Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 04:12:04 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 [44] 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 ... 101 »
861  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Bad News: Avalon ASIC Samples shipped, BUT... on: June 09, 2013, 07:45:52 PM
IIRC, Avalon said 30 sample chips per order, then changed it to 30 sample chips per shipping address. If that is true then they can take Avalon to court for breach of contract.

 Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin China  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

Good luck with that. Maybe ull have better luck suing BFL.

Lying to make a sale is really common... and Avalon people seem very sincere to me.

I would imagine the escrow agents would sue in their jurisdiction first and then if successful try to get that judgement enforced where the company has assets. That is the usual method for going after international companies.

Without seeing the actual contract terms, it is impossible to know how much leeway Avalon has. Plus, Avalon has $8 million dollars in one bitcoin address and that will buy a lot of lawyers.
862  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Call to arms] Why don't you destroy BFL rather than QQ? on: June 09, 2013, 07:40:38 PM


So in order to be a market leader, you can't have outside help, or subcontracted components? Come on, you can't be real... Who put you up to this? Am I on Punk'd?

I'm going to take this as your lighthearted admission to being wrong.  Give yourself a pat on the back, it feels good to admit it once and awhile, doesn't it?

Yes. I am wrong, give me a moment to get my backpedal up to speed.

FTFY. Factsies are a downer aren't they?

What facts?

I'm asking a simple question, and you're dancing around it. Are industry leaders allowed to subcontract out, or not?

You can't be an industry leader if you don't do any work in that industry. BFL does no actual work in ASICs if they subcontract out all of the design. Therefore they cannot be industry leaders in ASIC design.

So simple a 5 year old could understand it. Too bad you are not allowed within 200 feet of schools or you could get one to explain it to you Wink

It didn't say they were industry leaders in ASIC design. It said semiconductor design, and it appears to be a statement by a 3rd party. They're clearly industry leaders in ASIC mining hardware design, or at least they were at the time of the article's publication.

Once again, are market leaders allowed to subcontract or not?

You must do work in an industry to "lead" it. BFL does no work in ASIC or semiconductor design. The people who actually designed the ASIC could be called leaders in ASIC mining hardware (if they actually lead the industry instead of Avalon & ASICMiner), but none of those people work for BFL.

You should deflect somewhere else. This one is a dead end for you.
863  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Call to arms] Why don't you destroy BFL rather than QQ? on: June 09, 2013, 07:29:55 PM


So in order to be a market leader, you can't have outside help, or subcontracted components? Come on, you can't be real... Who put you up to this? Am I on Punk'd?

I'm going to take this as your lighthearted admission to being wrong.  Give yourself a pat on the back, it feels good to admit it once and awhile, doesn't it?

Yes. I am wrong, give me a moment to get my backpedal up to speed.

FTFY. Factsies are a downer aren't they?

What facts?

I'm asking a simple question, and you're dancing around it. Are industry leaders allowed to subcontract out, or not?

You can't be an industry leader if you don't do any work in that industry. BFL does no actual work in ASICs if they subcontract out all of the design. Therefore they cannot be industry leaders in ASIC design.

So simple a 5 year old could understand it. Too bad you are not allowed within 200 feet of schools or you could get one to explain it to you Wink
864  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Bad News: Avalon ASIC Samples shipped, BUT... on: June 09, 2013, 07:26:32 PM
I think we should just trust the group buy owners to co-ordinate and distribute the samples among the developers they think has the greatest chance of making good use of them.

If 2 groups are designing 16 chip boards, how can you distribute 30 chips to them equitably?
I think the escrow folks are going to have to put the screws to Avalon for more samples, or ask for their money back.

At least there are samples. 2 steps forward, 1 back.  Angry

The escrow folks have zero pull here. The arrangements for escrow were between the group buy organizers and participants. Once the orders were full, the payment was made directly to Avalon. Escrow agents can do nothing about it. Payment's been made.

IIRC, Avalon said 30 sample chips per order, then changed it to 30 sample chips per shipping address. If that is true then they can take Avalon to court for breach of contract.
865  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Bad News: Avalon ASIC Samples shipped, BUT... on: June 09, 2013, 07:17:41 PM
I think we should just trust the group buy owners to co-ordinate and distribute the samples among the developers they think has the greatest chance of making good use of them.

If 2 groups are designing 16 chip boards, how can you distribute 30 chips to them equitably?
I think the escrow folks are going to have to put the screws to Avalon for more samples, or ask for their money back.

At least there are samples. 2 steps forward, 1 back.  Angry
866  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Call to arms] Why don't you destroy BFL rather than QQ? on: June 09, 2013, 07:15:20 PM


So in order to be a market leader, you can't have outside help, or subcontracted components? Come on, you can't be real... Who put you up to this? Am I on Punk'd?

I'm going to take this as your lighthearted admission to being wrong.  Give yourself a pat on the back, it feels good to admit it once and awhile, doesn't it?

Yes. I am wrong, give me a moment to get my backpedal up to speed.

FTFY. Factsies are a downer aren't they?
867  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Call to arms] Why don't you destroy BFL rather than QQ? on: June 09, 2013, 07:00:32 PM

[shill bullshit]

They're not ASIC engineers by trade. So what's the best thing to do when you need a product/component from a trade you don't specialize in? Find somebody who DOES specialize in that, and hire them to design that component for you. Then subcontract with another company to manufacture that component.

[more shill bullshit]


Oh, so then they were lying when they posted "Butterfly Labs (BF Labs Inc.), a market leader in microprocessor design [...]" and "The company offers a range of products and consulting services in semiconductor design."?

Sounds to me like they are ASIC designers.  Or maybe they're a bunch of fucking liars?

Source: http://web.archive.org/web/20130129102300/http://news.yahoo.com/butterfly-labs-announces-next-generation-asic-lineup-054626776.html

NO FAIRS! WE CALLED NO FACTSIES!!!  Grin
868  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Recieved my Jalapeno! Order # 3486 on: June 09, 2013, 06:12:36 PM
Now, you will probably say that they're likely limiting clock speed in the firmware. OK, that's POSSIBLE, but if it were as simple as simply upping the clock speed, they'd be introducing more heat, which would in turn have a NEGATIVE effect on things, due to the fact that a guy running a bone-stock Jalapeno is losing hashing speed when he puts his unit back in the case, moderately reducing the cooling efficiency of the thing.

I am 99.9% certain that the chips have a programmable clock rate. So the firmware is indeed setting the clock. I am also fairly certain that the firmware can accept a clock rate from external to the device (otherwise testing would be horrifically awful). So if someone reverse engineers what those inputs are (no inputs = default clock rate) then everyone should be able to tweak their Jala's to a higher hash rate.
869  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Call to arms] Why don't you destroy BFL rather than QQ? on: June 09, 2013, 06:06:37 PM
Not BFL, it's sub-contractors who made the actual ASIC if I recall correctly. Everything was outsourced, as was evident from you always explaining why everything was done away from your direct control. (In stark contrast to why Avalon got things done quickly)

I quite enjoy when this fact gets brought up after BFL's monkey runs off on diatribes about how they created an ASIC. 

^This. BFL's input to the chip design was "make it hash this much" <holds hands about 12 inches apart>.

It is cute to see Inaba flailing around in the thread. Why isn't he adding his "cross-domain" expertise to getting Singles and Mini-rigs working?

I do believe that Xian is under an obligation to "exhaust" attempts to resolve BFL's breach of contract without resorting to the courts.
870  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Bad News: Avalon ASIC Samples shipped, BUT... on: June 09, 2013, 05:59:36 PM
Folks, miners and Avalon ASIC board developers,

I just got emailed from Avalon that the sample chips for the ASIC chips ordered are shipped. Even received an EMS shipping number, great news!

But I was also informed that only one set of sample chips will be delivered to one receiver address, which essentially means that you will receive 30 samples, no matter if you ordered 10k or 200k chips.

Given that I did the group buy with 70k chips for almost 300 users and there are at least 10 projects working on mining boards and desperately awaiting the samples for validation, this is disastrous news. It means that only one or two of them will be given the chance to finalize their design before chips arrive.

Very disappointing Sad

Ouch. That is going to leave a mark.  Angry
871  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Recieved my Jalapeno! Order # 3486 on: June 09, 2013, 05:13:05 PM
Okay, I am back.... Check out the specs on BFLs chips.

https://products.butterflylabs.com/65nm-asic-bitcoin-mining-chip.html

" Chip grades:  Chips come in four grades of performance.  Chips are sold in mixed grade lots.  A grade has 16 engines, B grade has 15 engines, C grade has 14 engines and D grade has no less than 12 engines.  All chips run at a minimum of 250 mhz.  Higher grade chips will run up to 294mhz.  The percentage distribution in each lot is 60% Grade A, 20% Grade B, 15% Grade C and 5% Grade D."


You have a 90% chance of having ZERO Grade D chips in the standard Jalapeno.
Remember Jallys now have 2 chips.

Running them both at 250 mhz will mean that there is an average output of at least 7.5 GH/s.
(I used an average of 15 engines per chip, at 250,000 hz per engine)

BFL has the Jally cranked down to run at 5.5 GH/s.

Unless that is the distribution for sale as opposed to the yield of the binning. For instance, they might be reserving D lot chips to go into Jalapeno's because they add up nicely to 5 GH/s.
872  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Call to arms] Why don't you destroy BFL rather than QQ? on: June 08, 2013, 11:48:19 PM
Do you just have a list that you copy/paste your posts from? They're all the same, guy. Get some new material!

Oh, the irony.

You only show up in threads where BFL faces an existential crisis. The Xian lawsuit thread, the BFL chip sale (or complete lack thereof I should say), this thread which threatened BFL with a wave of refunds. Wherever there is bad press for BFL, you swoop in and derail the threads with the same tired shilling.

I know you don't truly believe that refund requests would help BFL. If you did then you would encourage the refunds instead of fighting so desperately against them.  Grin

873  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Call to arms] Why don't you destroy BFL rather than QQ? on: June 08, 2013, 11:33:27 PM
Putting my day 1 preorder "up for auction" is NOT an option...............

IF BFL fails to deliver,I AM RESPONSIBLE for paying back that person,not BFL..................I would not jeopardize my principles for money.

Yet,I am greedy enough to hold out hope that BFL will deliver my unit  Cheesy

End of line...................................................................

Fair enough, if you don't want to assume the responsibility, that's understandable. One more example of a reason why people aren't doing what our omniscient, resident-know-it-all, K9, reckons you should... Just in case you missed it, HE was the one telling you what you should do with your money/preorders, not me.  Wink

Your next paragraph serves to reinforce my other point. You believe that you stand to gain financially by waiting. So it's not, as K9 asserts, just an attempt to 'stick it to BFL', and make sure they "don't get an interest-free loan," as he puts it.

Everyone has already admitted that people with a day 1 order of BFL equipment can still find a greater fool to sell it to. You don't need to belabor that point.
And no, I don't want to see people who were promised product 7 months ago get Xian'ed.

Sociopaths such as your self will not see the wrong in a bait and switch scheme, so I won't waste my breath explaining it to you. But promising someone a delivery and then reneging on that promise just because the delivery costs too much or you don't like the person anymore is breach of contract and that is something you will eventually understand as the courts explain it to BFL and they dock your paycheck.

K9,I read these forums MANY times a day & know all about you & others & know where you stand man.It's all good bro  Wink

My "point of view" will keep till later  Wink

Fair enough.  Wink
874  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Call to arms] Why don't you destroy BFL rather than QQ? on: June 08, 2013, 11:21:09 PM
Putting my day 1 preorder "up for auction" is NOT an option...............

IF BFL fails to deliver,I AM RESPONSIBLE for paying back that person,not BFL..................I would not jeopardize my principles for money.

Yet,I am greedy enough to hold out hope that BFL will deliver my unit  Cheesy

End of line...................................................................

Fair enough, if you don't want to assume the responsibility, that's understandable. One more example of a reason why people aren't doing what our omniscient, resident-know-it-all, K9, reckons you should... Just in case you missed it, HE was the one telling you what you should do with your money/preorders, not me.  Wink

Your next paragraph serves to reinforce my other point. You believe that you stand to gain financially by waiting. So it's not, as K9 asserts, just an attempt to 'stick it to BFL', and make sure they "don't get an interest-free loan," as he puts it.

Everyone has already admitted that people with a day 1 order of BFL equipment can still find a greater fool to sell it to. You don't need to belabor that point.
And no, I don't want to see people who were promised product 7 months ago get Xian'ed.

Sociopaths such as your self will not see the wrong in a bait and switch scheme, so I won't waste my breath explaining it to you. But promising someone a delivery and then reneging on that promise just because the delivery costs too much or you don't like the person anymore is breach of contract and that is something you will eventually understand as the courts explain it to BFL and they dock your paycheck.
875  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Call to arms] Why don't you destroy BFL rather than QQ? on: June 08, 2013, 10:40:59 PM

You just reiterated my entire point. The market demand and your own rational self-interest is what is driving your decisions. Not some asshat with zero vested interest, standing on a soap box.

I don't get how you get angry when I point this out, and then confirm that these are EXACTLY the reasons for your behavior. Nobody else is selling. BFL, for now, owns the market. That may change soon enough, but in the mean time, market forces are exactly what are driving your (and any other rational human being's) behavior. No reason to take offense to that.

Every post you make further solidifies, in my mind, how much of an idiot you are.  The lesser part of me secretly hopes BFL fails and that you and a select few are the ones left holding the bag. However,  I'd be equally satisfied if you end up so embarrassed with yourself that you disappear and the rest of us are never tasked with reading your bullshit again.

I'm adding you to my ignore list, which should have been done long ago.

I liked how you just called names without ever debating any points of my argument. Well played sir. Run away and bury your head in the sand. Seems to be all you're good for...

He can still see my posts. But since I am quoting you, for how much longer I cannot say.
Everyone knows that a few early BFL orders can be converted into more money than they were bought for. Greater fools abound on these forums (I use you as exhibit A). But later orders are worthless. If KNCMiner or Avalon delivers, the secondary market for BFL will evaporate.

Asking for a refund just guarantees you get screwed by BFL. Holding on to a day 1 BFL order until KNCMiner & Avalon deliver (or BFL delivers) is just people trying to salvage a little bit out of 11 months of fail.
876  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BFL ASIC specifications on: June 08, 2013, 10:31:05 PM
Do you care to speculate what could be the specific mistake that the BFL's designers made?

For example eldentyrell speculated a while back that they made their simulations at the default temperature chosen by SPICE in absence of specific setting: 25 deg C.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=166321.0

Obviously, we don't have sufficient information to make a real assesment; but I think even making a scientific wild ass guess will have some educational value for the readership of this forum.

I would guess that when doing integrity simulations they did not set the upper bound to say 85C, which is fairly common in commercial electronics.  In applications that use heatsinks sometimes this results in incorrectly calculating the efficiency of said heatsink.   This can be empirically tested, say by cooling with LN2, which is readily available at most lab test supply shops.  If the chip error rate reduces at the same clock frequency, then the efficiency of the heatsink and/or upper bound of simulation was not 85C.  In Cadence's package design software and subsequent sim, -20C and 85C are used as the lower and upper bounds, respectively.

There are a number of other reasons they could be experiencing low yields, but the facts are a) Global Foundaries' 65nm process is fairly mature b) the design rule checks (DRC's) provided by foundaries and/or built into any usable EDA software would catch the majority of other potential culprits, such as signal integrity or cross talk issues.


If they used fully unrolled SHA256 pipelines (128+ stages), a single glitch anywhere would take out an entire engine. If each engine takes up 0.5mm and one glitch would wreck it, that could explain crappy yields.

Of course one defect in a pipeline wrecks the pipeline.  Sorry if I assumed it was obvious, but it is.   However, for such a high defect per area density, modern commercial CPU and GPU manufacture would be lucky to yield one working chip per 300mm wafer.   GPU's would cost > 10k USD.

I was just reverse engineering the 7950/7970 die size (352mm2) with their binning. Roughly 45x the die size and they disable 256 of the cores during binning. It didn't seem unlikely that 50-100 of those cores underperform or fail tests. But I was just doing back of the envelope calculations. I might be able to lay my hands on what sort of defect rate AMD actually sees at that die size and what their worst case scenario looks like.

Might be interesting for comparison purposes, but I realize a GPU of that size is a "whole nother critter".  Grin
877  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Call to arms] Why don't you destroy BFL rather than QQ? on: June 08, 2013, 10:17:16 PM

Yeah,"market forces"................forces me to look elsewhere for my ASIC needs  Roll Eyes

Ahh yes, the bipolarism of the BFL customer scorned. All talk, no walk. If you've got 'elsewhere' to get your ASIC needs met, go for it. I call bullshit. Why would you be so hell-bent on keeping your BFL order if you had somebody else to meet your needs?
Wrenchmonkey rage incoming. Wrecked by Unacceptable and wrenchmonkey turns on him like a rabid squirrel.

Unacceptable does not want to be punished like Xian was. He is rightfully afraid to speak to speak his mind for fear of BFL retaliating. Until Xian resolves the legal dispute, people with early orders are wise to keep silent, or at least complain via an alias.
"Retaliating"? Oh my! But HOW praytell? Are they gonna come beat him up? Nooooo. Are they gonna cut off the head of his prized horse and leave it in his bed? Noooo.
They would do to him what they did to Xian.

How are they gonna "retaliate"? Maybe, cancel an order that he and the rest of the market REALLY, REALLY, REALLY want? Bingo! If it were just a matter of them canceling an order, and him going someplace else, it wouldn't be much incentive to prevent him badmouthing a company. So CLEARLY the market really fucking wants these things, right? Right.
He has waited 11 months, he doesn't want all patience that to turn into an interest free loan to BFL.

Market forces at work. Further demonstrating that you're not going to convince people to demand refunds en masse. Nor will those people demanding refunds have any meaningful bearing on BFL's order queue. Because for every potential day 1 order spot that gets opened up, there are 10 people ready and willing to jump on it. If another company comes along with ability to deliver faster, at a competitive price, people will no longer cling to their pre-orders, and will go elsewhere.

Market forces, son, market forces. Not rocket science.
IMO, day 1 customers should sell to the greater fool if they can. Then re-invest in Avalon or KNCMiner. Who knows when the supply of fools will run out?
Bad news from BFL or good news from KNCMiner could flush that "market" down the toilet.
Day 1 orders of mini-rigs or singles should not complain lest BFL turn their patience into an interest free loan and a potential lawsuit against an empty shell of a company.

What about day 90 orders? or day 180 orders? or day 270 orders? What is the value of an BFL order from April on the open market? Probably zilch.

And with that, I do believe this ass belongs to you. Let me just hand that back to ya.
Wink
FYI, that isn't my ass you are trying to hand to me, it is the ass you have been talking out of since you arrived. I will be happy to dispose of it for you. However, Josh might miss it next time he wants to take a crap.


878  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Call to arms] Why don't you destroy BFL rather than QQ? on: June 08, 2013, 09:37:14 PM
My purpose here is not to convince you or wrenchmonkey or any of the other BFL fanbois to change your stripes. That cannot be done. My purpose here is to provide a counterpoint to your reckless optimism and willful ignorance.

That's funny, because your sexual-fetish-level fanaticism was here on the forum WELL before either of us got here. So who's providing a 'counterpoint' to whom, exactly? Your type are a dime-a-dozen on this forum, guy. You're all predictable, all fanatics, and all using the same tired talking points. Roll Eyes
There are certainly dozens of people who are very upset with BFL while their determined supporters can be counted on a single hand.
I just happen to have the patience to debunk your crap ad infinitum.

I have a dog in this & would LOVE to express my feelings/presumptions/speculations....................but I'm not losing my day 1 preorder over it  Angry

BAM! Market forces at work!  Grin

Wrenchmonkey reading comprehension at work again. That is Josh instilling the fear of BFL order cancellation in people. Unacceptable does not want to be punished like Xian was. He is rightfully afraid to speak to speak his mind for fear of BFL retaliating. Until Xian resolves the legal dispute, people with early orders are wise to keep silent, or at least complain via an alias.
879  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Call to arms] Why don't you destroy BFL rather than QQ? on: June 08, 2013, 09:32:54 PM
Something, something, mental gymnastics to make my own position seem justified

 Roll Eyes
You have given up again. I suppose BFL is paying you whether you get schooled here or not.

There are plenty of statements by Josh (like the power measurements that they took on the chips they didn't have that said they met their projections that they have since admitted they did not meet) that were clearly lies (some would call it marketing) to put pressure on their competitors and reassure their pre-order base (which they had to keep on the hook for another 6 months).

Can't speak to that, as you provide no quotes or sources, and I can't trust your quotes/sources anyway, as you've clearly demonstrated your MO of distortion and deceit by altering or removing context.
You wouldn't believe the documentation provided by a federal court. You still believe Sonny Vleisides is a saint. Nothing I can link to would change your mind in the slightest. My links are for the people reading your sad little diatribes.

More nonsense and appeal to motive fallacy

*yawn*
You have given up again. I suppose BFL is paying you whether you get schooled here or not.

Declaration of victory in dead-horse-beating contest
Yes, congratulations, you've convinced me to give up on rehashing your sexual-fetish-level obsession with BFL and Josh.  Roll Eyes

You cannot be convinced, but every time you make an idiotic statement and I catch you in it with facts, other people might notice.
Since you are typing right now with Josh's nuts in your mouth, I wouldn't bring up fetish level obsessions if I were you.  Grin
If BFL delivers their mini-rigs before KNCMiner delivers a Saturn, BFL might still avoid the fate of bASIC.
BFL still has a shot at being the DeLorean of bitcoin mining.  Grin
880  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Call to arms] Why don't you destroy BFL rather than QQ? on: June 08, 2013, 09:26:33 PM
What change of subject? I've been trying every possible way to express to you that I'm no longer discussing the days-old topic with you because you proved yourself incapable of remaining in the hypothetical bounds of the discussion put there specifically to stay in rational terms.

The bASIC drama sounded like it was pretty bad.  How many bASIC units were ever sent out to actual customers?

You you keep changing the subject and declaring that you refuse to discuss the previous subject further because...
No reason yet supplied other than some vague complaint about "remaining within hypotheical bounds to stay in rational terms." Sounds like code for capitulation.

You may refuse to discuss the topic of the thread all you like. My purpose here is not to convince you or wrenchmonkey or any of the other BFL fanbois to change your stripes. That cannot be done. My purpose here is to provide a counterpoint to your reckless optimism and willful ignorance.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 [44] 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 ... 101 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!