381
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [AИN] NODE aka NXTLite - Oficial Discussion Thread! Launching Soon! Stay Tuned!
|
on: July 24, 2014, 10:26:28 AM
|
Im surprised your post aren't automatcally deleted
You don't make the rules, nor does the OP. It's bitcointalk -- not nodetalk, Go to your own forum where you get to make your own rules. Go away dude, people are sick of your shit!!! I am not going anywhere, especially not now after getting insulted. I intend to stay here as long as I am getting entertained. That would be a long time. My god, you are so annoying, and a scammer, tried to get multiple stakes You are probably one of the scammer who claimed he registered his entire neighbourhood. How any stakes do you have for your family? 10? then had the audicadity to try to be on the group that finds puppets, Would have done a lot better job than dzarmush who openly declared before seeing the evidence that everyone who disputes gets a free pass. I would give away 10% of my stake to have them take away yours. Aha, I am shaking in fear losing a stake that isn't even worth 1 BTC in shitcoin.
|
|
|
383
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Ethereum: Welcome to the Beginning
|
on: July 24, 2014, 07:15:51 AM
|
that has nothing to do with your argument about running out of etherium as "fuel". That's silly.
You sure have a very overactive imagination. Where exactly did i write we will "run out of ethereum as fuel"? Seems to me, perhaps; your brain is running out of oxygen since it's starting to hallucinate? Hallucinations are a well-known side-effect of lack of oxygen. Your brain must be hallucinating, since I never ever wrote anything about running out of ethereum as "fuel". Thus, one should then conclude you should perhaps try breathe a bit more often? You are the one who wrote this: If you want to stay within the "laws of physics" in this area, one should then conclude with that; *IF* this platform becomes successful, the price of the "fuel" (ethereum) *MUST* keep on dropping steady in price, or else the application-creators/runners will not be able to afford running their applications in a competitive manner. That implies that etherium needs high inflation rate to keep the price low which of course nonsense as you can just move to lower decimal point if the price is too high. It's not a physical fuel like oil, dumbass. There are plenty of etherium that can always be "cheap" as you keep moving the decimal points.
|
|
|
384
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Ethereum: Welcome to the Beginning
|
on: July 24, 2014, 06:39:10 AM
|
Nope. That is *your* claim and argument. Bitcoin is a currency and a storage of wealth, while ethereum is a "fuel" for running decentralized applications, which they clearly also state on their web-pages. Thus, Bitcoin and Ethereum can *not* be directly compared, because they are not the same. But this all brings us back to how "perception" works in a observer's mind, does it not? That's irrelevant. Both BTC and etherium are divisible by 8 decimal points. If demand is higher than supply, then of course prices will rise, but in neither case your are running out of the money/fuel. as they are divisible by eight decimal points. Whether early buyers make money, that is totally dependent on the adoption/popularity/demand and supply rate, and that has nothing to do with your argument about running out of etherium as "fuel". That's silly.
|
|
|
385
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Ethereum: Welcome to the Beginning
|
on: July 24, 2014, 05:34:49 AM
|
If you want to stay within the "laws of physics" in this area, one should then conclude with that; *IF* this platform becomes successful, the price of the "fuel" (ethereum) *MUST* keep on dropping steady in price, or else the application-creators/runners will not be able to afford running their applications in a competitive manner.
This nonsense. If demand is higher than supply, prices will rise, but services will still afford it as etherium like bitcoin is divisible, with 8 decimal points. You argument is similar to someone claiming 21 million BTC aren't enough, even though we know we will never run out of BTC as there are plenty of satoshi per BTC There is a pretty good chance the "purchasers" will end up doubling or tripling their investment if there is wide adoption. Even if there are 100 million etherium by the end of 2015, 1 billion market cap would mean profit.
|
|
|
394
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [NXT] Nxt - Official Thread
|
on: July 23, 2014, 10:47:12 PM
|
Big difference is that any value of UF's socks is far less than the value of BCnext socks. BCnext only had to halfass create 3-4 socks, while UF to have the same influence would to create 480+
There is no proof BCnext had socks as even he did, he was not stupid enough to get caught, like your Nem leader. The whole "fair distribution" thing is broken. If anything of the recent IPOs, crypti probably has the most fair distribution where you didn't have to create "puppets" (unless you are investing more than 15 BTC) to get more shares. "fair distribution" is a pathetic broken IPO system -- and all these coins are going to fail. There is nothing "fair" about money, unless you are a communist
|
|
|
395
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [NXT] Nxt - Official Thread
|
on: July 23, 2014, 10:41:37 PM
|
Who knows / who cares. An early NxT whale got around 40 million NxT for 1.5 BTC and there was no taint analysis to root out socks. It may as well be the case that BCnext took 200 million NxT for himself, as several of the NxT whale wallets have been inactive since 2013. The UF is old FUD and doesn't stand up that well as someone would have to create 160 sockpuppets in NEM just to match a NxT whale, even though NEM and NODE taint analysis never found any sockmasters with more than 5 stakes. UF I think didn't have the determination nor the time to do something like create 480 sockpuppets to get 15% of NEM.
Taint analysis proves nothing as it can easily be fooled. There is no proof that BCNext used sock puppets. Utopian got caught with his pants down using sock puppets. Big difference. The whole "fair distribution" system is nonsense as it encourages sock puppets to get more shares, rather than allowing the person to invest more fairly. It's total nonsense broken system introduced by Nem.
|
|
|
396
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: NEM Official Moderated Thread - One Click Install Is Here[Updates & Discussion]
|
on: July 23, 2014, 10:01:07 PM
|
Ethereum has the Goldmansach's connection and they presumably have angel investors with deep pockets. They're making it look like Ethereum actually has demand and a following but we know the opposite to be true - Ethereum forum is essentially dead, almost nobody talks about it on Bitcointalk (and those who did hate it), so Ethereum in a nutshell is another ponzi scheme ran by a few wealthy investors and they're going the copywrighting route like Mastercoin and Maxcoin (spamming lame articles and videos all over the place).
Stop posting frud about other projects and coins, ahem "no envy movement" troll. There are plenty of people investing. It's the most hyped gen 2.0 project for months and there is no cap. They did plenty of marketing, attended dozens of conferences, and there is no reason why there shouldn't be a large investment when there is no cap
|
|
|
397
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: NEM Official Moderated Thread - One Click Install Is Here[Updates & Discussion]
|
on: July 23, 2014, 09:51:27 PM
|
They've sold already 10,722,486 ETH. That's 10,722,486/2000 = 5361,243 BTC = 3,332,281$ = 3,3M$ and they got it just in 24h One thing is pretty clear. They have plenty of money to hire high paid developers and marketing money to team up with big companies and and banks. If they don't screw up the launch later in the winter, I think they have pretty good chance to challenge BTC for #1 spot.
|
|
|
|