What is intriguing is that for some reason the BBcode includes the link but leaves the space for the title of the topic in which the post was merited. Probably the same reason the links don't appear on the merit history page Something goes wrong with my variables. It works for some posts, scroll down this list and you'll find some titles. I never looked into it. This old script is kinda messy. |
|
|
|
Am I the only reading that they perform blockchain analysis to prevent investors from scamming Jambler? /become-seller.php]This stage makes it possible to terminate attempts of unfair investors to use an investment admittance as a mixer in order to clear their money and gain profit at the same time. What if someone has "clean" (whatever that may mean) funds, and only wants to break the link for his privacy? He could then be an investor, and gain profit after getting his money back. This whole check makes it sounds like they expect customers to mix "dirty" money, instead of just wanting privacy. |
|
|
|
By the way, I just checked Binance's Bitcoin withdrawal fees and I am kinda confused. Withdrawal fee for Bitcoin (legacy) is 0.00025 BTC while the withdrawal fee for SegWit that's supposed to be nearly 40% lower, is 0.00062 BTC. Did I misunderstood something here or doesn't this make any sense? Binance loves confusing users into accepting their own made-up token as Bitcoin. Charging more for SegWit looks like a way to increase profit from unsuspecting users:  |
|
|
|
I recall it starting in 2013 with a mispronunciation by professor Mark T Williams of Boston University. It led to him being known as Professor Bitcorn. I haven't found the actual quotation yet but I'm sure it's out there somewhere. For now I've had my piss and re-hydration and I'm going back to bed. https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mark_T._WilliamsI checked the source of the above image: It's user bitcorn, registered in 2011. |
|
|
|
my memory might be tricking me, but I think it started from "Bitcorn" That would make this the first occurrences: Dude.. its called microphone! No need to shout the voice through the internet
Bank academic guy doesn't know how to use a mic! Bitcorn bubble! Edit: Single digits! MY FUCKING EARS! Bitcorn, the coin that will hit single digits by June! Guaranteed.  |
|
|
|
Lol, why would you sell a currency which will have the only meaning in a world war 3 scenario? Well lets hope your fiat is still accepted as a currency by the end of the week. Government may feel the need to... Print/claim some war insurance. But but but ..... Fiat money is protected by armies 
I've been wondering for a while now: what's with the use of the word "corn" here? Is this where it started? It's been eerily quiet for a Monday afternoon. Something big's coming.
Time to start popping some corn. |
|
|
|
Is it a temporary or permanent ban? It's permanent. As a user, all I can see is public data, and temporary bans don't get published in modlog. |
|
|
|
since then nothing has changed It just changed: Previously, I was under the impression that Jambler was merely a software or platform provider, like Wordpress or AWS. But after reviewing it more closely, it meets the definition of a mixer as written. My mind was especially changed when I saw this diagram from their website:  The diagram clearly shows that Jambler is the actual mixer. They issue the "letters of guarantee", they send the BTC directly to the final customer, etc. The partners are just lightweight proxies in front of the true mixer, which is Jambler. Jambler "has a feature advertised for taking property, improving its privacy somehow, and then returning roughly the same type of property", and it meets the other two criteria, so it's a mixer. (Maybe you could make the case that Jambler's actual customers are its partners instead of the final end-users, but even in that case Jambler is acting as a mixer for its partners. Jambler is the one doing the mixing. So it's still a mixer in either case.) Since I had previously ruled that Jambler did not meet the definition of a mixer, and I've now changed my mind, there will be a short grace period: Jambler will be wordfiltered (and otherwise treated as a mixer) starting on April 22. As with other banned mixers, please do not interpret this as a moral judgement. I'm not saying that Jambler is or is not bad. |
|
|
|
is it indeed only one entity doing all the spam?! I'm not sure, but it looks like it: exactly the same fee, exactly the same transaction, often using the previous outputs as inputs, and broadcasting them in batches.
Maybe it's time to significantly raise the dust limit. This transaction creates more than 1000 dust inputs. |
|
|
|
if any admin or mod, posts a thread he does not need merits and therefore he may restrict the post to be merited, so people and/or the merit sources do not send merits to those posts and rather give merits to ordinary people. Reading between the lines, you seem to think Merit is scarce, so it should be preserved for "people who need it". That's the wrong approach. Merit isn't meant for "people who need it". And Merit isn't scarce, good posts are. I wouldn't like it if someone stops me from Meriting the posts I want. It's hard enough to get rid of sMerit already (and that's coming from someone who sent 49687 sMerits). If we'd reserve Merit for people "who need it", we wouldn't have needed the Merit system in the first place. Back then, every shitposter could rank up as many accounts as they wanted. Merit is supposed to stop many people from ranking up! |
|
|
|
I also had my proposals to block them (as spam), but some said that Bitcoin network should not start censoring arbitrarily (which is also something I agree with). I have a feeling the truth is somewhere in between. I wouldn't call it "arbitrary" if it's one person spamming the blockchain for so long. The reason I still think it's one person is because of the massive numbers of similar transactions that keep flooding the blockchain. If fees aren't enough to deter spammers, I'd like to bring back the "coin days destroyed" priority mechanism. But it's going to be difficult to get miners on board if it means less profit. |
|
|
|
my service is still working, slowly but surely. You may want to update the image in the OP. |
|
|
|
|
I appreciate the bumps, but you'll have to follow the one simple rule of this topic.
|
|
|
|
I earned far more then the power it costs. At the moment it earns about 4 cents a day profit I dont bother using it since 4 cents a day profit is meh. But many days it made 40 cents a day. At 4 cents a day profit I'd have free heating all winter Unfortunately, I've never seen any mining that's worth it considering the prices here. |
|
|
|
|
I don't have LN-funds at the moment, but what I usually do is take some low-fee altcoin, and use an instant exchanger to get LN funds.
For what it's worth, Bitcoin fees are a lot lower already than when you posted this.
|
|
|
|
I was told that those dust inputs carry Ordinals/NFT I don't care about some "deeper meaning" that someone external from Bitcoin made up for something. All I see is fungible on-chain Bitcoin dust. And if you hope expect to get 1000s of $ for that tx, spending 33$ is not a bad investment (in your dreams). I'd understand that if there's a few of them. But since someone is creating tens of millions of them, it doesn't make sense. It's not rare, it's not scarse, it's just BS. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
