Why not partner up and join forces with David Zimbeck and Bitbay?

Not only was it a bad idea, they went about it in the worst possible way. Putting it up to a vote and then ignoring the results of the vote was a huge mistake.

From here on down I'm buying.

Two pants-worth at a time...

It will have a couple of rebounds, 35-40% kind I believe, from mid low 3s...

ok then. A man who can't stick to his words don't deserve any respect for anyone.

Now you're just clutching at straws.

Easier for bittrex to add you if you cough up and pay!!! the community done there part by putting 1m in ur pocket so get off ur ass and give something back u scammer fuck head

I've decided to sell the last of my coins off over the past few weeks. I wish the developers the best of luck, but I think all of the altcoins are facing a grim future. Moving out of VeriCoin and back into Bitcoin over the past few months is probably one of the better decisions that I've made. I recovered most of the losses I sustained by investing in VeriCoin.

If the bag holders in this thread are planning on SuperNET saving the day, think again. My opinion is that all eyes will be on Bitcoin going forward.

On top of that, the developers seem to be speaking about this coin as if it's a side project now, which would explain why the development process has slowed down quite a bit. My guess is they are probably busy with their real life responsibilities and don't have as much time or interest to give to this project anymore.

Our focus is most definitely on the internet of things platforms, but whenever we meet with hardware integrators the first question is always "How can we acquire Gadgetcoin?" Surely we cannot avoid Gadgetcoin being listed on exchanges, but following the MtGox and Mintpal fiasco we can see a lot of resistance from new digital currency users when it comes to putting money in exchanges. Looking at it from a convenience standpoint it would also be better for the users to be able to buy Gadgetcoin in the wallet. This is because it would be the same place that the user is creating, monitoring, and configuring smart contracts so it would streamline the acquisition process of Gadgetcoin. Using a practical example, a hardware integrator for a security system would not need to go to the exchange to buy Gadgetcoin if the wallet does not have this decentralized exchange feature, instead he can buy 10 GDC to operate their 10 hardware modules from the wallet directly to simplify the process.  How does this work? The hardware integrator creates a smart contract that buys 10 GDC with the exchange rate of 0.005 BTC. Every gadget coin user will be able to see that smart contract in their wallet, and if you wish to sell your coin, then you will enter into the deal and sell 10 GDC for 0.05 BTC for the hardware integrator user. Furthermore, so far our biggest problem when dealing with hardware integrators, we have to educate people how to use exchanges to acquire Gadgetcoins, and we would rather cut this step out. If the Gadgetcoin wallet offers a decentralized exchange feature then it lowers the risk for our users by not having to use potentially risky exchanges.

Please read our white paper for more information about the decentralized exchange feature.

It seems the broker smart contract solves a real world business problem and sure, we will try to give you the broker smart contract function. Could you specify the main parameters for the contract please?

What did I miss?  

Regarding the statements above by Lizzard and others, regarding Patrick Nosker, the guy is sinister alright so nothing is off the table. More significantly, people should remember that when the very strange theft of VRC at Mintpal, the first move he made was transfer half or so of his coins to Mintpal... he offered me, via PM, the most absurd "explanation" ever: He had moved them there so if there was any movement (supposedly a sell off attempt of the 8 million coins robbed-, his (Nosker's) coins will be there so he would assume all the BUYS and all the SELLS... yep, THAT absurd of an explanation...

Anyway, personally I believe the shortcomings of the guy are of deeper natures and worse consequences than being a scammer, more like personality traits that make him a little frustrated dictator, on one side, and a thoroughly not trustable individual, on another... among others.

IE's has cozied up to Nosker and Doug and I believe it was Mintpal who asked Nosker to review the code of BYC, not IE. I could be wrong, of course. Not very relevant except for the fact that the lack of any and all action in VRC, while they are "helping" (being paid to do work) on other coins, that benefit only their pockets and not at all -the opposite would be true- VRC, means clearly what has been evident to us on THIS forum for a long time already: The stooges have nothing in the tank left. So, with months (many) before ANYTHING comes out of the SuperNET connection (and then only an absurdly obsolete and overall negative decentralized cloud), the fall in price will continue...accentuated by the fact that more and more rats will be jumping ship.

As I have stated, I would be looking to average down -and pocketing some slim gains- from the mid-to-high 3s downwards. No future at all on this one, but a couple of rebounds seem inevitable to me, of the 35-40% kind (from those levels I am willing to re-enter). I, of course, could be wrong, right MAD?

For one, this is the Unofficial Thread and who cares who posts?  Second, why push someone away? 

Read my posts in my history, please show conclusive evidence i have "been pushing this hard" oh no wait you can't cos i haven't

again you jump to conclusions with an inability to offer any real evidence rofl


directly quoted FROM MY PREVIOUS POST "You might very well be right , it might be a scam, If there is evidence to suggest so , not just someones own personal "truth" then i would believe you. but no one has been able to provide any proof....weird how people are convinced of something and yet unable to actually prove it"

i am telling you, you might be right, if you could offer evidence and you claim i am pushing this hard?

I am simply asking you for evidence and you cannot provide it   well done dumb ass

But suggesting because someone has a family and another person loves dogs that, that has any relevance to crypto currency is truly warped and delusional .

I think in a few months the coin will be top 5.

There were over 26,700,000 mined during the POW phase https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=602041.msg6789922#msg6789922

There were no extra coins generated from staking.

they want to ban me cuz i said the truth

still deleting my posts...but i dont care anymore...i only try to bumb the threads...

Also, vericoin started with 26million coins.   Now they have a extra 907k   all from minting, do the math  (i would say since it launched around 300k would be the max from minting, leaving a extra 600k minted from the hack)!  You can clearly see there was a flaw in variable interest that allowed people to mint a 'insane' amount of coins extra per day.

I think one major reason this crowdsale has been underwhelming so far is because it lasted far too long during an already bearish BTC market. I dont blame the devs for making this choice, but this obviously wasn't taken into account during setting up the crowdsale. I can guarantee you had this crowdsale lasted ~10 days instead, it would've made at least 500 btc within a week. The problem was, as with most ICOs, investors tend to ignore the 'early investor' rewards and always decide to get in on ICO's last minute. Within the past few weeks, the deteriorating alt volume just made some give up on it and went right back to  trading BTC/FIAT where the volume has migrated to. Though I still think there will be anywhere between 50-100 btc of buys during the last 48hrs, thats seriously being optimistic.

The volume of altcoins have dramatically been crippled, and it will probably be this way until BTC figures out what it wants to do..most optimistic being, moon, but at the very least, horizontal movement.