Hey Porf! I'd like to change my testimony from OP. Are you so kind, please, to change the following part? GazetaBitcoin: More than 40 translations so far. Translator of Bitcoin white paper listed on bitcoin.org.Please change it with this: GazetaBitcoin: More than 50 translations so far. Translator of Bitcoin white paper listed on bitcoin.org.Thanks in advance! |
|
|
|
|
Thank you for bumping this thread, cygan!
I also read UniJoin's article and, indeed, it is very useful for this matter. It is, if you want, complementary to this topic, both essays completing each other: one with theory and one with practical examples of what can happen when you lose your identity.
By sharing UniJoin's article here as well I hope that it will reach more readers and, maybe, they'll open their eyes regarding the risks they are facing by using CEXs.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll add here my two cents, if I may. I remember I read about this company back in April, yet it seems things are changed now.
I was not involved in this discussion since its beginning, but I kept an eye on it.
What I want to add here is that icopress is, for sure, a very trustworthy forum user and he received many appreciations for his professionalism during years. If he says he received the signed messages I believe him.
At same time, LV is another very trustworthy forum user and, in case he will also confirm the messages from PureMixer all doubts are solved.
Both of them are persons which I'd trust to cash out my salary each month and I'd be more than sure they would give me my money back.
Later edit: Loyce posted just when I was writing this and it seems we have his confirmation as well.
|
|
|
|
A new article is available guys  Thank you for sharing this, iwantmyhomepaidwithbtc2! Indeed, this is another must read article, as it explains very well the differences between CEXs and DEXs, together with explaining the major risks presented by CEXs. I hope that many users will read this essay and, in case they are users of CEXs, perhaps they'll change their vision now. CEXs are a disease, a plague, and many suffered because of them. For those not aware yet, check out Mt. Gox's case -- 600.000 BTC lost in 2014, the trial is not over even now and the customers are still not reimbursed. |
|
|
|
Avem inca un articol publicat de UniJoin: Differences between CEXs and DEXsRecomand tuturor citirea acestui eseu, care descrie atat de bine diferentele intre casele de schimb crypto centralizate si cele descentralizate. Articolul cuprinde o lista completa a avantajelor si dezavantajelor fiecarui tip, precum si riscurile mari la care se supun cei care apeleaza la serviciile caselor de schimb centralizate. |
|
|
|
It would be very hard to maintain as you have to check each domain every other time. There is no need to keep the list updated every single day. But I think it's not a too big effort to do it once at each 3-4 months. Or at least once at each 6 months. That would mean 2-4 updates per year... |
|
|
|
So what happened exactly? Some employees fired the owners? That would be first time I hear anything like that. And said employee is now going to pay back the money the owner took? Lol, yes. The employees' conscience did not allow them to sleep anymore, knowing that former owners scammed people, thus they decided to pay the debts from their own pockets. And also to arrange somehow to take the company away from owners' hands. |
|
|
|
So, to summarize: You took players' money, went quiet for 4 months, blame someone else say you're going to pay back the money you took.
Question: where is the refund money supposed to come from?
Question: why announce after 4 months that you're going to announce something in a few days? Couldn't you wait a few more days and just announce it without pre-announcing whatever it is you'll come up with? What baffles me more is this part: it became clear that continuing to work with the existing owners was no longer viable, and we terminated the partnership. So what happened exactly? Some employees fired the owners? That would be first time I hear anything like that. Thank you for your understanding. And this message is signed by who? By some employees which managed somehow to fire the owners of a business? |
|
|
|
Avem un concurs nou! [free to join] Ready for my new wonderful contest ? Win 3 great prizeshttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5474335Se pot castiga urmatoarele: un pachet Cryptotag, constand intr-un dispozitiv Zeus, din titan, pentru pastrarea frazelor de recuperare, o husa pentru acest dispozitiv si o sticla Hodl Bodl. Organizator: BecassinePoate participa oricine daca are rang minim de Member, cu conditia sa fi aiba minim 10 postari amuzante sau interesante. Modalitate de inscriere: participantii trebuie sa citeze o remarca despre Bitcoin a unei persoane celebre. Postarile pot fi submise pana la data de 10 decembrie, 0:00:00 ora Parisului. Transportul: nespecificat (in unele tari nu se poate livra, iar in altele se livreaza cu dificultati, insa Romania nu se afla in aceste situatii). |
|
|
|
I think it's unlikely that this would be a reason for a tag, especially given our intentions. But still, we decided to listen to your advice and renamed the thread. WEB503, you know the saying -- better safe than sorry I salute your decision and I inform you that I also operated this change in the Romanian translation of the topic. I also recommend you to contact French and German translators (iwantmyhomepaidwithbtc2 and Buchi-88) to perform this change as well. The other translations are not ready yet, so the translators will see the change when they'll do their translations... Other than that, perhaps you can also eliminate the Russian translation from OP, since it's outdated and a new translation will be performed in Russian...? (If you want I can talk to a Russian native speaker and kindly ask if he wants to make a new translation in Russian language). |
|
|
|
I am not such type of person too who can bring every piece of the puzzle together. OP did very well in this case. Thank you, BitcoinGirl.Club! I think let's not continue to this case anymore. Ratimov has been exposed very well. I would say that this new evidence is of extraordinary importance to find out, if there are archives about it. As always, we should investigate all the details to get the full picture here. I also share 1miau's opinion here... I suspected Ratimov for a long time for doing in Russian board some things even worst than the ones already known about him (plagiarism, copy-paste dozens of essays, feedback extortion, Trust abuse, merit abuse, building an army of minions, talking like a street thug etc.). But I would not think that he can make death threats. If this is the case, probably this will end his activity on this forum. It is crucial to find out if there exist such archives, proving Kingf1sher's allegation. However, by reading again this feedback he left a while ago, the surprise would not be too big anymore... A fuckhead with a broken head. After being raped by all the WEX employees, taking all his mother's money [...] |
|
|
|
- MixTum mixtumm4rtq2kfqe.onion
- Mixum.io: Fake copy of the mixer [banned mixer]
- Mixtum-io.com: scam
- mixtum.cc
- mixtum.online I checked these clones of MixTum and it seems none is still active. Perhaps they can be removed from the list. At same time, maybe OP can revamp this thread and ensure that all clones listed are still active? |
|
|
|
maybe it’s worth reminding the person who likes to crunch their nose how the moderators covered for him when he threatened me with physical harm?
he once told me that he wanted to break my nose when we met, but instead of being banned, he now continues to intimidate us with negative feedback)
if he says that this is not so, I will try to find these threats in my archives) There will be many questions about whether Russian moderators were covering for him.. and if I’m not mistaken, he also tried to defend Ratimov then Kingf1sher if this is true, I insist on finding those archives. Can you search them, please? At same time, if you can, please share this topic in Russian local board as well. And, of course, add Ratimov to your distrust list. |
|
|
|
Following an internal investigation, we have suspended this domain name. iwantmyhomepaidwithbtc2 this is brilliant! Big thumbs up, buddy! Do you think you can try something similar also regarding Unijoin.fun? It would be amazing to shut down third imposter website too! |
|
|
|
2. This part contains 2 small typos: "[...] or you receive Bitcoins sent from exchanges. This coins is unlinkable [...]"
- it should be "bitcoins" instead of "Bitcoins" (when you refer to the currency "bitcoin" term should be used; "Bitcoin" is used for when referring to the network)
- "This coins is" should be changed with "These coins are" Thanks, this has been fixed. Glad I could help here 1. Topic title indicates an incorrect fee: 📌 [banned mixer] - Maximum Anonymity 🤖 Fees 1 - 5‰
The fee is 1-5%, not 1 - 5‰. This is not actually a typo. In the section in which our thread is located, there are many other threads whose names contain unusual Unicode characters. And we just wanted to find some kind of non-repeating symbol for the thread that would convey the essence and look quite unusual. I don’t think that anyone in real life constantly encounters this symbol (thousandths of a percent), so we considered it reasonable to add it to the name of the thread. I understand that you looked for an out-of-ordinary symbol but, at same time, take into consideration that "‰", just like "%", is a mathematical symbol. Practically, in your topic title you are stating that you are charging fees 100 times smaller than in reality.Then afterwards, within the thread, you are stating fees 100 times higher than those mentioned in topic title: We charge from 1% to 5% of the amount + 0,0007 BTC 1-5% is 100 times greater than 1-5‰ and this may raise some (unpleasant) discussion at some point. My friendly recommendation is to forget about the "fanciness" of "‰" and use the correct symbol representing your fees, which is "%". This may be a long shot, but I've seen users tagged on this forum for far less that that. You never know who will read this and see that topic title states something then below other amounts are stated and from this someone could leave you an unpleasant feedback... It's up to you how you'll proceed, I just gave you my two cents. |
|
|
|
iwantmyhomepaidwithbtc2, GazetaBitcoin Thank you very much for taking the time to localize our thread! You are very welcome! It was a pleasure to do the translation. I hope the threads you translated will be no less active than our main thread! Let's hope so! Oh and about your request from the translated topic, I already replied you there: there is a link toward your original thread (and also one nominating you as the author) Please look again. I would send you a like (merit), but unfortunately I don’t know how often I can do this since at the moment I see “0” Don't worry about that You'll can do it after you'll receive more merits.
I also take this opportunity to let you know about 3 small typos I notices inside the original Webmixer thread: 1. Topic title indicates an incorrect fee: 📌 [banned mixer] - Maximum Anonymity 🤖 Fees 1 - 5‰ The fee is 1-5%, not 1 - 5‰. It should look like this: 📌 [banned mixer] - Maximum Anonymity 🤖 Fees 1 - 5% 2. This part contains 2 small typos: "[...] or you receive Bitcoins sent from exchanges. This coins is unlinkable [...]" - it should be "bitcoins" instead of "Bitcoins" (when you refer to the currency "bitcoin" term should be used; "Bitcoin" is used for when referring to the network) - "This coins is" should be changed with "These coins are" I hope this helps. |
|
|
|
Mulțumesc din nou pentru traducerea firului nostru (apropo, am menționat asta în firul principal). A fost placerea mea Dar ai putea pune un link către versiunea în limba engleză a firului în bara de navigare? Am pus, este chiar a doua linie a topicului: |
|
|
|
In addition, I've updated my code in the OP as what's been still there until now was still for the old version. It's updated now. Can you pinpoint the changes, please? Thus I make sure I also add them to the Romanian translation. I've just changed the code part: | Name (link) | Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported? | SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?** | Usefulness (subjective rating)  *** | Works without JS? | Rated by | | ________________________ | ________________________________ | _________________________ | _________________________________ | ____________________ | ________________ | | xxx | Yes / No (xx/2022) / Yes / No (xx/2022) | Yes (09/2019) | x / 10 Points | Yes/No | Your name |
[table]
[tr]
[td]Name (link)[/td]
[td]Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?[/td]
[td]SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?**[/td]
[td]Usefulness (subjective rating) :P ***[/td]
[td]Works without JS?[/td]
[td]Rated by[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]________________________[/td]
[td]________________________________[/td]
[td]_________________________[/td]
[td]_________________________________[/td]
[td]____________________[/td]
[td]________________[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td][url=xxx]xxx[/url][/td]
[td]Yes / No (xx/2022) / Yes / No (xx/2022)[/td]
[td]Yes (09/2019)[/td]
[td][b][color=black]x / 10 Points[/color][/b][/td]
[td][b]Yes/No[/b][/td]
[td]Your name[/td]
[/tr]
[/table] I come back to this post as I finally had some time to investigate the needed changes for the Romanian translation of OP. However, I don't see any change that I should make... This is how Romanian translation looks like: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5268520. 1miau, are you so kind, please, to help me a little with those changes that I should do? |
|
|
|
with this letter (dated november  , 16 democratic and republican members of congress call on president Joe Biden to withdraw the us extradition request against WikiLeaks publisher Julian Assange This was, probably, a move that US secret services did not anticipate. People point the finger toward Biden but I believe that behind him, all decisions about Julian are taken by secret services. The Guardian also informed about this and, as far as I see, it may be the heaviest action pro-Assange from recent past. Indeed, some may point the finger that behind the letter stays Marjorie Taylor Greene, which is supporter of Trump, but this should not affect too much the fact that 16 congressmen signed the letter. Let's hope for the best... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
