Whats wrong with LTC mining on GPU's as ASIC & FGPA dont work for LTC Presuming you are mining for the purpose of profit, then that's what's wrong with it. There is none (unless, just like with Bitcoin mining, you pay well below average electric rates.) At the current LTC/USD exchange rate of about $0.07, that means that the 28K LTC mined each day all together produce less than $2K USD per day. From another thread: a bunch will switch to ltc (litecoin) mining
Every time I see that assertion I think of this: With Bitcoin about $80K USD worth of bitcoins are distributed to the hashing provided by miners. With Litecoin that is about $2K USD worth of LTC issuance. Since each addtional GPU becomes essentially another mouth to feed it lowers the revenue for the other miners. The reason the GPUs will be arriving is because they could no longer mine bitcoin profitably. They won't stick with mining LTC unless it too can be done so profitably. i.e., it soon will be time to power down your GPU rigs. I think most people who are going to jump to LTC will do so hoping the price will increase. But then I wonder, if they're expecting the price to increase just to the point it's profitable, why is the price not going up today, when you can buy them for cheap? My only conclusion: nobody cares.
|
|
|
We're not close to reaching the block size limit
You and I have differing opinions on what "close" is then. Here are the last 10 blocks: 214657 48.711 214656 31.016 214655 133.286 214654 261.695 214653 15.265 214652 42.617 214651 36.039 214650 204.577 214649 3.489 214648 214.828 The average for these is about 100K. And it appears to be approaching the rate of 300 transactions per block (about 43K transactions per-day). - http://blockchain.info/charts/n-transactions-per-block?timespan=180days&daysAverageString=7This is a transaction every two seconds. A lot of these are microtransactions (e.g., under a dollar's worth of coins) used for wagering, so the blockchain already has a way of limiting those: If the blocksize is more than 250 kB, transactions get increasingly more expensive as the blocksize approaches the limit of 500 kB. Sending a transaction when the blocksize is 400 kB will cost 5 times the normal amount; sending when it's 499 kB will cost 500x, etc.
- http://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Transaction_feesBut twelve months ago no SatoshiDICE existed and nobody knows what 2013's breakaway Bitcoin success story will be but what if there are four of them, each as popular as SatoshiDICE is today. Then the blockchain size limit (at the current restrictions) will be reached.
|
|
|
It looks like the Reference market was active on Dec 31st (until 17:14) and the event date was Dec. 31, 2012 end of day Eastern Time. Was it known? http://betsofbitco.in/item?id=503I see. Since the bet deadline is always at least one day prior to the event date, there was no reason to change it because the event date did not change -- the reference market was trading on December 31st. So it doesn't seem justified for the deadline to have changed in this instance.
|
|
|
I need to buy bitcoins using moneygram. But if I go to bitinstant, when I have to select the country it only shows a few of them, what happened?? I live in Switzerland, and I remember that last month there were a lot more countries available...
They were beta-testing an on-line bank transfer method that was available in a number of countries but then they removed that option. They didn't yet support MoneyGram from the EU as far as I know. I see that UKash is available in Switzerland. That can be used for purchasing bitcoins from VirWoX, BitcoinNordic, and Mercabit.eu. The rate isn't that great but it is one method. There are also many, many sellers who will sell bitcoins to you face-to-face: - http://localbitcoins.com/country/chIf you must do MoneyGram, then WM-Center and ECurrencyZone are two of these exchanges that do this: - http://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/WM-Center - http://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/ECurrencyZoneThere may be other methods that work for you as well: - http://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Buying_bitcoins
|
|
|
So what if I DON'T get money TRANSFERED TO ME, instead "deposited" aaaaaaand then sent to CAMPBX. Would I still need a permission slip signed by mommie, i mean DWOLLA?
I can't see how Dwolla would know nor care where the funds deposited to your bank account came from before they pull them to your Dwolla account. or did I find a loop hole everyone else is already using,
There is only one exchange in the U.S. that still has an anonymous cash-deposit-at-a-bank method. After depositing cash at a Chase bank into BitMe's account, those funds get credited to the person's BitMe exchange account. But then those funds are used to satisfy ACH withdrawals so the exchange doesn't need to get those funds to an exchange to "restock". - http://www.BitMe.comThere is a bulk buyer who will accept cash deposits of large amounts ($1,000 or more) at B of A, Wells Fargo, or PNC Bank, though they currently are not accepting new clients: - http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=87094.0What they do (very well) is hold a large chunk of funds in reserve so that they can meet daily demand while funds from previous sales are flowing through the bank system. For example, cash deposits at Wells Fargo might be sent as an ACH transaction to their B of A account which is then used for their payments. So performing proper cash management is the approach they use to accommodate the delay between when a transaction is initiated and when those funds are available for use at the proper destination.
|
|
|
Asking $50 paypal. Perhaps I don't wish for my PayPal account to be used for this. Would you accept bitcoins?
|
|
|
My suggestion is everyone stop selling over eBay +1 If anyone has any advice for how we (and other merchants) might fight against this problem I'd love to hear it... This person sold four under a unique approach. I don't see further sales, so I'm presuming it didn't end well: - http://www.ebay.com/itm/320981224642
|
|
|
My question is how that happened?
How what happened? If you are not familiar with how PayPal operates, they will often place a payment received "on hold" and the reasons vary. Sometimes they release the funds days later, and other times they don't. But now you are on PayPal's radar. If they haven't freezed your PayPal account (and any funds you had not yet withdrawn), it is just a matter of time before they do.
|
|
|
And it's aggravating that a service offers something that when utilized gets a user suspended.
It is pretty clear: User Conduct You understand and agree that you will not engage in the following activities: ● Act as a marketplace and/or exchange for virtual currency products without prior written consent; That was written SPECIFICALLY with bitcoin in mind. They can't know that a transfer between two people was for the exchange of baseball cards or bitcoins, so it happens that people successfully trade bitcoins for Dwolla and vice-versa. But when Dwolla figures it out (it aint that hard to do), they have the absolute right to no longer provide their service to you. They didn't say "no exchanges ever allowed", they wrote: "without prior written consent".
|
|
|
Hope they dont run off with our money...
Looking dodgy atm no word from support and the guys no where to be seen... hmm
You know, ... slinging accusations like that are damaging. Do you really believe this service that has been operating for over a year now and provides so much for Bitcoin (nearly all of it free of charge to users, incidentally), is thinking that the best option from here is to throw it all away and run off with your £200 GBP? Or, might it be that it was a holiday weekend, maybe short staff at Qkos, or at Barclays or a combination of the two? This isn't the first time you've pulled out the "scam card" as leverage. From another thread: Yes like i said my first transaction went fine. this one just seems dodgy
Not saying they scam just wondering whats happening and i hope i get my money
Yes, it sucks when the banking system doesn't work fast and perfect each and every time. Bitch at Blockchain.info about being slow here. Bitch about there not being good communications (nothing is on their thread or anywhere else explaining the delays). But please do not sling accusations that are not deserved.
|
|
|
Reference market was closed for a day and that's a reason to change the deadline?
It is not reasonable to expect that Bets of Bitcoin to be a domain expert regarding every detail of every bet statement submitted. In this instance,the bet submitter didn't know to specify the proper bet deadline. [Edited] The deadline couldn't be December 31st, because that is the day the event occurs, and thus if it still were open the site would continue taking bets placed after the outcome was already known. So the earliest deadline for this bet then became December 27th. [Edit: Incorrect. The reference market did trade on December 31st.] This is no different from the message you'll see at a casino: "machine malfunction voids all payouts". Your wager wasn't lost. The bets made after the revised deadline were returned to bettors.
|
|
|
I first noticed something was wrong because my client knew about 2 blocks that blockchain.info didn't...
The issue appears to have been resolved now. [Edit: The Twitter account had addressed the issue in their status update: Apologies for the downtime. Looking into it now. - https://twitter.com/blockchain/status/285788380099391489 ] [Edit2: From another thread: Sorry everyone one server crashed, should be fully functional now, have a great new year.
]
|
|
|
So now I have a choice. Redownload the entire blockchain using this wallet, or use a slightly older backup that was like this one If you know what the balance should be (i.e., to know if the backup was recent enough) simply rename the existing wallet.dat (to something like wallet.err) and restore from the other backup. [Edit: Use -rescan if needed] If the balance is correct, use that one. If that did not have all the keys, then you want to try to salvage the wallet (available since v0.7.1): * -salvagewallet command-line option, which moves any existing wallet.dat to wallet.{timestamp}.dat and then attempts to salvage public/private keys and master encryption keys (if the wallet is encrypted) into a new wallet.dat. This should only be used if your wallet becomes corrupted, and is not intended to replace regular wallet backups.
|
|
|
I feel a bit stupid for bothering everyone with this.....
Don't -- it is a good reminder to others who might just have made a recent backup after empathizing with you. The wallet.dat contains, by default. a key pool of the next 100 addresses your client will use. An address is consumed each time you click "New Address" and then each time a change transaction (back to yourself) is made it pulls one address from the key pool. The keypool is topped up after each time an address is drawn from it. (with a few exceptions). So you as long as your backup is newer than the past 100 transactions it should have all the keys in it.
|
|
|
I'm having no joy with testnet-box. Would someone please send a few testnet bitcoins to mvkjv42GuYsKuuPSxGsVZkmTGZcmj1cnFj
Here:
|
|
|
A small amount well under the verification limit. That doesn't mean they won't ask for AML documentation for "suspicious activity" Mt. Gox will request identification information (such as an identity card, invoices, Government issued photographic identification, utility bill, residential certificate, signed certification of cohabitation, or similar, banking information) depending on the amounts deposited on the Accounts or the presence of suspicious activity which may indicate money-laundering or other illegal activity.
- https://mtgox.com/terms_of_serviceThey said that the money has been caught up for AML review. It is a manual process, and they are "limited" for the holidays: From December 24th to January 7th, Mt.Gox will work in limited capacity - http://www.facebook.com/MtGox/posts/404075009676912Mt Gox should have a better support over the holiday period. With Bitcoin exchanges you have the following choices: Good, Fast, Cheap. Pick one.
|
|
|
There are alternatives in the "Lite" world....
You get the blockchain headers with Simplified Payment Verification (SPV) clients, such as MutliBit.
|
|
|
Someone trying to influence the exchange rate knowing that big a rise in these types of metrics tend to pull the price up as well? One source of (legitimate) new users are from: - http://nzbsrus.com <--- PayPal kicked them out, so now the only way its customers can subscribe is using a bitcoin. This is not an insignificant number of subscribers.
|
|
|
|