Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 05:42:22 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 [33] 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 ... 209 »
641  Other / Meta / Re: Requesting theymos to remove Mabsark from DefaultTrust on: December 11, 2014, 09:06:34 PM
really hope you are wrong on this one.

AFAICR, Ive only really been proven wrong about almost anything once in the past few years. I was wrong by 0.7% - thinking difficulty would not go down last week.
Its the only time I made a bet Smiley.
642  Economy / Services / Re: Signature campaign: earn 10TH worth of cloudy mining and 0.1 BTC bonus on: December 11, 2014, 08:57:33 PM
Hi Puppet, I would rate this as one of the least useless signature campaign.  Grin

Smiley thanks !

Quote
I would be so proud of being part of it, BTW I don't know if multiple signatures are allowed.

Anything goes, be creative, change the color, make it fit with your current sig, its all good.

Quote
PS: Can't wait for the payday, 10TH are awesome!  Tongue

Payday? When would that be ? Smiley
643  Other / Meta / Re: Requesting theymos to remove Mabsark from DefaultTrust on: December 11, 2014, 08:52:39 PM
My take on the whole hashie thing is.... Friedcat knows what he is doing.

at the risk of further derailing this; friedcat does not know because he outsourced this to people who do not know what they are doing. Ive been talking to amhash about their partnership with hashie, and they simply do not understand they are unwittingly vouching for a scam and setting themselves up for a big problem. They do not know the identity of hashie operator either, just imagine the stupidity it requires to resell your products (and earned trust) through an anonymous almost-certain scammer who will later use his stolen trust to compete against you (the next "'gen 2" ponzi).
644  Economy / Securities / Re: [HAVELOCK] PETAMINE - 1,150 TH/S HASH RATE (1GH/S per Unit) on: December 11, 2014, 08:46:38 PM
Slightly improved performance?  Each share represents 1 GH/s, and they should be at 1150 GH/s no matter the pool, any improved performance of units are going straight into their pockets, or is the contract changing and they are paying more out to people than 1 GH/s?

Different pools use different difficulty settings etc that may influence performance, even if only marginally (except in cases like p2pool). Id be surprised if the 3% (?) fee slush charges made up for that, and Id be even more surprised if variability would drop when switching to a pool that only has 3% of the network, but hey, at least its a trusted pool.

Maybe someone can explain cryptx that he can divide his hashrate over multiple pools to reduce variability (and ensure no pool becomes dominant).
645  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Recovery program beginning in January for PB Mining customers. on: December 11, 2014, 08:41:09 PM
A chat log from our live chat 'Zopim' on our site from a few months back and yes it clearly was whoever owned PB in repose to our posts about them on here.

What makes you think it was pb owner, and not one of its bazillion mignons that promote it for refs or just to keep the ponzi going?
Either way, it doesnt matter much since we know just about everything about Jason except for the name of his dog.
646  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Recovery program beginning in January for PB Mining customers. on: December 11, 2014, 08:32:03 PM
Visitor 73542558
..
4:08 PM
Visitor 73542558 has left.

What am I looking at here exactly? A chat log from what, where, when ? Are you suggesting that IP belonged to Jason?
647  Other / Meta / Re: Requesting theymos to remove Mabsark from DefaultTrust on: December 11, 2014, 08:26:51 PM
You are also incorrect about the sale of accounts causing scams.

I didnt say that. Im saying your business thrives on scams, hence your incentive is not to prevent them.

Quote
It reduces scams by putting value on an account so someone can choose to sell their account instead of scamming.

Thats a ridiculous argument, selling the account is just outsourcing the scam to the highest bidder and to someone more capable and willing of pulling it off without risking jailtime myself.

Quote
Since you do not believe in innocent until proven guilty, you were accused of owning ASICminer shares and bashing the competition in order to cause your shares to rise in value. You have denied this but have not proven that you do not own shares. Under your own logic you should be labeled a scammer until you can prove you do not own such shares.

I dont need to prove I dont own shares, even if I held shares that wouldnt invalidate my points or make me a scammer. You accused me of shilling and promoting certain specific offers, and that I can easily disprove, That proof is my 3000+ post history which contains nothing resembling what you and spanishmoron claim and an overwhelming amount of posts that prove the exact opposite.
648  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Recovery program beginning in January for PB Mining customers. on: December 11, 2014, 08:14:06 PM
I would like the legit pbmining to continue still.

I would like the real santaclaus to bring me my presents.
Unfortunately, I was deceived as a kid, he never existed.
649  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: $50 Worth of Free Mining When you purchase +$200 of Hashpower with NexusMining on: December 11, 2014, 07:23:08 PM

No doubt they are paying through a coinmixer instead of paying from mined blocks.
650  Other / Meta / Re: Requesting theymos to remove Mabsark from DefaultTrust on: December 11, 2014, 07:10:32 PM
Quickseller sells forum accounts.  The real demand for forum accounts comes from scammers (if its an old/trusted account) who want to pull off a confidence scam, and from signature campaign beggars, who thrive on scams. How any of these things are allowed here is completely beyond me, and completely kills this forum, but at least dont expect people who feast on this to like scammers being exposed for what they are; its bad for this kind of shitty business.
651  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Recovery program beginning in January for PB Mining customers. on: December 11, 2014, 07:01:28 PM
A note to all those posting their customer #, and demanding a refund. 99.99% sure that is not going to happen. The best you/we can hope for is that he continues to make payouts every Sunday, and eventually re-coup the potential losses. Even if he cuts the payouts to 50% or less, its better than nothing, and also a step towards showing he is willing to make restitution.

I have plenty of experience of people owing me $$$, that is beyond what they can come up with on short notice. When you force their hand, a lot of times, they go into hiding. They also develop a ridiculous little bitch mentality of "he's being a dick to me, so I'm not going to pay him back", to justify them not even trying to pay you back. I have found that the best policy is to just "let it be" for a short time to see how they handle the situation. Many times, I have been paid back with interest as a thank you for not busting their balls.

If he does not show any signs of trying to make restitution within the next month or two, than by all means, feature him on your next episode of "will it blend" on liveleak. If he's smart enough, he won't get himself into that type of situation.

Lets be clear here: this can not be unwound and its impossible for Jason to repay everyone in full, even if he never spent a satoshi of his loot (fat chance). PBmining has been paying out since the beginning of this year, investors that participated in this scam early enough made a profit. If you can not clawback those profits, the money just isnt there, and we are not talking small change here that jason could solve by selling his car. Or even his house (which isnt his).

So wait all you want for 'signs of trying to make restitution', it will do you no good. The only things you can hope for is that whatever can be recovered will be divided honestly and that we are ensured Jason will serve as an example for other scammers by being punished adequately. For both of these, you need to get the authorities involved.
652  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: TERABOX - Cheapest mining contracts - from 0.0012/Ghs! on: December 11, 2014, 06:50:39 PM
+1 but trying to tell people this can be like banging your head against a brick wall.

Depends which "people". Keep in mind the vast majority of accounts here is held by relatively few  (pretty sad and desperate) individuals out to capitalize on freebees, signature campaigns and referral links and who will do anything for a satoshi.  Once they saved enough satoshi's to buy something somewhere, they will often gamble it on a ponzi, hoping they got in early enough that by promoting the heck out of it, they can make sure the ponzi survives long enough, while cashing in refs and sig bonuses.  You are not going to 'change their minds', because they dont care. They may be responsible for the majority of posts,  because they need to up their activity level and seniority,  and spam their signatures. But they are not the ones spending significant sums that keep the ponzi's going.

Im hopeful, possibly naively, that raising awareness will have at least some tangible impact among the silent masses that do provide the real funding.  You may not ever hear from them, most of them may not even have an account here (see pbmining collapse, all newbies coming out of the woodwork), but Im assuming they can use google and once in a while read a post that makes them think.
653  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: TERABOX - Cheapest mining contracts - from 0.0012/Ghs! on: December 11, 2014, 05:19:12 PM
The problem is that the crime isn't when a ponzi stops paying out, it is from the moment it starts bringing in money. They are already doing something wrong.

Amen.
654  Other / Meta / Re: Requesting theymos to remove Mabsark from DefaultTrust on: December 11, 2014, 05:08:51 PM
Interestingly, the people on DefaultTrust do not. Because they are enjoying the undue advantage. If u are really trustworthy, then trust system would work great for you even without DefaultTrust, e.g. this guy => https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=143551. DefaultTrust is simply babysitting certain individuals as trustworthy.

No, it would only work for people like that, who have no 'enemy'. No one has incentive to give that guy negative trust, he hurt no one and did an amazing job.
However, try exposing GAWminer, or BFL once upon a time, and see what happens to your trust rating when one of the Josh's begins paying for negative feedback for any critics.
655  Other / Meta / Re: Requesting theymos to remove Mabsark from DefaultTrust on: December 11, 2014, 05:01:06 PM
No. There is no problem in the trust system. The root of the problem is DefaultTrust and that is to be abolished.

Details: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=311527.0

Default trust is flawed, but otoh, consider if you weigh everyone's vote equally, that most scams here will beat you in numbers due to all the paid-for-via-signature campaign and referral shills. As a result every obvious ponzi with a lucrative profit sharing deal (ie referrals) will get high trust scores, and any wannabee scambuster like yours truly will be labeled a scammer.
656  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: ▁ ▂ ▄ ▅ ▆ Cloudmining 101 (ponzi risk assessment) ▆ ▅ ▄ ▂ ▁ on: December 11, 2014, 04:07:29 PM
added hashcoin, didnt know their service was up for sale already. Some red flags I encountered:
- as mentioned above, user selectable pool requires undisclosed fee and its not even clear you can direct your entire hashrate
- No internal pool info or blockchain evidence that Ive seen
- pictures show generic datacenter but no miners whatsoever
- linkedin profile CEO suspicious, endorsements from coworker (who is listed as CEO in other company), company profile shows only 1 employee..
Ive also seen some of those profile pics before, but cant remember where.
- Unclear what asic supplier they use. If hashfast, lack of endorsement might be understandable, but where are they going to keep sourcing chips?

Its not a clearcut 100% scam, but the above should be enough to avoid it until they provide more compelling evidence.
657  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: ▁ ▂ ▄ ▅ ▆ Cloudmining 101 (ponzi risk assessment) ▆ ▅ ▄ ▂ ▁ on: December 11, 2014, 03:28:22 PM
hashcoin != hashfast

Hashcoin is a fairly shady company that sold/sells some 2 chip miners based on hashfast chip and makes promises (and sells) some larger miners with specs that cant be real (Ill believe 1TH/S and 0.6J/GH from a hashfast GN chip when I see it). Id be very wary of their cloudmining offering.
658  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: ███ Stay away from GAWminers.com ███ on: December 11, 2014, 01:43:46 PM
Proving their hash rate by renting the hash just makes running their operation fraudulent more difficult as they have a middleman to pay out and thus have extremely tight margins(so tight they may as well just buy the equipment themselves) .

No, not at all. Because I (being the scammer here), would rent not much more than the hashrate I already sold, or even less,  and rent it only for a (very) limited time (until I run), while taking in revenue for contracts that are pretty much perpetual. Thats where my margin is, and its pretty big.

edit: almost forgot, the rented hashrate actually brings in mining revenue too of course, so the real cost is relatively minor. On a lucky day I might even profit just from renting rigs alone.
659  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: ███ Stay away from GAWminers.com ███ on: December 11, 2014, 01:29:11 PM
Not sure I follow. As I understand, if I rent hashrate on nicehash, I can point it to any pool I want, even my own bitcoind and sign my blocks however I want, or point it to any pool and prove my control of the worker/account. I could rent the hashrate for as long as my scam is profitable, and increase the rented hashrate as my combined sales grows until I reach the point where I maximized my profits. How would you ever prove or even guess I dont have a datacenter in my basement?

Any company that does not prove its hashrate by showing the blocks is of course, extremely suspicious, but one that does 'prove' it this way, might just be a more clever scammer. Its not a guarantee afaics.
660  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: ███ Stay away from GAWminers.com ███ on: December 11, 2014, 01:22:12 PM
Another salient point, but I was suggesting permanently and transparently showing a sustained hashrate or newly minted bitcoins deposited before payouts.

How would you distinguish rented hashrate pointed at your private pool from actual owned hashrate?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 [33] 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 ... 209 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!