The feature you mentioned has been here forever yes but not the ones Shasan mentioned where basically If I'm chatting with you, you could delete my own messages from both parties and not just yours.
Ok, I see this is a new feature. I literally tried it now. I didn't new that its possible to delete others messages too. That also looks pretty risky to deal with. Also, taking screenshot would not help. I would too say its better avoiding telegram for deals. |
|
|
|
On telegram earlier, no one could remove the message from both sides. And if it could be removed from both side then it was only a few and most recent.
This is not a new feature, it was there from start and many people are already taking advantage of it to scam more users on telegram. If a user deletes the sent message, you have some options to choose from: 1. Delete for Yourself 2. Delete for both (yourself and viewer) If the user selects second one, it will delete the message for every one. The best solution is taking screenshot of the conversation if you find the person you are talking to is suspicious or risky. I always prefer taking screenshots if I trade through telegram. |
|
|
|
They are basically alternate accounts of same person.
Connected ETH address: 0xea5944EDdF486BC43Ab9Be4Be34De7486B15E69e Bitcointalk Username: Taki
Current post count with this post incl.: 2301
BTC Address: 3Kzfo64KxA4CTQXzrdLmBAd4xg9PSwVs2w
ERC20 Compatible Wallet Address: 0xea5944EDdF486BC43Ab9Be4Be34De7486B15E69e
Wear Signature : done
Wear Avatar : done
Hello! On the first page I see that you have 4 open slots for my rank, so I would gladly take one of it  Username: greeklogos Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=800530Rank: Full Member Current post count: 366 BTC address: 124sV8Hhe3GvvV2RvLFucAcHHjtg8jPCxk ERC20-compatible ETH address: 0xea5944EDdF486BC43Ab9Be4Be34De7486B15E69e
This is clearly termed as merit abusement. |
|
|
|
I also think that the above accusation against 2double0 is bit of an over exaggerated and there is not much happening here. I have successfully provided the proofs of the transaction and I think the thread should be locked with the title getting edited. Its weird because: 1. The loan itself was weird. Quote:I know that I came after long time as I had health issues for which my doctor suggested to keep distance from things like smartphones and laptops as the rays were not suitable for me. I'm here after I completely recovered from my problems, trauma had stopped and I can use these things back again. So what kind of health issue is this?? Yes, the reason for sure looked weird, thats why I confirmed if the account is owned by the original owner or not. He atleast had his account at risk if he did not paid my loan back. But I am gald it didn't happen and the deal was smooth.
2. You handled the loan details off-forum, in a weird manner. Even if you are naive and didn't know any better, it raises suspicion.
All is in the past, but hacker, you should slow your roll a little bit. You went from shitposting bounty hunter to lender to forum issues expert too quickly.
Thank You for your apprication but I don't understand what it's meant by "slowing the roll little bit". I think you are a bit over suspicious about me. Yes, I handled some of the conversation off-forum (on Telegram) but there was nothing intentional behind it. I just found it more easy and fast to converaste there. Although I just confirmed that he holded the address linked with the account some years back on telegram and confirmed it here to fund the loan. I don't think just getting the conversation off-forum would make it suspicious. |
|
|
|
Scam Accusation is a good place to find scam project but we can't find it at the beginning. in this method, we can find it
If you don't hag up much there you should know some people are actively browsing through the altcoin announcement section and finding latest scams. Still, If you think you want to invest in some project and would like it review by Scam Buster's on Bitcointalk, you could just post a thread about it there and I think you would surely get some legitimate reviews. Also to let you know, Bitcointalk forum staff does not moderate scams and I don't think mods could check every new project and give a review about it. It is also prone to manipulation somethimes. |
|
|
|
When I try to send the bitcoin forum message, it tells me that bitcointalk blocked me from sending message
From this I could say your account is probably banned if you are unable to send PMs on the forum. It's not only about message getting deleted but you should have broked some Forum Rules for being banned by mod. It could be better understood if you could post a screenshot to the message you get after logging into the forum. |
|
|
|
|
Received the pins. Great, would deal again.
|
|
|
|
P.S Why should they confirm their gender and what it has so with their account? If they are a female, will you be rude over them or willing to overpower them? A male dominant mindset is not good!
I don't think anyone here posting has such of an low level mentality and would not judge others so. It just looks like an out of curiosity attempt by the OP. BTW thank you for letting us know LoyceV has a wife !  |
|
|
|
Theymos has already confirmed the Gender of Lauda in one of his post's. Hope we could keep this as an official proof of her being a female!  Damn, I'm found out. While personally training Lauda in the dark arts of forum moderation, we fell deeply in love. I couldn't bear to see her endure the torture of trust drama while doing unspeakable deeds for me, so I invented this complicated algorithm as an excuse to add her back in even though I could've just unilaterally added her to DT at any second. Truly, my cowardice knows no bounds.
About LoyceV he is most probably according to my observation a male. But who knows it could be a heterosexuality issue too. Just kidding. |
|
|
|
All of the above posts are already deleted. In similar cases further you should just use "report to moderator" option and explain the spam they are causing in the discription box so that moderator could understand the case and react accordingly. He was basically breaking a forum rule here: Edited: 30. Similar marketplace items must be listed together.
Thank You suchmoon for the corrections, I copied the wrong rule.  |
|
|
|
There are some rules for avoiding the sale of hacked accounts which links to personal info. Selling invites is allowed, but there are some restrictions in order to prevent people from selling accounts and invites obtained through hacking. In order to sell invites or accounts to invite-only sites, you must:
- Have some history here, with more history being required for trades of invites/accounts in bulk. Or,
- Have substantial history on reputable invite trading forums such as torrentinvites.org which prohibit selling hacked accounts. Or,
- Be vouched for by someone from one of the above two categories.
For now a red tag would be Ok. It could be reversed if he could confirm that his sale is legitimate somehow. But I don't think it is legit anyway. |
|
|
|
Oh, and at least 2double0 ^allegedly^ managed to repay his lender.
I confirm that 2double0 has smoothly repaid my loan as per he said. And I have no doubt about his trustworthiness there.
I also think that the above accusation against 2double0 is bit of an over exaggerated and there is not much happening here. I have successfully provided the proofs of the transaction and I think the thread should be locked with the title getting edited. |
|
|
|
telegram @nukulauta ( user deleted now)
I see the telegram still active and not deleted yet. It would have been better if your could recover your chat history somehow.
Should I not post in this forum for others to learn a lesson?
Yes, you should post so that people can stay away from that person though only foolish people will trade with that person. Even after making more awareness. Also, you have not mentioned from where you received that bitcoin wallet id. I agree with shasan here. There is nothing others could help with a foolish person who would be scammed even after much of an warnings already listed. |
|
|
|
I have seen much of an diss-aggrement about the freewallet and there support team. You should post proofs to your conversations with the support and also the transaction to which you are pointing so that the community here could atleast review it and act accordingly. I have personally experienced some problems with there support. Once there was bit of an mistake in the transaction memo while I recieved a EOS transfer in my Freewallet account. I contacted the support via email, they replied to me and said would solve the issue. It was basically solved after some weeks and I got my transaction back but they charged around 10% of the total transaction as fees which did not satisfy me. From then I tried avoiding them. This is the official Bitcointalk ID of the Freewallet: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1177176If you could provide proper proofs about your abuse as I mentioned earlier the community would react in a better way. For now you lack the evidence her as per I see. |
|
|
|
|
There are two different security features in Binance for Google Authentication and SMS Authentication.
For Google Authenticatior:
You need to copy a key generated on the Binance itself and an another key from the Google Authenticatior.
And paste it back there and you are done with it. Next time you login it will ask for an Google Authenticatior verification.
For SMS Authentication:
You just have to put in your phone number there and you will instantly receive a verification code via SMS.
Next time you log in it will ask for SMS verification.
Note: You can keep both of them ON for extra security.
|
|
|
|
|
It could also sometimes get you eligible for a no-collarate loan as the user is getting some ammout of income from the account and he would not default the loan mostly and ruine his own repo.
Also you should mention most of the above benefits are only limited to BTC paid signature campaign participants, rest depends on the manager of the campaign the user is participating in.
|
|
|
|
Crex24 is in a way misleading invertors to buy and sell scam tokens on there website which is purely shaddy business. Even after many users complaing about there scam projects listing on the thread they have changed nothing yet. More and more projects are getting add everyday as you could see update on the ANN. I could bet 50% for those are Ponzi and Exit Scams. I think the team atleast should respond about the issue here. If not a red-tag from DT would surely help.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
