Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 03:28:51 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 [41] 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 ... 170 »
801  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Are hashlets worth it? on: November 01, 2014, 08:58:53 PM
@jimmothy
He was right in this part: he's very selective with his responses and ignores most things people are telling him in his thread
You acted like nothing is ignored, yet in the same post you ignored the most important part:

So, GAW is using their miners as very expensive heaters, and they even bought more recently because the winter is coming Wink
You solved the great mystery, good job!

I only ignored that one comment because I really don't understand the point.

I think you are trying to imply that because they have pics of some miners, they must not be a ponzi which is an incredibly flawed argument. It's clear that they do have SOME hardware, just how much is completely unknown.

Again, if they actually have 100% of the hashrate they've sold, there is no reason to not prove it with a mining address.

Quote
This whole discussion has gone off topic, the question was if hashlets are worth it. If you want to make GAW submit proof of mining, you have to contact them.[/i]

I would say a companies trustworthiness and likelihood of being a ponzi is an important factor when deciding if the "investment" is worth it.

Here's the SEC's advice of how to spot a ponzi scheme:

Quote
What are some Ponzi scheme "red flags"?

Many Ponzi schemes share common characteristics. Look for these warning signs:

    High investment returns with little or no risk. Every investment carries some degree of risk, and investments yielding higher returns typically involve more risk. Be highly suspicious of any "guaranteed" investment opportunity.

    Overly consistent returns. Investment values tend to go up and down over time, especially those offering potentially high returns. Be suspect of an investment that continues to generate regular, positive returns regardless of overall market conditions.

    Unregistered investments. Ponzi schemes typically involve investments that have not been registered with the SEC or with state regulators. Registration is important because it provides investors with access to key information about the company's management, products, services, and finances.

    Unlicensed sellers. Federal and state securities laws require investment professionals and their firms to be licensed or registered. Most Ponzi schemes involve unlicensed individuals or unregistered firms.

    Secretive and/or complex strategies. Avoiding investments you do not understand, or for which you cannot get complete information, is a good rule of thumb.

    Issues with paperwork. Do not accept excuses regarding why you cannot review information about an investment in writing. Also, account statement errors and inconsistencies may be signs that funds are not being invested as promised.

    Difficulty receiving payments. Be suspicious if you do not receive a payment or have difficulty cashing out your investment. Keep in mind that Ponzi scheme promoters routinely encourage participants to "roll over" investments and sometimes promise returns offering even higher returns on the amount rolled over.

http://www.sec.gov/answers/ponzi.htm

Impressive that this totally legit company manages to trigger 6/7 of the SEC's warning signs of a ponzi.

Quote
And some of your questions are ridiculous like "why did they create their own forum?" And why did KNC start their own forum? You're really grasping straws here.

It's not ridiculous at all. KNC/BFL/GAW created their forum for the same reason any other company with something to hide did.

This discussion should have made you realize exactly why GAW created their own forum, because if this was taking place on hashtalk I would have been banned after the first post.

Just look at how well censorship/astroturfing is working for GAW. Hundreds of complaints/criticisms/ponzi accusations on this forum, yet you cannot find a single negative comment on their own forum.

Quote
As for the second part, they have a proof of having the miners, and a lot of them. So what do you think they are doing with all this hardware if not mining? IMO they simply don't want to reveal what is being mined and where, and it's their choice, just as your choice is to calculate the risk and decide if the whole thing is worth investing.

They have pics of miners and obviously there is nothing else a miner can do but mine.

What you are missing or intentionally ignoring is the fact that anyone can buy/host a few dozen miners and claim they have a multi-MW mining operation. Even if they have hundreds of miners, that may only be enough to cover 1/4th of the hashrate they are selling. (like a fractional reserve)

Quote
No amount of complaining and repeating the same bullshit on the forum will help in this case.

Not true at all. If you GAW fanatics would quit being such gullible pushovers, GAW would have proven they were mining within days of launch. (assuming it's not a ponzi)

It's clear that you (just like bitgeek) spend 100% of your free time championing GAW.

So instead of wasting constant hours of your life defending GAW, why don't you just ask GAW to prove they are not a ponzi with a simple copy/paste of a mining address?

Think about all the button clicking and arbitrary games you will be able to play with the hours you will be saving.
802  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Are hashlets worth it? on: November 01, 2014, 12:41:28 AM
Don't even start with this guy, he's very selective with his responses and ignores most things people are telling him in his thread,

What exactly am I ignoring?

Here are some things you GAW fanatics are constantly ignoring: Why is GAW refusing to publish a mining address? Why did they create their own forum? Why does their TOS say they are not actually mining on the selected pools?

Quote
I checked his trust coments and it looks like he tried that before.

"retarded in the head
Claims the Havelock IPO is not a scam "because he said so".
Don't trust what he says, since he either is trolling, or intentionally misleading or he is a complete fool."


Nice attempt at ad hominem.

I've never done business with either people who left negative feedback and one of them is a known scammer and the other thinks havelock is a scam (even though 1 year later havelock still hasn't scammed anyone).

Looking at your own post history it's clear that championing GAW is pretty much all you do.

Why don't you just ask them to publish a mining address so all you beliebers don't have to waste hours defending them with nothing but flimsy evidence?
803  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Are hashlets worth it? on: October 31, 2014, 08:33:28 PM
I believe they mine on the pools they sell contracts for, not just calculate the avg earnings and payout that amount haha.

If you could provide proof that would be hugely beneficial towards shutting me up. (along with the other skeptics)

Their TOS says it's all virtual:

Quote
Hashlets earnings depend on the pool chosen and Payouts reflect respective Pool Payouts. Selecting a Pool does not imply physically or electronically mining at the selected Pool. Rather, selecting a Pool determines a Payout corresponding to a calculation based on the selected Pool’s payout (based on, for example, real-time Megahash/second/day calculations). A Hashlet is virtual software. You will receive Payouts according to the Pool with with the Hashlet is associated

https://zenminer.com/cloud/terms.html

Quote
Releasing a bitcoin mining address would allow competitors to calculate their average hashrate to be able to know exactly how much to buy or invest to make them on top again.

I'm sorry but that makes no sense. Competitors don't care how much hashrate GAW has, they only care about the total network hashrate.



Almost all manufacturers/cloudmining companies have gone public with their hashrate.
804  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Are hashlets worth it? on: October 31, 2014, 08:17:40 PM
I can't understand why, even though there's confirmed proof FROM THE SUPPLIER, this guy still goes on about how there is no hashing power and it's a big ponzi.

I think you perfectly understand why a new purchase of 5 PH/s doesn't prove they have been mining up to this point.

Seems like quite a waste of time/effort to have Bitmain confirm when all they need to do is post their mining address.

Quote
Oh, because they're innovating and creating a market for hashlet skin collectors to get rare hashlet skins?

Yes they have created value by painting a rock different colors. Good on them, but I wouldn't call it "innovation" as much a gimmick.

Quote
Oh, because they're putting a ton of fun and never before seen cool features into their cloud mining service?

Clicking buttons to boost your hashrate every day is fun? If I made a cloudmining company where you could boost your hashrate 10 times a day would it be 10 times as fun?

It's only "fun" because you have the illusion that you are making extra money but really after all that clicking/arbitrary games you are only making as much as you would have earned if the games never existed.

Quote
Oh, because they let you buy different hash power for different pools?

Do you not find it suspicious that they don't actually mine on those pools and instead calculate the earnings?

Quote
Oh, because they have a forums where people get rewarded for meaningful posts (heaven forbid!)?

You mean rewarded for circlejerking/and banned for any form of criticism? Sounds like a great place to have a non-biased discussion!

This is the one time a company has created their own forum for censorship purposes and turned out to be entirely trustworthy right?

Quote
Is it because they're creating a healthy coin? God forbid there be an actual company launching a coin with financial prowess and innovation behind it.

Innovation? You're joking right?

Here's the puppet-masters take on Hashcoin:

Quote
HashCoin is what we've been working on for months, under Project Prime. It is, I'm confident to say, the single biggest advancement for cryptocurrency since the original Bitcoin white paper.

Quote
Our initial ICO round will happen in the next 2-3 weeks. Our minimum investment floor is 1 million USD, and the line of investors and banks is forming :grinning:.

Quote
Its VERY clear why most coins have not done well. Technical innovation does not make a coin popular. Marketing, business strategy, adoption, and scale do.

Only the GAW CEO could announce to his cultists that he is inventing a coin, premining it, selling million dollar batches, and not get laughed at.

He might even be right though, all it takes is a massive marketing campaign towards ignorant noobs to make money.

Quote
By the way, a company could buy only BTC mining hardware, mine bitcoins, and sell Scrypt mh/s contracts based on what their SHA-256 mining power is. For example, the pool that someone buys a 1mh/s  hashlet on, lets say multipool, posts earnings per mh/s on average. If you have an SHA-256 miner getting .1 btc a day, and sold contract for 1mh/s scrypt that generates average .001 a day, you can sell 100 1mh/s Scrypt contracts and that's all just theory.

Occams razor: "among competing hypotheses, the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected".

You can make up many complicated scenarios where they might be able to payout, but a ponzi is the simplest explanation.

Quote
So regardless what kind of power they bought from Bitmain, they have it, and everything can always be intertwined mathematically. I believe everything you've ever flamed about in this topic was covered, but forgive me if I missed a few non essential points. Good day  Wink

Yes I agree, the 5PH/s from Bitmain is most likely legit. I'm willing to bet that as soon as they bring it online, they will provide the public with their mining address as every legit company would.

The question is why they have refused to prove they are mining up to this point.

Clearly I'm not the only one who thinks it's a ponzi/sketchy/untrustworthy, so why sacrifice potential customers when all it takes is a few seconds to prove without a doubt that they are not a ponzi?
805  Economy / Securities / Re: AMHash1: Cost-Effective Mining Contract on: October 31, 2014, 07:34:00 PM
I am a noob but compared to the price i think its not that bad, other cloud mining providers do have much higher rates and never roi under 100 days, so 135 doesnt sounds bad for me

f.e.: http://www.cryptocurrencyminingreport.com/pb-mining-roi-oct-26th-weekly-payout-1-99-total-roi-92-61-23-weeks%EF%BC%81/

PB mining has roi after 31 weeks / 217 days and price is 0.0021 btc/gh

PBmining is the best priced offering by far but it's also a ponzi scheme.

Before they implemented a coinmixer it was easy to see the coins go directly from new customer payments to the "mining earnings" wallet.
806  Economy / Securities / Re: AMHash1: Cost-Effective Mining Contract on: October 31, 2014, 07:28:57 PM
Divs showed up on Havelock...

"0.00000927" damn...
... per share (GH).

If BTC price/diff ratio will stay in similiar levels as now then ROI in ~135 days...

Ouch, that is a low as hell div. Yeah...this is never going to ROI. What a bummer, good thing I didn't invest.

The daily div shouldn't be a surprise because it can be calculated at any time.
807  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Cloudhashing without proof of mining [poll] on: October 31, 2014, 07:17:57 PM
New cloudmining offering AMHash has disclosed their mining addresses:

5.There are 3 payment addresses of our hashrate:
  1HtUGfbDcMzTeHWx2Dbgnhc6kYnj1Hp24i
  1ERszMSERwHNR9Xty73KZXpsg1jjBXWcHh
  1K7AuMJwVfZg3UVjinnjT2HzG4pJvACat6


Just like pictures can be faked, mining addresses can be rented for premium price. I remember people purchasing freshly mined bitcoins on this forum only. Then I did not understand the reason, but now I do. Unless the miner is at your location, everyone is same. There is NO DIFFERENCE between PB Mining and Cloudhashing whatsoever.

It's really not that simple.

To fake a picture all you need is a miner and a bit of photoshop wizardry.

To fake hashrate you need to find a company with several PH/s that is willing to support a ponzi scheme. Maintaining the illusion of a constant hashrate when you're buying newly mined coins daily is much easier said than done. The only company I know that is selling freshly minted coins in mass is Bitfury, but they have integrity and want to see bitcoin succeed instead of plagued with scams.

If you were going to go through all the trouble of paying a premium for freshly mined coins every day for months on end, you might as well just buy the hashingpower from Bitfury/whatever company because it would be cheaper, less hassle, and less risk to actually mine the coins.

Freshly mined coins are not really ideal for cloudmining ponzi schemes, but they are great for money laundering. Besides, PBmining almost never pays out "mining earnings" that originate from recently mined coins so it appears it's not even necessary to pay a premium for newly mined coins.
808  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Cloudhashing without proof of mining [poll] on: October 31, 2014, 12:51:39 PM
New cloudmining offering AMHash has disclosed their mining addresses:

5.There are 3 payment addresses of our hashrate:
  1HtUGfbDcMzTeHWx2Dbgnhc6kYnj1Hp24i
  1ERszMSERwHNR9Xty73KZXpsg1jjBXWcHh
  1K7AuMJwVfZg3UVjinnjT2HzG4pJvACat6

809  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Cloudhashing without proof of mining [poll] on: October 31, 2014, 12:43:02 PM
GAW for example is leasing their hash, so if they are mining themselves it's just with a fraction of their total power. They showed a lot of pictures and recently bought a lot of hardware from Bitmain, which was confirmed by the seller.

Pictures are not proof because there are many ways they can be faked.

Bitmain confirming their 5PH/s purchase is a step in the right direction but still requires trust in a third party. (although Bitmain is pretty trustworthy)

I have no doubt that GAW will let everyone know their mining address as soon as they get the 5 PH/s online.
810  Economy / Securities / Re: AMHash1: Cost-Effective Mining Contract on: October 31, 2014, 07:21:25 AM
4 There are 3 payment addresses of our hashrate:
  1HtUGfbDcMzTeHWx2Dbgnhc6kYnj1Hp24i
  1K7AuMJwVfZg3UVjinnjT2HzG4pJvACat6
  1K7AuMJwVfZg3UVjinnjT2HzG4pJvACat6


The last two addresses are the same.

Anyways thanks for providing proof of mining.
811  Economy / Securities / Re: [HAVELOCK] AlcheMiner Scrypt ASIC on: October 30, 2014, 06:51:01 PM
Can AlcheMiner clarify the relationship with Mining-asic-technologies?

It's kind of awkward when both companies are claiming to have designed the chip/hardware themselves.

Hi jimmothy,
AlcheMiner definitely designed its chips in house; we did the chip design and taped out to TSMC through GUC (Global Unichip). If anyone here has contacts at either of these companies, they're welcome to verify that independently.

Regarding the case design, it's becoming somewhat of a 'generic' design, so that's the reason for the similarity.

Personally, I'm happy with the quality of the case design - and I think it looks a bit sharper than the boxy Titans  Grin

That doesn't really answer my question.

What is Alcheminers relationship with Mining-asic-technologies?

The cases are not "similar" they are exactly the same and so are the hashing boards. Is MAT a reseller?

Sidenote: that's an incredibly lazy/wasteful design for the 96 mh/s miner. I'm sure you guys could slim it down to the size of a Bitmain S3.
812  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Cloudhashing without proof of mining [poll] on: October 30, 2014, 06:42:12 PM
Zeushash has always been visibly mining on the Litecoin network  Smiley

Here are a few others that are visible on the network:

Hashnest (antpool)
KNC
Cointerra
Cloudhashing
Bitfury
Bitfinex
AMHash
813  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Are hashlets worth it? on: October 30, 2014, 06:30:52 PM
They are really trying to make mining fun for you, so there are many different features to choose from. You get points for keeping your money there as a BONUS. You don't have to do it, but if you choose to, or simply forget to withdraw, you'll get points, that you can use as a store discount. IMO it's a great feature that makes them unique.

To be honest, I can't take you seriously when you say "they are trying to make mining fun". Adding an absurd amount of gimmicks/arbitrary games is not fun, it's a massive waste of time.

GAW knows it's a massive waste of time which is why they implemented the games knowing that only a select few will actually waste their time day after day.

Quote
I'll say this again.

You don't have to register on hashtalk - it's optional.
You don't have to collect and use hashpoints.
You don't have to keep your money in the cloud, a lot of their clients withdraw daily.

Most cults are in fact "optional".

And many people cannot withdraw their BTC but that's another issue.

Quote
All those features are available for those who want to do something more than simply take their daily payout and forget about it.

That's BS. Everything GAW does is a calculated effort to extract money from gullible idiots using every scheme known to man.

You'd have to be outright delusional to think that it's a "great feature" that they pay you to store your BTC on their service. There's absolutely no reason they would want you to store BTC with them unless they plan to steal it once they've accumulated enough.

Any day now GAW will get "hacked" or "lose all their coins due to a technical glitch" and many of you will still try to fork over more money.

sidenote: I'm honestly surprised you're a hero member and at the same time so ignorant about bitcoin. Did you buy that account recently or what?

Quote
Side note: You might want to check out GAW's latest purchase - 5 PH/s from Bitmain Wink

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=827552
https://hashtalk.org/topic/12390/bitmain-confirmation/197

Interesting that GAW has a few million dollars lying around. It's also a bit strange that they are willing to prove they own the sha-256 hardware but we are just supposed to just believe they actually have the scrypt hardware.

But good on them for being relatively honest for once.
814  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: October 30, 2014, 05:53:13 AM
I was digging around blockchain and I've come to the conclusion that KNC did actually dump $40m worth of bitcoins on the market.

Here are addresses owned by KNC:

1H1sq6Msgt9HjRrBuz8ieZdThzWXS6oPVA (knc in the coinbase.)
1A73ExsM2doRwTLp82rv5U36QHbBFmHD1X (knc in the coinbase)
1Nbq2XZaRsKknf5fcT2wTXvBS31PaUWSeX (KNC mining at eligius)
1D5FhoiuLMJJ43BCMGidwvbKWfr71g1vH9 (another eligius address)

Combined they have mined ~82,000 btc.

From the mining addresses the BTC is then sent to a few consolidation wallets the largest of which is 1CU8DYQxwBfq7UTWdopxsodimYwZMVXcbh

From there it looks like just about all the BTC is sent to exchange wallets.
815  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Are hashlets worth it? on: October 30, 2014, 02:38:19 AM
Yeah let him read all those non GAWs threads and make up his own mind.

So all these threads where people have positive opinions and recommend them are "GAW's". Cheesy You got the nerve!

LOL typo... But maybe he will like cheerleaders and the kool aid they serve on the GAWS modded forums? IDK  Huh
Obviously some people do? But that still doesnt put Coins in your wallet.

Don't they pay you for positive/liked comments?

I read that if the CEO likes your comment you are given $1 and if people dislike your comment you lose money and eventually get banned.

If that doesn't work you can try your luck clicking buttons and playing arbitrary games to earn money.

Haha, great idea. But if that was really true don't you think there will be thousands of people praising the GAW for the money? For now I can see only clients who like GAW, clients expressing a constructive criticism and  haters/trolls. Seriously now, your theorycrafting is so good that soon you will be telling us that GAW was founded by the CIA or something like that...

I know it's hard to admit you're part of a scam/cult but I'm not "theorycrafting".

https://hashtalk.org/topic/4059/hashpoints-inofficial-faq

Quote
Q: How much Hashpoints do I earn for upvotes?
A: 1 upvote=1 Hashpoint
GAWCEO upvote = 100 Hashpoints

Q: What are HashPoints Worth?
A: Currently 1 HP = $0.01USD

And I've just found the biggest red flag yet:

Quote
Q:** How do I get Hashpoints?**
A: You earn Hashpoints for keeping your bitcoin in ZenCloud
and for upvotes in Hashtalk.

Every legit pool/cloudmining company makes it clear that they are NOT a bank and that you should remove your BTC ASAP.

GAW on the other hand is pretending to be a bank and wants you to store as much BTC in their cloudmining service as possible.

I'm not sure how people haven't put 2 and 2 together on this one.
816  Economy / Service Discussion / Cloudmining without proof of mining [poll] on: October 29, 2014, 09:43:07 PM
As most of us know, the great invention known as the blockchain gives us the ability to see exactly how much BTC any address holds and where it came from without requiring trust in a third party.

Strangely enough many cloudmining companies are not taking advantage of this incredibly easy way to prove their legitimacy which requires practically no time and effort.

Just curious to hear some thoughts/opinions.

If you haven't already I would check out this blog to get a better understanding of how the blockchain and mining works: http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/2014/10/october-28th-2014-weekly-bitcoin.html

Bitcoin lead developer Gavin Andresen's take on cloudmining: https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/gavin-andresen-suspects-ponzi-schemes-bitcoin-cloud-mining/
817  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Are hashlets worth it? on: October 29, 2014, 09:22:48 PM
Yeah let him read all those non GAWs threads and make up his own mind.

So all these threads where people have positive opinions and recommend them are "GAW's". Cheesy You got the nerve!

LOL typo... But maybe he will like cheerleaders and the kool aid they serve on the GAWS modded forums? IDK  Huh
Obviously some people do? But that still doesnt put Coins in your wallet.

Don't they pay you for positive/liked comments?

I read that if the CEO likes your comment you are given $1 and if people dislike your comment you lose money and eventually get banned.

If that doesn't work you can try your luck clicking buttons and playing arbitrary games to earn money.
818  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Are hashlets worth it? on: October 29, 2014, 09:15:22 PM

These 2 threads have more positive opinions than negative. You're just proving my point here, thanks Smiley

You don't mean this point do you?

Quote
And for your information GAW has sold to thousands of clients, so it's normal a few % of the reviews to be negative.

Looking at those threads it's pretty obvious that it's a bit more than "a few %" of negative reviews. In fact many of the positive posts come from the same people championing GAW in this thread now.

When ~50% of your potential customers are skeptical or think your company is a ponzi, the logical response would be to prove you are not a ponzi.
819  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Are hashlets worth it? on: October 29, 2014, 08:14:50 PM
Hi everyone, I'm looking to start mining, and the cloud miners, by GAW miners (the hashlet) look like a good deal. How long do you have these miners? 5 years? Also, are there any hidden fees I should be aware about? Thanks!

As you can see from the answers and the other thread, You will probably regret spending your money on this...

This other thread?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=752824.0

Or maybe this one?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=750909.180

Looks like people are quite happy with GAW.

And for your information GAW has sold to thousands of clients, so it's normal a few % of the reviews to be negative.

Or what about this thread? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=765856.20

Or this one? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=752233.0

Or what about this entire subreddit that used to be filled with GAW fanatics but is now filled with customers who think it's a scam? https://www.reddit.com/r/GAWMiners/

Also for your information, GAW's incredible amount negative feedback/ponzi accusations is anything but normal. (well it's normal for a scam)

Why do you think Hashnest, Cointerra, KNC, Cloudhashing, and other legit cloudmining companies don't have nearly as much, if any, negative feedback/ponzi accusations?
820  Economy / Securities / Re: [HAVELOCK] AlcheMiner Scrypt ASIC on: October 29, 2014, 07:19:37 PM
Can AlcheMiner clarify the relationship with Mining-asic-technologies?

It's kind of awkward when both companies are claiming to have designed the chip/hardware themselves.
I thought mining-asic-technologies was a scam?

It is most likely a scam IMO but they are apparently shipping the same hardware that AlcheMiner claims to have designed/manufactured.

Looks a bit like a AlcheMiner ALCHEMIST  ??






AlcheMiner


Mat miner

My simple website: http://www.bitcoinupdate.nl/home/mining-asics-technologies-levert-eerste-miner-af

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 [41] 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 ... 170 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!