Parity with one pound (16 oz) of silver.
One troy pound of silver is composed of 12 troy oz. Each troy oz. has 480 grains, as opposed to the "normal" ounce of 437.5 grains. The British pound was not a Troy pound. Rather, it was a Tower pound, which measures 12 Tower ounces and weighs slightly less than a Troy pound.
|
|
|
I would buy myself a BlackBerry. Please keep the posts on topic, guys. The thread was made to be a historical counter we can look back on, and irrelevant posts detract from that goal.
|
|
|
Well other than a more secure network, for the first few weeks as new ASIC hit the network and blocks are found a little faster than normal confirmations will go quicker to, correct? If I understand things correctly short block discovery from an abnormally low difficulty will allow for quicker confirmations. Then after each 2016 blocks it will adjust. So there should be windows of time that blocks are found quicker than 1 every 10 minutes. At least until we get the bulk of the ASIC on the network.
I guess it might not even be that noticeable, but its a thought. What are your thought's or expertise?
If faster confirmations were universally accepted to be a good thing we would decrease the block time. Disclaimer: I believe faster confirmations would be a good thing, but recognize that others don't.
|
|
|
I had a full blockchain before the upgrade. After the upgrade, 0.8 reindexed the blockchain once. That's fine, I thought. Not much time later, the number of blocks remaining went up by ~8000 and the last ~8000 blocks needed to be reindexed again. And now, the number of blocks remaining went up by ~3000 and the last ~3000 blocks need to be reindexed one more time. How many reindicies should I expect? Is this normal behaviour?
|
|
|
I've never actually watched two opposing pennybots at the same time. I'm kind of interested in what would happen: would they waste all their money on dismantling both the best ask and best bid, or are they smart enough to avoid fighting?
|
|
|
Worse yet, ASICs have high hps but zero flops.
|
|
|
The *...* emphasis was basically an attempt to differentiate "will eventually comeday quite likely really really seem to actually right then urgently need" from "we right now do urgently need it, we are losing adoption rate and suffering lowering exchange rates every hour or day we fail to get a higher limit into use".
Yes the apparent/seeming "need" will tend to tend upwards.
But, constantly pulling the rug out from under infrastructure development that also will tend to seem more and more "needed" in a basically fundamentally doomed attempt to turn the world's highest difficulty currency-of-final-international-settlement into a retail payment processor so people can buy penny candy using e-currency despite no longer having pennies in the snailmail world doesn't seem a productive response.
We not only have 1 megabyte per ten minutes of international final settlement transaction space, we also have, secured by that same hashing power, several other sets of blocks (namecoin, devcoin, ixcoin, i0ccoin, groupcoin, coiledcoin, and it is easy to add more) that have already established tendencies to cater to lower-value transactions (by using lower-value coins).
So if people still feel a need to spam out to the world trivially small value transactions (which to the primary chain might mean less than a few thousand dollars worth, to the first secondary chain might mean less than a few hundred dollars worth, to the second primary chain might mean less thans of dollars worth (at this early stage; later multiply all those figures by a power of ten from time to time as adoption proceeds).
So plenty of space is out there for low-value transactions, and more can be added very easily and moidularly (add another chain, add another chain, all the time each chain remaining fully and easily within the capabilities of a single home computer on a home internet connection to fully verify).
-MarkM-
While it's true that Bitcoin adoption is outpacing hardware growth in the moment, this trend will not last. I'm in the midst of writing an essay that goes deeper. Hopefully my calculations will allow us to move forward together, rather than bicker about how necessary a size increase is.
|
|
|
If I have the release candidate installed should I update it as well? Is there a difference to the actual release? For something as serious as Bitcoin, I would assume no (important) changes between final RC and release. I haven't verified, however.
|
|
|
Parity with one pound (16 oz) of silver. That would mean BTC wiping out centuries of depreciation in the oldest currency the Pound Sterling (GBP) in a matter of a few years. Or to put it in another way parity with what a GBP used to be worth.
We only just reached parity with what a USD used to be worth. Don't preempt, it's bad for your sanity.
|
|
|
Second to only one. Record coming tomorrow? Quite possible!
1. 2011-06-09 W. Avg: 29.58 2. 2013-02-19 W. Avg: 28.19 3. 2011-06-08 W. Avg: 27.25 4. 2013-02-16 W. Avg: 27.16 5. 2013-02-15 W. Avg: 26.99 6. 2013-02-18 W. Avg: 26.76 7. 2013-02-17 W. Avg: 26.40 8. 2013-02-13 W. Avg: 25.48 9. 2013-02-14 W. Avg: 25.46 10. 2013-02-12 W. Avg: 25.09 11. 2011-06-10 W. Avg: 24.67 12. 2013-02-11 W. Avg: 24.13 13. 2013-02-10 W. Avg: 23.42 14. 2013-02-09 W. Avg: 23.24 15. 2013-02-08 W. Avg: 22.42 16. 2013-02-07 W. Avg: 21.61 17. 2013-02-06 W. Avg: 21.09 18. 2013-02-01 W. Avg: 20.73 19. 2013-01-31 W. Avg: 20.58 20. 2013-02-05 W. Avg: 20.57
|
|
|
IMPROPERLY FORMATTED TITLE
|
|
|
if this nutty buying keeps up.... I lose my bet Would you call it nutty when she earns 20% off it?
|
|
|
Another 2000 BTC buy to take us back to 28.
|
|
|
Gone back down now. That was a wild buy (2500 BTC!).
|
|
|
why don't all miners modify their client and use the 1MB limit so they can include more transactions and collect more transaction fees? it can't be because of propagation speed, if propagation speed was that important they would include no transactions at all Because they are too lazy.
|
|
|
I've seen it mentioned on the forum many times that there's currently an "artificial" limit of 250kB per block, what does that mean, compared to the 1MB limit?
There was, and still is, an absolute block size limit of 1 MB. If a block exceeds this size, all Bitcoin clients will reject it, as standardized in the Bitcoin specification. For miners running the Bitcoind mining client, there is now a 250 kB "artificial" limit. Blocks can still be created up to the 1 MB absolute limit; however, miners using the popular Bitcoind client (most solo miners and several pools) will no longer generate blocks larger than 250 kB. This is an experiment to see how the network reacts to greater competition for block space. This "artificial" limit is ignored by several pools, notably Eligius.
|
|
|
Living on the BitcoinTalk forums isolates you from the greater society. Truth is, Bitcoin is not very well known, and is an extremely niche currency. Here, we boast about how Kim Dotcom, Reddit, Wordpress, etc. have mentioned Bitcoin—but we don't realize that a mention doesn't imply knowledge. Have you realized that Wordpress also mentioned the book, "Moon over Martinborough"?
For most of us, the answer is no. We are so accustomed to picking out the word "Bitcoin" in press that we don't realize how we skip 99.9% of press. Accordingly, 99.9% of the world has no idea what Bitcoin is. Knowing this, is it still a surprise that theresident.net doesn't feature Bitcoin?
|
|
|
I restarted BitcoinQt recently, and noticed that the BitcoinQt toolbars (which I had moved to the side, as that makes better use of screen space) were relocated to the top. Is this expected behaviour? Is there anything I can do to change it? Are there settings in bitcoin.conf that allow me to relocate the toolbars?
|
|
|
Since I recently got out of bit jail I thought I's sing a song, but I'm bad at lyric.
Can we finish this?
He's a good girl, Loves her NASCAR, Loves Beavis, and American Dad.
I'm a bad boy, South Park's awesome, Kill Kenny, You bastards, are Chef's slaves.
Chorus: And I'm free, Freeballin' Yeah I'm free Freeballin'
emphasis mineGender ambiguity?
|
|
|
I wonder if it's all a big scam
12 TH/s, at least, thanks to ASICMiner. Where can you see this information? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.0They are currently deploying 12 TH/s and possibly more, with around 6 TH/s already mining at BTCGuild. 50 TH/s additional is currently being produced.
|
|
|
|