1782
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Peerplays - First Ever Blockchain-Based Gaming Platform
|
on: May 18, 2016, 05:38:44 AM
|
This type of Announcement looks very familiar, I think I remember seeing it somewhere before...
A lot of pictures cut and pasted onto backgrounds with pictures of random people with typed out skills...
I think it was the 72 BTC scam to be honest lol
I believe each of them have posted on this thread and can be researched (welcome to bitcointalk!). There is actually nothing here that can't be verified elsewhere on the web by way of identities of the team. I won't link their posts because the thread is only 7 pages thus far. Edit - If your post is because of a signature campaign and you are attempting to fill your quota without doing proper research then I hope this gets factored into their decision to count it as payable.
|
|
|
1783
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Peerplays - First Ever Blockchain-Based Gaming Platform
|
on: May 18, 2016, 03:27:41 AM
|
Yep Thats what I said earlier. At this rate I would be surprised if they are able to get 200k. I think its mismanagement to overrate your product this much, it definitely decreased my opinion about this "professional" team. IMHO they should lower the price. If they only they had done that before they would have already gotten much more, now it will only cause problems.
It would make more sense to total the contributions and distribute all the tokens proportionally like Waves. Either that or just destroy all the unsold tokens. Reducing the price would penalise the people who have already contributed (unless they just send them extra tokens out anyway). The current token price of $2 per token is ridiculous though. MakerDao offered tokens at this rate and it is trading well above the initial price. There are differences, for sure, but the team seems to be pretty hardcore and if there is a genuine long term plan then I might not be so inclined to disregard it. If they have solved texas hold'em on the blockchain then this could be pretty big...even if the initally offered games are smaller in scale. Or you could be right. It should be noted that there is already a peerplays market on freedom ledger...
|
|
|
1785
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [PRE-ANN][RISE] Rise | ICO STARTED 25% BONUS | FULL ESCROW | AFFILIATE PROGRAM
|
on: May 12, 2016, 05:43:24 AM
|
However, if we get enough funds to do something really interesting, I have a house that I'm nearing end of construction that I'd be willing to keep for a certain ammount of time just to experiment with IoT type projects linked into blockchain based RISE. Because... that's what we do! Forget IOT stuff. That's what Slock.it is doing. You should make this different from everything else if you want to increase your chances of success. Emphasise what makes this different. Hold on. If you have a real time experimentation with IoT in a house that is communicated in real time then I am interested. You would actually have to broadcast it in real time though....or something very close. I want to watch that.
|
|
|
1791
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][SILKCOIN][DARKSILK PREANN][TESTING STORMNODES/DarkSIlk MARKET/I2P]
|
on: March 19, 2016, 07:21:19 PM
|
Repost. There are also a lot of other awesome posts contained in the previous pages of this thread. I post this because I remembered the conversation about supply. Here is an updated graph to show the total money supply of Silk as well as the inflation rate: Each black bar represents one decade of Silk money supply creation. The white curve shows the change in the inflation rate over time. 44,000,000 SLK will be the initial money supply. Each year, because of the static PoS block reward of 2 SLK, only 986,175 SLK will be minted. The total money supply of Silk is hardcoded to 2 billion SLK and the network should reach that supply in about 1984 years. After the first year, the inflation rate will be 2.145%. By year 10, the inflation rate will have dropped to 1.831%. As you can tell from the graph, the function that produces the inflation rate curve is negatively hyperbolic, and it converges, over time, to ~0.0493% inflation per year. Hopefully, this clears up any confusion about the supply of Silk. Please do not hesitate to ask any and all questions you may have here, in a PM, or on the Silk Network Slack Group. A more detailed analysis; including extensive data, forecasting, graphs, (and more!), of the Silk Network will be included in a forthcoming paper that I am currently writing to be released before the end of 2015. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=676976.msg13313121#msg13313121
|
|
|
1795
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [IOC][ I/O Digital ] I/O Coin - Identity SideChain - Private Messaging - POS I/O
|
on: March 16, 2016, 10:22:37 AM
|
Hi all, To be clear about the 15th march voting round of the European Fintech Top 100. http://100.fintech.nl/category/blockchain-bitcoinWe have WON the official public voting round! They have extended the voting period to introduce an extra award. "the public award". Also giving them the ability to earn entrance tickets for the event. This extra voting round has got NOTHING to do with the original voting period which we won. This winners list of round one (15th March winners) will be seen by the jury and they will give their votes as well counting as 75% On that list we are number ONE in the Blockchain category! They have said to me that all votings until 15th of March are written down and the current votes online do not represent the 15th of March voting end anymore because they extended the voting for the extra tickets. But again that has got nothing to do with the original voting round. I have asked them to publish a winner in every category for the March 15th voting round to be clear and even reset voting stats to compete for the extra public awards. Thats the most honest thing to do because everybody did their best to get votes and win this 15th March round. Now its just a little bit of a disappointing round one ending in my opinion. So YES!!! we won the first round!!! Thanks all for voting. Richard, Sam, Joel Is there a link for that confirmation? Also, if they are extending things, is there a reason why anyone needs to care beyond enabling them building their relevance? You guys are are on the forefront. The product should speak for itself... Edit to add...Side Chain It Up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|