Certainly, data collection via e-mail is quite non-transparent. I won't be surprised if some anonymous people start appearing, confirming how they got a refund from Betnomi. But the ultimate motive for everything that comes from there is still unclear. I assume that Betnomi will no longer work as a gambling site, and the only thing that seems likely to me is that Sorsis wants to have some positive feedback, because "CEO of Betnomi" is mentioned in his biography.

There has to be a beginning sometime. Learning from his mistakes may be expensive, but it is one of the best ways to gain experience. Given that he already deals with financial services, I believe he has a good basis for an escrow offer.
Although I personally would never decide on such a business, there are too many parameters that are difficult to recognize in advance and can turn for the worse.
Anyway, good luck with this shasan, I hope you'll be successful.

Left, green side, what has been read, and right, red side, unknown and still to go through it 

He earned the tilde for vindictive editing of his trust list. This was helped by the deletion of posts in his self-moderated threads. The next bad thing he did was delete his threads with link collections, which was once again vindictive towards all the forum members.
One wrong negative feedback that initiated the whole drama was not enough reason for me to distrust him. But all of the above, along with a very aggressive way of discussion, led to only one thing, ~

If we were to remove the tilde now because he deleted all the feedback, that would be a violation of the trust system. It would be pure blackmail, pressure with the sole purpose of removing the feedback that we believe is incorrect.
This is how I saw the whole matter.

TL, I'm really surprised that you, who only deal with things related to reputation here on the forum, don't recognize such clear things.

---

I apologize to mikeywith and to 1miau for this offtopic, you can continue where you left off. 

I'm not sure which wallet you were thinking of buying and why it has to be the whole lot of 100 pieces, but for example Trezor currently has a Black Friday sale, where the Trezor Model One is $48. If 30 pieces are enough for the contest, that is significantly below the $7,000 budget you mentioned. Even the latest model, Trezor Safe 3, is in that case affordable at €79 regular price. I don't see any conditions for buying a certain quantity.


Should we start a discussion about the categories of this contest, as far as I remember there were several illogicalities in the last selection. For example, miss Bitcointalk, where we cannot claim for anyone whether they are male or female. Some of the votes were ridiculous the last time. Or even, "antihero", where the nominees for the award are mostly due to negative contributions on the forum. It's a bit strange that someone who left a negative mark in the past year is rewarded financially.



To avoid duplicate Q&A, perhaps you could leave links to previous quiz rounds. So that those interested could check the earlier questions. Honestly, I don't know which quizzes you mean here. I know that there were several, that some users started on their own initiative.

Let's turn our attention away from phishing scammers, I will make a small digression here by reminding all eligible users about this free raffle. 1 slot left for the Custom UniJoin Card. I am almost surprised that Unijoin's promoters are not interested in the possibility of receiving such a gift.

[FREE RAFFLE] - Custom UniJoin Card, (S/N 6). Only by invitation!

---

iwantmyhomepaidwithbtc2 would you apply also as a paid2 ? 

Oh man, I was convinced that you were already a merit source. You seem to understand the forum well, it would be logical to see you in this role.
If my support means anything, you have it. 

Is it just me that this looks like an open book?

I guess then they would first declare bankruptcy and close the business before paying such a fabulous fine. If there is a business closure, it will be caused by future wrong steps (if any).
btw. No matter how much I'm not a supporter of Binance, I still don't like these kinds of revelations about any company.

Already earlier this year there were signs that the end for Bittrex was coming soon. Some very bad decisions, they were among the first to introduce mandatory KYC, even at a time when there was not so much pressure for it. I'm not surprised by what's happening, more like you, I wonder how the hell they managed to last so long. If I remember correctly, they left the US because they were doing business illegally

Bittrex Files for Bankruptcy in Delaware
Bittrex to shut its U.S operations

It happened to me a couple of times while writing a post, my computer restarted due to a power outage. After rebooting, the text I entered was still there. No special cache settings. (Chrome browser)
Also, the preview button saves the currently written post into a draft and is available there for 7 days. It seems to me that this is quite enough from the "outdated" version of the software.

I think someone more familiar said here that Ratimov is his last name in real life. From that point of view, this change is completely understandable. He probably should have done it earlier, this way it looks like the drop in ratings initiated the change.


If I remember correctly, The Cryptovator changed his username twice in a short period. Still, theymos has proven that he follows events on the forum, although it does not participate in most of the discussions.

Ratimov?? Who is Ratimov?  You mean Symmetrick?
This drama will never end. Ratimov changed his username, now he is Symmetrick 

dkbit98 just started a nice raffle, Satochip hardware wallet as custom card [FREE Raffle] SATOCHIP - Exclusive 14th Years Bitcointalk Special Edition 1
It seems that there is no limited number of participants, certainly interesting to participate.

This is an obvious phishing scam. There are no legal exchanges that will ask you to make a deposit first to allow you to withdraw. He already presented his scam accusations here Account Frozen Due to Suspicion of Money Laundering And it is obvious that he did not use the official bitmart.com Bitmart site, but phishing site at the address bitmartcn.net

user: examplens
Nice project and a good idea!
I can only sound like a bot until I hold one SatoChip card in my hands. But I like the way it looks. btw. Will it be possible to make a custom card or is only satoshi's account available? (I don't mean only this raffle)

Can you explain to me exactly what offshore means and what is the essential difference between offshore and dedicated servers? Or is it just a marketing trick, to make the service packages sound more powerful?

Also, To pay with Bitcoin, do you use an intermediary service, a payment gateway, or is the service directly through you?

I don't like to judge based on assumptions. My red feedback to them is for a reason they just disappeared without any explanation. I believe that they wrote a statement that it will be offline for 6 or 8 months and that it will not be active during that time, that would be a little more acceptable.

If Sorsis managed the betnomi account here from the beginning, it did so in a very bad way. If that's how he managed the casino, then it's no surprise where they are now. A few months after leaving the forum, Sorsis appeared and added everyone who left negative feedback to his distrust list. https://loyce.club/trust/2023-09-09_Sat_05.07h/2532772.html
I'm not sure what he wanted to achieve with this (I'd like to hear his explanation).
Now with the new story, it seems to me that he just wants to remove the "scam" tag next to his name, i.e. the name of his essential reference. This tag may represent a significant obstacle in developing a new business.

If you did not receive an error report or an undelivered message, it is only a confirmation that the support email is active. User @Andrew77Elton5 claimed the opposite thus implying something completely different.


They were last active on November 17th, quite possibly because of the same user. The appeal was about a similar problem.

I think a more appropriate question is what he didn't drink. Sounds like someone who missed therapy.
I wonder how he even managed to solve the captcha during registration. Regardless, this is just another proof of freedom of speech on this forum. Everyone is allowed to trumpet whatever comes to his mind.