Several months ago i was subscribe signal trading channel for free but i had decide to leave that channel because the results of profit from them is not so different such as mine and in my view signal trading only have 50% percentages or less to get profit that's why i always be avoid paid trading signal because there is no guarantee the profit would be good and regardless all of it i think as a trader we have to confident to our own skill rather than rely on signal trading or similar of it
I never trusted such signals or beleived they could actually help to improve the profit. Your experience obviously confirms that. If someone has found the receipe how to make the profit I don't think it would so generously share it with others. To my opinion this is just another way to get money from the crypto users for the service they actually don't need. |
|
|
|
|
To my opinion these are the two coins that will actually survive and be also used in the future.
There are many coins at the market but only few will survive and keep the value and Bitcoin and Ethereum are definetely among them. This is good investment now and it will remain in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, tips and tricks from successful trader could be an imspiration and motivation but I'm not sure this could make you successful trader.
Every person is unique, has its own methods, perception, experiences and goals set. It's good to learn something from others and to try to avoid their mistakes but just that isn't enough to become a successful trader. No pain, no gain, remember that, that especialy refers to crypto world.
|
|
|
|
|
The idea you presented sounds more like fiction than something that could function in reality. Printing money instead of taxes is disaster for any economy, that wouldn't work. Without taxes it wouldn't be possible to accumulate enough funds to cover all needs of local community or state in whole. And cryptocurrencies are not the solution, they can't replace taxation as well as they can't replace fiat money.
|
|
|
|
|
Consumption of energy to mine Bitcoin is probably rather big. Still the number of mined Bitcoin is limited so energy consumptiom for mining will not last forever. Also, I don't think that currently Bitcoin is representing the biggest problem when it comes to energy and environment saving.
Still some alternative energy sources could be the solution for more efficency although I'm not sure if that is feasible.
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin has lost anonimity, or at least the major part, long time ago. To beleive that Bitcoin is still anonimous is utopia.
Big companies like Microsoft are very well aware of that. Also, they are aware they have to find their niche and role in crypto world and they know they have to follow all regulations and cooperate with governments and provide them their services in order to survive. That is why that what is left of Bitcoin anonimity is not their interest.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know many people who are full time traders and can make living out of that.
I think that requires outstanding skills and knowledge, plenty of experience and great control of stress and emotions.
Anyone who is willing to take the risk and prepared to sacrifice a lot can try. Still, many have tried but only few succeeded.
|
|
|
|
|
Africa doesn't have very strong and developed economy or stable finances. In.that sense Bitcoin might help but only on individual level since Bitcoin isn't and it will be not formaly introduced into economy of any country on that continent
But how much Bitcoin could help it depends also on internet connectivity and education of people there about Bitcoin and new technologies in general.
|
|
|
|
Contrary to a lot of people here, I would welcome such steps taken by legal merchants and businesses. Because legal businesses are bound to the comply with the local laws and regulations. Also I don't understand why would anyone resist such KYC requirement if that particular individual isn't doing anything illegal. If I have a t-shirt store today and my payment settlement provider is asking for KYC, why would I deny the request and take my business elsewhere?? What's the problem in here??
I have to say that I completely agree. It's sad that many users don't understand that KYC is actually designed for their protection not against them. Also, in order to run legitimate business crypto related services must performe KYC. And I don't understand why would some user want to do business with some exchange or other service that is not compliant with the law, at the end this might have bad consequences. But people obviously don't have a broader picture. |
|
|
|
|
I don't think that Bitcoin needs worst case scenario when it comes to Libra.
First of all Libra is totaly different crypto concept that is not competition to Bitcoin. It's centralized, backed up ans with intention to be stable coin, so everything that is opposite to Bitcoin.
Even if Libra becomes successful which I seriously doubt that will not endanger Bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
Yeah, same here, though when I view the tab address book, addresses are still there, but when I'm going to send then I tried to use the address present on the address book by clicking the My addresses, it's all empty.
Maybe is then some kind of bug that came with new update. Hope they will fix it soon and I will try to contact the support to see if there is any kind of solution. I was very unpleasantly surprised when I saw my addreses are gone, so far I only had good experiences with Mycelium, it was my favourite wallet. |
|
|
|
|
After a last update of Mycelium wallet my address book disappeared, it's just empty. I had a lot of stored addresses that I used and now they are gone.
Did anyone had similar experience, what could I do?
|
|
|
|
|
I think that that depends how is your approach to technical analsys. It's important not to take it too serious and too exact, more like a general information and guidline. Technical analisys shouldn't be something that you will base your investment decisions because that might lead you to the wrong way. But it might be helpful if you combine technical analysis and other sources of information.
|
|
|
|
I would very much like for this forecast to come true. However, I do not think that by the end of 2022 we will see bitcoin at a price of $ 100,000. Money supply in dollars is unlikely to grow so fast that, due to inflation, people begin to invest in cryptocurrencies and bitcoin could so rise in price. Moreover, it will not actually be a rise in the price of bitcoin, because the purchasing power for goods and services will also rise.
I don't think Bitcoin will come to 100,000$ price especially not so soon. In fact I find such prediction exaggerated and not very likely to come true although we have learned that everything is possible with Bitcoin. Bitcoin is marked with volatility, corrections are happening all the time and expecting only price rise and huge price rise isn't realistic. |
|
|
|
|
This article has no touch with reality. Bitcoin will not consume or replace anything, especially not the fiat currencies. The author of the article shows some utopia that is never going to happen and it certainly wouldn't be good if it did.
|
|
|
|
In an ideal world, everything should be returned to its owners, and all scammers should be punished. But, unfortunately, we do not live in an ideal world. In the cryptosphere, the return of stolen funds seems almost impossible. That's the price of anonymity.
It's true, we don't live in ideal world but that doesn't mean we have to give up justice. Everything that is stolen should be returned, that is only right. Yes, anonimity could be an issue but still it's not so big obstacle anymore, transaction could be traced great deal. Also, I think that regulation could also help against illegal crypto activities. |
|
|
|
|
I think that is question for regulators but also how users itself see Bitcoin. To my opinion for Bitcoin users it's more or less irrelevant if it's defined as a currency or not. I often use it as a payment method so as a currency because that suits me. And probably is the same for many other Bitcoin users.
From the point of regulation it might represent a difference in sense how it will be introduced in financial and economic system if that ever happens.
|
|
|
|
|
For people who are not involved with Bitcoin long time this is maybe new or surprising but Bitcoin is volatile and price is not only rising.
Corrections in price are quite often and depend on various factors on the market and outside. This is something you should always count on, especialy when investing and planing your funds. To my opinion price will not cross 15000$ for a longer period of time.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think that volatility is going to disappear, it's one of the main characteristics of Bitcoin. And I don't see how anyone or anything could influence on it to change it. From time to time, depending on situation in the market volatility isn't so visible but it's always there.
Bitcoin is not designed to be stable and I can't see what use would that bring even if it where.
|
|
|
|
|
I think that exchanges and other crypto services should be regulated. With development of cryptocurrencies I think that has become necessary.
But coins itself should be regulated in some way to otherwise we will have some legal gap that is ideal for misuse. For protection of users it's necessary to be clear defined what is legal and legitimate and what isn't.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
