That is quite an impressive record, but at that time and right now. No shame in losing out to those very talented boxers.
At this point in time, I think his attention should be solely on his mental health. If we are lucky to see another mega main event like Pacman vs Mayweather, that'd be great, but if not, he should pick his opponents shrewdly
.
His last fight shows he still got it in him, but for how long?

The bull run of 2017, which can be said to be the first actual price bubble saw many alternative currencies multiply in value at a higher rate than Bitcoin, and during the ensuing bear turn, majority of those altcoins dumped hard, and they were exposed for their lack of actual product value.
This drove majority of investors back to Bitcoin. Also the spike is also caused partly by operations in Bitcoin itself such as the halving, hence the current emphasis on Bitcoin.
Altcoins would rise, but I don't think at the rate it did the last time.

Most projects would not want to actually invest in bounty hunters, rather they would prefer to pay them in the currency they generated, and base the payment on a wide speculative value.

Only project developers who are confident in the potential value of their currency can actually offer to pay all or part of the bounty reward in Bitcoin or preferably any other top ten cryptocurrency by market cap.

I usually do not bet on tournaments I do not actively follow up and the pre qualifiers to the Europa league is one of them. The qualifiers proper would kick off at the start of the season when clubs would have returned from their preseason tours.
That would spicing up the tournament and attract more bookies and more exciting odds.

Demand and supply is basically the main factors in the market dynamics of Bitcoin. There are many other factors which affect customers willingness to buy such factors can cause fear, panic, and drive people to dump i.e sell at a lower price than it's worth, it can also lead to FOMO and make investors come in regardless of the growing prices.

The media plays an important role in investor behavior and affects our decisions, so it's also an important price determinant.

He actually portrayed Bitcoin in it's actual form and how it has matured over the years. Speculation is the main reason most are in cryptocurrency now, the potential for growth, and this is tied to volatility which I would say is gradually on the decline.

Coming from him considering the position he holds fives Bitcoin a higher level of publicity.
With volatility and mass adoption would Bitcoin become more useful as a means of making payment? That we would see in the coming years.

Asia in my opinion has few of the most cryptocurrency friendly Nations, which support the integration of the blockchain technology and growth of upstarts.
Some other countries on the continent are currently very averse to the idea of cryptocurrency.

But, worldwide industries are already isolating cryptocurrency from the blockchain technology and using it in different forms other than method of transferring funds.

KYC is one of the process in customer verification, which is necessary for exchanges and sites which have to confirm with certain regulations. And to an extent regulations, are necessary, so yes KYC is also. This serves as the major advantage, it also helps to reduce the rate of scamy ICOs.
It's disadvantages borders majorly on identity theft.

I do not think spamming results in permanent bans for those involved, except in cases of newly opened accounts which can be nuked if they spam excessively and their posts deleted as well.
Not all forum rules violations result in bans.

Moderators use their personal discretion in handling their various sections and the same rules do not always apply.

I have never come across a KYC process which required one to submit their wallet address, and doubt there is. Such information is not needed to prove the identity of someone and also is not meant to be shared.

Fake volume is reputed to be present on even the top exchanges, it's somewhat a reality that traders and investors are to cope with. Reason why I do not much value trading volume as a criterion when searching for a cryptocurrency project to get involved in, I look for other parameters, which are more difficult to falsify.

Always be safe on exchanges, do not store your funds.
Invest only what you can afford to lose.
And do your research.

The most recent bear market exposed a lot of ICOs and alternative e currencies. I know of a number of reputable ICO/STO managers who pulled out due to lack of credible projects. Only the projects with actual products and use case survived.
This action caused most to lose faith in most altcoins and shift to Bitcoin and the few alts that actually have product value, hence the rise in BTC dominance.
Also the current mini bull run started with Bitcoin while other currencies were slow at growing, FOMO drove investors to BTC as well.

I do not think that regulation is a solution to financial crimes involving cryptocurrency. Fiat currencies are regulated but has been a tool for crime long before Bitcoin was invented.
I also do not share the notion that it is easier to engage in crimes using cryptocurrency, that's the idea most governments are selling to deter their citizens from getting involved in it.

Now, there needs to be some form of regulation so the cryptocurrency space does not become a sea of scammers. Exchanges and up starts should be audited for credibility. And investors and traders should be sensitized on proper ways to safeguard their wallets.

I've come across such a case, where an individual gave access to someone he thought was a member of an ICO team to help fix his wallet (the project had a separate blockchain). And the imposter made away with all the funds he/she had on that wallet.

Also if you're a bag holder in any currency, it's preferable to have a separate device for the safekeeping of your assets, different from the one you use to browse and visit sites. This reduces the risks of falling victim to some malicious link.

Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile
Rank: Member
Amount of Posts (including this one): 473
SegWit BTC Address for payments: bc1q6gqdpau39v8tkamhswg2chkf7pxvxnr9yrp4dd
Personal text: Updated
Signature: Would update if selected.

That is not quite accurate, and banks do not support that.
It really doesn't matter to the general forum who is behind the keyboard, as long as you follow the rules and engage constructively.
It's not a permanent ban.
Whoever is posting should have a good command of English, or prioritize posting on local boards.
As @jetcash also noted, take lessons on English, it's not everyone's first language, but it's the standard in the forum.
He runs a program to support those willing to learn. I do not quite know if it's still active. But here's the link: http://fittotalk.com/english-talk/index.php
(His son can open a separate account and register, if he is the one who needs the lesson)

This is the actual link referenced in the trust flag.
Trust flags are designed to be used for alleged scams and high risked profiles


You did not get a negative free back gor joining a signature campaign. The campaign manager, LiveCoin Manager and the warning sign displays when thread created by that profile is viewed.

There is a process to applying to be a merit source that has to be followed. One of which you missed out is providing ten quality post which you deem worth of merits, it tells of you ability to determine which posts to award merits to.


I do not believe links to your personal forums would matter. You should be a somewhat established member  here on bitcointalk.

I didn't state otherwise, only that I don't think expertise somewhere else would matter here.
I am very open to every rank becoming merit sources as I think it expresses inclusion, especially of lower ranked users.
Good luck, @TheWolf666 on your application.

The introdiction of trust flags (which is solely for scam cases) means that the previous trust system now serves to define the general trustworthiness of a member, which can have various interpretations. I would agree that it had been misused in the past, which k believe is one of the reasons flags were introduced in the first place.

I do not write get while majority are viewing algeriayas the under dogs, they have been brilliant so far in this tournament, arguably the best team up till this point. And they are also more successful than Senegal in previous AFCON competitions. It would be a tight match, and also a great watch.