Atlas,
Why do you refuse to admit having posted on these forums as Atlas, Immanuel Go, I. Goldstien, HarveyAlpha, Ragnar, ALPHA., EndTheBanks, Boss and Jon?
|
|
|
Atlas,
Why do you refuse to admit having posted on these forums as Atlas, Immanuel Go, I. Goldstien, HarveyAlpha, Ragnar, ALPHA., EndTheBanks, Boss and Jon?
Moreover, why when I call you "Atlas", why do you keep responding if you're not Atlas, even though you are a coward and don't want to admit it? Do you have the IQ of a goat?
|
|
|
Atlas,
Why do you refuse to admit having posted on these forums as Atlas, Immanuel Go, I. Goldstien, HarveyAlpha, Ragnar, ALPHA., EndTheBanks, Boss and Jon?
|
|
|
This thread makes no sense. Does any one in the history of money exist that is 'only a buyer'?
|
|
|
While Matthew has made objectively false claims about my integrity, I can say his subjective claims have merit.
I will say that I have no remorse, no guilt and no shame about my previous actions.
I am happy and winning. I am just too awesome.
Losing. Also, Atlas, Why do you deny having posted on these forums as Atlas, Immanuel Go, ALPHA., Boss and Jon?
|
|
|
Atlas,
Why do you deny having posted on these forums as Atlas, Immanuel Go, ALPHA., Boss and Jon?
|
|
|
Atlas,
Why do you deny having posted on these forums as Atlas, Immanuel Go, ALPHA., Boss and Jon?
|
|
|
Atlas,
Why do you deny having posted on these forums as Atlas, Immanuel Go, ALPHA., Boss and Jon?
|
|
|
I don't hurt nor scam people.
Anyways, I am only winning. I couldn't ask for a better thread.
Atlas,
Why do you deny having posted on these forums as Atlas, Immanuel Go, ALPHA., Boss and Jon?
|
|
|
I just saw a couple FB advertisement on this? Can it be? ? Hehe.
|
|
|
Pitty they don't have a BTC balance. +1 they're services rock and have a stable platform but a btc balance would be nice to have too. I'm still quite amazed by the speed they implemented bitcoin with their platform. Happy customer since 2011 Ironic. Do you even know if they are legally registered in their country?
|
|
|
Disagree. I think this forum could use more moderation, particularly in Speculation. Too many pointless junk posts and silly attempts to manipulate the market. I think raising the level of discourse and quality in this forum would be a positive thing, particularly if it gets the more annoying posters to move to a different forum.
I don't mind sitting at the kiddy table. I'd just be concerned that everyone would miss out on comedy gold.
|
|
|
I say the more magazines, the merrier.
+1 MNW - Can you post a link to the first e-zine from a year ago? I'd love to see it.
I'll look it up.
|
|
|
rofl. This thread is so full of awesome.
|
|
|
(Thread moved from Speculation)
If you think threads such as "Do not buy a single Bitcoin" are of necessity for free speech, there are plenty of other Bitcoin forums in competition. In case enough people deem the policy bad, discussion will move there.
Meh. We let Atlas tard around endlessly. Why not let someone give us their uneducated opinion on why not to buy bitcoins?
|
|
|
I think censorship is bullshit.
I thought this was a forum for the free and open exchange of ideas, clearly this is not currently the case.
Perhaps we need a new forum, but I rather like this place and feel inclined to fight for it...ideas?
A whahabahuminahuh?
|
|
|
A response from you was inevitable and not really a major concern.
It sure is inevitable that I would be attracted to shoddy projects and push them to raise the bar. It's what I do. And why would it be a major concern unless you are hiding something? You're weird. The current state of publishing is only the initial soft rollout online.
So in other words, it still isn't published, and you're just an electronic magazine at this point. There's nothing to be ashamed of from starting small, I just don't understand why you're trying to lie. Here you try to make it sound like you yourself aren't just an e-zine. If there is another magazine (not eZine or "coming soon") about Bitcoin, I would like to know about it By the way, you're not even the first e-zine. There was one a year ago and it actually sucked worse. I guess I should be glad the bar is rising at least. I am not concerned with the checklist you are providing, we will proceed on our own merits.
And apparently proceed on your own reality as well. In our reality we call "lying" a deceptive business practice and it's typically frowned upon. Announcing "Coineer - The Bitcoin Magazine", the World's First Bitcoin Magazine.
Coineer: This is what he is talking about. A bit surprised that you haven't seen it since the thread has been on the first page a lot over the past few months. I am actually well aware of that particular site and the threads surrounding it, which was why I said if there was one that was not an eZine or " coming soon". Coineer The Bitcoin Magazine, Print Edition Available Shortly
Isn't your printed 'magazine' "coming soon" also?
|
|
|
An ISSN number does not make it published, but it does make it easier for retailers to get access So then it's not published? When are you planning on publishing it? I'd really love to order a copy when it's ready. This flattery is too novel to ignore.
|
|
|
In the words of Coach Z, "Good Jorb!" I have to say I'm a bit disappointed this trolling wasn't more elaborate. Fake ISSN? Check.Thinking having an ISBN or ISSN means you're published? Check.Complete lack of content? Check.Lack of research into previously existing PDF e-zines for Bitcoin? Check.Confusing self-distribution through personal site and being distributed? Check.I give it 3/5 stars for effort, with comical emphasis on this line: Coineer print edition is available to retailers through traditional magazine distribution channels. Carry on!
|
|
|
Well, call it the Bitcoin Fire Department then, its exactly equally as good a name.
Hey MPOE-PR, wanna found the first Bitcoin Fire Department?
|
|
|
|