Sure, but your TRX will be exchanged for BTC at the point you deposit, your investment will be calculated in BTC, and you will have to withdraw the funds as BTC once you choose to end your investment.

So your point is that your faucets should have been deactivated sooner rather than later?
I might agree, however this action is part of a new way to approach faucet abuse and only has recently been introduced.
Yeah, it should have happened sooner, but better late than never.

I'll leave that to the many happy players that enjoy the site every day.

Oh, you can see the future, Saturday's powerball numbers, please.

Actually, less and less. And if they have, they have to battle abuse just like everyone else.
Faucet casinos are cracking down on these cases, in different ways. Some had to resort to remove the faucets altogether, among them the biggest and earliest casinos in the cryptogambing space.
If not removing the faucets altogether, they had to decrease them (recent action by yet another site comes to mind), or find other ways to combat the increasing amount of faucet abuse.

But if there are so many alternatives with unlimited faucets, I would strongly suggest you to go there and abuse their faucets, if you insist on being allowed to continue your abuse.
Oh, and do report back how many of those other sites allow you to farm 0.1BTC off their site without taking any action.

Thank you for your honest review.

Hey Kristy, how you doin? Still spamming ref links for ponzi scams in casino chatrooms?

Over these three years, you've deposited a grand total of 0.008BTC.

For those people who know how to handle that privilege and do not abuse it to enrich themselves off the investors money.

Let us do the math on that, shall we.

You did deposit 0.008BTC, and you've withdrawn 0.114BTC, that's a plus of 0.106BTC. But did you actually "earn" it?
Looking at your gambling stats, you are at -0.0039BTC, so the plus in withdrawals does not come from lucky betting and winning big. Where does it come from, then?
You're a private first class, which means you're somewhere at faucet level 6-8, let us assume 7. That's currently a faucet of 0.00000840BTC. On your account, there's a grand total of 12705 requests.
12705*0.00000840=0.106722, which is almost exactly your withdrawals, minus what you deposited.
Let us be honest here, you haven't "earned" that money as much as you have abused the faucets to farm it.

You misread, it's not a fund, not even close to being one.

This forum/thread isn't the whole world, measuring success by activity on a bitcointalk topic leads you to making wrong conclusions sooner or later.
Just because there is no activity here doesn't have to mean there is no activity elsewhere or behind the scenes.

That's not even part of the goals of the CFG, did you bother to read them before commenting?

So you are giving advise for something you don't understand the nature of or the goals of.

Read your message again, you got the prefix wrong, buddy.

Wait what, Timelord creating Flags that are absolute bullshit? Surprising.

Which exchange does not support P2SH addresses? That has been out since 2013, you'd really have to be lagging on your technology if you don't allow your users to withdraw to P2SH addresses at this point.

What you're calling "native segwit" is bech32. I doubt it would have a bch prefix however.
Are you sure you aren't mixing things up with the cashaddress standard? Arguably, cashaddress borrows a few things from bech32, so it might be easy to mix up the two.

That seems heavily outdated.
I doubt BetKing in its current trust standing (reference: this) is representative of the values CGF stands for.
Nitrogensports seems to have some issuse of their own as well, and might have been excluded from the foundation for those. You can quickly find those if you google for it.
Overall, the first reply should be updated to include the current operators that joined after it was last edited, and exclude those that are no longer a part.

Bitvest & CryptoGames are both featured as verified opreators on the foundation website.

The first step is to never share your private keys with anybody else.
Whoever buys these has already violated that very first step, because they shared the keys with you.
Whether or not we trust you have deleted the keys on your end is irrelevant, the idea is not having to trust anybody.
I get you want to make some of the money you spent on creating those keys back, but this sounds like a terrible idea.

Technically the 24 words are a mnemonic phrase, from which the seed is created, which then in turn is used to derive a HD wallet from.
Ledger, Trezor and other hardware wallets did not invent the technology that is used to do that, they apply several BIPs in their devices for that.
To list them, there would be:
BIP39 - The wordlists used for mnemonic phrases and how to derive seeds from them.
BIP32 - The method to build HD wallets from a seed.
BIP44 - Extending BIP32 via defined derivation paths.

As you can see, the full path from mnemonic phrase up to the private key/public key pair is done using open source technologies, meaning any other software and hardware wallet can implement the exactly same method.
Such has been done ample times and there is a long list of alternative ways to get to your keys and thus funds in case you lose your device / it becomes unusable.

---

A few more points of information:

Both the Ledger and the Trezor do use proprietary software, but not in the process of generating keypairs.
slush and stick are co-authors of BIP39 & BIP44, and the founders of SatoshiLabs, the company selling Trezors. So while they created some of the software used, they have made it available to everyone.

The username seems like a bad start.

Luckily it is under cc0 license, I think I narrowly escaped a lawsuit there. Phew.

That's giving me serious E.T. vibes.

BTC has avoided hard-forking for over 10 years now. Let's start doing 4 per year. That sounds like a reasonable suggestion.
I get it, that works for smaller coins with less services and plurality of wallets. But I can imagine the chaos that BTC would stumble into with this.

---

Sounds great. Sounds also like something completely different than bitcoin.
Go pursue it, but do it as a new project, don't attempt to force bitcoin into something it isn't.

Let's take a closer look at that, shall we. Because you've made several comments regarding that in the last few days, so let us compare:
"There are many estimates. However, several of the larger Russian dictionaries quote around 130,000 to 150,000. " (source: LTRL)
"The Second Edition of the 20-volume Oxford English Dictionary [...] contains full entries for 171,476 words in current use, and 47,156 obsolete words." (Source: lexico)

Let's go for a more complete comparison of the word-map some popular languages use: https://www.lingholic.com/how-many-words-do-i-need-to-know-the-955-rule-in-language-learning-part-2/

coL lost that, and got eliminated from the tournament.
0:1

Nice try, but no.

Oh yeah, let's get the court system involved. Especially international court cases, over a posted picture on a bitcoin forum. That sounds like a reasonable response.
What a rational decision, showing once again how in charge of your actions you are and how much I would want to trust you with my donations.
While you're at it, when filing lawsuit against theymos, do us the favor and file a self-indictment regarding the three times you have made death threats in this thread.
Just to save us others the time, you know.

The bigger fonts you use, the more right you are.
Following the classic principle of who shouts the loudest gets their way.

LedgerWallet (the company) does not have access to your private keys, not now, not ever.
The point of a hardware wallet is that the keys are only stored on that specific piece of hardware, they are not shared, they are not accessible from the outside.

If LedgerWallet (the company) goes out of business, their software companion to the Nano, Ledger Live, would likely stop working.
You would not get any more firmware updates and might not be able to install new currencies on your ledger without some workaround.

However, there are a lot of third party wallets integrating with the Nano, those will continue to work regardless. Electrum would be one that comes to mind for Bitcoin. Mycelium works with the Nano as well, IIRC.
Even if this wasn't an option, you could still use your mnemonic phrase (the 24 words) to restore your private keys in another kind of wallet.
(eg import them into Electrum directly, instead of connecting Electrum to the Nano)

In conclusion: LedgerWallet (the company) going out of business will likely decrease the usability of your Nano, but it will never leave you without access to your funds.

Fine, don't acknowledge me taking your point apart bit by bit.

I don't know what any of that means.
Some of the words aren't even English, and when guessing what they mean, nothing of this is making any sense.
Can somebody translate this blurr of nonsense into proper English for me? I honestly tried, but I can't seem to make sense from any part of that.
It's just a stream or random letters and terrible punctuation to me.

Maybe you should start getting the image removed at the actual location, imgur. Not at the image-proxy that bitcointalk hosts.