I think a more appropriate question is what he didn't drink. Sounds like someone who missed therapy.
I wonder how he even managed to solve the captcha during registration. Regardless, this is just another proof of freedom of speech on this forum. Everyone is allowed to trumpet whatever comes to his mind.

I wanted to do the same thing, to test their email address. Did you get a reply yet? Generally, it does not take much time to get a response from the server if the address is not correct.
They have another address on the website, has it been checked as well?

The moment you get information about these types of transactions, it is usually already too late to get involved and use them for trade. Usually, you would have to know who moved such a large amount and why, to be able to use such information.
It's not quite as simple as it looks.

From everyone else, this seems like an unnecessary and uninteresting discussion. Both of you mostly repeat the same thing and do not deviate from your positions.


You might not like it, but...
Adding someone to the distrust list is not a "use of the trust system against someone". It's a matter of personal opinion about someone's views.

Any discussion, where we present our personal views, affects what judgment other users will have about us. Even if two users have the same attitude towards something, that does not necessarily mean that they should be added to the trust list. Sometimes it is enough to see someone's way of expression, regardless of the topic being discussed.
A political discussion will show someone's character more clearly than, for example, a discussion about which miner is more efficient. Also, some users avoid participating in political discussions, even if they have something good to say. And that ignoring gives some picture of these users.

In the end, we mostly don't know each other here personally and we make our judgments about others based on what is presented or written here.

It's not very clear to me. After stealing user usernames/passwords, why did the hackers place bets that they would surely lose? How did they get the money out of there in the end? Why didn't they, like all other crypto thieves, just withdraw to their addresses?

on the link shared by the OP, there is information that there is already a proven accusation that your employee bagged the money.

86 - examplens

thx MoparM 

We saw. What to do next?
You did the easier and simpler part of the job, registered the domain, installed two scripts and added the donation address.
I am quite curious about the basic idea and what you want to achieve with this site. What exact problem did you recognize, and which will your service solve?

If I were to take my wife as an example, women are not really supporters of the hold, especially not in the long term. 

I know about it, but only one wallet was tested, which is not a guarantee for the others. Just for the record, I also received one Betnomi Ledger.

Also, don't ignore shipping costs and possible taxes. This can vary a lot, so it can happen that someone will pay almost the same price for delivery as if he were to buy it himself. Or, if you give a choice, what are you going to do with 30 or 40 wallets that the winners didn't want to take over?


It is about rewarding users who made a specific contribution to the forum during the year. In this contest, beginners have very little chance to win a prize, at least that's how it was until now. This makes the whole thing even more ridiculous.

This is not the best place to ask for help resetting 2FA on freebitco.in. Better try in their thread, as far as I can see they have an official representative there, so maybe he could guide you in the next steps https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=320959.27060

Also, be careful, always check that you are really talking to someone who is a representative of this platform and do not provide sensitive information.

Last time one of the prizes was a Ledger wallet, sponsored by Betnomi. Didn't it turn out to be justifiably risky in the end, because Betnomi was accused of an exit scam, and now we still have their confirmation that part of the team left with the user's data?
After that, I wouldn't even consider this as an option.

Needless to say, but it's too much Needless to say for an anonymous person here who wants to make some money for himself.


They are still not at the lowest level and you would probably get into a problem if you were to invest other people's money in it now. But I guess, Needless to say.


Stick to that Kardashian show, when you make money there, then move on to something big like the property business. Do you think that those who have the money to buy luxury real estate need someone like you (or me)? Even only for advice.


So you would manage your real estate business in the USA but via the Internet?


How can you claim this if you are from the USA? How many times have you participated in the sale of real estate in the USA?
I guess these are not conclusions based only on the experience of watching movies.


Doctors and pharmacists.

I'm not sure if this thread is open to solving your doubts about whether 1miau is eligible for DT, or if you're asking the community to exclude him from the DT selection. You seem insulted to me, because you had (perhaps still have) trust in 1miau and his judgement, and he returned it with distrust. Anyway, I see that he is still on your trust list, also the feedback you left him can be interpreted as a direct answer to the question posed by this topic.



If I may ask. Why is the argument that he moved you from trust to his distrust list? Is this strictly prohibited and is excluding you considered a direct violation of the "rules"?

This example you mentioned, its (1miau) negative tag is certainly not the best reference, because it is about the user who already has several negative feedbacks due to similar things. 6 negative, mostly accusations of trolling.


As for the "conflict" that started the whole thing, I'm quite surprised that you both went that far. A completely useless debate where both sides claim that their media sources of information are more honest than the other. That's the first thing I saw after a quick look at the discussion you mentioned.

To @1miau, (not to write in your thread specifically). You mentioned that we all need to have a thicker skin here, shouldn't that apply to you as well and that you don't fall into the fire through dramas like this? Because of politics, seriously?

First question, is the transaction where you send Bitcoin to Sinbad.io confirmed?

The Sinbad team has announced their absence these days, so there may be a delay in the response. Here is the confirmation of their campaign manager on the forum

High fees, as well as planned leave, caused certain delays in solving issues. A bit of patience is required for everything.

Well, given the circumstances, it shouldn't be a problem to use an altcoin for payment temporarily. The current situation is horrible for all Bitcoin transactions.

Perhaps we should also ask what Sinbad's business is like and how high fees affect it. I would not be surprised if here too there is a significant drop in the use of mixers and users are waiting for a better time to mix coins. Whatever, it is not good for business.

3 examplens

I would add the option that all participants participate in paying the fee, at least while the fees are high. There are 50 members in the campaign, deducting $1 from each to cover the fee is acceptable, and the total amount ($50) would certainly cover the costs.

I am of the opinion, that all domains should be left listed, even when they become inactive. Someone may try to start a legitimate business at some point, and it would be good if there were a warning for domains with a scam history. Just imagine, you start a business, invest a lot of money in it, and suddenly you start being contacted by scammed users who want their money back, even though you have nothing to do with it.

It is still not possible to change the language. System error (code: anticsfr)


Well, you use WordPress script here, and as far as I know, it is in English by default. I am not sure what kind of minor errors you are talking about here, except that it is an error in the bad setup of the WP script.

Is it possible that you were in such a hurry to present this here, and there are so many shortcomings?
I guess you should do all possible tests first, before publication, so only after that do you ask the community to help you with testing. Based on everything I've seen, I seriously doubt the capacity of this service.

It can be said that that part is completely unnecessary, The DT strength page is more relevant for that. It should only have changes made by the user.
Although I would listen to Vod's proposal, maybe there is a more useful solution.