I doubt very much that your IQ, and your purpose

good ,do you have more comments about bitbay?

Counterparty is NOT involved in ANY regard with XTC/Tilecoin. We are not "vouching" for anything one way or another, and I was only made aware of this project a few days ago. ASIC-8tile reached out to me to ask me to look at an element of their technical design. I am no longer interested in doing so, given that a) I was asked to look at something as a favor without being told it was a tilecoin client, and then my "involvement" was marketed to the thread without me being aware, and b) the Tilecoin community reaction to my PM response was publicly posted and trolled, and then misinterpreted.

We plan to have our first pilot project with a security company, and during our talks with them we quoted that their infrastructure would require 1000 gadgetcoins per year to run. We asked them if $5000 a year would be a reasonable price to run their yearly infrastructure. They said it was a reasonable estimate because their current software costs are upward of $60,000 (including SQL, hardware controlling etc)

Even a high-end home that would require home automation can fit this price of $5 per gadgetcoin into their budget. 

Therefore we came to the conclusion that pricing $5 per gadgetcoin is reasonable to enterprise users.

Tilecoin is actually good for Counterparty. I cann't understand what you have said.

 ...  but we intend to keep GadgetCoin's price at $5, we believe that's the price we, you and all coin holders should sell GDC to hardware integrators

Well thats not a good idea, you won't get the proper info from those two. Im sure they haven't mentioned that effects is working on a new POS (PoST) which is a complete change in the protocol and make vrc the safest pos out there, I'm sure every pos will be jumping on it as soon as they have it done. Plus I'm sure the trolls haven't mentioned that @onsightit has been working on the auto update features for the wallet.

You can be kept up to date at the official veriocoin forums  https://www.vericoinforums.com/threads/development.576/page-5

There are significant differences though. While the stooges are kids with no name, playing with crypto, Brian Kelly is a celebrity, a writer of books and frequent CNBC contributor. The backlash would indeed affect his career outside of crypto, therefore it is very much in his interest that NAUT not only succeed but remains very, very clean.

The stooges, unfortunately -and I don't know if they have dumped or not, let make that perfectly clear-, don't seem to be aware -or care at all for- the fact that what they are doing now is registered in the ledger of the Internet and in the future could easily come back to haunt them, much like a DUI in your early years could actually damage your career prospects when you grow up. For instance: IF and when law enforcement seizes their upcoming "decentralized cloud" and finds child porno and drug and arms contracts stored there, among other "goodies", them being the responsible party, how do you think that will look on a background check when they apply for a government grant for scientific medical development?

But who cares now, right? They have their on show on the hangouts and a few cheerleaders actually cheering them, something this nerds have never ever have in their lives, so they seize the moment ... and the perception that they can actually be rich... 10s of thousands rich, mind you.

Wow, thank you so much for offering to help us! At this stage I think the most important thing is if people like yourself, who have contacts and understand the market, help us get off the ground. In return for such help we are happy to invite the helpful community members and investors to the GDC Foundation where the major decisions about coin price, selling condition of the coin, hardware sales, distribution of the profit from hardware sales will be made.

There won't be an ICO if initial coin offering is defined as the process when the coin is sold prior to the release the software.
As the OP describes, hardware integrators will be able to buy the coin from the GDC Foundation in the open market. We need to decide prior to that how best to distribute the coin to the investors who are willing to put money into this venture. Over the last few days, especially today after GadgetCoin appeared in the news we received inquiries from investors about how to acquire GadgetCoin. It seems there are serious interest revolving around whether or not to allow brokers to sell the coin. Since quite a few investors are interested in working with us on this venture we have put forward this question to the GDC foundation: should we sell GadgetCoin for a very limited price to those who are willing to help move the project forward?  It would probably be a good idea, as we don't mind having investors onboard who believe in this coin and help them realize a 500% profit. As we said in the OP on the 15th of December we want to start the network, and we would imagine prior to that we need to sort out the pre-sale conditions (if there will be a pre-sale at all). Please let us know what you think.

Known identities is obviously an asset, craved more and more by investors tired of scams. But no amount of known identities will help a coin that doesn't move at all, let alone progress in one way or another. Like VRC. Or NAUT. Can you believe Brian Kelly has not been able to get POS working in NAUT after "trying" for months? That is a feature that every shitcoin out there has. And now, after being abandoned by several people "working" on it, including Bryce Wiener, he is in the hands of Julian Yap... not exactly a solid guarantee. Hence the dumping. It is evident that Kelly at the moment has much bigger fish to fry than salvaging an enterprise which is worth, in total market cap, less than what he makes in 6 months at their other income enterprises, maybe even less than 3 months. Problem is he's selling -trying to- a book which is supposed to be a banner add for his crypto enterprise and the current state of total failure  is not exactly and advertising gimmick, so, hopefully, the need for it to rebound will prompt some more decisive action.

One thing is lack of innovative technology -which is ok- and quite another total lack of implementation of the most basic features that any copy/paste hackjob have readily available. No matter how much exposure you can bring, if what yiou try to sell is a turd, you are not going to be very successful.

Here are the BitBay videos

http://youtu.be/SfrPRQVSR6Q
http://youtu.be/hGocWhXsOGE
http://youtu.be/EhE_K5qmbQc

As you can see the BitBay solution exists only on a white board, while you have demonstrated already at least something that looks like a working software. The race for smart contract dominance is exciting!  and don't worry, there will be multiple winners.

I would imagine it will be as "festive" as usual. I know that both Kevondo and Lootz are happy counting the thousands of thousands of dollars (I believe they call them millions stateside) that the status of SuperNET's asset their radio operation will eventually achieve. Our pants-boy may have been caught by the wife and it isn't a pretty picture... him, the wife probably is. Idiots are lucky that way some times...

Meanwhile, NAUT is crushing me. I though that Brian Kelly was a lot smarter than he actually is, books and all. Hopefully that one will rebound because I'm going in big, big time. No way to go back now...

via,looks good.

Here you go, we have compiled a video to demonstrate the very first implementation of Broker Smart Contract. Please note this is work in progress and the software will be fine tuned according to the upcoming business requirements.




Or if the image file disappear

Watch here

Buying 300 K APEX at 300 satoshi was theoretically impossible. I checked the graphs, and it seems that back at the very start of APEX in July and August, one could have only bought something like 100 K at 300 satoshi, and only if you caught the lowest price over the days and weeks. So it doesn't add up.  

So as many people do - I did the opposite of what bobsurplus was saying, I bought more apex !

How did you concluded that proposition from the answer you received?

Could apex go to 10,000 sat ?! You really think so man? I think 5,000 is possible, but more than that...hmmm...