I also remind you to be careful with the services you trust to save your identity, if you don't disclose yourself, some services have the potential to do it out of stupidity. Maybe both have different levels of risk, but basically all the criminal that is done will only target your crypto wealth.

I do not further measure the actual market interest in the fundamental side of the coins that are disputed here. As for the SEC lawsuit meaning it has depreciated most of the market capital flows which it ascertained from US users, I dunno if they have the opportunity to trade that elsewhere in the future. I only predict the domino effect that will occur from this event, that the global SEC will do the same.

In certain types of games such as PvP can rely on skill. And futures trading (which is relatively short) is basically luck and it can take all your capital like gambling. In both trading and gambling, all your orders and bets are predictive.
There is indeed a fundamental difference between the two if you look at it from a different perspective.

I don't think tracking the next purchase matters that much to anyone (in the context of future reference needs), the event was just 10k bitcoins for 2 pizzas and that was the only moment the community captured into a celebration.
If you think this is worth knowing and to avoid speculation, afaik Laszlo is still alive and you could do another interview specifically with him about how much bitcoin he spent in his lifetime for pizzas.

Up to this point, you must understand the risks. You are involved in this space actually violate, and if you teach your friends then it means you make the network of violators wider.


Aren't you already halfway through guiding your friend? Your decision depends on two considerations, you care about the solidarity of your friendship, so continue this guidance. Or you care about the law then stop here.

Bitcointalk Username: rat03gopoh
Utopia Public Key: 2D1263260FD6B760A50F08795B34E7BFE2B7AE694392F07429AC5DD5E156901F
BTC Address: bc1qzfmx3g6svkt2d6yt40p3590yphaxhlhr5ex9fq
Message Deep Link (Chat link): https://utopia.im/d53b4431fd604e2f0261792444797aa4?tid=3194505043859351848
Slot No: 89

One has to stop thinking about "what's next". Traders won't be completely deprived of their trading facilities.
Trading platforms are the best business in this space and all companies will always compete with each other to be the top choice even if they have to go against the wishes of their users in order to comply with regulations. In the end, users will readjust to the new regulatory provisions.

Due to ipevil restrictions, signing up with an exclusive email might be a wasteful decision the first time, unless you're willing to buy a copper membership. It's better to get the desired username first with a random email before syncing with the real email.

After all, forums have a method of security and account recovery that is known to be compromised very rarely: Signed bitcoin addresses.
All reputable account owners with high commercial value do this and almost never complain about the forum's security system.

In a more specific definition I can't generalize all crypto activity is "job", even bitcoin can grow in value on its own. Jobs are those in which people must be bound for a certain amount of time to complete official duties, not optional tasks.
A little story a few years ago in my fellow connection, someone left their main job to be unemployed to have more free time to explore crypto opportunities which at that time sounded more promising in terms of income. Maybe this is also happening a lot out there which concludes that crypto has the opportunity to make someone leave the main job.

First Im not a potential investor, but if you're willing, can you elaborate more on this part? It seems interesting to know. To my knowledge, this is no longer the way to convince people no matter how good the project is. Market interest is unpredictable these days.
Unless you can vouch that return, then send loan proposals to local banks around you instead.

Where is the solution in your writing?

Everyone who has access to the KYC database is an authority, what we fear is data leakage by "bad" authorities, which in some cases the service team trades on the black market.

That in no way prevents losses, several cases of recent exchange money laundering investigations impacted KYC users as well where their assets were frozen.

It depends on the internal policy of the service, to solve certain problems the customer has to do a more complicated re-verification.

This project had a previous announcement thread^[1] by member @emmaglory5^[2] here which was later deleted.
Then launched 2 rounds of the bounty program^[3][4] managed by the worst management team of all time (sofico), if you look at the ERC20 addresses of some of the first round participants, they haven't even received bounty distribution.

Nothing wrong, I remember several projects creating an account after being reported as scams here just to respond to all the accusations.

---

1. https://ninjastic.space/topic/5406138
2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2650942
3. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5366713.0
4. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5376531.0

Now state which legal basis you take refuge in?
In the following points your service is somewhat regulated^[1], but it's impossible for you to implement it effectively without asking for actual user information.

Is there another way to identify age, legality of sources of user funds and other things without ask KYC?



1. https://nonkyc.io/legal/terms

OgNasty did it here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5275043
And also on my local board, hosted by joniboini https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3315373.0

Actually, it wasn't just encouraging users to make good posts, but a request to learn the basic knowledge that aspiring bitcoiners should have. Overall, it's good.

I'm trying to understand the OP's intent well.
In order to use the exchange, users need to register a crypto address as well as a bank account where their deposits will come from or withdrawals will go to. These two things will be continuously intertwined.

A solution without kyc verification in this situation I think can only be implemented if exchanges and banks cooperate with each other to share user identities.

And a zero fee offer would be suspicious in the first place (sounds like a scam), it's against the mainstream of crypto exchanges where high withdrawal fees are a business they won't ignore.

The risk is dealing with people you can't trust, and that can be difficult to identify. Even for someone who has been involved in the bitcoin lending business on this forum for years, they occasionally lose money due to default even though they are given some time leeway.
The rule that guarantees almost no risk is actually clear, "no collateral, no loans". I don't know why this rule is slowly being abandoned and choosing to be without collateral for certain members.

Damn, so all along it was a shortcut link. I honestly didn't pay much attention to that sign since I registered (I think a lot of other users did too) because yeah the display isn't that flashy. While I stand by the OP's request, I don't mind it being considered longer. I think it's better to make the board inside the sub-board more visible.

Well, many people still relate that the exchange problem is a bitcoin problem which seems as if they are inseparable. Even though the main problem for investors started when they chose the exchange as their trust, then there was no bitcoin trust at stake.

Can you explain in outline if it is a violation of general provisions, for example the OP is from a restricted country or whatever?
On the player's side, this reason is as if you're taking the easiest action to refuse to pay the winnings. Implicitly you want to let every next big win end with a delay in the verification process.