"Shall we play a game?"
I remember that guy pfffff please don’t be hacked or something ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) Hehe, no, I'm not hacked. I actually received the very same message from my friend (who wanted to play multiplayer Call of Duty with me) yesterday and it was a bit surprising to see such a familiar message. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) I think mymenace or something was the guy trolling with that line.... He really drilled that line in my head ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Yeah, he used to be just fine until he messed up the whole forum with that stupid sentence.
|
|
|
"Shall we play a game?"
I remember that guy pfffff please don’t be hacked or something ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) Hehe, no, I'm not hacked. I actually received the very same message from my friend (who wanted to play multiplayer Call of Duty with me) yesterday and it was a bit surprising to see such a familiar message. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
I think that the "2FA" section is useless because pretty much all exchanges have a two-factor authentication of some kind.
Should I remove it completely?
Yes. Although apparently Quedex is still not offering it? You might consider adding Bitcoin.com to the list. Everyone hates Roger Ver but you can withdraw "1 BTC daily or 5 BTC monthly without KYC." They don't allow US traders but I assume I can squeak by with a VPN..... Why the hell doesn't Quedex have a 2FA login in 2019? ![Cry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cry.gif) Bitcoin.com does provide a nice exchange platform and I'll look into its details right away so that I may include it in OP. I agree with removing the 2FA section and I also think you should take the DEX one as well.
A better way to do it would be to make another list for DEXs and separate it from the centralized exchanges.
That's an interesting idea and I'll definitely look into it once I add at least 2-3 more DEXs (as of now there are only two DEXs listed). It'll also help in the cases like Binance, where you've got both, a DEX and a CEX.
|
|
|
Question is - How come number 1 team ends up with this disaster? Something's wrong and it's very big!
The answer is that the team is Pakistan and they are well known for their unreliable performance. In one match they will perform like the world champions, and still they can lose the next match to teams such as Kenya or Scotland. There is no dearth of talent in Pakistan and probably they have the second largest player pool (after India). But they are not being able to convert these to their advantage. I'd not agree with that. Pakistanis might be well-known for their unreliable performance in cricket, but that unreliability has always remained within the two formats: test and ODIs. If we take a look at the track record of the T20s, then the Pakistani team has consistently scored and won the matches. However, this Sri Lankan tour changed it all. I don't remember ever seeing Pakistan's T20 squad being this bad; something has terribly gone wrong, and I guess it has something to do with Misbah. Since he has been hired for the next 3 years, I hope that he doesn't repeat the same mistakes again. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) That said, there will be a group of people who will be more disappointed than the Pakistanis right now. I am talking about players such as Dinesh Chandimal, Akila Dananjaya, Dimuth Karunaratne and Suranga Lakmal, who refused to travel to Pakistan giving pathetic excuses. Many of these players will come under pressure now, as the youngsters have performed exceptionally well.
LOL yeah, I agree!
|
|
|
Wow... still no Vegeta meme today so far.
|
|
|
Sri Lanka finished at 147 and Pakistan would need 148 runs for a consolation win. But had they fielded properly, then they would have been chasing a total in the range of 1250-130 rather than 148. I thought that Usman Shinwari bowled well, but his figures gives an impression that he was horrible out there (4-0-43-0). Too bad that in the bowling stats we don't include the easy chances put down by the fielders while that particular player was bowling. Mohammad Amir was impressive as always and Imad Wasim was very economical. The only thing that went bad for Pakistan today was their fielding. Their bowling (both spin and pace) was very impressive.
Not sure why PCB loves Usman Khan Shinwari so much; he pretty much always proves to be a disaster for the team. He doesn't seem to be improving with time at all; there are much better alternatives available like Junaid Khan and Husnain (I liked his bowling in the last match, even though the overall figures at the end of his bowling spell weren't so good) and PCB should choose them. BTW, I believe Sri Lanka will lose this one.
|
|
|
IMO, there's no need to hate big blockers; with all the thousands of altcoins out there, I think it's fine to have a variant of bitcoin that consists of big blocks. Consider it as just-another-altcoin. I, of course, don't like CSW and consider him a liar, but I do believe that BSV's vision (with an exception of the "rEaL bItCoIn" tag they carry along) is better than the vision of thousands of sh!tcoins out there, who aim to become the "nExT bItCoIn". P.S. Y'all don't have to say it; I'll just post it myself: F*** You Raja
|
|
|
Graviex:
The total number of accusations: 0 The number of major accusations: 0
List:
<none>
Note: Low-volume exchange. Be careful while depositing funds in a large amount.
|
|
|
Sounds like a trustworthy exchange to me if they are notifying their users well in advance about up coming changes.
Bittrex trying hard to recover its reputation. They lost the No 1 position while ago because of the messed up created by their team. Check out the Trust summary & reference link for richiela. These users know the forum and left feedback. There are thousand of Bittrex users who maybe don't know about Bitcointalk & still complaining about Bittrex on Twitter Reddit & other social media platforms. Even I was about to lose .04 BTC because suddenly they blocked withdraw without KYC. Imagine You're using Bittrex for years and all of a sudden they locked your funds and never returns your money along with no replies from Support. Why they are providing good services to customers now? Because they have lost over 80% of customers to Binance. They won't exist if they keep doing horrible judgments with users. I read some of the posts related to 2017. I had no idea Bittrex has so many issues. To be honest I am surprised. Have there been any issues in recent times, say going back to the previous 12 months? That unexpected KYC requirement was the major reason for Bittrex's downfall; they didn't alarm before going for the enforcement of KYC. Only those who proceeded with the KYC and provided all the required information were able to continue using their services. I just received a third notice email and I thought about sharing this for people who might have missed it. You have 3 days left (11th October) before the following coins get removed: BITS, BSD, COVAL, VRM, XMG so you should withdraw them, otherwise, you'll have to pay a fee for Bittrex to retrieve them for you.
That's odd, I didn't get such notification in my inbox. Is it because I don't have any of those that is scheduled to be removed thats why I don't get the notice or its because I didn't request to receive such updates and notices. Its sad that COVAL or Circuits of Value is also included in the coins that will will be removed in Bittrex. COVAL use to perform well. I didn't receive any such e-mail/notice either.
|
|
|
I think that the "2FA" section is useless because pretty much all exchanges have a two-factor authentication of some kind.
Should I remove it completely?
|
|
|
why PCB went back to old players when their previous T-20 squad was winning the games for them?
Of-course this is PCB :-P Is Chief Selector Mishab backing both of them for T-20 World Cup? You can not predict anything LOL We will see. I mean I am seriously disappointed and frustrated with the performance. First one I thought was an accident but this one! No doubt that there are no accident. The team is not what we thought. We have seen enough of him in WC and now here in T20. Need a new Captain now. IMO, changing (T20) captain at this stage will only further ruin the overall team performance. Sarfaraz has been one of the most successful T20 captains for the last few years, and we've got a T20 World Cup coming up next year. I believe that Misbah's decision of selecting Umar Akmal and Ahmed Shahzad (along with Faheem Ashraf) is the core reason for this series failure. Moreover, I've noticed that the presence of Umar Akmal not only damages the team by his own pathetic performance but also damages the team by completely evolving the behavior of Babar Azam (maybe because these two are cousins?). ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
Maybe he's just trying to become the next Pomp? Pomp became pretty famous by just tweeting pretty much the same stuff with a new taste again & again.
|
|
|
Along with the spot trade of ADA/BTC, I'm going for a 3x leveraged trade as well: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FPPVKCKc.png&t=664&c=1IPpdgx6tg4YMg) I just closed it at a nice profit; currently, ADA is standing at 495 satoshis. I'm definitely going to re-enter it at around 480 satoshis, but this time, with bigger amount and smaller leverage (2.1x). I'll update this post with an edit once I enter ADA long again. EDIT: No, even after 36+ hours, I'm still in no ADA position because it didn't drop as much as I expected; I'll just wait patiently for a better level to enter another ADA long. FOMO'd in because of break-out on multiple timeframes: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FqCTeJmf.png&t=664&c=mvRIiCTMTVMrBQ) I think I'll regret it in a couple of days; however, I'll continue to average down if it goes down, so no worries.
|
|
|
IMO, Tweezer Bottom is one of the (very) possible scenarios at this stage: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FEGPCMcFWsAMm6Ay%3Fformat%3Djpg%26name%3Dmedium&t=664&c=RcihMu9-iAvukQ) Credits: @BigChedsYeah ok so I've never heard of a tweezer before and looked it up and I'm wondering if people just sit around making up names for every fucking pattern they ever see now. http://www.chart-formations.com/candlestick-patterns/tweezers.aspxWhats the criteria to be a named pattern, happened more than once in any market anywhere? Not sure why you haven't heard of the tweezers before; it's one of the commonly used candlestick patterns and it was introduced back in the 1950s.
|
|
|
we're cooked
so much for lambo world
What about that Anon's October prediction? P.S: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FEGN9b94XoAAdx6f%3Fformat%3Djpg%26name%3Dsmall&t=664&c=GEUikvpHHA7wcw)
|
|
|
IMO, Tweezer Bottom is one of the (very) possible scenarios at this stage: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FEGPCMcFWsAMm6Ay%3Fformat%3Djpg%26name%3Dmedium&t=664&c=RcihMu9-iAvukQ) Credits: @BigCheds
|
|
|
The next 38 minutes are critical.
|
|
|
Bitcoin dominance seems to be approaching the major support range: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FvtN5zSc.png&t=664&c=rGM1eYvu529lvQ)
|
|
|
|