same software? I always thought it does not matter. Once someone has a seed then they can use this seed to restore using any client software that support restoring using seed.

The client software needs to be same when it comes to wallet.dat file I believe. Like the wallet.dat file of a bitcoin core is not gonna open using Electrum client.

Man! Talking about betting it reminds me the nightmare memory of this cricket world cup. I have lost over 0.1BTC. In the England vs Sri Lanka match alone I have lost 0.05BTC :-(

Back in the tennis match, I was expecting Federer to win the match but I know that it will not be easy for both of them whoever wins it and indeed it was not an easy one. In fact it seems one of the match that will be remembered for very very long time.

There are nothing like sweep I think. Pretty sure you have messed up with the seed of the wallet that is why you are not seeing any balance in the restored wallet.

You said you created a new wallet with that seed.

With the same seed you actually do not create a new wallet, you restore the wallet with a given seed. May be some of the question was asked by the user above will help us to guide you.

It's the ID that was given was same for both account.



That's a very good question. The issue should be spotted at the time of verification. By the way, I just want to be clear here: You are the real owner of the ID?



Assuming you are the real owner of the ID and in that case you should create this topic in the scam accusations board to get the targeted people for your case.

Have all the information including the transaction ID that was sent to localbitcoins account also try signing the address to prove your ownership of the from address of the transaction.

If you provide solid evidences then you will get good attention and hopefully this will awake the localbitcoins team to resolve your case in a priority base. We have seen so many examples that were solved when the awareness were raised in here.

Good luck bud.

Well although leaving a red trust does not effect like it used to be but if kenzawak get the account back and can prove that he indeed got it back then I do not think it will be appropriate to leave a negative trust since it's with him the original owner.

May be a neutral can serve as a reminder that the account was hacked twice but now it's with the original owner.

Still it's very unfair for both the lender and the original account owner who did not actually request the loan. What if the original owner does not have the money because the given some was very large amount.

The only way I think is very safe for both party is the requester signs a message with their BTC address every time they request a loan.

I am pretty sure it's a bug.

Since every thing is very clearly showing on the blockchain, I would say there are nothing to worry for Backslash77. The balance are in his wallet. According to the transaction on the blockchain 1 BTC was sent to the address 3KodMvBcdXdUfNMV5v8Fe1rvrzRibPzoZw and the rest were gone to the changed address which is bc1qssyu9sxgczgvtdxt3jctf7kxf4gh50qx2zxp0d  is this case.

I never felt to try my Ledger Nano S with Electrum. If I ever do then may be I will write a short post about it.

---

Edit:

I can confirm that one needs to update their Ledge Live to have this feature for your Ledger wallet.




@Backslash77
Can you try to Clear cache of you Ledger Live?

Go to the settings icon on the top right corner, next to synchronize.


Click and then go to help tab and finally find the Clear blue button to clear the cache.


Not sure if that will help but worth trying.

I have Ledger Nano S. I will try later today and will post an update on this topic. Hopefully it will help us to understand.




I heard that there is a risk involved of exposing the private key. Never tried it though.

It's their procedure. Like it or not, you have to accept it.

Anyway, I still wonder that Coinbase has customers even after they admitted that they sold their customer data. The crypto was meant to protect ones privacy.

Thank you. I was missing that for my Ledger wallet. They supported legacy, wrapped segWit address before.

Anyway, updating the ledger live will be enough or we need to do anything else to generate the native SegWit?

Edit:
What I realize that just updating the live will work fine.
https://github.com/LedgerHQ/ledger-live-desktop/releases/tag/v1.11.0

LOL seems like game-protect is taking a vacation or something. He was last online on 14th and it's been almost 3 days.



This game protect bingo seems a perfect fit for him :-P

Does this guy or the team or whatever have any real client? If there are any then those must be some bunches of crazy people as shit :-)

It's a common practice for the scammers to use fake pictures, now using fake feedback seems another common practice. I have seen many people post in the service section for paid review. This is purely unethical.

Good thing that you bought the site in attention.

You are in a very tough situation. If you are the real owner of the ID then the other guy must managed your ID illegally and was using it for his localbitcoins account.

Now, I do not see how this case will be resolved.

Asking help from the local authority for what?  Identity theft?

If you file the case then how they are going to get the other guy?
Will localbitcoins disclose their information if the local authority ask?
How would they (localbitcoins) know that the request for disclosing information came from the local authority?

If you failed to provide further information then what happens with the fund that was locked? Will localbitcoins keep them? Can they really legally keep the coins?

Have they locked the other account too?

I think this is what could be a possible solution.
Send the coin back to the address it came from. Lock the other account too and if there are any balance to the other account then also send those balance where they came from once that other guy will ask for his funds.

By the way, I suggest you to move this topic to the scam accusations board and also follow the proper format so that you get attention from the DT members. Here is the format to follow: