|
@LemonAndFriesOne, I removed your troll post.
|
|
|
|
|
3 pages since my last visit, TLDR version anyone?
|
|
|
|
I just really waited wallet works well at least to see how the people need to see and know IOTA  "I waited for a while, but the wallet now works well at least! This will help people get to see and understand IOTA." That's my best guess! Actually it was an anagram of a song lyrics fragment: ... At least wallet works well And people really know IOTA How I just waited need To see To see (chorus) ... |
|
|
|
2) Quantum computers allegedly could still provide a route to quicker collision finding in hash functions anyway. Perhaps not as much of a difference as for Shor' s algo or for ECDSA, but still worth pointing out.
Use 384-bit hashing, a QC will need 2^192 operations to crack it (subject to P=NP problem). |
|
|
|
You can delete my posts, they aren't very relevant to Iota tech discussion anyway, just venting frustration.
Nay, that was just a hint that dick measurement contest is not welcome in this thread. |
|
|
|
|
* Starts polishing his banhammer *
|
|
|
|
A 512 bit or less encryption should not be a big deal for quantum computers. 2048 bit however is very hard to crack. You need a lot of qubits to crack such encryptions.
2 extra qubits are required for that. |
|
|
|
The current wallet are already having the quantum resistance, but there is some solution for making it more safe with upgrading the SHA256 into the SHA512 but this will affecting the storage of blockchain will be doubled. i think the quantum are just for downgrading SHA256 into the 128 runtime, but the current wallet are already having a resitance for the quantum computers.
This won't help much, a QC will break the consensus mechanism too. |
|
|
|
dumb but obvious question, as quantum computing doesn't exist yet, how does anyone know that their chosen encryption is immune to it?
1. Mathematically proven or 2. There is no a known algo that cracks it |
|
|
|
Quantum computing has nothing to do with 'breaking' SHA-256. In our current understanding of quantum computing, the only danger it presents is to the elliptic curve cryptography used in signing transactions. So in an universe where quantum computers actually exist, one 'could' get a private key from a signed transaction. Even without changing anything, if you don't reuse private keys, you are probably safe.
Not only this. Bitcoin Mining is much faster. |
|
|
|
"concern troll" does not apply here because I am an Eth holder and have no interest in damaging eth through pretend concerns.
Can you prove it? After your lies were exposed I stopped trusting your words. e9917313d217fcd6a87a8a14e690cbcf99c79f567eb10009e8d078b9df75a938Prove I lied... Hash "I bet he will make an excuse, as usually..." with SHA-256 and you will get "e9917313d217fcd6a87a8a14e690cbcf99c79f567eb10009e8d078b9df75a938" that you have quoted. You are so predictable, my friend. Well, you are again in reality denial state, let's take a break, I don't want your brain to meltdown. See you next week. PS: If someone is curious what video was meant - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KM36ED544iE |
|
|
|
"concern troll" does not apply here because I am an Eth holder and have no interest in damaging eth through pretend concerns.
Can you prove it? After your lies were exposed I stopped trusting your words. e9917313d217fcd6a87a8a14e690cbcf99c79f567eb10009e8d078b9df75a938 |
|
|
|
And CfB can't you just let it die who was wrong? Who cares. All of us were wrong at one point.
"Concern troll" is the most favorite trick of Cryptohunter, I just warned the others so they won't feed him. |
|
|
|
Hmmm I'm not sure exactly.. Perhaps...
It seems you have finally got good pills against your reality denial issue, at least I see some progress... |
|
|
|
Your assumption (concerned troll) is incorrect. I am seeking to discuss and understand further the POS method Eth will employ after it finishes the POW phase.
You were caught on an outright lie and you think someone will trust your words? |
|
|
|
translation: i don't have a good answer so i need to make rediculous ad hominem accusations.
Translation: a dude is Bitcoin Maximalist who created a newbie account to post BS. |
|
|
|
As a matter of fact there is not a single pos-coin on the market which isn't broken one way or another.
Go figure.
WARNING: A brainless Bitcoin Maximalist spotted. |
|
|
|
Do you have more precise time when the source code will be fully available on gitbub?
thank you
I put it on Github in a private repo controlled by IOTA Foundation. Ask them for more info. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
