Didn't he die in 1527?

Bit of historical humour for you there.

Only for dying coins. 

Of course. However PMC does have its unique characteristics of a low total supply and the inability of market flooding due to difficulty drops on its side. Dumping rare coins is a costlier risk, and because the block rewards are based on network activity, a drop in difficulty doesn't mean an increase in miner rewards. Although mining rewards change based on block volume, the block rewards are divided amongst the active miners, so if 100 miners stop mining, the difficulty goes up, but that same amount of coins is shared amongst the miners still mining, so across an average of 100 blocks you'll probably find Premine is actually quite stable in block reward output compared to a coin that is still minting.

Coin rewards may not shoot up when the difficulty drops, but they won't plummet either. Premine is very stable. I'll eventually write a detailed article on this, but it's the reason I've stuck with PMC. The way it works is quite brilliant if you understand how the market and blockchain affect one another. Which of course you do, being the developer.

We're starting to talk big money now, so in order for someone to amass that many coins, they either bought in recently or understand the value of Premine. Or both.

Like has been said over the last few pages, you would have to be absolutely nuts to dump PMC. Infact it appears that the opposite of dumping is taking place. Investors are taking coins out of weak hands then selling them at expected future market value. This is the act of investors, not dumpers.

I'm trying to imagine that sell order being eaten up and it just blows my mind. PMC jumped 3 times yesterday. I thought it was over after each jump. From here on in it could go up at any moment.


I don't. I have no pity for those who do not see the potential. But I do respect those who admit to themselves when they are wrong and accept that Premine is about to cause a storm. The community of Premine is accepting. Still not too late. 

When I can be certain that the coins I purchase are safe and will arrive safely in my wallet I will be happy. Until everyone is on the same page I can't take such a risk.

1 - Who is/isn't on the right blockchain
2 - How do I confirm I am on the right blockchain?
3 - Which exchanges are on the right blockchain?

Yeah. I have an inkling. At least they're not being dumped, anyway. Sort of disappointing to make it that obvious that one person holds a large stake, but it could be several holders who have just agreed that .002 is a fair price. It's possible. It only takes 2 or 3 early stake holders to agree on a sell price for that to happen. So it may not be one person.

It felt like the right moment, and PMC seems to do everything the right way, so I wanted it to have meaning when I said it.

To you, Premine.

 

I lol'd IRL.

Put me down for 10k. I'll support that.

You need to send it in smaller amounts. Keep lowering it until you are able to send it.

Basically your transaction is made up of lots of smaller transactions on the blockchain. There's a limit to how big a transaction can be at times. That's the only way I can explain it. It can also be caused by too much "dust" in your wallet. Too many small amounts of coins to combine together into a single transaction.

Just keep lowering the amount until you are able to send it in smaller chunks. It's just too many to send at once.

Yes, which makes it harder for real developers to get noticed, but easier for smart people to see when a developer's claims are legitimate. Inmean has made his identity public and his business acumen is also public and verifiable.

A damn lot more than can be said of other developers who make the same claims.

getbalance should work with seperate accounts. You can send coins to and from accounts within one wallet, and use getbalance to retrieve the total number of coins from those accounts. I know because I use getbalance regularly with other coins. Many altcoins in fact.

If you're running a service accounts are essential. As someone who has a script that relies on knowing exact account balances on a regular basis I can confirm that if he's unable to get the correct balance from his accounts, then either there's a problem on his end, or with the source.

The community has the power to change Catcoin for the better, but it is not working with one voice. Catcoin needs a dev team, not everyone working on different ideas and cross purposes.

Work on becoming a dev team with one voice, and the rest will follow. You need to make singular decisions as a group. The priority now is fixing this fork mess once and for all and deciding on an official fork and then that's it. Then get on with promotion and services.

It's a wonder Catcoin has survive through all this. Even the thread title still mentions a fork.

End the forks.

http://coinmarketcap.com/volume.html#pmc

Cryptorush back up, but Poloniex back down.

Our market cap should be much higher, but with only one active exchange being taken into consideration the figures are misleading. Should get a nice boost once both exchanges finally sort themselves out with the recent upgrades.

It's interesting to see a coin developer who is also a real businessman. If you believe as strongly in Prospercoin as I think you do, then I feel my coins are a good investment.

As far as I'm concerned Cat is alive but sleeping right now.

The Catcoin community is active but Catcoin became a technical discussion and stopped being about promoting Catcoin. That's when my activity in the community began to decrease.

I will always support Catcoin, but in terms of investing my time in Catcoin vs investing my time in other coins I was seeing increasingly diminishing returns, and unfortunately you have to emotionally detach yourself from coins to get a real perspective of their value.

Nobody knows what Catcoin is anymore. Its identity, how many active forks there are, or what the current plan is. It's in that similar situation that Klondike Coin is now in where the diehard community are the only ones keeping it going.

I have to be completely honest, because honesty is what this coin needs; I don't feel secure holding Catcoin anymore.

It's up to the developers to change that situation, not me. It's not my responsibility to ensure the coins I trade in retain their value. Only if I hold enough for it to be in my personal interest to do so, and for that to happen I'd have to be in possession of several thousand Catcoin. That is not the case, and I won't risk my BTC on investing in that many.

I will support Catcoin always, but I'm telling you now, honestly and truthfully, the only people keeping Catcoin alive are the diehard community. Catcoin is a shell of what it once was. You can still turn this around. Stop being a group discussion of technical specifications and start talking about Catcoin beyond difficulty readjustment algorithms. Casual crypto users have lost interest. There's no point in fooling yourselves in order to portray that everything is fine and dandy, because too many people believe that to be the case now, and it's slowly killing Catcoin.

Positivity is great, but the lack of real criticism or action is extremely disconcerting. I've never seen so much time spent on difficulty readjustment algorithms when some coins just make a decision, enact it, then get on with developing services and a community. This obsession with the difficulty readjustment has to end. Make a decision and stick with it. Every fork is another nail in the coffin.

Still holding my Prospers. 

I have lost all concept of what money is any more. It's just a bunch digits I have here, there and everywhere. 

Meh. Bought 1.3 million with some LTC I had laying about doing nothing on coinedup. Worst case, I'll lose some pocket change I won't even miss.

We really need to get on a stable exchange with an API so it can be added to coinmarketcap.