We just explained clearly why DT is centralized, you don't seem able to debunk our points. Simply saying you disagree is not an argument.
You misunderstand. My argument is not simply me saying "I disagree". My argument is that the differing opinions between DT members observably demonstrate that DT is not centralised. My disagreement is being offered as evidence of the differing opinions I am referring to. Just like saying " it is my opinion" that tecshare should be black listed from DT and Tman, lauda and Nutildah should not be blacklisted. Not only that but I believe nutildah, lauda , and tman should be included on to the boards trust system, is avoiding and running away from presenting you reason or argument for that statement.
So again are you able or willing to say WHY you believe that? or will you try to avoid it because you know you can present no sensible case for that statement that will stand up to scrutiny?
This is the problem with meta, peoples opinions seem to be based upon reasoning that collapses under any mild scrutiny. Then they get angry, run away screaming troll.
The beauty of opinions is that they don't have to be based upon reasoning. That's what distinguishes them from facts. Your apparent wilful inability to distinguish the two is why we claim you are a troll. |
|
|
|
Which rules to apply and wear your avatar.
The rules are you have to cycle an obscene amount of merit between yourself and other members of the merit/trust gang that exists in the conspiracy theory that cryptohunter's all worked up about, so I'm afraid you don't quite qualify at this stage. Sorry. I'm touched that you think so highly of me, to be in the rarefied air of not being a complete shitposter, it brings a tear to my eye.  I didn't mean to imply you were an incomplete shitposter, though to be fair that would still put you in an elite minority.  |
|
|
|
If Foxpup doesn't mind, then there is a suggestion to change the color of the avatar of one of the users to make it easier to recognize them. Sorry, but I started my avatar campaign in protest of all the other avatar campaigns, which cause the same confusion. How do you feel, for example, about nutildah, DarkStar_, and Pamoldar sharing the same avatar? (There are a zillion others, of course, but those are first users with paid avatars who come to mind who aren't complete shitposters.) Note also that LoyceV and suchmoon were both looking for an avatar campagin to join at the time I proposed mine, so there's a good chance they would have ended up with identical paid avatars without my involvement. Still, if paid avatars bother you guys so much, I suggest petitioning theymos to ban them.  |
|
|
|
Thanks to lauda, tman and foxpup i got banned because a death threat towards a scammer.
Shortly later: 9/14/2019 8:55:16 PM Changed to Archived status Autoban user Yeah, I reported him for ban evasion and then forgot to lock the time machine afterwards. Sorry about that.  |
|
|
|
You claim that tecshare should be blacklisted from DT. We are simply asking you to detail the reasons WHY tecshare should be blacklisted but members such as tman, lauda, nutildah should NOT be blacklisted but you say SHOULD BE INCLUDED in DT? This seems unthinkable and totally irrational. However we want to see your reasons for saying this.
Yes, I can see how that would seem unthinkable and irrational to someone who thinks DT is centralised. Let me try to explain it another way: I am a different person to you, and therefore I hold different opinions about certain things. My opinions even differ from those of other DT members, as difficult as that concept may be to comprehend for someone who believes that we're all of a single mind. For more examples of opinions I hold that may differ from other people's opinions, I think that lemons are okay and are the appropriate garnish for a martini, that homosexuality is fine and dandy, and that people who put ice in whisky should be shot. |
|
|
|
You claim Tecshare should be blacklisted from DT do you vixen? this is a view we do not share nor understand at this stage.
Then you should express your view more clearly. I do not share or understand your view that DT is centralised when its own members disagree about who should be allowed in it. It's hardly the ideal model of a single-minded colluding group, you have to admit. This is going to be interesting.. or will we witness a high velocity vile vixen vanishing act?
Only if it ceases to be interesting. You'd better not bore me by repeating the same tired rant over and over again. To summon the agent one it seems need only mention 'vixen' and it appears to assist as best it can.
Good vixens always come when called.  |
|
|
|
gameprotect helped me get back my btc from a scam casino, see most posters here are paid by these scam casinos so of course they will defend them. GP is helping people and gambler shills are trying to bring him down
Good for you. I'm sure you won't mind telling us the name of the casino in question, or the exact means by which you got your BTC back, or any other little details that might back up your story. |
|
|
|
You can not debunk a observable instance. Well perhaps one vixen could......in their mind anyway.
Oh, all right, if you insist...
You are increasingly centralizing power to those handful of people that have undeniable and independently verifiable instances of financially motivated wrong doing. This again is quite undeniable.
False. DT was previously decided by theymos unilaterally. The new system, however much you dislike it, is decentralised by comparison. You are allowing and sanctioning those same bunch of scammers and their supporters to punish whistleblowers. You are empowering these scammers to do so.
Okay, here you're onto something. I don't know why TECSHARE hasn't yet been blacklisted from DT any more than you do. My best guess is that theymos is waiting to see if the system will resolve itself in a decentralised way. No point saying no because your posts are boring, or no because it's bullshit or no because you must be now banned, or sorry the posting style is too annoying or long winded.
Penmanship counts. You'd do well to heed Strunk & White's advice to omit needless words (or just omit words). |
|
|
|
What happened here?  I checked to see if I removed him by accident, and I definitely have not. Is it because he just got nuked? (Also, in an apparently unrelated bug, it seems removed entries are absent from BBcode pages, forcing me to mark up this post myself.) |
|
|
|
Local rule - this is addressed to theymos only. Therefore only his opinion is on topic and relevant. Nobody except theymos and our selves may post on this thread.
Then why bother starting a thread at all? Is theymos blocking your PMs?  |
|
|
|
Imagine if we found his trust list
I myself have a hard time imagining it. Like your good "friend" cryptohunter, you've always proven too lazy to find publicly available information, even when it would support your (what I'm generously calling) arguments. |
|
|
|
I've only had experience with Ethereum vulnerability here but assumed this would apply to other networks.
More details in our blog post here:
By default, the Ethereum RPC doesn’t have any authentication methods, unlike Bitcoin.
Would you please actually read what your writers contribute to your blog before repeatedly posting advertisements for it disguised as normal forum discussion? Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
The freedom to do what one wants with one's bitcoins necessarily includes the freedom to give custody of them to a third party. Some (such as those who are unwilling or unable to safely manage their own private keys) will find such an arrangement beneficial. And some will not benefit from such an arrangement, and choose not to use it. That's what freedom means.
|
|
|
|
.if you needed a friend to deposit a large sum of cash into my bank account you would call ALICE??? WTF
Hahah let me listen to your advice on things please. hahaha
If it does not get stolen, spent on crack, blown-up, shot, thrown over board, burned, eaten, or freely given away to that lovely man who said he would help alice carry it to a different bank that was run by fluffy tailed squirrels ... Foxpoop get over here please you are going to lap this one up.
Of course. Because if there's one thing I love lapping up more than the taint sweat of my alleged merit/trust buddies, it's the equally hot and salty pretzels you so lovingly make by twisting other people's words.  If I was sick and needed a friend to deposit a large sum of cash into my bank account, I’d call Alice… Unless her boyfriend, Bob is around.
unless conjunction
except under the circumstances that; except on the condition that.
Clearly, DireWolf's point is that he will not in fact call Alice to handle his large sum of cash, precisely because of her relationship with Bob. Trust you to read the opposite of the actual meaning because you don't know what a simple word like "unless" means. |
|
|
|
[4079 characters]
TL;DR: Homophobia is the new lemoniphilia. Have I got that right? |
|
|
|
We would not likely put him on our trust list .
You'll find it's likelier than you think, cryptohunter. |
|
|
|
I'll probably get a 3000 character reply now.
[6310 characters]
Gotta love this guy. Always giving more than what's asked of him. Must topup foxpoop up again I notice his merit cycling is going very nicely.
Though I do wish he'd stop misgendering me. It's little things like that that make me almost wish c******unter never turned me into a vixen. |
|
|
|
You know you don't have to be here, right? RIGHT?! Out of a billion websites, you choose to use the one website you hate most? Lol  I just assumed he was a masochist like me. That's why I'm still here, after all. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
